Report Writing For Police Officers (100+)
Report Writing For Police Officers (100+)
FOR
POLICE OFFICERS
(2nd ed.)
(∃x)P(x) ≠ (∀x)P(x)
P⇒Q ≠ Q⇒P
by
Preface
This book is designed for criminal justice instructors. This book requires the instructors to
help students work through the various police reports. The reports are intentionally left
incomplete and they require students to work through them. Some reports may seem to ask
confusing questions, which may lead to unreliable responses. This is to be used as a learning
lesson: responses that are not reliable create statistics that are not valid. Managers need to
improve the forms in order to obtain valid data.
This book first discusses communication theory and how it applies to police officers and
prosecutors in the courtroom. Information presented in the courtroom by police officers has
a significant impact upon the jurors. Indeed, police officers communicate both verbally and
nonverbally in the courtroom and this affects their credibility on the stand. Furthermore, by
employing persuasion theories, prosecutors can align the officers’ testimonies to the jurors’
particular communication preference. Second, this book discusses truth as it relates to
probable cause and beyond a reasonable doubt. Finally, because report writing is a
significant part of police work, this book presents a variety of police forms that will engage
students in written communication.
ii
Author
Wayne L. Davis holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University of
Michigan-Dearborn, a Master of Science in Business Administration from Madonna
University in Livonia, Michigan, and a Ph.D. in Criminal Justice from Capella University in
Minneapolis, Minnesota. In addition, Dr. Davis has earned a helicopter pilot license, an
advanced open water scuba diver certification, a technician plus amateur radio license
(N8ZFG), and a basic emergency medical technician certificate from the State of Michigan.
Dr. Davis has graduated from three different law enforcement academies (city, state, and
federal): Schoolcraft College in Livonia, Michigan, the Indiana Law Enforcement Law
Academy, and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. He has over 20 years of law
enforcement experience with city, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.
While he worked as a product design engineer at Ford Motor Company, Dr. Davis introduced
the electronic engine control module into the pleasure boat industry. This included writing a
product specification manual and performing test-to-failure statistical research. As a result,
Dr. Davis was nominated for the Ford Motor Company Electronics Division Worldwide
Leadership Excellence Award. Subsequently, this led to his research paper called, A Study of
Factors Affecting a Supply Decision by the Ford Motor Company International Division for
Original Equipment.
Dr. Davis has received numerous awards and publications. Dr. Davis has received the U.S.
Customs & Border Protection Commissioner’s Award, the U.S. Customs & Border
Protection Scholastic Award, and he was appointed to a field-training officer by the Indiana
State Police. In addition, Dr. Davis has conducted an exploratory research study called, A
Correlational Study of Childhood Religiosity, Childhood Sport Participation, and Sport-
Learned Aggression among African American Female Athletes. Subsequently, Dr. Davis has
published several textbooks, which include a) Critical Thinking: Totality of Circumstances,
b) Police-Community Relations: Different Lenses & Perception of Truth, c) Interviewing,
Interrogation, and Communication for Law Enforcement, and d) Terrorism, Homeland
Security, and Risk Assessment through Research Proposal.
Recently, Dr. Davis has created table top police scenes for which he has filed a patent. In
addition, he has served as the Academic Coordinator for the Criminal Justice and Human
Services Programs at Aiken Technical College in Aiken, SC. With the support of local law
enforcement agencies, Dr. Davis has created an application-based criminal justice program
that meets the needs of the local community.
