KEMBAR78
Rubric | PDF | Cognition | Cognitive Science
Scribd
Upload
31 views1 page

Rubric

The document outlines a grading rubric for group presentations, detailing criteria for content mastery, presentation skills, organization, use of visuals, team collaboration, and Q&A interaction. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Needs Improvement,' providing specific descriptions for each performance level. The final grade is calculated out of 100% based on these assessments.

Uploaded by

bpards2
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views1 page

Rubric

The document outlines a grading rubric for group presentations, detailing criteria for content mastery, presentation skills, organization, use of visuals, team collaboration, and Q&A interaction. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Needs Improvement,' providing specific descriptions for each performance level. The final grade is calculated out of 100% based on these assessments.

Uploaded by

bpards2
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Group No.

_____

Members:

Needs Improvement
Criteria Excellent (100-90%) Proficient (89-80%) Satisfactory (79-60%)
(59-0%)

Demonstrates deep Shows good


Lacks understanding of
understanding of the topic; understanding with mostly Some understanding,
Content the topic; contains major
information is accurate, well- accurate information; but with noticeable gaps
Mastery inaccuracies and lacks
organized, and minor gaps in or minor inaccuracies.
clarity.
comprehensive. explanation.

Speaks clearly, confidently, Somewhat clear but Difficult to hear or


Generally clear and
Presentation and maintains good eye lacks confidence; understand; lacks
confident; minor lapses in
Skills contact; engages the audience minimal audience confidence and does not
engagement or clarity.
effectively. engagement. engage the audience.

Presentation flows logically


Mostly well-organized, Presentation has a basic Disorganized, difficult to
Organization & with a clear introduction, body,
though some transitions structure but lacks follow, lacks clear
Structure and conclusion; smooth
may be weak. smooth flow. structure.
transitions.

Visuals are present but


Visuals are well-designed, Visuals are helpful but Poor or no use of visuals;
Use of Visual may not add much value
enhance understanding, and may have minor design or they are distracting or
Aids or are not well-
are effectively integrated. integration issues. irrelevant.
integrated.

All members contribute equally Some members


Most members participate Poor collaboration; some
Team and demonstrate teamwork; dominate while others
actively, with some minor members do not
Collaboration smooth transitions between contribute little;
imbalances. participate at all.
speakers. transitions are rough.

Handles questions confidently


Answers most questions Provides basic Unable to answer
Q&A and and provides insightful
well but may struggle with responses but lacks questions effectively;
Interaction responses; engages the
some. depth or confidence. avoids interaction
audience.

FINAL GRADE: _________/ 100%

You might also like