Secure Shell - Wikipedia
Secure Shell - Wikipedia
The Secure Shell Protocol (SSH Protocol) is a cryptographic network protocol for operating network
services securely over an unsecured network.[1] Its most notable applications are remote login and
command-line execution.
Finnish computer scientist Tatu Ylönen designed SSH in 1995 and provided an implementation in
the form of two commands, ssh and slogin, as secure replacements for rsh and rlogin,
respectively. Subsequent development of the protocol suite proceeded in several developer groups,
producing several variants of implementation. The protocol specification distinguishes two major
versions, referred to as SSH-1 and SSH-2. The most commonly implemented software stack is
OpenSSH, released in 1999 as open-source software by the OpenBSD developers. Implementations
are distributed for all types of operating systems in common use, including embedded systems.
SSH applications are based on a client–server architecture, connecting an SSH client instance with
an SSH server.[3] SSH operates as a layered protocol suite comprising three principal hierarchical
components: the transport layer provides server authentication, confidentiality, and integrity; the user
authentication protocol validates the user to the server; and the connection protocol multiplexes the
encrypted tunnel into multiple logical communication channels.[1]
Definition
SSH uses public-key cryptography to authenticate the remote computer and allow it to authenticate
the user, if necessary.[3]
SSH may be used in several methodologies. In the simplest manner, both ends of a communication
channel use automatically generated public-private key pairs to encrypt a network connection, and
then use a password to authenticate the user.
When the public-private key pair is generated by the user manually, the authentication is essentially
performed when the key pair is created, and a session may then be opened automatically without a
password prompt. In this scenario, the public key is placed on all computers that must allow access
to the owner of the matching private key, which the owner keeps private. While authentication is
based on the private key, the key is never transferred through the network during authentication.
SSH only verifies that the same person offering the public key also owns the matching private key.
In all versions of SSH it is important to verify unknown public keys, i.e. associate the public keys
with identities, before accepting them as valid. Accepting an attacker's public key without validation
will authorize an unauthorized attacker as a valid user.
On Unix-like systems, the list of authorized public keys is typically stored in the home directory of
the user that is allowed to log in remotely, in the file ~/.ssh/authorized_keys .[4] This file is
respected by SSH only if it is not writable by anything apart from the owner and root. When the
public key is present on the remote end and the matching private key is present on the local end,
typing in the password is no longer required. However, for additional security the private key itself
can be locked with a passphrase.
The private key can also be looked for in standard places, and its full path can be specified as a
command line setting (the option -i for ssh). The ssh-keygen utility produces the public and
private keys, always in pairs.
Use
SSH is typically used to log into a remote computer's shell or command-line interface (CLI) and to
execute commands on a remote server. It also supports mechanisms for tunneling, forwarding of
TCP ports and X11 connections and it can be used to transfer files using the associated SSH File
Transfer Protocol (SFTP) or Secure Copy Protocol (SCP).[3]
SSH uses the client–server model. An SSH client program is typically used for establishing
connections to an SSH daemon, such as sshd, accepting remote connections. Both are commonly
present on most modern operating systems, including macOS, most distributions of Linux,
OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Solaris and OpenVMS. Notably, versions of Windows prior to Windows
10 version 1709 do not include SSH by default, but proprietary, freeware and open source versions
of various levels of complexity and completeness did and do exist (see Comparison of SSH clients).
In 2018 Microsoft began porting the OpenSSH source code to Windows[5] and in Windows 10
version 1709, an official Win32 port of OpenSSH is now available.
File managers for UNIX-like systems (e.g. Konqueror) can use the FISH protocol to provide a split-
pane GUI with drag-and-drop. The open source Windows program WinSCP[6] provides similar file
management (synchronization, copy, remote delete) capability using PuTTY as a back-end. Both
WinSCP[7] and PuTTY[8] are available packaged to run directly off a USB drive, without requiring
installation on the client machine. Crostini on ChromeOS comes with OpenSSH by default. Setting
up an SSH server in Windows typically involves enabling a feature in the Settings app.