iii
Table of Contents
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………. 234
iv
List of Tables
v
List of Figures
vi
POLICE REPORTS WITHIN THIS TEXTBOOK
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS………………………………….. 37
Police Department Assignment Card…………………………………… 38
Police Daily Activity Report ……………………………………. …….. 39
Police Employee Personal Illness or Injury Report……………………. 40
Police Vehicle and Equipment Form …………………………………. 41
Affidavit of Citizen Complaint ……………………………………….. 42
Commendation/Complaint Form ……………………………………... 43
Supervisor Investigation Report ……………………………………… 45
Employee Disciplinary Report ……………………………………….. 47
Field Training Officer (FTO) Daily Observations ……………………. 48
vii
Crash Information Exchange Form …………………………………… 78
Vehicle Crash Summary Involving Serious Injury or Fatality… …….. 79
Police Vehicle Crash Form …………………………………………… 80
Report of Police Car Crash or Equipment Loss ……………………… 82
Interview Statement ………………………………………………….. 83
Voluntary Statement …………………………………………………. 84
Police Department Public Safety Checkpoint Plan ………………….. 85
Special Activity Report ……………………………………………… 88
DUI Investigative Notes ……………………………………………… 89
Implied Consent Warning ……………………………………………. 98
DataMaster Evidence Ticket ………………………………………….. 99
Affidavit for Probable Cause: Driving While Intoxicated ……………. 100
Charging Form for Driving While Intoxicated ……………………….. 104
Monthly Alco-sensor Report ………………………………………… 105
Mobile Video Tape Log ……………………………………………….. 106
I-94 Arrival/Departure Record ……………………………………….. 107
viii
Interview Statement ………………………………………………. 129
Consent to Search ………………………………………………… 130
Example 1: Affidavit for Search Warrant ………………………… 131
Example 1: Order for Search Warrant …………………………… 132
Example 1: Search Warrant ………………………………………. 133
Example 2: Affidavit for Search Warrant ………………………… 134
Example 2: Search Warrant ………………………………………. 135
Affidavit for Search Warrant …………………………………….. 136
Order for Search Warrant ………………………………………… 137
Search Warrant …………………………………………………… 138
Field Interview Card ……………………………………………… 139
Police Department – Intelligence Report ………………………… 140
Suspect Report …………………………………………………….. 141
Case Report Checklist Attachments ………………………………. 143
Investigative Checklist ……………………………………………. 144
Lead Sheet ……………………………………………………….. 145
Case Report (criminal)………………………….………………… 146
Supplemental Case Report ………………………………………. 148
Final Disposition of Case ………………………………………… 149
Affidavit for Probable Cause (General) …………………………. 150
Information for Violation of Law ………………………………… 152
Application for Criminal Arrest Warrant ………………………… 154
Arrest Warrant …………………………………………………… 155
Arrest Warrant Service Report …………………………………... 158
Example of MUG Sheet …………………………………………. 159
Consular Notification ……………………………………………. 160
Jail Intake Form ………………………………………………….. 162
Custody Order/Custody Hold…………………………………….. 163
Temporary Hold Form – Detention Division …………………… 164
Fingerprint Card Information …………………………………… 165
Example – Latent Print Card …………………………………….. 166
ix
Latent Print Card ………………………………………………… 167
Probable Cause Declaration – Bail Setting Information ………… 168
Narcotics or Intoxication Report ………………………………… 169
Correctional Medical Survey …………………………………… 170
Crime Scene Entry Log …………………………………………. 171
Photography Log Sheet …………………………………………. 172
Evidence Bag Example …………………………………………. 173
Police Property Record & Receipt Form – Chain of Custody …… 174
Request for Police Laboratory Examination …………………….. 176
Certificate of Proof of Chain of Physical Custody ……………… 178
Tape Review Request …………………………………………… 179
Subpoena ………………………………………………………… 180
In Field Show-Up Report ……………………………………….. 181
Photographic Lineup Procedures ……………………………….. 182
Photographic Line-Up ……………………………………………. 183
Citizen’s Arrest ………………………………………………….. 184
Use of Force Report ……………………………………………… 185
Use of Firearms Diagram Information…………………………… 186
Firearms Report ………………………………………………….. 187
Vehicle Pursuit Critique Form …………………………………… 189
Injury Report – Corrections Employee ………………………….. 191
Inmate Violation Report …………………………………………. 192
Custody Request – Detention Division ………………………….. 193
Application for Emergency Protective Order …………………… 194
Emergency Protective Order ……………………………………. 195
Domestic Violence Supplement ………………………………… 196
Trespass Warning ………………………………………………. 198
Suspected Child Abuse Report ………………………………… 199
Police Department – Victim’s Notification and Waiver ………… 200
Wanted/Missing Person Report ………………………………….. 202
Missing Child Report ……………………..……………………… 203
x
Crime Scene Checklist ………………………………………….. 204
Stolen Items Notification ……………………………………….. 207
Juvenile Information ……………………………………………. 208
Juvenile Notice of Violation ……………………………………. 209
Release to Custody ……………………………………………… 210
Juvenile Fingerprint Card – Final Disposition ………………….. 211
xi
CHAPTER 1. COMMUNICATION THEORY
Although the U.S. has less than 5% of the world’s population, it has nearly 25% of
the world’s total prison population (Liptak, 2008). Having such a large incarceration rate is
due, in part, to get tough policies and longer prison sentences (Kelley, Mueller, & Hemmens,
2004). Indeed, at the end of 2007 in the U.S., there were about 2.3 million people
incarcerated, 4.2 million people on probation, and 800,000 people on parole (Fears, 2008;
McCarthy, 2009). Hence, there is a need for police reports.
Since September 2001, federal resources, which were previously used to fund local law
enforcement, have been redirected toward homeland security (Kingsbury, 2006). With a
45% cut in funds, many local law enforcement agencies have reduced their manpower.
