Recent Shift in Bangladeshs Population Policy and
Recent Shift in Bangladeshs Population Policy and
net/publication/242745958
CITATIONS READS
9 2,034
2 authors, including:
Rifat Akhter
University of Central Arkansas
12 PUBLICATIONS 75 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Rifat Akhter on 30 June 2015.
Paper 5
RECENT SHIFT IN BANGLADESH’S POPULATION
POLICY AND PROGRAMME STRATEGIES:
PROSPECTS AND RISKS
Mohammed A. Mabud
Rifat Akhter
As part of the above mentioned CPD-UNFPA collaborative programme the CPD has
planned to bring out a series of publications in order to facilitate wider dissemination of
the findings of the various studies to be prepared under the aforementioned CPD-UNFPA
programme. The present paper on the theme of Recent Shift in Bangladesh’s Population
Policy and Programme Strategies: Prospects and Risks has been prepared by Dr.
Mohammed A. Mabud, Former Division Chief, Planning Commission, Government of
Bangladesh and Ms. Rifat Akhter, Assistant Professor, Population and Environment
Department, Independent University, Dhaka.
Acronyms
Table of Contents
Page
1. Introduction 1
2. Policy and Programme Review in Retrospect 2
3. Multi-sectoral Strategies and Progress 8
4. Debate on Policy and Programme Strategies 12
(a) Revisionist School of Thoughts 12
(b) Reformist School and Thoughts 13
5. Introduction of Health and Population Programme Strategy (HPSP)
and its Scope 14
6. Essential Service Package (ESP) 14
6.1 Reproductive Health Care 16
6.2 Child Health Care 20
6.3 Communicable Disease Control 21
6.4 Limited Curative Care 21
6.5 Behaviour Change Communication (BCC) 22
7. Common Grounds and Differences
between Revisionists and Reformists 23
8. Some Critical Lapses in HPSP 25
8.1 Lack of Multi and Inter Sectoral Approach 25
8.2 Demographic Momentum 27
8.3 Women's Development in Population Context 28
9. Policy Instrument 29
10. Prospects and Risks 29
10.1Risks 29
10.2 Prospects 31
11. Concluding Remarks 31
References 34
1. Introduction
Since Bangladesh came into being in 1971, all successive Governments demonstrated
two things in common in respect of population policy planning, namely, their serious
concern about the rapid proliferation of human number and political commitment to solve
the problems arisen out of that. In a war ravaged country fraught with poverty and
massive illiteracy, the first such concern and commitment were shown by the
Government of Banghabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1973 which declared that the
population control and family planning activities were of national priority and that as a
policy response, most of the development ministries had to undertake appropriate
population activities in one form or the other befitting their scope and stride. The
population policy goal was set to reduce growth rate from 3.0 to 2.8 percent by the end of
the First Five Year Plan period (1973-78) and it was achieved. Multi-sectoral policy
strategies were also clearly laid out. Besides, true to its spirit and commitment,
Government had created a separate sector for "Population Planning" for effective
coordination, resource management and activity planning. It created a Population
Planning Division in the MOHFW to give an undivided attention to population issues and
intensify service delivery all over the country. It also laid an emphasis on human resource
and institutional development. The Government's serious concern for fertility control was
revealed in the following statement .
The above thrust and emphasis on population activities continued until the introduction of
Health and Population Sector Programme (HPSP) in 1998. This change resulted into
several shifts in emphasis on population activities from the point of view of strategic
approach to the population problem. The central purpose of this paper is to discuss those
shifts and their prospects as well as risks. Keeping in view this purpose, the paper is
structured as follows: First in order is the review of the population policy and programme
in retrospect to highlight the success and failure followed by a discussion on the debate
that has emerged for introducing new policy and programme strategies through HPSP.
This is followed by some discussion on the major highlights of the HPSP with a view to
showing the shifts that differ from the previous policy strategies. Some common ground
between the old and new policy strategies are also identified and discussed. Based on the
analyses of the implementation experience of various stakeholders, some risks and
prospects are presented. Finally, the author makes some recommendations as to how risks
can be minimized in the current policy strategies.
delivery package and all logistics, infrastructure and supplies were geared towards this
end. The National Population Council (NPC) headed by the Head of the Government
was, for the first time, established; and the first Bangladesh Fertility Survey (BFS, 1975)
was conducted. Three important findings of this survey were: TFR was 6.3; CPR was 8.5
percent; and female age at first marriage was estimated to be 14.9 years.
The successor Government of Ziaur Rahman (1976-82) not only maintained the policy,
but also went one step ahead by declaring that the population problem was the nation's
number ONE PROBLEM. It put emphasis on service delivery and follow up care at the
doorstep. For this purpose, it deployed 13,500 matriculate female workers and 4500
whole time union level supervisors by replacing 30,000 part time village Dais with back-
up service by the technical staff like doctors and hundreds of paramedics all over the
country. Zia's Government bifurcated the Ministry of Health into Population and Health
Divisions and put one Minister exclusively in charge of Population Division to address
population issues with full attention. In 1976, the government approved a National
Population Policy guidelines involving various ministries and NGOs. The policy
contained both family planning and non-family planning measures such as (i) tax benefits
to unmarried and families with fewer children; (ii) preferential treatment in allotment of
housing, and giving medical benefits to individual with fewer children; (iii) credit and
economic benefits to the mothers' club, women's cooperatives and other organized
groups; (iv) liberalization of law relating to abortion, to cite a few. The central purpose
was to hasten the achievement of demographic goal of NRR=1 set for the year 1990,
much ahead of social changes, especially in respect of education, health, and women's
status simply by pursuing two strategies namely (i) accelerated service delivery at the
doorstep, and (ii) multi-sectoral approach to poise the society through intensive campaign
and services through organized sectors. The Government's in its desperate bid,
experimented a "5 Year Zero Population Growth" at Dhamrai - a suburb of Dhaka.