SSH is important in cloud computing to solve connectivity problems, avoiding the security issues of
exposing a cloud-based virtual machine directly on the Internet. An SSH tunnel can provide a secure
path over the Internet, through a firewall to a virtual machine.[9]
The IANA has assigned TCP port 22, UDP port 22 and SCTP port 22 for this protocol.[10] IANA had
listed the standard TCP port 22 for SSH servers as one of the well-known ports as early as 2001.[11]
SSH can also be run using SCTP rather than TCP as the connection oriented transport layer
protocol.[12]
Historical development
Version 1
In 1995, Tatu Ylönen, a researcher at Helsinki University of Technology in Finland designed the first
version of the protocol (now called SSH-1) prompted by a password-sniffing attack at his university
network.[13] The goal of SSH was to replace the earlier rlogin, TELNET, FTP[14] and rsh protocols,
which did not provide strong authentication nor guarantee confidentiality. He chose the port number
22 because it is between telnet (port 23) and ftp (port 21).[15]
Ylönen released his implementation as freeware in July 1995, and the tool quickly gained in
popularity. Towards the end of 1995, the SSH user base had grown to 20,000 users in fifty
countries.[16]
In December 1995, Ylönen founded SSH Communications Security to market and develop SSH. The
original version of the SSH software used various pieces of free software, such as GNU libgmp, but
later versions released by SSH Communications Security evolved into increasingly proprietary
software.
It was estimated that by 2000 the number of users had grown to 2 million.[17]
Version 2
In 2006, after being discussed in a working group named "secsh",[18] a revised version of the SSH
protocol, SSH-2 was adopted as a standard.[19] This version offers improved security and new
features, but is not compatible with SSH-1. For example, it introduces new key-exchange
mechanisms like Diffie–Hellman key exchange, improved data integrity checking via message
authentication codes like MD5 or SHA-1, which can be negotiated between client and server. SSH-2
also adds stronger encryption methods like AES which eventually replaced weaker and
compromised ciphers from the previous standard like 3DES.[20][21][19] New features of SSH-2 include
the ability to run any number of shell sessions over a single SSH connection.[22] Due to SSH-2's
superiority and popularity over SSH-1, some implementations such as libssh (v0.8.0+),[23] Lsh[24]
and Dropbear[25] eventually supported only the SSH-2 protocol.
Version 1.99
In January 2006, well after version 2.1 was established, RFC 4253 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc
4253) specified that an SSH server supporting 2.0 as well as prior versions should identify its
protocol version as 1.99.[26] This version number does not reflect a historical software revision, but a
method to identify backward compatibility.
OpenSSH and OSSH
In 1999, developers, desiring availability of a free software version, restarted software development
from the 1.2.12 release of the original SSH program, which was the last released under an open
source license.[27] This served as a code base for Björn Grönvall's OSSH software.[28] Shortly
thereafter, OpenBSD developers forked Grönvall's code and created OpenSSH, which shipped with
Release 2.6 of OpenBSD. From this version, a "portability" branch was formed to port OpenSSH to
other operating systems.[29]
As of 2005, OpenSSH was the single most popular SSH implementation, being the default version in
a large number of operating system distributions. OSSH meanwhile has become obsolete.[30]
OpenSSH continues to be maintained and supports the SSH-2 protocol, having expunged SSH-1
support from the codebase in the OpenSSH 7.6 release.
Future
In 2023, an alternative to traditional SSH was proposed under the name SSH3[31][32][33] by PhD
student François Michel and Professor Olivier Bonaventure and its code has been made open
source.[34] This new version implements the original SSH Connection Protocol but operates on top
of HTTP/3, which runs on QUIC. It offers multiple features such as:
Faster session establishment, reducing the number of Round-trip delays from 5-7 to 3.
High security: while SSHv2 relies on its own protocols, SSH3 leverages TLS 1.3, QUIC, and HTTP.
X.509 certificates
OpenID Connect
However, the name SSH3 is under discussion, and the project aims to rename itself to a more
suitable name.[35] The discussion stems from the fact that this new implementation significantly
revises the SSH protocol, suggesting it should not be called SSH3.
Uses
SSH is a protocol that can be used for many applications across many platforms including most
Unix variants (Linux, the BSDs including Apple's macOS, and Solaris), as well as Microsoft Windows.
Some of the applications below may require features that are only available or compatible with
specific SSH clients or servers. For example, using the SSH protocol to implement a VPN is
possible, but presently only with the OpenSSH server and client implementation.
For setting up automatic (passwordless) login to a remote server (for example, using
OpenSSH[36])
In combination with rsync to back up, copy and mirror files efficiently and securely
For tunneling (not to be confused with a VPN, which routes packets between different networks,
or bridges two broadcast domains into one).