Some midsize cities have reduced their manpower by about 25%. In addition, according to
Kingsbury, U.S. prisons are releasing about 630,000 inmates each year and the recidivism
rate from state prisons is about 67%. Thus, with fewer police officers on the streets and
more criminals on the streets, there is a public safety concern.
From 2011 to 2012, the FBI has indicated that there was an increase in the number of
violent crimes in the U.S. (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2013). In 2012, the FBI has
indicated that there were more than 1.2 million violent crimes, such as murder, robberies, and
aggravated assaults. As the number of crimes increase, more arrests will be made.
Therefore, police officers can expect to find themselves in the courtroom more often.
Indeed, the public’s safety depends upon prosecutors and police officers performing
effectively within the courtroom.
To effectively serve the public, a police officer must be a credible witness in the
courtroom during a trial. Part of the job of a police officer is to arrest criminals, to complete
the proper paperwork, and then to testify in the courtroom. Poor paperwork may indicate in
court that the officer is lazy or incompetent. Officers who fail to write effectively have failed
1
to do their jobs and have failed to adequately protect the public. In short, police officers
must learn how to properly testify in court and to effectively persuade jurors.
For example, if a defense attorney discovers mistakes in a police report, the defense
attorney may ask the officer if the officer has performed the work to the best of his or her
ability. At this point, the officer is in trouble because the officer must admit that he or she is
incompetent or deceitful (if best effort was put forward) or that he or she is lazy and sloppy
(if best effort was not put forward).
In 1776, the American Revolution took place. During this era, the U.S. Constitution
was written, which affords each person charged with a crime the right to a trial by jury. Like
Great Britain, trials are based on an adversarial model, where debate is expected (Resnick &
Knoll, 2007). Thus, the founding fathers have promoted communication theory and
persuasive arguments within the courtroom; it has always been a part of U.S. history.
2
In modern times, there have been several landmark theories involving communication
theory and interpersonal persuasion (Reardon, 1981). These landmark theories include: 1)
the Balance Theory; 2) the Attribution Theory; 3) Congruity Principle Theory; 4) the
Cognitive Dissonance Theory; 5) the Learning Theory; 6) the Functional Theory; 7) the
Inoculation Theory; and 8) the CounterAttitudinal Advocacy Theory. Indeed,
communication theory is a very broad field of study (Stremler, 1982).
During the 1950s, Fritz Heider developed the Balance Theory (Crandall, Silvia,
N’Gbala, Tsang, & Dawson, 2007; Reardon, 1981). This theory states that people like
consistency and they resist change. Because people like to remain static, successful
persuasion must create a degree of imbalance from the status quo. In addition, Heider also
developed the Attribution Theory, which states that people seek reasons to justify someone
else’s behavior. This is the reason to seek a motive when a person commits a crime.
Also during the 1950s, Osgood and Tannenbaum developed the Congruity Principle
Theory (Reardon, 1981). This states that when a person is confronted with two or more
incompatible concepts, the person will change his or her attitude so that the two concepts are
congruent. For example, if John supports the death penalty and his friend Lisa does not, then
every time John thinks of Lisa he will have negative feelings toward her due to her stance on
the death penalty.
3
During the 1960s, Staats developed the Learning Theory, which describes how
people are conditioned to respond in particular ways (Reardon, 1981). People can be trained
to provide certain responses based on certain information provided to them. A classic
example of conditioning would be the experiment when Pavlov conditioned a dog to saliva at
the sound of a bell. Also during the 1960s, Katz developed the Functional Theory.
According to the Functional Theory, people tend to behave and perform only those actions
that they find favorable, they refuse to humble themselves and admit their faults, they act in
ways to foster preferred impressions, and they tend to act in ways that provide certainty.
Continuing with the 1960s, according to Reardon, McGuire developed the Inoculation
Theory. This theory states that the best persuasion is one that supports one side of an
argument and, at the same time, refutes the other side of the argument. By explaining both
the benefits for doing something and costs for doing something else, this will be more
persuasive; it is like being pushed and pulled in the same direction. Furthermore, by
reinforcing the message with multiple sources, this will improve credibility and, thus, be
more persuasive (Tucker, Donovan, & Marlatt, 1999).
During the 1970s, Miller and Burgoon developed the CounterAttitudinal Advocacy
Theory (Reardon, 1981). This theory states that people will best construe their own beliefs
and behaviors when rewards are not associated with their activities. This theory is the
opposite of the theory based on incentives, which states that people will perform those acts
that are rewarded.