Despite four times larger per capita investment, the results of this experiment were far
from expectation and the project was abandoned in 1982. In fact, this new policy of 1976,
in spirit and many of its components, was the resonance of the previous policy and its
demographic goal of NRR=1 set for 1990 was no longer pursued as it was found to be
unachievable within this stipulated time. But efforts for service delivery were heavily
intensified through field workers and motivational campaign with all conceivable means.
In brief, a Director at the Divisional level; a Deputy Director and two Assistant Directors
at the District and a Family Planning Officer at the Upazila level were created. Besides, a
Medical Officer (MCH-FP) at the Upazila level was also created for technical
supervision. A Family Planning Assistant at the Union level (FPA) and a Family Welfare
Assistant (FWA) at the Ward level were appointed on full time basis. Besides, several
institutions were also established for manpower development. These were: (i) a college of
nursing, (ii) 12 family welfare visitors' training institutes and, (iii) eight Medical
Assistants' Training Institutions (MATIs).
During the tenure of Hussain Mohammed Ershad (1982-90), the population policy
strategies remained more or less the same as the previous governments. Ershad used to
hold National Population Council almost every month to monitor the progress of
implementation of population activities and gave necessary direction to the MOHFW and
other ministries involved in population activities. In fact, the programme during the 80's
entered into the 2nd phase. In early 1983, it confronted the most controversial issues viz
integration of health and family planning, and later on, "functional integration" was
rationalized to appease the rival groups in the programme. In the beginning, it may be
noted that "integration" was understood to mean basically integrating family planning
services with health and MCH with a view to making it more acceptable and more
effective by using a common delivery system. But those who opposed such integration
held the view that emphasis on population control and family planning would be lost, if it
is integrated with health service delivery system which was already weak and that
required priority would no longer remain. The underlying reasons for not being able to
integrate family planning with health was that the FP structure was a new one. It had
generated a built-in resistance to major changes and that despite various problems, this
separate arrangement was making progress. The "functional integration" as it was used to
be called was meant separating health and family planning into two separate structures,
but placing the two structures under one Minister and one Secretary as the head of
administration. In substance, two vertical wings namely, Health and Family Planning
joined at the top at the office of the Secretary of the Ministry and at the bottom by multi-
purpose village-based workers, but bifurcated at the Directorate, district and upazila
level.
A significant policy decision taken during the Second Five Year Plan (1980-85) was
regarding the fixing of the demographic goal to achieve a replacement level fertility in
1990. By implications, it means to reduce the crude birth rate from 43 per 1000 in 1980
to 32 per 1000 by 1985 implying a concomitant increase in contraceptive use rate from
14 percent to 38 percent during the plan period. While this demographic goal was too
ambitious, the decision to adopt such a high goal was governed by the consideration that
a ten years' delay in achievement of NRR=1 by 1990 would result in an increase of about
12 million population by the turn of the century. An additional 2.1 million tons of food
grain would need to maintain the current meager average per capita consumption of 16
ounces per day; and additional work force of 3.1 million, and increase in the number of
school going children by about 8 million. The social and economic costs of absorbing this
additional population will be enormous. Recognizing these realities, the Government felt
that the population policy strategy must aim at achieving a considerable decline in
fertility without any further delay. The implementation strategy to achieve the objectives
included strengthening health and family planning/MCH service delivery at upazila level
and below.
The third Five Year Plan (1985-90) was launched in the country with wide range of
policy, programmatic, social and motivational initiatives undertaken by both the GOB
and the NGOs with a view to achieving the demographic goals and programme targets.
The goals and targets of the plan were to reduce population growth rate from
approximately 2.4 percent in 1985 to 1.8 percent by 1990; to bring down infant mortality
rate from the prevailing rate of 125 per 1000 live births and to reduce maternal mortality
rate from 6 to 4 per 1000 live births. The contraceptive practice rate was planned to
increase from 25 percent to 40 percent by 1990. In order to achieve this goal, the
following strategic approaches were made:
a. Family Welfare Assistant registers were introduced for proper record-keeping of
acceptors, and monitoring the programme performance. This register is expected to
help improve local level planning and priorities for the different segments of eligible
couples for different services. A country wide couple registration system was
introduced to generate couples related data base.
b. Satellite clinics, twice a week, are being organized by FWVs from each Union Health
and Family Welfare Center to provide family planning and MCH services to the door-
step of the people. similarly, Medical Assistants (MAs) organized Satellite Clinics for
health education and other services.
c. On average, two sterilization camps from each of the 345 Upazila Health Complexes
were organized every month to take the service facilities nearer to the people.
d. Community level depo-holders for contraceptive distribution was organized from
amongst the female members of the Village Defence Parties (VDP) in the rural areas.