For using as a full-fledged encrypted VPN. Note that only OpenSSH server and client supports this
feature.
For forwarding X from a remote host (possible through multiple intermediate hosts)
For browsing the web through an encrypted proxy connection with SSH clients that support the
SOCKS protocol.
For securely mounting a directory on a remote server as a filesystem on a local computer using
SSHFS.
For automated remote monitoring and management of servers through one or more of the
mechanisms discussed above.
The Secure Shell protocols are used in several file transfer mechanisms.
Secure copy (SCP), which evolved from RCP protocol over SSH
rsync, intended to be more efficient than SCP. Generally runs over an SSH connection.
SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP), a secure alternative to FTP (not to be confused with FTP over
SSH or FTPS)
Files transferred over shell protocol (FISH), released in 1998, which evolved from Unix shell
commands over SSH
Fast and Secure Protocol (FASP), aka Aspera, uses SSH for control and UDP ports for data
transfer.
Architecture
The SSH protocol has a layered architecture with three separate components:
The transport layer (RFC 4253 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4253) ) typically uses the
Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) of TCP/IP, reserving port number 22 as a server listening
port. This layer handles initial key exchange as well as server authentication, and sets up
encryption, compression, and integrity verification. It exposes to the upper layer an interface for
sending and receiving plaintext packets with a size of up to 32,768 bytes each, but more can be
allowed by each implementation. The transport layer also arranges for key re-exchange, usually
after 1 GB of data has been transferred or after one hour has passed, whichever occurs first.
The SSHFP DNS record (RFC 4255) provides the public host key fingerprints in order to aid in
verifying the authenticity of the host.
This open architecture provides considerable flexibility, allowing the use of SSH for a variety of
purposes beyond a secure shell. The functionality of the transport layer alone is comparable to
Transport Layer Security (TLS); the user-authentication layer is highly extensible with custom
authentication methods; and the connection layer provides the ability to multiplex many secondary
sessions into a single SSH connection, a feature comparable to BEEP and not available in TLS.
Algorithms
Vulnerabilities
SSH-1
In 1998, a vulnerability was described in SSH 1.5 which allowed the unauthorized insertion of
content into an encrypted SSH stream due to insufficient data integrity protection from CRC-32 used
in this version of the protocol.[42][43] A fix known as SSH Compensation Attack Detector[44] was
introduced into most implementations. Many of these updated implementations contained a new
integer overflow vulnerability[45] that allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code with the privileges
of the SSH daemon, typically root.
In January 2001 a vulnerability was discovered that allows attackers to modify the last block of an
IDEA-encrypted session.[46] The same month, another vulnerability was discovered that allowed a
malicious server to forward a client authentication to another server.[47]
Since SSH-1 has inherent design flaws which make it vulnerable, it is now generally considered
obsolete and should be avoided by explicitly disabling fallback to SSH-1.[47] Most modern servers
and clients support SSH-2.[48]
In November 2008, a theoretical vulnerability was discovered for all versions of SSH which allowed
recovery of up to 32 bits of plaintext from a block of ciphertext that was encrypted using what was
then the standard default encryption mode, CBC.[49] The most straightforward solution is to use
CTR, counter mode, instead of CBC mode, since this renders SSH resistant to the attack.[49]
On December 28, 2014 Der Spiegel published classified information[50] leaked by whistleblower
Edward Snowden which suggests that the National Security Agency may be able to decrypt some
SSH traffic. The technical details associated with such a process were not disclosed. A 2017
analysis of the CIA hacking tools BothanSpy and Gyrfalcon suggested that the SSH protocol was not
compromised.[51]
Terrapin attack
A novel man-in-the-middle attack against most current ssh implementations was discovered in
2023. It was named the Terrapin attack by its discoverers.[52][53] However, the risk is mitigated by the
requirement to intercept a genuine ssh session, and that the attack is restricted in its scope,
fortuitously resulting mostly in failed connections.[54][55] The ssh developers have stated that the
major impact of the attack is to degrade the keystroke timing obfuscation features of ssh.[55] The
vulnerability was fixed in OpenSSH 9.6, but requires both client and server to be upgraded for the fix
to be fully effective.
Standards documentation
The following RFC publications by the IETF "secsh" working group document SSH-2 as a proposed
Internet standard.