Communication Theory
U.S. democratic principles rely upon truth being discovered through open debates
within the courtroom (Bank, 2001). Therefore, communication theory is critical in law
enforcement, especially within the courtroom. Indeed, the way police officers communicate
within the courtroom will influence the jurors’ decisions. The basic assumptions of
communication theory indicate that jurors perceive information that impacts their attitudes,
resulting in decisions that could be significant (Tucker et al., 1999). For example, based on
the information that they receive and perceive, the jurors may set a killer loose, or, on the
4
other hand, they may convict an innocent person. Thus, prosecutors and police officers, who
are the message sources, use persuasion to affect the attitudes and opinions of the jurors in
order to arrive at an appropriate verdict (Tucker et al.). Although most police officers
receive very little training in courtroom testimony, the jurors believe otherwise and have high
expectations for them (Smith & Hilderbrand, n.d.). Thus, the jurors already have a
misconception about how well the police officers should testify. Consequently, police
officers must learn how to effectively communicate in the courtroom so that their testimonies
are credible. In short, persuasion is directly related to credibility.
Verbal Persuasion
A police officer’s verbal communication in the courtroom impacts the police officer’s
credibility as a witness. Verbal communication can be either written or spoken. If it is
written, then it takes the form of police reports, which may include arrest reports. If it is
vocal, then it takes the form of oral testimony. Indeed, both types of verbal communication
impact the office’s credibility as a witness. In all cases, any communication that is less than
truthful is illegal and unacceptable. This being said, it is assumed that the police officers
have made justifiable arrests in which they are testifying.
5
instead of passive statements. This can be achieved by focusing on what witnesses saw,
rather than by focusing on what witnesses did not see. For instance, the statements, “I did
not see the driver look back before he backed his car,” is not equivalent to, “I saw the driver
not look back before he backed his car.” The former statement is problematic because it
may indicate that the witness saw nothing, but the latter statement is valuable and describes
what the witness actually saw. Third, in order to keep the jury’s attention, the report must be
organized and structured. It is just like watching television; in order to keep the jurors
interested and to help them understand the flow of events, the report must not keep changing
channels/directions (Boccaccini, 2002). The report should flow smoothly, and this requires
proper grammar. If there are grammar mistakes within the report, the jurors will perceive the
officer as either lazy and uncaring or incompetent. If the officer is perceived as
unprofessional, uncaring, or incompetent, then the jurors may transfer that negative
perception to the validity of the report. In the jurors’ minds, if they believe that the officer is
a fool, then they will consider themselves bigger fools if they agree. Finally, because
defense attorneys are experts at finding weaknesses in police officers’ reports, police officers
must put the necessary time and effort into writing good reports. Indeed, their credibility
will be determined by the evidence presented in the courtroom, which is their written
documentations (Lewis, 2001).
When police officers are testifying in court, they should never start a sentence with,
“To be honest” or “To tell the truth,” because this will give the impression to the jurors
6
that the rest of the testimony is less than truthful (Being, 2001). In addition, if the truth is to
be discovered, the officers must persuade the jurors using plain language (Lewis, 2001;
Navarro, 2004; Stewart, 2007). If a police officer uses slang or police jargon, then the jurors
may either become confused, not understanding what is being said, or they may perceive that
the officer is insulting them, by trying to make them feel dumb and inferior. Both cases will
impede persuasion. For example, suppose an officer said, “District 11, 11-43, 10-23, 7
south, signal 6.” Although this meaning may be quite clear to a police officer in District 11,
this is meaningless to the average civilian or juror. As indicated, the officer must present the
information in a normal conversational manner.
Testifying in the courtroom is an art and the police officer is a performer (Navarro,
2004). A good way to think about this is to consider the courtroom as an amusement park
and the jurors as customers who love thrills. If the police officer rehearses and memorizes
the testimony, the jurors will perceive the testimony as a boring and lame merry-go-round
(Boccaccini, 2002). Also, if an officer continually pauses during the testimony, jurors will
perceive this as a frustrating Ferris wheel, which keeps stopping every few seconds
(Navarro). However, by speaking moderately fast with variations in pitch and volume, the
jurors will perceive this as a roller coaster, something interesting and exciting. Moreover,
the officers must project their voices with confidence, like a big screen television. This will
eliminate any perception of doubt in their voices (Defoe, 2007). In short, just as in written
communications, weaknesses in a police officer’s oral testimony will be exposed. Thus,
police officers must practice on being perceived as credible witnesses.