In addition 20 female VDP members belonging to one selected upazila of each
district (64) initially are being attached to each FWA.
e. Logistic Monitoring Teams identified problems relating to supply, storage and
distribution of contraceptives and other commodities. They also provided guidance
for proper maintenance of stores at central, regional and district level.
f. it was decided that in order to strengthen the IEC programme through Television, 25
minutes-attractive-programmes were telecast daily besides, Journalists were
encouraged to publish population related articles, stories etc. to create awareness of
small family norm.
g. Branch of National Population Council was set-up in each district under the
chairmanship of the District Coordinator. In this committee like the National
Population Control Council, people from all walks of life especially MPs, teachers,
doctors, political leaders, administrative heads of all government organizations etc.
were made members. But their functioning was moderate to low owing to lack of
leadership/initiative at the district.
h. Three Women's programmes were strengthened. In addition to project level regular
evaluations, three important studies were conducted namely, contraceptive prevalence
surveys in 1981, 83, 86 and 1989 (USAID), Bangladesh fertility Survey, 1989
(NIPORT), and Family Planning impact Survey at the District level by the PDEU,
1990 which provided a significant data base for the programmes.
During Begum Zia's tenure (1991-96), resource utilization was full and population
programmes made a considerable progress. At the beginning of the Fourth Five Year Plan
(1990-95) the population was estimated to be 114.2 million with a growth rate of about
2.16 percent, a crude birth rate (CBR) of 35.2 and crude death rate (CDR) of 13.6 per
1000 population. Total fertility rate (TFR) was estimated at 4.6. The 4th Plan document
stated: "if the present rate of population growth continues to be unchecked, Bangladesh is
expected to double its population by 2022 AD." At present, one out of every three
eligible couples is using contraceptives in comparison to one out of four during the
Second Plan. The Planning Commission observed that "in the MCH-based Family
Planning Programme where MCH component is vital for overall programme thrust, the
desired progress is slow". The Commission has further observed that NRR=1 could not
be achieved by the year 2000. It shifted this demographic goal upto 2005 (Ref: Chapter-
XII on Population Control and Family Planning in the Fourth Year Plan, 1990-95).
These five components were brought together under the overall umbrella of the
Directorate of Family Planning headed by the Director General who was assisted by six
Directors and a Superintendent of the MCH Institute. The Directorate of Family Planning
is a permanent set-up operating through officers at 6 Divisions, 64 Districts and 464
Upazilas and they are borne out of the revenue budget of the Government. The Director
General, Family Planning (DGFP) as the Chief Programme-Manager administers the
programme through six Directors, each responsible for six field of activities, namely,
Service Delivery, Administration, MIS, Logistics and Supplies, Finance, Information,
Education and Motivation (IEM).
marked improvement in several key demographic and programme indicators in the table
below:
In fact, during 1973-96 i.e. for long twenty three years, the population policy involving
various sectors of economy, initiated by the first Government remained as the key
guiding force. In 1973, there was only one programme viz family planning programme
which had several components, namely (i) an establishment of several hundred officers,
doctors and a large fleet of field workers including 30000 DAIS at the village level; (ii)
logistics; (iii) supplies and services; (iv) information, education and communication
(IEC); (v) training and (vi) research. But some of these components were turned to be
rudimentary when the size of the acceptors started increasing year after year. Some
strategic approaches had to be clearly laid out in the successive Five Year Plans with
clear-cut policy objectives and an ambitious demographic goal. As a result, each of the
above components was turned to be a big programme supported or reinforced by a
number of technical projects. The number of projects/programmes ranged from 32-40
during 1975-80 to 50-65 during 1980-85. In 1995-96, the number of projects came down
to 42 in the Population Sector. Almost two-third of the projects/programmes were
implemented by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, while one-third by other
Ministries such as (i) Ministries of Education, (ii) Information, (iii) Local Government,
Cooperatives and Rural Development, (iv) Agriculture, (v) Labour and Employment, (vi)
Social Welfare, (vii) Women Affairs, (viii) Religious Affairs, (ix) Youth and Sports and
(x) Ministry of Planning/Planning Commission. The nature of participation of these
ministries was in the form of (i) training and orientation of their own personnel in
population activities, (ii) utilizing their trained personnel for motivation of their target
population, and (iii) integration of population and MCH components into their activities
and training curricula. In fact, skill training, credit facilities and MCH-based population
education, use of mass media, population census and programme evaluation were the
main features of multi-sectoral population programmes. About one-fifth of the total
investment used to be spent for multi-sectoral population activities. While four-fifth was
spent for population projects/programmes under the Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare.
An examination of the data in Table I shows that investment in population sector during
1985-1997 gave promising results and brought hope to various stakeholders. Initial
progress was slow, but steady. There was linear increase in achievement in ever
indicators. Entire investment was, as if, directed towards social mobilization, human
resource and infrastructure development. When the society was poised and a reasonable
ground was prepared through the concerted efforts of the stakeholders, civil society, large
number of field workers and use of mass media, including Radio and TV, faster decline
in fertility1 and moderate decline in mortality2 started especially infant mortality and
1
Total fertility rate was reduced from 1990 level of 4.9 to 3.3 in 1996-97.
improvement in contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) and life expectancy at birth from
1985 onward. Notwithstanding low socio-economic development, massive illiteracy and
wide-spread poverty, progress in terms of fertility decline and increase in CPR was
spectacular during 1990-97 (see Table-1). Although policy was prepared in the country,
policy-ideas, sometimes, came from the donors who were also the participants in policy
planning and implementation. Apart from the Government, donors especially the World
Bank has been a major player in the population field since 1973 till to-date. In fact, their
financial and technical assistance played a great role for the success of Bangladesh's
population policy and programmes during the entire period of 1973-97.
