KEMBAR78
Notes Paper 4 | PDF | Conspiracy Theory | Elections
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views4 pages

Notes Paper 4

The document discusses the impact of misinformation on the belief that the 2020 election was stolen, highlighting the role of social media in spreading false claims. Despite extensive verification proving the election's integrity, conspiracy theories persist, fueled by influential figures like Mike Lindell. The fragility of democracy is emphasized, suggesting that acceptance of factual evidence is crucial for its survival, especially with the upcoming 2024 presidential election.

Uploaded by

gsteenolsen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views4 pages

Notes Paper 4

The document discusses the impact of misinformation on the belief that the 2020 election was stolen, highlighting the role of social media in spreading false claims. Despite extensive verification proving the election's integrity, conspiracy theories persist, fueled by influential figures like Mike Lindell. The fragility of democracy is emphasized, suggesting that acceptance of factual evidence is crucial for its survival, especially with the upcoming 2024 presidential election.

Uploaded by

gsteenolsen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

​ When facts are ignored and lies are believed civilization crumbles into a barbaric culture

run by power mongers promoting their dogma. In the current political climate, the popular and

widespread use of social media has changed how journalists present topics and information. It is

no longer important to fact check and verify sources because the motivation for journalists or

citizen reporters is the number of views and likes an article receives. As social media has become

a dominant source for gathering and sharing information, disinformation has become more

powerful and influential. The widespread conspiracy theory alleging that the 2020 election was

stolen, was based on the spread of misinformation through the internet, unsubstantiated evidence

of voting machine manipulation, and the absence of any scientific data analysis has been proven

to be a false claim.

​ Internet information is often not verified and anyone can be an influencer.

Misinformation spreads rapidly and is reposted exponentially which, after so many times, can

make it seem believable. A frightening example of this spread of misinformation is what Mike

Lindell has been doing for the past three and a half years. Lindell is the founder of the “My

Pillow” company and a staunch conservative right wing Trump advocate. He has been pushing

his conspiracy theory that “the 2020 election was stolen” (Lindell). According to Rick Weible, a

guest on Lindell’s podcast, “Championing Election Integrity: Mike Lindell and Rick Weible

Tackle Voting Security,” Weibel believes that currently “somebody is manipulating and rigging

the primary election which would make them guilty of a federal offense.” Weibel explains that in

his opinion, these election officials would then be blackmailed in order to “rig” the upcoming

general election. This conspiracy theory is still being repeated even now, after many recounts and

court hearings have proved their claim to be false.


​ Voting machine manipulation has been unsubstantiated and yet many believe it to be true.

Although the 2020 election has been proven to be the most secure and accurate election on

record, conspiracy theorists are still trying to claim that the voting machines were programmed

to change the election results. According to the online article “Explainer: Voting Systems

Reliable Despite Conspiracies,” by Christina Cassidy it was “the most secure in American

history.” Cassidy explains that a coalition of election officials, both state and federal,

representatives from the voting machine companies including cybersecurity personnel concurred.

Cassidy reports that it was possible to check the accuracy of the voting machines because there

were paper ballots that proved that the count between the machine and ballots matched. The

group went on record stating that, “no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes,

changed votes, or was in any way compromised” (Cassidy). The conspiracy theorists remained

undeterred and unstoppable in their endless pursuit of this stolen election lie. Finally, they were

taken to court and agreed to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the Dominion voting machine

company.

​ Pushing the dogma and repeating the conspiracy theory is convincing many people even

in the face of scientific data to the contrary. According to Naomi Orsekes, confirmed theories are

backed by evidence that has been scrutinized by experts. Oreskes’ TEDTalk “Why we should

trust scientists,” discusses the process by which “scientists judge evidence collectively and focus

on a consensus.” The only scientific data that exists for this conspiracy theory proves it to be

false. The facts are there. The votes were recounted and confirmed. Voting machines were

checked and paper ballots used to corroborate the results. Formal election challenges were made

in the courts and it was repeatedly found to be an accurate and fair election, thus confirming that
the election was not stolen. However, if facts are not convincing, or even acknowledged, a

civilized and democratic system may fail.

​ The 2024 presidential election is only six months away. The conspiracy theory of the

stolen election has been disproved but has not gone away. The fragility of democracy can be seen

with the results of this election. If the voting American public plays by the rules and accepts the

election results then the idea of democracy will continue until it is challenged again. If the truth

is upheld and the lies are discounted and not believed, then everyone can win in the next

presidential election.

Thesis: The widespread conspiracy theory alleging that the 2020 election was stolen, based on

the spread of misinformation through social media and the internet, unsubstantiated evidence of

voting machine manipulation, and the absence of scientific data analysis, has been proven to be a

false claim.

BP 1: The spread of misinformation through social media and the internet is rampant.

Source 1: For the past three and one half years Mike Lindell, founder of the “My Pillow”

company and staunch conservative right wing Trump advocate, has been spouting his conspiracy

theory that “the 2020 election was stolen” (Lindell). According to Rick Weible, a guest on

Lindells podcast, “Championing Election Integrity: Mike Lindell and Rick Weible Tackle Voting

Security,” Weible believes that currently “somebody is manipulating and rigging the election”

which would make them guilty of a “federal offense” which said “somebody” would then use to

blackmail those same election officials in order to “rig” the upcoming general election. This

conspiracy theory
Source 2: According the online article “How Search Engines Boost Misinformation,” by Lauren

Leffer

BP 2: Facts are Voting machine manipulation is unsubstantiated but believed by many.

Source 1: Mike Lindell vehemently claims that the voting machines used during the 2020

elections were rigged to change votes from Donald Trump over to votes for Joe Biden on his

podcast “The Lindell Report” (Lindell).

Source 2: Christina Cassidy “Explainer: Voting Systems Reliable Despite Conspiracies”

BP 3: The is no scientific data to

Source : Without any scientific data to support Lindell’s conspiracy theory that the “2020

election was stolen” it is impossible to confirm this theory as fact. Confirmed theories are backed

by evidence that has been scrutinized according to Naomi Orsekes. Oreskes’ TEDTalk “Why we

should trust scientists,” discusses the process by which “scientists judge evidence collectively

and focus on a consensus.”

Source 2:

Conclusion:

You might also like