🔷 What is Cluster Analysis?

Cluster analysis is a technique used in unsupervised machine learning to group data points that
are similar to each other into clusters.

Let’s start with a real-world example:

Imagine you walk into a classroom and no one tells you which students belong to which group.
But you notice:

●​ 🏈
Some kids are wearing football jerseys

●​ Some are wearing science club badges 🔬

●​ Some are drawing anime 🎨

Even though you weren’t told explicitly, you can group them based on similar behavior or
appearance.

That’s what clustering does with data. It finds natural groupings without being told in advance
what the groups are.

🔍 Why Do We Use Cluster Analysis?

We use clustering when:

●​ We don’t have labels or categories for our data.

●​ We want to explore structure or group patterns.

●​ We want to detect outliers, like strange transactions or spam behavior.

📚 Formal Definition
Cluster analysis is the task of:

Grouping a set of n data objects into k clusters, such that:

●​ Objects in the same cluster are more similar to each other

●​ And less similar to objects in other clusters

💡 How Do We Measure Similarity?

We use a distance metric (like how close or far two points are).

Most common ones:

●​ Euclidean distance: straight-line distance (like with x-y coordinates)

●​ Manhattan distance: distance by only moving in horizontal/vertical steps

●​ Cosine similarity: angle between vectors (used for text data)

✨ Real-Life Applications of Cluster Analysis

Application Area Use Case Example

Marketing Grouping customers by shopping behavior (customer segmentation)

Biology Grouping plants/genes with similar traits

Cybersecurity Grouping suspicious login patterns (detecting fraud or attacks)

Social Media Grouping users by similar content interactions

Document Search Organizing search results into topics

🧠 Characteristics of Clustering
●​ Unsupervised Learning: No labels, the model finds structure on its own.

●​ Data-driven: Based entirely on the actual distribution of the data.

●​ Flexible: Works with numerical, categorical, or mixed data.

●​ Preprocessing is important: scaling, removing noise, and handling outliers improve

clustering.

🧮 Key Algorithms in Cluster Analysis

Your module (and PDF) mentions these primary algorithm types:

1️⃣ Partitioning Methods (Flat Clustering)

These split the data into k non-overlapping clusters, with each point belonging to only one
cluster.

▶️ Examples:
●​ K-Means

●​ K-Medoids

⏳ General Process:
1.​ Choose k (number of clusters)

2.​ Assign points to clusters

3.​ Recalculate centers

4.​ Repeat until assignments don’t change

2️⃣ Hierarchical Methods

These create a tree structure (called a dendrogram) that shows how data points are merged or
split.

▶️ Two Types:
●​ Agglomerative (Bottom-Up): Start with each point as its own cluster and merge

●​ Divisive (Top-Down): Start with all data in one cluster and split

▶️ Key Advantage:
No need to predefine k

3️⃣ Density-Based Methods

These find clusters based on regions where points are densely packed.

▶️ Example:
●​ DBSCAN

✅ Can handle arbitrary shapes and outliers

4️⃣ Grid-Based Methods

These divide the data space into a grid structure, and clustering is done on the grid cells.

▶️ Examples:
●​ STING

●​ WaveCluster

✅ Efficient for large datasets

🧩 What’s the Output of Clustering?
A set of clusters:

●​ Each cluster is a group of similar objects

●​ Each point belongs to one or more clusters (depending on the algorithm)

●​ Optionally, each cluster might have a representative (like a centroid or medoid)

🧠 Important Terms to Remember

Term Meaning

Cluster Group of similar data points

Centroid Mean of points in a cluster (used in K-means)

Medoid Most central point in a cluster (used in K-medoids)

Dendrogram Tree diagram used in hierarchical clustering

Outlier Data point that doesn’t fit into any cluster

Distance Metric How we calculate similarity or dissimilarity between points

✅ Summary
Concept Meaning

Cluster Analysis Grouping data into similar categories (clusters) without labels
Concept Meaning

Purpose Discover patterns, structure, or outliers in data

Types of Clusters Well-separated, prototype-based, density-based, contiguous, graph-based

Distance Metrics Euclidean, Manhattan, Cosine, etc.