In brief, the population policy during 1973-97 was characterized by (i) multisectoral
approach involving many agencies/sectors, (ii) a separate "Population Planning" sector of
the economy for better resource management and activities planning, (iii) deployment of
a large fleet of matriculate female field workers for door step service delivery, (iv)
establishment of 3200 family welfare centers at the Union, 12 FWVTI's and a National
Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT) and (v) implementation of a mix
of programme and projects approach, (vi) integration of population/MCH component
with women activities of the BRDB, Rural Social Service Programme (RSS) of Social
Welfare Directorate and Vocational Training Programme of the Women Affairs
Department and (vii) effective use of mass media especially Radio and TV, and (viii)
Regular undertaking of demographic surveys, programme evaluation and three decinnial
censuses (1972, 1981 and 1991). Though Bangladesh was extremely in low profile on
development scale, it has, however, earned a great reputation for its remarkable
achievement made through credible implementation of its population policy and
programmes especially after 1985. It was expected that this policy would continue up to
2005-the year set for achieving the NRR-1 as the performance trends clearly showed that
the demographic goal would be achievable by then, if the policy could remain
uninterrupted. Coinciding with the end of the GOB's Fourth Five Year Plan (1991-95),
the World Bank-led 4th Population and Health Project also ended. Later on, tenure of both
the GOB's Fourth Plan and World Bank's 4th Population and Health Project was extended
2
CDR was reduced from 1990 level of l2 to 9 per 1000 population in 1998-97.
for two years (1995-97). This intervening period gave a window of opportunity to review
the then-policies and programmes which generated many new thoughts and holistic ideas
deliberated in many workshops and seminars. This lag period saw the emergence of two
schools of thoughts -"Revisionist" and "Reformist".
in phases and not in the whole country in a single go as it might create problem for the
providers and beneficiaries. They also urge that population policy must be redesigned to
take into account the adverse effects of several emerging problems, such as; (a)
increasing malnutrition; (b) peoples' health hazard owing to arsenic contamination; (c)
rapid increase in adolescent girls and their high fertility; and (d) environmental
degradation affecting people; (e) imbalance in the spatial distribution of population; and
(f) growing size of labour force and unemployed population. The Population Policy
should be responsive in the sense that it must seek to ameliorate the adverse effects of
these emerging problems.
(b) The Reformist School of Thought represents the MOHFW and some development
partners, especially the World Bank. They argued for a sector-wide approach in which it
is assumed that resources available through revenue and development budget be taken
into consideration for the entire gamut of health and population activities. According to
them, earlier progress was slow and could not reduce substantially the maternal and
infant death which is largely owing to lack of health orientation of the policy itself and
that time had come to shift the policy strategies towards sector-programme approach
rather than the multiple project approach. All health and population activities are brought
under one mega-programme called Health and Population Sector Programme (HPSP).
Only this programme is included in the ADP, but its various components such as
logistics, IEM, service delivery etc. will not be reflected there. There will be an Annual
Operational Plan (AOP) showing implementable activities and budget. The AOP will be
prepared by the line-directors who will submit it to the MOHFW for clearance by two
inter-ministerial Steering Committees -one is headed by the Secretary and the other by
the Minister of Health and Family Welfare. The former steering committee is a
recommending body; and while the latter holds the approving authority. The advantage of
this approach is that different line-directors need not have to run to the Ministry of
Finance and Planning Commission for release of fund or approval of the new project(s)
or revised unapproved project(s). In their view, sector-wide management is a time-saving
device, efficient and cost-effective. This School of thoughts proposed several reform
measures such as:
improve system management. The Government currently provides many elements of the
Essential Service Package through the Directorates of Health and Family Planning.
However, with the increasing cost of health care, the Government has to focus on the
ESP which consists of the following five major areas:
Due to resource constraints intended increases in the coverage, quality and accessibility
of the ESP will not be immediately feasible. A prioritization exercise was done to
identify the potential interventions and those that need to be included in the first year.
The "Reformist" argued that for efficient delivery of ESP, reforms in service structure at
three tiers would be necessary. First, actual restructuring of the central level (Secretariat
and the Directorates) is to be completed by year 2000. Second, restructuring at the thana
level and below where the ESP delivery will be through an unified structure comprising
health and family planning workers under a single manager who will be responsible for
the overall management and administration of all activities including:
(a) writing the Annual Confidential Reports (ACR) of the officers and the staffs at the
thana level, and
(b) as drawing/disbursing officer
The third restructuring will be at the community level where the services will be provided
from a fixed Centre, namely 'community clinic'. This is a significant shift from the
existing domiciliary-based service delivery system. The main principle in establishing
these community clinics is to make these as centers with community involvement through
their initiation in maintaining and providing the requisite security. The need for one-stop
service delivery and follow up visits for dropouts and/or special target group have been
taken consideration. The following discussion will illustrate various components of ESP
as mentioned above.