Nonverbal Persuasion
In addition to communicating verbally, police officers also communicate in many
nonverbal, non-symbolic manners (Carter, 2002). Indeed, similar to verbal communication,
nonverbal communication in the courtroom also impacts the police officer’s credibility as a
witness. First of all, a police officer’s appearance sets the stage for the perception of his or
her credibility as a witness. Because jurors make judgments on the outward appearances of
police officers, the officers must dress appropriately and professionally (Navarro, 2004;
Stewart, 2007). The jurors may make the analogy that a dirty yard equals a dirty house. In
7
other words, if the officers do not even care enough to take care of themselves, then they
probably also do not care about their work. Second, a police officer’s conduct impacts the
police officer’s credibility as a witness. Indeed, police officers must have postures that show
interest (Boccaccini, 2002; Lambert, 2008; Navarro). For instance, if a boy is interested in a
girl and is about to kiss her, he learns forward toward her and he focuses his eyes upon her.
This is an example of a person showing interest, and it is obvious when it is observed. On
the other hand, negative body language, such as fidgeting, crossing the arms, looking at one’s
watch, and looking at the ceiling, gives the impression that the officer has more important
things to do than to be in court (Navarro; Tower, 2011). Thus, if the officers are perceived as
being disinterested, the jurors will perceive the officers as less than sincere.
The Attribution Theory states that people seek reasons to justify someone else’s
behavior; they try to find a motive when a person commits a crime (Reardon, 1981).
8
Suppose a person commits a benevolent act but it is perceived by someone else to be a
criminal act, then the motive may be the determining factor for whether a crime has been
committed. Because the jurors do not want to convict an innocent person of a crime, and
because they do not want themselves to be wrongly convicted of a crime, they desire to find
reasons for the actions. Thus, with no motive for committing a crime, the jurors will be less
likely to convict a person. As part of the criminal investigation, it is the police officer’s job
to determine a motive. Once the motive is determined, it is included as part of the written
case report. It is then up to the police officer to explain the motive, in simple language, to
the jurors so that they will understand it.
The Congruity Principle Theory states that jurors will try to align two or more
incompatible concepts (Reardon, 1981). The prosecutor and police officer can take
advantage of this by aligning the criminal activity to a negative concept held by the jurors.
For example, if the local county is dry and the jurors disapprove of alcoholic beverages, then
a person who is being tried for possession of marijuana can be associated with being an
alcoholic. In this case, the prosecutor can say that marijuana causes intoxication and leads to
car crashes, killing innocent people. Furthermore, marijuana is an addictive habit, just like
alcohol.
The Cognitive Dissonance Theory states that people behave in ways that reduce
dissonance between two cognitive elements (Reardon, 1981). In this case, the prosecutor can
associate the idea that if the defendant is set free, then one of the jurors may be the
defendant’s next victim. This stressful perception will persuade the jurors to convict the
accused; they will associate the defendant’s freedom to negative feelings. Furthermore, by
persuading the jurors that justice and democracy demand fair payment for the defendant’s
actions, and that jail is the perfect place for the accused, the jurors will appropriately match
the two cognitive elements.
The Learning Theory describes how people are conditioned to respond in particular
ways (Reardon, 1981). The county prosecutor is an elected official and knows the local
community issues. By associating the particular crime to something that the jurors, who are
9
local community members, find upsetting, the prosecutor can direct their anger toward the
accused. For example, if the jurors are upset about paying higher taxes, the prosecutor can
illustrate how the accused could not care less about their money problems, as is evidenced by
the commission of the criminal act, and that the accused is now mocking them by using their
tax paying dollars to get away with it.
According to the Functional Theory, people refuse to humble themselves and tend
to perform only those actions that they find favorable (Reardon, 1981). In this case, the
prosecutor can use the jurors’ pride against them by linking the conviction of the accused to
the jurors’ intelligence. This can be achieved by indicating to the jurors that they are too
smart to be fooled by a common criminal (who was not too smart to get caught). By stating
that the jurors are community pillars whom the local residents are relying upon to protect
them, the jurors may find it beneficial to convict the accused.
The Inoculation Theory states that the best persuasion is one that supports one side
of an argument and, at the same time, refutes the other side of the argument (Reardon, 1981).
In this case, the prosecutor can argue that in order to reduce crime, the accused needs to be
locked up. On the other hand, if the jurors fail to convict, their safety is at risk. Thus, the
jurors can reduce crime and promote safety at the same time. In order to reinforce this
argument and to make it as persuasive as possible, all submitted evidence related to the crime
should be emphasized, including victim statements, witness statements, photographs, and
laboratory reports (Tucker et al., 1999).
Finally, the CounterAttitudinal Advocacy Theory states that people will best
construe their own beliefs and behaviors when rewards are not associated with their activities
(Reardon, 1981). In this case, the prosecutor can remind the jurors that by serving on the
jury, they are serving their community. Convicting the perpetrator is not for personal gain,
but it is their patriotic duty as U.S. citizens. Democracy and freedom depend upon law and
order. For without law and order, there can be no democracy.
