MATHS ASSIGNMENT
STATISTICS INFERENCE
UNIT 2
MATH 1281-01
24/4/25
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR PROPORTIONS
Part 1
Question 1a
Hypotheses:
H₀: p = 0.50
Hₐ: p < 0.50
As recommended by Sullivan (2018), independence and success-failure conditions were checked
prior to conducting the test.
Conditions Check:
Independence: Random sample, and n < 10% of the population.
Success-Failure:
np₀ = 220.5
n(1-p₀) = 220.5
Both values exceed 10 (Sullivan, 2018).
Test Statistic:
A one-proportion z-test was conducted using the standard formula (Sullivan, 2018).
P-value:
Calculated using JASP statistical software (JASP Team, 2024).
Conclusion:
Since p-value < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. There’s strong evidence that less than 50% of
adults who avoid college cite affordability as the reason.
Question 1b
Sample Size Calculation:
The recommended sample size was calculated using the margin of error formula for proportions
as outlined by Sullivan (2018).
Recommended sample size: 2,835 adults
Part 2
Question 2a
Conditions Check:
Following Sullivan (2018), both independence and success-failure conditions were verified.
Confidence Interval Calculation:
The difference between two proportions was computed with a 95% confidence level using the
appropriate formula (Sullivan, 2018).
Interpretation:
Since the interval includes zero, no statistically significant difference exists.
Question 2b
Hypotheses:
H₀: p₁ = p₂
Hₐ: p₁ ≠ p₂
Test Statistic and P-value:
A two-proportion z-test was performed using pooled proportions and calculated via JASP
software (JASP Team, 2024).
Conclusion:
As p-value > 0.05, the null hypothesis was not rejected, indicating no significant difference.
References
JASP Team. (2024). JASP (Version 0.18.3) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
Sullivan, M. (2018). Statistics: Informed decisions using data (5th ed.). Pearson Education.