Interventions aimed at fertility reduction will continue but strategically focus on delaying
the age of first birth, improving continuation rates and improving quality of surgical
contraception. This will require complementary actions in other sectors to attain, e.g.
female education, employment generation and empowerment of women. The broad
categories of reproductive health care are:
¢ Safe Motherhood
¢ Family planning
¢ Maternal nutrition
¢ Unsafe Abortion
¢ Adolescent care
¢ Infertility
¢ Neo-natal care
(a) Safe Motherhood will focus on creating, in the health facilities as well as the
community, the necessary conditions for preventing maternal death and disability. The
focus will be on increasing utilization of EOC services. For this purpose, EOC will be
decentralized together with mobilizing communities. Antenatal care, safe birth practices
and postnatal care will also be emphasized. This component has the provision for FP
services, particularly for preventing unsafe abortions and the resulting death and
disability. Health facilities will be improved to make them women friendly and provide
services related to violence against women (both curative and counseling) along with
emergency transportation.
While at the thana and below the overall services will be provided under a single
management. As a transitional process, technical back-up management will be provided
by the directorates. The overall functions of safe motherhood have been divided between
the Health and Family Planning Directorates. At the community level, till to date the
TBAs are the only linkage to assure safe delivery, but existing evaluation suggests that
this has not improved the situation significantly. There are suggestions for the need for a
cadre of community midwives to ensure safe birth practices and prompt referral of
obstetric emergencies. However, it is planned to train the FWA and female HAs for 24
weeks on basic EOC and through the community clinic they will be able to provide the
obstetric first aid with normal delivery care closest to the community.
(b) Family Planning Service is an important means to achieve the country's goal of
NRR=2 by year 2005. The attainment of this goal will require introducing some strategic
changes. The most important strategy is to consider the FP activities as integral part of
Reproductive Health Care and accordingly, implement this re-conceptualizing process.
While the basic strategy will be to increase overall CPR of modern methods; other
strategies would be to reduce discontinuation rate of different contraceptives and to
encourage gradual transition of acceptors to long acting and permanent methods. A third
strategy will be to improve family planning services, for which improved management
skills will be ensured at all levels particularly in low performing areas and for under -
served groups. A fourth set of strategies will focus to increase skill manpower, improved
logistic supply, appropriate follow-up with supportive supervision and monitoring, and
improved management of side effects and complications.
(c) For Prevention and Control of RTI/STD/AIDS, the main focus will be on BCC and
condom promotion. In addition, the Government has identified syndromic management
for men and women with appropriate referral services as a strategy. The component of
prevention and control of RTI/STD/AIDS under the reproductive health care reflect those
intervention targeted for women within the 15-49 years age groups.
(d) Menstrual Regulation (MR) and Unsafe Abortion: Existing information suggests that
each year about 2.8% of all pregnancies undergo MR and about 1.5% undergoes induced
abortion. A significant amount of these are conducted in the public facilities, but under
unsafe conditions. Although significant number of doctors and paramedics (about 12,000)
received formal training in MR, and rate of complications and side effects have been
reduced over time, still unsafe termination of pregnancies mostly occurs due to
inadequate trained personnel and logistic support. In addition, many women do not know
of a provider or are not aware of time limits and access to legal MR services, especially
in rural areas. These also contributed to the factors related to unsafe abortion and MR
causing avoidable morbidity and mortality.
(e) Adolescent Care: Adolescents in Bangladesh, both male and female, constitute about
a quarter of the total population. Son preference and low status of women are affecting
girl adolescents' nutrition, education and access to health care. Early marriage and early
matrimony affect their overall health status. Only when they are married, the adolescent
girls get maternal care or family planning services; unmarried adolescents may not have
access to health care of any kind. Specific BCC messages will be addressed to
adolescents for:
¢ Information about puberty, safer sexual behaviour and how to avoid health
(g) Neo-natal Care: The services that will be mainly at domiciliary and union levels
include the following education, motivational and health care:
¢ Health education for mothers on cleanliness.
¢ Breast-feeding
¢ Thermal control
These situations, therefore, indicate a need for an integrated approach to managing sick
children and for child health programmes that go beyond single diseases in order to
address the overall health of a child. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI)
is a child survival strategy directed at improving prevention and case management of the
five major diseases measles, malaria, malnutrition, diarrhoea and bacterial pneumonia
which are responsible for about 70% of all mortality in children under 5 years of age.
(c) Malnutrition: It is the major factor that has been referred to as key compounding
factor for infant and child mortality. Nutritional status of children and adolescents not
only affects the present generation but also the future one. Chronic energy deficiency,
protein energy malnutrition, low birth weight, micronutrient deficiency are all serious
health problems in Bangladesh. Improper breast-feeding and weaning practices are
aggravated by the current situation of poverty, gender discrimination and inadequate food
security.
(d) School Health Services: School health services include training of school teachers for
providing first aid to the school students and provision of a First Aid Box in every school.
At least one school teacher will be trained for this purpose. The Medical Officer in THC
responsible for disease control will visit schools to conduct health check-up of school
children. Trained teachers may also identify students who need to be referred for
examination and treatment for any major illness or infirmity in THC/District hospitals.
Teachers will provide Health Education to the students mainly on hygienic practices,
communicable disease control and on life skills to prepare for adulthood. This will
include information on reproductive health including family planning and raising
awareness of STD/HIV/AIDS, and also identification of illness among students and
referral.