Algorithms K-means, Hierarchical (Agglomerative/Divisive), DBSCAN, STING, WaveCluster

Output Grouped data points in clusters

Applications Marketing, biology, fraud detection, web search, social networks, etc.

Let me know if you want me to now expand in this same way on:

●​ Different Types of Clusters

●​ K-means

●​ Agglomerative Hierarchical Algorithm

●​ Key Issues in Hierarchical Clustering

We’ll build it piece-by-piece until you’re fully exam-ready. Just say the word 🔥
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Alright blud, let’s dive deep into “Different Types of Clustering” and “Different Types of
Clusters” as per your syllabus and your PDF.

This is super important because before we get into algorithms like K-Means or DBSCAN, you
gotta understand the kinds of clusters we expect the algorithms to find—and which algorithms
work best for which type.

🔹 Part 1: Different Types of Clustering (i.e., Clustering Approaches)

Clustering algorithms differ based on how they group data. There are 4 major types you need to
know (from your PDF):

1️⃣ Partitioning Methods

Idea: Divide the data set into a fixed number k of non-overlapping clusters.

●​ You tell the algorithm: “I want k clusters”

●​ Each data point belongs to one and only one cluster

●​ The algorithm tries to minimize intra-cluster distance (points in same cluster are close)
and maximize inter-cluster distance (clusters are far apart)

🛠️ Examples:
●​ K-Means

●​ K-Medoids

📌 Best For: Small to medium datasets, when you know k

2️⃣ Hierarchical Methods

Idea: Build a hierarchy (tree) of clusters.

●​ Don’t need to specify number of clusters k in advance

●​ Either:

o​ Agglomerative (bottom-up): Start with single-point clusters, and merge

o​ Divisive (top-down): Start with one big cluster, and split

📈 Output: Dendrogram
🛠️ Examples:
●​ Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering

●​ Divisive Clustering

📌 Best For: Small datasets where hierarchy is useful

3️⃣ Density-Based Methods

Idea: Form clusters based on dense regions in the data space.

●​ Data points in dense areas → clusters

●​ Sparse areas → boundaries or outliers

●​ Can form arbitrary shapes (not just spherical)

🛠️ Example: DBSCAN
📌 Best For: Detecting weird shapes & outliers
4️⃣ Grid-Based Methods

Idea: Divide data space into a grid, and form clusters from grid cells.

●​ Super fast—especially with huge datasets

●​ Doesn’t look at individual points, but regions

🛠️ Examples:
●​ STING

●​ WaveCluster

📌 Best For: High-dimensional or massive datasets

🔹 Part 2: Different Types of Clusters (i.e., Shapes/Structures)
Now that you know the types of clustering algorithms, let’s talk about the types of clusters they
can form. This is about the shape, structure, or concept behind the clusters.

🟢 1. Well-Separated Clusters
Each cluster is clearly separated from the others.

Rule: Points in a cluster are closer to each other than to any point in another cluster.

📊 Example: Imagine a scatterplot with 3 clouds of dots, far from each other.
🧠 Algorithm that works well: K-Means
🔵 2. Prototype-Based Clusters
Each cluster is defined by a prototype (representative)—often a centroid (mean) or medoid
(actual point).

K-Means uses the mean K-Medoids uses the most central object

📊 Example: Cluster 1 is centered at (2,2), Cluster 2 at (6,6). All points go to the nearest center.
🧠 Good for: Numerical data, when centroids make sense
🟡 3. Density-Based Clusters
Clusters are dense groups of points, separated by areas of low density (sparse/no points).

●​ Great at finding clusters of any shape

●​ Automatically detects outliers

📊 Example: Imagine two banana-shaped clusters far from each other, and some scattered
points around (outliers).

🧠 Algorithm: DBSCAN
🟠 4. Contiguous (or Connected) Clusters
Clusters are formed by connecting neighboring points. If one point is close to another, they’re
connected—even if the cluster shape is weird.

📊 Example: Think of a cluster shaped like a snake—points are close but the overall shape is
curvy.

