Introduction To Project Management
Introduction To Project Management
by 102.244.45.29 on 03/03/25. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Chapter 1
Introduction to Project
Hands-on Project Management Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Management
(1) Since projects are unique, project managers and project teams are not
repeating the same projects; they are not “riding the learning curve”,
i.e., improvement by mere repetition is limited. Structured learning
and training activities are needed to enable project managers and
their teams to practice, repeatedly, the tools and techniques they may
use to manage a project. It is important to keep the cost of learning
low and, more importantly, to minimize the cost and likelihood of
making mistakes on real projects. One way to support learning and
Our goal, in writing this book and using the student version of the
simulation software, the Project Team Builder, that accompanies it, is
to help anyone involved in projects deal with the above three problems.
Specifically, this book is written for project managers and project
teams, as well as graduate and undergraduate students, who want to
learn and practice the basic tools of project management. This book
presents tools and techniques commonly used to manage projects.
It also describes and provides a simulation platform with which it is
possible to simulate a large variety of projects in a safe, user-friendly
environment.
Project management is defined by the Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBOK) fifth edition as “the application of knowledge,
skills, tools and techniques to project activities to meet the project
requirements.”
teams can practice these tools and techniques in a safe and inexpensive
environment.
There are nine chapters in this book:
1. Introduction to Project Management
In this chapter, we present some of the terminology commonly used in
project management. We also discuss the history of project manage-
ment, focusing on the last one hundred years, as most of the tools and
techniques presented in this book were developed during this period.
The selection and initiation of projects is discussed and illustrated.
2. Introduction to the Project Team Builder (PTB) Simulator
In this chapter, we present the Project Team Builder simulator, its
logic, and the major functions it supports. The PTB is based on the
following principles:
hese principles are discussed in detail later in this book along with
T
examples and screenshots to introduce the PTB to the reader.
The project budget represents financial sources and the use of funds
throughout the project life cycle. The budget is an important part
of the plan, and it is based on estimates of income and cost. The
direct cost of resources, as well as other costs, such as the cost of
idle time or the penalty due to missed due dates, are presented in the
project budget. The PTB shows historical (past) costs along with
future (estimated) costs, as well as the cash flow and cash position
of the project at any time.
7. Risk Management
The non-repetitive nature of projects limits the amount of past infor-
mation available to the project manager and the project management
team as a basis for planning. A risk is an event with some probability
and some expected outcomes that may occur during the course of a
project and have an adverse effect on the project. A project manager
must assess which risks are most likely to impact the ability of the
project team to achieve the project goals and to satisfy its constraints.
Risk management is an important consideration in project manage-
ment. This activity should start very early in a project life cycle in
an effort to identify risks and to analyze them as a basis for risk-
related decisions. The initial analysis is performed as part of project
initiation, as the level of risk associated with a proposed project is an
important factor in the go/no go decision, i.e., a decision to start the
project. Furthermore if the decision is “go”, there might be differ-
ent technological and operational alternatives to perform the project.
The risk associated with each of these alternatives is a major factor
in the decision as to which alternative to select for implementation.
During the project planning phase, the decision whether to mitigate
of Project Management
Project management has been widely practiced throughout history, dating
back to the construction of the Egyptian pyramids almost 5000 years ago.
Hands-on Project Management Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
tasks are identified, including an estimate of resources and costs that will
be needed. The heart of a project plan is the scheduling and control phase
when resources are assigned to each project task, and the project idea,
formulated in earlier phases, is realized. Finally, a project concludes with
Hands-on Project Management Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
1.3 Development of alternatives
1.4 Evaluation of alternatives based on performance (quality), cost,
duration, and risk
1.5 Selection of the “most promising” alternative and gaining
approval
gram increases the likelihood that a project’s deliverables will meet pro-
ject specifications as stipulated by stakeholders and senior management.
Throughout project execution, a risk management plan is updated as
new information is made available. Risks are monitored, as early detection
Hands-on Project Management Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
of a risk event can trigger corrective actions to bring a project back to its
planned course.
systems are designed with three objectives: (1) to identify deviations and
to forecast future deviations between actual project plans and work actu-
ally completed; (2) to identify the root causes of these deviations; and (3)
to support management decisions aimed at righting the course of the
project.
by 102.244.45.29 on 03/03/25. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
area (e.g., schedule delay) may trigger deviations in other areas (e.g., cost
overrun).
All project operational data collected by a project control system are
analyzed. If deviations are detected by the project management team, then
corrective actions might be devised to correct a project’s course. The
existing project plan is modified accordingly.
During a project’s life cycle, a project manager is continuously updat-
ing original estimates of completion dates and costs. Updated estimates
are used by the management to evaluate a project’s progress and the effi-
ciency of participating organizations. Management evaluations form the
basis of forecasts concerning expected project success at each stage of its
life cycle.
1.3. Project Success
The success of a project is measured by the stakeholders, typically across
at least three dimensions known as the project triangle: cost, schedule, and
quality/scope. The first two criteria — cost and schedule — are quantita-
by 102.244.45.29 on 03/03/25. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
tive metrics that can be explicitly tracked. However, a project can suffer
from cost overruns and schedule delays and, nevertheless, be deemed a
success. For example, the movie Titanic was released several years after
its initial forecast release date with a budget overrun of close to 100%. Yet,
Hands-on Project Management Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
it won numerous industry awards and was the first movie to gross over
$1 billion in revenue.