(b) For vector-bone diseases, particularly malaria and kala-azar the accepted Strategy for
Early Diagnosis & Prompt Treatment (EDPT) will be strengthened. For control of
filariasis, WHO recommends annual chemotherapy along with deforming for intestinal
infestations of parasites. A pilot study will be conducted to determine the most effective
regimen under this strategy.
advice. Such services are especially important for the poor. The resources available will
limit the amount of service provided. However, economic evaluation of limited curative
care would be incorporated into overall cost-effectiveness prioritization of ESP
components in the future years of the HPSP. For the first year, provision of funds has
been made for basic first aid, management of medical and surgical emergencies at the
community, HFWC and THC levels. The most common disease like -asthma, skin
diseases, eye, dental, and ear diseases of infectious nature are also included. The first year
operational plan is given in Annex 8.1.4 along with the child health component.
The primary aim of the BCC component is to shift health and family planning service
provision from a sectoral and provider-based system to an inter-sectoral, client-oriented,
demand-based system emphasizing community and women's empowerment with a focus
on social and gender issues, elderly and the poor. Target client will understand their need
for, and entitlement to, the Essential Service Package and demand them. The BCC
component aims at:
¢ Changing attitudes and behaviour of people to improve their health status;
centered services;
¢ Promoting men's respect for the special situation of the women and the girl
including the social and political system, community and religious leaders,
and the mass media. Advocacy will be carried out to ensure partnership of the
non-health sectors, particularly the Ministries of Information, Education,
Religious Affairs, LGRD(DPHE), NGOs and corporate entities.
¢ ESP Intervention promotions -the promotion of the Essential Services
messages into existing programmes in order to sensitize men for those aspects.
(b) Notwithstanding the common ground, both have many subtle and strong differences.
First, Revisionist School feels that integration of Health and Family Planning should be
experimented in one or two districts and based on experimental results, it could be
expanded in phases throughout Bangladesh over a period of five years. The Reformist
School holds the view that integration should proceed with a single go and that
experimentation is unnecessary as it will delay the process of integration. Secondly,
"Revisionist School" feels that all thematic programmes, about 14 to 16, could be
included in the Annual Development Programme (ADP) for better accountability and
monitoring the programme activities, goal(s) and resource allocation. On the country, the
Reformist School holds the view that all components of the Health and Population Sector
should be brought into one mega programme, under the rubric of Health and Population
Sector Programme (HPSP) and that only this will be included in the ADP for better intra-
components-resource-management and overcoming the delays in meeting the complex
process of approval. It also argues that both health and population sectors should be
converted into a single sector which is contrary to the notion of the Revisionists that such
a conversion is uncalled for and undermine the importance attached to the "Population
Planning and priority", it has been enjoying since 1973. Thirdly, the Revisionist School
holds the view that inter-sectoral programmes should be broadened to include health
issues, HIV/AIDS, nutrition, arsenic and remain as an important part of sector financing.
Some of the inter -sectoral programmes now exist are too thin both from the point of
view of investment and coverage of population. Both the GOB and other donors should
also directly participation in inter -sectoral activities. The Reformist School excludes it
altogether and holds the view that HPSP would confine itself within the MOHFW,
although it admits that outcome of the programmes of other sectors of the economy may
affect the outcome of the HPSP. Lastly, the Reformists converse both revenue and
development into a single budgetary system for programming the activities -a new system
in which revisionist finds no real benefits.
Arguably, Revisionists stand for cautious move as they believe that social change should
not precede any scientific experimentation and that any good and sustained results can be
achieved by initiating changes, modifications or even some reforms within the system as
problems are, by and large, outside the MOHFW, but disease burden and adverse
outcome of these problems squarely lie on it. This is why it is important that other sectors
of the economy must be allowed, especially when they are so willing, to play their due
role befitting the scope and stride, in reducing the adverse consequences of deteriorating
health, population growth momentum) nutrition status and other emerging problems like
HJV/AIDS and STD and arsenism.
Realizing the importance of other sectors' participation in population activities, the Fifth
Five Year Plan assigned appropriate roles to various ministries such as: Education,
Information, Social Welfare, Women Affairs, Local Government, Rural Development
and Cooperative, Agriculture, Youth and Sports, Planning etc. (PP 481-82). The
introduction of HPSP provided great opportunity to extend such role to those ministries
for health, nutrition, HIV/AIDS and STD, and arsenism. This strategic lapse has
disturbed the culture of participation which was already developed through conscious
effort and deliberate policy planning. The hietas created by the narrowly defined
boundary of HPSP is difficult to fill in, unless immediate steps are taken to extend
opportunity to other Ministries for participating in population and related activities. For
the Success of HPSP itself, two kind of inter-and-multisectoral approaches are needed -
one is direct and the other is indirect. Direct inter-sectoral participation is one which is
conceived within the framework of HPSP and its operational definition. This will provide
an obligation for other ministries to prepare their own project or operation plan
envisaging objectives-based-specific activities, method of participation, result of such
participation to the Health and Population Sector and budget from the pool fund or from a
bilateral donor. Indirect participation is the one which is designed primarily to achieve
objectives of the sector-ministry and secondly, to contribute to the achievement of Health
and Population Sector objectives. In fact, given the seriousness of Health and Population
Sector problems, HPSP needs both direct and indirect inter-sectoral participation. Due to
narrowly defined boundary of HPSP, the MOHFW has alienated itself from other
Ministries and their agencies and thus, turned itself as a lone custodian of Health and
Population activities.