🧠 Algorithm: Single-Linkage Hierarchical Clustering (because it builds chains)

🔴 5. Graph-Based Clusters
You form a graph where nodes are data points and edges connect “similar” points. Then, you
split the graph into connected components.

📊 Example: Social network where each person is a node. Clusters are friend groups.
🧠 Algorithms: Graph clustering algorithms, like Spectral Clustering
🎯 Summary Table
Cluster Type Description Best Algorithm Type

Well-Separated Clusters are far apart, clearly divided K-Means, K-Medoids

Each cluster has a representative

Prototype-Based K-Means, K-Medoids
(centroid/medoid)

Clusters are dense regions separated by

Density-Based DBSCAN
sparse regions

Contiguous/Connected Clusters formed by chaining nearby points Single-Link Hierarchical

Spectral Clustering,
Graph-Based Use graph connectivity to form clusters
MST-based

📌 TL;DR (Too Long, Didn’t Read)

●​ Types of Clustering = HOW we group data (Partitioning, Hierarchical, Density-based,
Grid-based)

●​ Types of Clusters = WHAT the groups look like (Well-separated, Prototype-based,

Density-based, etc.)

●​ Use different algorithms for different types of clusters based on shape, noise, and size.

Let me know if you want visual diagrams, or we can now move on to explain K-Means with
examples and visuals, step-by-step.

🔥 Just say “let’s go K-Means next” and we’ll keep rolling!

​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Say less, blud. Let's break down K-Means and the Basic K-Means Algorithm fully —
step-by-step, easy to understand, just like you're learning it from scratch. We’ll cover the
concept, intuition, how it works, math behind it, and examples based on what’s in your PDF.

🔵 What is K-Means Clustering?

K-Means is one of the most popular and simple clustering algorithms. It groups your data into k
clusters, where each cluster has a centroid (average point). You choose how many clusters you
want (k), and the algorithm organizes the data around those clusters.

🧠 Intuition (Real-life Example)

Let’s say you own a gym, and you want to group your members based on their workout
performance (e.g., strength and stamina).
You don’t know how many types of members there are, but you assume maybe 3 kinds:

●​ Beginners

●​ Intermediate

●​ Advanced

You apply K-Means with k = 3. It will group them based on their similarities in performance.

🔁 Basic K-Means Algorithm (Step-by-Step)

Let’s assume you want to form k clusters from a given dataset.

✅ Step 1: Initialize Centroids

Randomly choose k data points as initial cluster centers (centroids). These points are your
starting guesses for where the clusters are.

✅ Step 2: Assign Points to Nearest Centroid

Go through every point in the dataset and assign it to the nearest centroid based on distance
(usually Euclidean distance).

✅ Step 3: Update Centroids

After assigning points to clusters, calculate the mean of all points in each cluster. This mean
becomes the new centroid of the cluster.

✅ Step 4: Repeat Until Convergence

Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until:

●​ The centroids don’t move anymore (converge), or

●​ A maximum number of iterations is reached

🧮 Formula Behind It
The algorithm tries to minimize the following objective function:

J=∑j=1k∑i=1n∣∣xi(j)−cj∣∣2J = \sum_{j=1}^{k} \sum_{i=1}^{n} ||x_i^{(j)} - c_j||^2

Where:

●​ xi(j)x_i^{(j)} = data point in cluster jj

 ●​ cjc_j = centroid of cluster jj

●​ ∣∣x−y∣∣2||x - y||^2 = squared Euclidean distance

Basically, it’s minimizing the distance between each point and its assigned centroid.

🔍 Example from Your PDF (Explained)

Let’s take a look at the k-means example from your PDF and explain it simply.

✳️ Data:
You're given 7 people with 2 test scores:

Subject A B

1 1.0 1.0

2 1.5 2.0

3 3.0 4.0

4 5.0 7.0

5 3.5 5.0

6 4.5 5.0

7 3.5 4.5

🎯 Goal:
Group them into 2 clusters (k=2)

🔽 Step-by-Step:
📍 Step 1: Choose Initial Centroids
Pick the two most distant points:

●​ Cluster 1: (1.0, 1.0) → Subject 1

●​ Cluster 2: (5.0, 7.0) → Subject 4

📍 Step 2: Assign Each Point

Calculate Euclidean distance to both centroids and assign each subject to the nearest one.