RFC 4432 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4432) – RSA Key Exchange for the Secure Shell
(SSH) Transport Layer Protocol (March 2006)
RFC 5647 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5647) – AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure
Shell Transport Layer Protocol (August 2009)
RFC 5592 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5592) – Secure Shell Transport Model for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP) (June 2009)
RFC 8332 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8332) – Use of RSA Keys with SHA-256 and SHA-512
in the Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol (March 2018)
draft-gerhards-syslog-transport-ssh (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gerhards-syslog-tr
ansport-ssh) – SSH transport mapping for SYSLOG (July 2006)
See also
Brute-force attack
Corkscrew
Ident
OpenSSH
Web-based SSH
References
1. T. Ylonen; C. Lonvick (January 2006). The Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol Architecture (https://data
tracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4251) . IETF Trust. doi:10.17487/RFC4251 (https://doi.org/10.17
487%2FRFC4251) . RFC 4251 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4251) .
3. T. Ylonen; C. Lonvick (January 2006). The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol (https://da
tatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4252) . IETF Trust. doi:10.17487/RFC4252 (https://doi.org/10.1
7487%2FRFC4252) . RFC 4252 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4252) .
4. "How To Set Up Authorized Keys" (https://wiki.qnap.com/wiki/How_To_Set_Up_Authorized_Key
s) . Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110510111514/http://wiki.qnap.com/wiki/How
_To_Set_Up_Authorized_Keys) from the original on 2011-05-10.
10. "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry" (https://www.iana.org/assignme
nts/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml) .
11. "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry" (https://www.iana.org/assignme
nts/port-numbers) . iana.org. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20010604223215/http
s://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers) from the original on 2001-06-04.
12. Seggelmann, R.; Tuxen, M.; Rathgeb, E.P. (18–20 July 2012). SSH over SCTP — Optimizing a
multi-channel protocol by adapting it to SCTP. 8th International Symposium on Communication
Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP). pp. 1–6.
doi:10.1109/CSNDSP.2012.6292659 (https://doi.org/10.1109%2FCSNDSP.2012.6292659) .
ISBN 978-1-4577-1473-3. S2CID 8415240 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:841524
0) .
13. Tatu Ylönen. "The new skeleton key: changing the locks in your network environment" (https://
web.archive.org/web/20170820162632/https://www.scmagazineuk.com/the-new-skeleton-ke
y-changing-the-locks-in-your-network-environment/article/545848/) . Archived from the
original (https://www.scmagazineuk.com/the-new-skeleton-key-changing-the-locks-in-your-net
work-environment/article/545848/) on 2017-08-20.
14. Tatu Ylönen. "SSH Port" (https://www.ssh.com/ssh/port) . Archived (https://web.archive.org/
web/20170803235736/https://www.ssh.com/ssh/port) from the original on 2017-08-03.
15. Ylönen, Tatu. "The story of the SSH port is 22" (https://www.ssh.com/academy/ssh/port) .
www.ssh.com. Retrieved 2023-11-30.
16. Barrett, Daniel J.; Silverman, Richard E. (2001). SSH, the secure shell: the definitive guide
(1st ed.). Cambridge [Mass.]: O'Reilly. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-596-00011-0.
17. Nicholas Rosasco and David Larochelle. "How and Why More Secure Technologies Succeed in
Legacy Markets: Lessons from the Success of SSH" (http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~drl7x/sshVs
TelnetWeb3.pdf) (PDF). Quoting Barrett and Silverman, SSH, the Secure Shell: The Definitive
Guide, O'Reilly & Associates (2001). Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Virginia. Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20060625065258/http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~drl7x/sshVsTelnetWe
b3.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2006-06-25. Retrieved 2006-05-19.
18. IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force): datatracker for secsh (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/s
ecsh/documents/)
19. RFC4252: The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol, Jan 2006 (https://datatracker.ietf.or
g/doc/html/rfc4252)
21. RFC4250: The Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol: Assigned names, Jan 2006, page 16 (https://datatr
acker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4250#page-16)
27. ssh-1.2.13 now available: copying policy changed (permission now required to sell ssh
commercially, use is still permitted for any purpose) (https://marc.info/?l=secure-shell&m=885
61413417101)
33. Michel, François; Bonaventure, Olivier (2023-12-12). "Towards SSH3: how HTTP/3 improves
secure shells". arXiv:2312.08396 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08396) [cs.NI (https://arxiv.org/
archive/cs.NI) ].