In addition to cost and schedule, a project is evaluated by the value
that it brings to its stakeholders. Specifically, did a project meet or exceed
the goals that were laid out in the original project plan that was approved
by stakeholders? Often, a project’s goals are revised in mid-stream due to
changing internal and market factors. In this case, a project’s ultimate
deliverables can be measured with respect to originally stated goals,
accounting for the changes that were requested and accounting for the
technical and business issues that were encountered in order to incor
porate requested and needed changes. In some instances, a project can
be compared to other projects in the organization with respect to
delivering on project milestones. In practice, an organization may arrive at
an overall perception of a project based on various internal and political
considerations.
In general, a project seeks to achieve goals in three dimensions: cost,
schedule, and quality/scope (the project triangle). Typically, a project
manager must make a trade-off between these three dimensions — for
example, delivering a project on schedule by going over budget and hiring
additional resources or working overtime. The dimensions of critical
importance will vary with the type of project. For example, a project to
develop the halftime entertainment at the Super Bowl must be completed
by the time of the Super Bowl, regardless of cost overruns. There is no
credit given if the show is ready one day late, but under budget. Likewise,
a project to develop a new automobile feature must emphasize scope or
quality of the deliverable. In this case, delivery of a faulty product — but
delivering on time and within budget — is meaningless, as customer
safety is paramount.
In contrast, 76% of small projects (projects with labor content < $1MM)
were successful, and only 4% failed. This high level of success among small
projects justifies, in part, the spiral and the agile project development.
In a 2006 study, the Standish Group investigated root causes for
project failure. In surveying organizations, the study found that overopti-
mistic estimates concerning risk factors and the ability to develop new
technologies and processes coupled with project scope changes were the
leading root causes of project failure. The learning from this study is that
project managers should realistically set expectations for stakeholders at
the outset of a project. Although a project manager should, in general, be
optimistic and passionate, they should also be candid and broad-minded in
assessing risks and potential pitfalls.
The success of a project can also be tied to various factors. Among the
most prominent root causes of a project’s success are: (i) clearly defined
project goals and objectives whereby each individual on the project under-
stands his/her role and how that role contributes to the overall project;
(ii) top management support, which leads to support of resources and
personnel that are needed to successfully execute a project; and (iii) effec-
tive communication channels whereby a project manager or the project
management office is communicating on a consistent basis with a consist-
ent message to all project stakeholders and participants.
needs to balance cash flow and resource usage. For example, certain
key developers may be required for a number of lucrative proposed
projects. If only a finite number of such resources are available at any
particular time and if significant barriers exist in acquiring similar
resources, an organization may have to defer some profitable projects
to a later date when required resources become available.
the success of the project but has limited authority over the people
performing project activities. In some organizations, a project manager
must work through the functional managers to get things done.
Another example of a project organization structure is a matrix
organization. In this case, a project manager has some authority, as the
organizational structure is a combination of the functional structure and
the project-oriented structure. However, the project manager in a matrix
organization shares authority with functional managers and has to coordi-
nate with them. In both the functional structure and the matrix structure,
communication skills are very important as is the ability of the project
manager to take full responsibility of the project with limited authority.
Understanding the internal politics of the organization and how to “get
things done” is another important but hard-to-teach skill.
Even in a project-oriented organizational structure, a project manager
may not be able to select the project team members; a project team may be
formed prior to the nomination of the project manager. Alternatively, team
members may be selected based on which individuals are available at the
time the project is initiated.
Development of shared understanding of project goals and constraints
as well as shared understanding of the way the project team members
should work together is a crucial step in team formation. In many projects,
shared understanding is developed “on the job” during project planning
or, even later, during project execution. The price is a low performing
team and conflicts among team members during early, important phases of
the project. Research found that teams that used simulation to analyze
alternative project plans and performed dry runs of the execution of
selected project plans developed shared understanding among team mem-
bers much earlier (Shtub et al. 2014).
1.6. Summary
Project management is the art and science of planning and executing a
non-repetitive effort to achieve specific goals while satisfying the needs
Hands-on Project Management Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
References
Salas, E., Wildman, J. I. and Piccolo, R. F. (2009). Using simulation-based t raining
(SBT) to enhance management education, The Academy of Management
Learning and Education, 8(4), pp. 559–573.
Shtub, A. (1999). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): The Dynamics of
Operations Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Shtub, A., Parush, A. and Hewett, T. ( 2009). Guest editorial: The use of simulation
in learning and teaching, International Journal of Engineering Education,
25(2), pp. 206–209.
Iluz, M., Moser, B. and Shtub, A. (2015). Shared awareness among project team
members through role-based simulation during planning — a comparative
study. Procedia Computer Science, 44, pp. 295–304.
Shtub, A., Iluz, M., Gersing, K., Oehmen, J. and Dubinsky, Y. (2014). Imple
mentation of lean engineering practices in projects and programs through
simulation based training, PM World Journal, 3(3) pp. 1–13.