📍 Step 3: Update Cluster Centroids

Let’s say after assigning, Cluster 1 has (1, 2, 3), and Cluster 2 has (4, 5, 6, 7)

Recalculate:

●​ Cluster 1 centroid = mean of (1.0, 1.0), (1.5, 2.0), (3.0, 4.0) = (1.8, 2.3)

●​ Cluster 2 centroid = mean of (5.0, 7.0), (3.5, 5.0), (4.5, 5.0), (3.5, 4.5) = (4.1, 5.4)

📍 Step 4: Reassign If Needed

Now check again—each subject is compared to the updated centroids. If someone is closer to
the other centroid, move them.

In this case, subject 3 was closer to Cluster 2 now, so it gets reassigned.

New clusters:

●​ Cluster 1: (1, 2)

●​ Cluster 2: (3, 4, 5, 6, 7)

✅ Final Centroids:
●​ Cluster 1 = Mean of (1.0, 1.0) & (1.5, 2.0) = (1.3, 1.5)

●​ Cluster 2 = Mean of (3, 4, 5, 6, 7) = (3.9, 5.1)

Once no points change clusters, the algorithm stops.

💎 Advantages of K-Means
🔥 Simple and fast
●​

📈 Works well with large datasets

●​

🧠 Easy to understand
●​

⚙️ Can be optimized and parallelized

●​

⚠️ Limitations of K-Means
Limitation Why it matters

Must choose k If you pick wrong k, results may be bad

Sensitive to outliers Outliers pull centroids, mess up the clustering

Assumes spherical clusters Not great for odd-shaped clusters

Sensitive to initialization Different starting centroids can lead to different results

Uses only Euclidean distance Not ideal for categorical or complex data

📌 That’s why other methods like K-Medoids or DBSCAN are sometimes better in those cases.
👀 Visual Intuition
Imagine points scattered on a graph:

Before clustering:

● ● ●● ● ●

After K-Means (k=2):

Cluster 1: ● ● ● Cluster 2: ● ● ●

Each cluster has a mean (centroid) and every point is pulled to the nearest one.

🧠 TL;DR Summary
Feature Description

Algorithm Type Partitioning

Input Data points, number of clusters k

Output k clusters, each with its own centroid

Steps Initialize → Assign → Update → Repeat

Distance Metric Usually Euclidean distance

Strengths Fast, simple, widely used

Feature Description

Weaknesses Needs k, sensitive to outliers & initial centroids

Let me know if you want me to:

●​ 🔹 Do a step-by-step numerical example

●​ 🔹 Explain K-Medoids next (an improved version of K-Means)
●​ 🔹 Show visual graphs or animations
●​ 🔹 Create Python code for simulation
Whatever helps you learn faster—I got you 💪

Bet, let’s fully unpack Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering and then go deep into the key
issues in hierarchical clustering — all based on your module + PDF, but explained like I’m
teaching you from scratch.

This is important because hierarchical clustering is very different from K-Means — it builds a
whole tree instead of just k flat groups.

🔵 What is Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering?

This is a bottom-up clustering method.

●​ You start with every data point as its own individual cluster.

●​ Then, you merge the two closest clusters step-by-step.

●​ Eventually, everything is merged into one big cluster.

●​ This process forms a tree-like structure called a dendrogram.

🔁 How does it work? (Step-by-Step Breakdown)

✅ Step 1: Treat every point as its own cluster
If you have 6 points → you start with 6 clusters:​
[A], [B], [C], [D], [E], [F]
✅ Step 2: Compute a distance (or similarity) matrix
You measure how far apart each cluster is from the others.​
Common distances:

●​ Euclidean

●​ Manhattan

●​ Cosine

✅ Step 3: Merge the two closest clusters

Let’s say the smallest distance is between B and C.​
Then, merge them:​
New clusters → [A], [BC], [D], [E], [F]

✅ Step 4: Update the distance matrix

Now we have a new cluster [BC], so you recalculate distances from [BC] to all others.