36. Sobell, Mark (2012). A Practical Guide to Linux Commands, Editors, and Shell Programming
(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. pp. 702–704. ISBN 978-0133085044.
37. Harris, B.; Velvindron, L. (February 2020). Ed25519 and Ed448 Public Key Algorithms for the
Secure Shell (SSH) Protocol (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8709) .
doi:10.17487/RFC8709 (https://doi.org/10.17487%2FRFC8709) . RFC 8709 (https://datatrack
er.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8709) .
38. Stebila, D.; Green, J. (December 2009). Elliptic Curve Algorithm Integration in the Secure Shell
Transport Layer (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5656) . doi:10.17487/RFC5656 (http
s://doi.org/10.17487%2FRFC5656) . RFC 5656 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc565
6) . Retrieved 12 November 2012.
39. Miller, D.; Valchev, P. (September 3, 2007). The use of UMAC in the SSH Transport Layer Protocol
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-miller-secsh-umac-00) . I-D draft-miller-secsh-
umac-00.
40. Ylonen, T.; Lonvick, C. The Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol (https://datatracker.ietf.o
rg/doc/html/rfc4253) . IETF. doi:10.17487/RFC4253 (https://doi.org/10.17487%2FRFC425
3) . RFC 4253 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4253) .
41. Igoe, K.; Solinas, J. (August 2009). AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport
Layer Protocol (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5647) . doi:10.17487/RFC5647 (http
s://doi.org/10.17487%2FRFC5647) . RFC 5647 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc564
7) .
43. "Vulnerability Note VU#13877 - Weak CRC allows packet injection into SSH sessions encrypted
with block ciphers" (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/13877) . US CERT. Archived (https://web.a
rchive.org/web/20100710040357/http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/13877) from the original
on 2010-07-10.
45. "Vulnerability Note VU#945216 - SSH CRC32 attack detection code contains remote integer
overflow" (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/945216) . US CERT. Archived (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20051013074750/http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/945216) from the original on 2005-
10-13.
46. "Vulnerability Note VU#315308 - Weak CRC allows last block of IDEA-encrypted SSH packet to
be changed without notice" (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/315308) . US CERT. Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20100711103528/http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/315308) from the
original on 2010-07-11.
47. "Vulnerability Note VU#684820 - SSH-1 allows client authentication to be forwarded by a
malicious server to another server" (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/684820) . US CERT.
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20090901012536/http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/6848
20) from the original on 2009-09-01.
50. "Prying Eyes: Inside the NSA's War on Internet Security" (http://www.spiegel.de/international/g
ermany/inside-the-nsa-s-war-on-internet-security-a-1010361.html) . Spiegel Online. December
28, 2014. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20150124202809/http://www.spiegel.de/inte
rnational/germany/inside-the-nsa-s-war-on-internet-security-a-1010361.html) from the
original on January 24, 2015.
51. Ylonen, Tatu (3 August 2017). "BothanSpy & Gyrfalcon - Analysis of CIA hacking tools for SSH"
(https://www.ssh.com/ssh/cia-bothanspy-gyrfalcon) . ssh.com. Retrieved 15 July 2018.
53. Jones, Connor. "SSH shaken, not stirred by Terrapin downgrade vulnerability" (https://www.ther
egister.com/2023/12/20/terrapin_attack_ssh/) . www.theregister.com. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
54. Jones, Connor. "SSH shaken, not stirred by Terrapin downgrade vulnerability" (https://www.ther
egister.com/2023/12/20/terrapin_attack_ssh/) . www.theregister.com. Retrieved 2023-12-20.
Further reading
Barrett, Daniel J.; Silverman, Richard E.; Byrnes, Robert G. (2005). SSH: The Secure Shell (The
Definitive Guide) (2nd ed.). O'Reilly. ISBN 0-596-00895-3.
Tatu Ylönen (12 July 1995). "Announcement: Ssh (Secure Shell) Remote Login Program" (https://g
roups.google.com/group/comp.security.unix/msg/67079d812a19f499?dmode=source&hl=en) .
comp.security.unix. Original announcement of Ssh
M. Joseph; J. Susoy (November 2013). P6R's Secure Shell Public Key Subsystem (https://datatrack
er.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7076) . doi:10.17487/RFC7076 (https://doi.org/10.17487%2FRFC707
6) . RFC 7076 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7076) .