10
Conclusion
As mentioned earlier, democracy and truth rely upon open debate within the
courtroom (Bank, 2001). However, jurors select their own truths based on their perceptions
of the credibility of the information that they receive (Peterson, 1954). One way that this
credibility is determined is through the jurors’ assessment of the way police officers
communicate, both verbally and nonverbally. Thus, police officers must communicate well,
be credible, and learn to effectively persuade. A second way that credibility is determined is
by the way a prosecutor presents information in the courtroom. By using multiple
communication theories, and simultaneously employing as many of them as possible,
prosecutors can align information in ways that will be well received by the jurors. Being
well received, the information will be more credible. Being more credible, the information
will be more persuasive. In short, persuasion through communication is the basic concept of
courtroom testimony for both police officers and prosecutors.
11
CHAPTER 2. TRUTH
12
Null hypotheses are based on educated guesses and are used to assess research
questions. However, because human knowledge is limited (i.e., there is an unknown number
of extraneous variables), hypotheses cannot actually be proved true. Thus, researchers
attempt to prove them false (Field, 2005; Shields, 2007). In other words, it can be shown
that two variables are not related. However, if the two variables appear to be related, the
relationship could be due to some other factors. In the courtroom, the jury can never be
100% sure that a person is guilty. Therefore, when the jury makes a guilty verdict, the jurors
are saying that they have a certain confidence level that the defendant is not innocent.
Being not false is not the same thing as being true. In order words, if something is
not negative, this does not mean that it is positive (i.e., it could be neutral). For example, if a
sport team has played 10 games and is undefeated, what is the team’s record? It is unknown
because the team may have tied any number of the 10 games. If by some chance the team
had tied all 10 games, a defense attorney may claim that the team has never lost, while the
prosecutor may claim that the team has never won. Both statements are true, yet they seem
contradictory. Indeed, the statements do not necessarily conflict with one another. This is
how statistics can be misleading. Should consumers buy the same shoes used by the team?
Either decision may be argued and supported with statistical data.
Results are not negative or positive if they are zero (neutral). Police officers need to
detect diversionary flares (i.e., deception) that are intended to lead the officer off track. The
way to do this is to get the sought-after answers. Questions and answers need to be presented
in the active voice (American Psychological Association, 2010). For example, if an
individual answers questions through double negatives or through misplaced modifiers, this
may change the meaning of the statement. Notice in Table 1 that “I have won” ≠ “I have not
lost.”
13
Table 1. Interpretation of Sport Statement.
Interpretation of Results
Suspect statement
I have not lost x x
I have not won x x
I have won x
I have lost x
Suppose I stated that the sky was not cloudy all day. All day means 100% of the
time. Therefore, I am stating that it was not cloudy 100% of the time. It could have been
cloudy 0% of the time up to 99% of the time. In other words, it could have been sunny 1%
of the time up to 100% of the time. If you were investigating a case and it was important for
the sky to be sunny, stating that the sky was not cloudy all day may be detrimental to your
case. See Table 2 for an interpretation of the statement.
Interpretation of Statement
Sunny all Cloudy up to 99% of
Cloudy all day
day time
Suspect statement
Not cloudy all day x x
Not cloudy any part of day x
Now suppose that a police officer arrives at a crash scene. A car that was parked near
a curb pulled out into traffic and was struck by another car headed in the same direction.
Suppose the police officer asks a witness what she saw and she states, “I did not see the
driver in the parked car look before he pulled out into traffic.” The officer must evaluate the
value of the statement. See Table 3 for an interpretation of the statement.
14
Table 3: Interpretation of Witness Statement.
Interpretation of Statement
I was not I was looking at driver
looking and I saw driver not look
Suspect statement
I did not see the driver look x x
I saw the driver not look x
Thus, the witness statement provided has little value. Notice the first four words: “I did not
see.” This is problematic because the police officer wants to know what the witness did see.
Indeed, the witness statement never claimed that the driver of the parked car did not look
before he pulled out into traffic. The witness statement would be true even if the witness was
not looking in the right direction at the time of the crash. It would be wrong to assume that
the witness was looking in the right direction. To argue in court that the witness saw the
driver of the parked car not look would be changing the truth value of the witness statement.
In short, a police officer needs to be careful about relying on assumptions. Hence, police
officers need to get responses that provide direct and positive information.
Verbs
In police report writing, officers should use the active voice rather than the passive
voice. This demonstrates clear and decisive actions taken by the police and may be
perceived as confidence by jurors. A confident officer is perceived as a credible officer.