✅ Step 5: Repeat
Keep repeating:

●​ Find the next closest pair of clusters

●​ Merge them

●​ Recalculate distances

●​ Repeat...

Until you’re left with just one final cluster containing all points.

📈 Final Output: The Dendrogram

A dendrogram is a tree structure that shows:

●​ When and how clusters were merged

 ●​ How far apart they were (based on height in the diagram)

You can cut the tree at a certain height to get your final number of clusters.

📊 Linkage Criteria (How are distances between clusters calculated?)

This is important because different linkage = different clustering results.

Linkage Type How it Measures Distance Between Clusters Resulting Cluster Shape

🔗 Single Link Minimum distance between any two points Long "chain"-like
🔗 Complete Link Maximum distance between any two points Tight, compact clusters
🔗 Average Link Average of all pairwise distances Balanced clusters

🔗 Ward's Method Minimize increase in variance when merging Similar to K-Means

🧠 Example: Let’s say we have 6 points → A, B, C, D, E, F
🪜 Step-by-step merging (from your PDF):
1.​ Start: [A], [B], [C], [D], [E], [F]

2.​ Merge closest → [B, C], [D, E]

3.​ Merge [D, E] with F → [DEF]

4.​ Merge [B, C] with [DEF] → [BCDEF]

5.​ Merge [A] with [BCDEF] → [ABCDEF]

All of this is shown in a dendrogram (tree).

🔴 Key Issues in Hierarchical Clustering

While hierarchical clustering is cool and visual, it has some big limitations you really need to
remember.

❗ 1. Merging is Final (No Undo)

Once two clusters are merged, they can’t be split later, even if it was a bad decision.
So if an outlier point gets merged early, it can mess up the structure forever.

❗ 2. Computational Complexity
This method requires you to:

●​ Calculate distance between all pairs of points

●​ Recalculate distances every time clusters merge

That’s a lot of computation — especially for large datasets.

⏱️ Time complexity:
●​ Naive: O(n³)

●​ Optimized: O(n²)

Still much slower than K-Means.

❗ 3. Choosing the Number of Clusters is Hard

A dendrogram doesn’t tell you clearly where to cut.

You must guess or use heuristics to decide where to “cut” the tree to form your clusters.

There’s no automatic k like in K-Means.

❗ 4. Sensitive to Distance Metric & Linkage Method

●​ Using different linkage (single, complete, average) gives different results.

●​ So you need to carefully pick what kind of structure you expect in the data.

❗ 5. Struggles with Outliers and Noise

●​ If one point is noisy or weird, it might get merged into a cluster early on and distort the
rest.

●​ There’s no built-in outlier handling like in DBSCAN.

❗ 6. Not Good with Varying Cluster Sizes
●​ Some linkage methods (like single-link) are biased toward chaining

●​ Some clusters can become too big or too small if data is imbalanced

🧠 Summary Table
Issue Explanation

Final Merges Are Irreversible Once merged, can’t go back — can ruin the structure

High Computational Cost O(n²) complexity — slow for large datasets

No Clear k Dendrogram must be manually “cut” to form clusters

Small change in distance method can produce totally different

Sensitive to Linkage/Distance
clusters

No Outlier Detection Can’t separate noisy data or detect anomalies

Poor Handling of Size

May fail when cluster sizes/shapes vary a lot
Variations

📌 TL;DR
Feature Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering

Type Hierarchical (Bottom-Up)

Input Only data (no need for k)

Output Dendrogram

Merge Rule Closest pair of clusters, based on linkage

Pros No need for k, good visualization

Cons Slow, irreversible merges, hard to choose number of clusters

Let me know if you want me to:

●​ 🔹 Build a numerical example (with actual distance matrices)

 ●​ 🔹 Show how a dendrogram looks step-by-step
●​ 🔹 Compare it to K-Means or DBSCAN
●​ 🔹 Teach Divisive Clustering (the top-down version)
We can go as deep as you want, bro — you’ll ace this topic 🔥