As stated above, under the optimistic assumption of NRR=1 by the year 20051
population will grow upto 170-172 million in 2020, but under the less optimistic
assumption, it may increase upto 180 million or more by then. At any rate, Bangladesh is
destined to add up 40-42 million or more population in the next two decades. Already,
the present population is too large and addition of 40-42 million population or more in
the next two decades is frightful to visualize and sure to have terrible strains on its
resources, land space, and worsen further the man-land ratio, per capita food availability,
population density, nutritional status, per capita educational and health expenditure. In
fact, it will affect all branches of the economy. The situation demands an all-out
inter/multi-sectoral approaches at all levels -national, district, thana and union as well as
all sectors of the economy to offset the adverse effects of population momentum. The
sense of urgency which the situation demands is not addressed in the HPSP .
9. Policy Instrument
Although a comprehensive Population Policy of the sort that Bangladesh should have, is
not in place at present, even whatever policy measures are envisaged in the 5th Five Year
Plan are also not implemented in real sense of the term for sheer dysfunctionability of the
Policy Instrument which is, in this case, the National Population Council (NPC), headed
by the Head of the Government. The National Population Council is the highest policy
making body. During the last four years only two meetings were held. The MOHFW is
the Secretariat of the NPC which has been rendered ineffective by the Ministry itself. The
NPC does not even know the various roles and responsibilities of different ministries in
respect of population, nor perhaps is it aware of the emerging problems like population
momentum, deteriorating nutrition problem, problem of high adolescent fertility,
population environment linkage etc. The MOHFW is fully preoccupied with the
implementation of the HPSP which is a service delivery related-operational policy
strategy confined to itself. The dysfunctionality of the NPC is a major deterrent to the
Population Plan/Policy implementation.
10.1 Risks
The HPSP has superseded many aspects of the 5th five year Health and Population Plan
(1997-2002). For example, the 5th Five Year Health and Population Plan (p. 479 )
envisages implementation of HPSP in unions where there are FWCs with doctors and
also, in phases. Based on implementation experience, it should be gradually expanded to
other places in congruence with the progress in human resource development through
training in new programme strategy. This basic approach was undermined. The
Government has rushed into implementing the programme without creating a core of well
motivated trained people to implement the package of services envisaged in the HPSP.
Contrary to previous practices, the MOHFW designated 30 (thirty) senior officers as the
line Directors who are vested with both financial and administrative power to execute
thirty different components of HPSP. These line-Directors themselves were not
reportedly fully conversant or oriented with the programme approach. Such inadequate
preparation has created some confusion at the national level and further down. Thus, it
has affected service delivery programme. It has been observed that some established
institutions like NIPSOM and NIPORT which used to draw their annual allocation from
the Ministry of Finance is now made subservient to the Line Director (training) who
cannot provide them the resources they need unless he gets approval of the Ministry of
Health and FW and Ministry of Finance. Consequently, it has not only limited the
institutional freedom, but also affected their training programme. Same is the case with
research activities which are also subject to similar limitation. The sector-boundary is
defined within the narrow confine of the MOHFW barring the participation of other
Ministries (P. 19). This has extremely limited prospects of other Ministries' contribution
towards achievement of the objectives of Health and Population Sector. The MOHFW's
shift from "doorstep" to "one stop" service involves risk as the society is not yet poised
and accultured towards visit to clinic or hospital to take F.P. services. Female literacy rate
is still not high enough to ignite such strong motivation as may be needed for one stop
service. It is not the public demand that workers should not visit them at home, for
motivation, follow up and supplies. In fact, all these problems have created a great risk
for the success of population/family planning service delivery. Some analysts even doubt
that the 'demographic and social objectives of the Health and Population Sector as
envisaged in the 51h Five Year Plan may not be achieved under the changed
circumstances. Instead whatever progress has been achieved so far is most likely to be
neutralized owing to lack of direction and operational stagnation at the grass root level.
Various reform measures such as (I) hospital autonomy, (ii) cost sharing in public
hospitals etc. are yet not taken. As mentioned earlier inter-sectoral support for HPSP* was
not visualized as essential and thus, other ministries' ability to contribute towards the
success of the HPSP is thwarted. The measures to counter the effect of demographic
momentum are not built-in the HPSP itself, because in other sectors' direct involvement
in population and health activities is excluded. Such an important issue, is highly
marginalised. This is indeed a serious risk.
*
We are referring to HPSP, because Population/FP activities are taken as an integral part of it.