15
up to Tim and James, he struck him with his fist, and afterwards he cursed. It would seem
that Jon struck either Tim or James, but the sentence does not make it clear. Furthermore,
Jon, Tim, or James could have cursed. Thus, the information can be made much clearer if
the individuals are identified by names. A better report would state that Jon ran up to Tim
and James. With his fist, Jon then struck Tim. Afterwards, Tim cursed.
Sound Natural
Remember, the goal of a police report is to accurately document and communicate to
the jurors the events that actually happened. This requires that police officers clearly
communicate with the jurors. In addition, police officers must understand that jurors have
emotions and these emotions may come into play in the courtroom. Therefore, a police
officer must not alienate the jurors by writing in terms that are unclear or that create a
gradient between the jurors and the officer. In short, jurors may not be familiar with law
enforcement jargon and jurors may be negatively impacted by artificial or unnatural
language. This may also apply to writing the police report in third person, which may appear
to be unnatural. Although some police departments require reports to be written in third
person for objectivity, other departments require reports to be written in first person, which
may be more personal to the jurors. A police report written in third person is written for the
police department while a police report written in first person is written for the jury. A report
written in first person allows an officer to take ownership of the report.
Unnatural: This unit was notified by dispatch that there was a 10-50 on US 20.
Natural: When I arrived at the scene, I parked my police car on the shoulder of the road.
Unnatural: When this unit went 10-23, this unit parked his commission on the berm.
Unnatural: This unit engaged in visual surveillance of the residence for one hour.
16
Also, police officers must not assume that all individuals define words in the same way. For
example, consider the following statements.
The latter sentence is problematic because dinner is not time dependent. Although supper is
the last meal of the day, dinner is the largest meal of the day. Thus, for some people, dinner
may not be the same as supper. In other words, if an officer asks a suspect several questions
about his alibi during dinner time, the officer may be thinking about 5:00 pm and the suspect
may be speaking about noon. Therefore, the police officer needs to make sure that the
suspect correctly understands the questions that are being asked.
Because misplaced modifiers incorrectly modify the wrong words, and dangling
modifiers have no referent in a sentence, misplaced and dangling modifiers may alter the
meaning of a sentence (American Psychological Association, 2010). Thus, adjectives and
adverbs should be placed as closely as possible to the words that they are supposed to modify
and the active voice should be employed. This may help eliminate any unintended meanings.
17
Intended meaning: While at the school, I told my wife that I love her.
Perceived meaning: I told my wife that I love her being at the school.
The latter statement does not indicate that I love my wife but it does indicate that I love my
wife’s presence at school. This would be appropriate, for example, if my wife worked at a
school and I did not want her to quit her job and to leave the school.
Correct statement: I walked to the gas station because my car ran out of gas.
The latter sentence indicates that I ran out of gas (not my car). This may imply that I was
jogging, I became tired, and I started to walk.
18
Conditional statement: If he is allowed to pass, then he has the document.
Converse statement: If he has the document, then he is allowed to pass.
Conditional statement: If you are the police, then you can arrest.
Converse statement: If you can arrest, then you are the police.
Suppose I stated to my child that if she behaves then I will give her candy. Then
suppose she misbehaves. Can I give her candy and still be truthful? Yes, I can give her
candy and still be truthful. The only guarantee that I provided was that I will act in a certain
way if she behaved. However, I never addressed what I will do if she misbehaved. Thus, if
she misbehaves, my actions will be truthful whether or not I give her candy. I will only be
untruthful if she did behave and I did not give her candy. This analogy becomes very
important involving the passport law.
19
Table 4. Interpretation of Law: A nonimmigrant cannot enter the U.S. without a passport.
Interpretation of Law
If have, then will be If do not have, then will be denied
allowed entry entry
Documents
Foreign
Not Addressed x
Passport
Quantifiers
An existential quantifier is not the same as a universal quantifier (Smith et al., 2006).
It is important for police officers not to change the meaning of a statement by changing an
existential quantifier statement into a universal quantifier statement. For an open sentence
that uses an existential quantifier, the sentence is true if the truth set is nonempty, which
means that the statement is true if the statement is true at least one time. However, for an
open sentence that uses a universal quantifier, the sentence is true only if the truth set is the
entire universe, which means that the statement is true only if the statement is true all of the
time. For example, if a suspect stated that he likes beer, this statement is true if the suspect
likes at least one type of beer. Thus, for the suspect to be lying, an officer will have to prove
that the suspect dislikes all types of beer. However, if the suspect stated that he likes all
beer, then the officer only needs to show that the suspect dislikes one type of beer for the
suspect to be considered untruthful.