10.2 Prospects
Prospects of the HPSP is not, however, totally bleak. The HPSP is a new paradigm which
postulates a relationship between rapid improvement in health care and adoption of new
reform measures through sector-wide management. Here sector has one programme with
many components and necessary resources will be injected for each component from both
development and revenue budget. It has abridged the multiple planning processes. Once
the programme is approved, It needs not have to come to the Planning Commission or
ECNEC. Different desk masters can resolve their problems through the intra-sectoral
arrangement. It is also a time saving device in the sense that each component of the HPSP
has to have an annual operational plan with budget breakdown for each sub-component
and so on. The designated Line Directors are the key holders of the HPSP. The Secretary
of the MOHFW is the principal task Manager and responsible for overall implementation
of the programme. The HPSP is supposed to ensure economy of scale at various level,
especially at the MOHFW, but in reality it remains as large as before and the Line
Directors, despite their delegated authority, are still dependent on the Ministry even for
tasks which they can do. For example, the service matters of the non-gazetted staff of the
Directorate of the Health services are still attended by the MOHFW which as a matter of
fact, no other Ministries deal with such matters. If the risk factors are taken into account
from now onward and addressed properly, the HPSP may yield expected result. But it
will take some more time than one might have vitualised. If risk factors are undermined
or ignored, the HPSP may have disastrous consequences. The part of its success also lies
on the trained manpower at all level of Health and Family Planning programme which is
currently lacking.
sectoral to sectoral, (iii) from a mix of projects and programme approach to single mega-
programme approach; (iv) from sectoral status to sub-sectoral status; and (v) from 40/50
project/programme directors to 28/30 Line Directors, to cite a few. The Population and
Health Plan as contained in the 5th Five Year Plan envisages the implementation of the
HPSP in phases (FYP. 479) rather than in single-go to avoid risks that may endanger the
outcomes of earlier policies and programmes. Thus far the 5th Plan guidelines were not
adhered to fully nor are the other policy strategies such as the issues relating to spatial
distribution of population, support to three population related women's programmes, and
adequate support to inter-sectoral population programmes of other ministries, problem of
adolescent population, environmental degradation and its impact on population, peoples'
health problem owing to arsenic contamination etc. There appears to be some lack of
appreciation of such policy measures resulting into some lag impeding the progress.
Besides, lack of meaningful understanding of the HPSP strategy by the large number of
stakeholders at various levels has slowed down the pace of progress. Hence, it is widely
believed that in stead of making progress, sector may have some backward trend in
respect of decline in fertility and mortality as well as raising contraceptive prevalence
rate.
Thus, in a variety of ways, HPSP appears to be in risk. Having such a scenario, one can
foresee that prospect of the HPSP strategies may not be as rosy as predicted. It is
important that Government should initiate a mid term review to find out the extent to
which (i) different ESP elements are in place as envisaged in HPSP; (ii) Whether CPR
has increased and fertility rate has decreased further; and (iii) the extent of GOB's efforts
in initiating the various reforms measures. In order to provide inputs in the review
exercise, one quick survey with the stakeholders and another one with the general
beneficiaries should be concerned to see the status of various health and population
indicators. The sooner these surveys are taken, the better for the country. Based on
results, the HPSP can be modified, retained or strengthened. In the meantime, in
appreciation of the other Ministries' expressed desire to participate in population
activities, some more broad-based multi and inter-sectoral programmes can be taken up.
Some inter -sectoral programme/project which are currently underway with the support
of the UNFPA are the remnants of the past and can hardly cover the large target
population. These need to be broad based.
The purpose of this paper is not, however, to say 'right' or 'wrong' with the HPSP per se,
but to see whether the on-going population programme strategies, apart from family
planning/reproductive health activities, can attenuate the adverse consequences of some
of the emerging population problems like demographic momentum, arsenic problem,
HIV/AIDS, deteriorating nutrition status of growing population, increasing slums,
environmental degradation and massive flux of rural population to the urban areas and so
on. The HPSP has made the MOHFW as the single custodian of population activities,
although sources of population problem largely remain outside the scope of this Ministry.
It is important that the problems-ongoing and emerging ones that threat the existence of
population should be inter and multi sectoralized. It is also important that the population
policy instrument which is, in this case, the National Population Council (NPC) that has
been highly dysfunctional for long should be activated to allocate population-business to
other Ministries and regularly monitor the progress of implementation. Unless these tasks
are taken seriously now, this poor nation will pay time-penalty which will be too high to
bear with.
*
Population responsive policy ameliorates or overcomes the effects of unpreceded increase in population
size and density, high birth rate, death rate and growth rate; and population influencing policies will bring
about a reduction in fertility, mortality, and in growth rate and will beneficially influence internal
migration. Policies for employment, food supply, urbanisation and resource development are in the first
category. Family Planning Programme/programme to reduce fertility, health and nutrition programme, to
reduce mortality, and transportation and industrial planning to influence internal migration are in the
second.
References
1. First Five Year Plan (1973-78), Bangladesh Planning Commission, Dhaka, 1973.
2. Outlines of Population Policy, Ministry of Health, 1976
3. Two Year Plan (1978-80), Bangladesh Planning Commission, Dhaka, 1978.
4. Second Five Year Plan (1980-85) ibid , 1980
5. Third Five Year Plan (1985-90), ibid 1985
6. Fourth Five Year Plan (1990-95), Ibld 1990
7. Fifth Five Year Plan (1997-2002), ibid, 1997
8. Health and Population Sector Programme, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,
1998
9. Mabud Mohammed A., "Projected Population Estimates, 1995-2020"; Population
Wing, Bangladesh Planning Commission, Dhaka.
10. Ibid, "Report on the Status of Inter and Multi-sectoral programme on Population,
Health, Nutrition, Arsenic, HIV/AIDS, STD etc.", DFID/MOHFW, Dhaka;
December, 1999.
11. Mabud, Mohammed A. and Ali Amzad "Decentralisation on Health and Family
Planning Services at the Upazila, March-April, 2000.