Assumptions
All decisions depend on assumptions, and we will never know if the assumptions are
100% accurate. Although we may be confident about information, we cannot know with
absolute certainty that the information is correct and complete. However, understanding the
assumptions that were relied upon in making a decision is important because the assumptions
may change, which may impact an objective decision. In law enforcement, if the
assumptions change, then the police officers should be willing to modify their position.
20
Correlation does not mean causation (Leedy & Ormrod, 2005). Just because two
events are highly correlated does not mean that one event causes the other. For example, it
does not get dark at night because the sun is on the other side of the earth (Verma, 2005).
The sun is an additional light source, but it is not the only light source in the sky. Thus, in
this case, a wrong assumption may lead one to believe that the lack of sunlight causes it to
get dark at night. Likewise, the amount of ice cream sold is positively related to the murder
rate (Kentner, 2012). However, spending all of the department’s resources to eliminate ice
cream sales may not be very effective in addressing the murder rate.
Error by design
Because human knowledge is limited, hypotheses cannot be proved true with 100%
certainty (Field, 2005; Shields, 2007). However, given available information, statements can
be proved false. If the hypotheses are not proved false, then they may be true (but we will
never know with 100% certainty). In other words, if hypotheses are not proved false, then
they are accepted as true at a certain confidence level.
Likewise, in court, we will never know with 100% certainty that a defendant is guilty
of a crime (we will never know all of the variables that are involved). Indeed, evidence can
be presented to show that the defendant is innocent (e.g., the defendant was already in prison
at the time of the crime). However, if evidence is not presented to show that the defendant is
innocent, and once a certain confidence level is reached that the defendant committed the
crime (i.e., beyond a reasonable doubt), then the defendant may be convicted. This implies
that there is an acceptable level of being wrong. Thus, innocent people will sometimes be
wrongly convicted.
For a trial verdict, there are two possible ways to make a mistake. One way is to
convict an innocent person. The other way is to set a guilty person free. A juror can only
ensure that one type of error is never made, but this will require either a) always setting
defendants free or b) always convicting defendants. For either case, there is no need for a
trial. On the one hand, if one juror wants to ensure that he never makes a mistake by letting a
guilty person go free, then that juror must always vote guilty. His reasoning may be that the
21
police do not arrest innocent people. With this reasoning, there is no need for a trial because
every person arrested will be convicted by this type of juror. On the other hand, if another
juror wants to ensure that she never makes a mistake by sending an innocent person to jail,
then that juror must always vote not guilty. With this reasoning, there is no need for a trial
because every person arrested will be set free by this type of juror. Thus, in both cases, there
is no need for a trial. However, there are trials in the U.S., which means that there is
compromise and the chance of making mistakes.
Negotiations are required during jury deliberations. If a mistake is made, then the
question is whether U.S. jurors want to error on the side of convicting innocent individuals or
to error on the side of letting guilty individuals go free. By design, the U.S. legal system is
set up to error on the side of letting guilty persons go free. A conviction is based on guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt; an acquittal is not based on innocence beyond a reasonable
doubt. As indicated in Figure 1, because decisions are based on confidence levels and
negotiations, innocent individuals will sometimes be convicted. This is an inherent part of
the U.S. legal system. Notice that this argument is not influenced by the penalty of the
conviction, such as the death penalty. In other words, it is expected that innocent persons
will sometimes be convicted and sentenced to death.
Levels of Proof
____________________________
↑
Arrest
↑==========↑
conviction Acceptable truly guilty
chance of wrongful
convictions
22
CHAPTER 3. REPORT WRITING
The purpose of this book is to expose students to different types of police reports and
forms. Instructors will need to help students work through the process of writing the
narratives of various reports. The goal is for students to learn the process of report writing,
which can be adapted to a particular department’s needs. Also, by understanding what type
of paperwork is required, students should anticipate the paperwork that will be required
during various details. For example, students should expect to complete a property record
and receipt form whenever evidence or property is collected.
Police report writing is not creative writing in the sense that all police reports have a
consistent format. This format needs to be followed. Do not use creative writing to deviate
from the standard format. Prosecutors collect reports from many different police
departments, such as city police, county police, state police, conservation officers, and excise
police. Thus, prosecutors need to be able to quickly and easily evaluate reports. In other
words, information needs to be straightforward and presented in a consistent manner. Many
different police forms within a department may contain the same information and
consistency from form to form is quite important.
The state law book is a very valuable tool when enforcing state laws. The state law
book provides the elements of a crime, which are needed when an officer completes
affidavits and charging forms. The narrative should describe the particular crime, which
must contain all of the required elements for that specific crime. For example, the elements
of arson is not arson (never used a word to define itself). Likewise, arson is not setting fire
to a building. If this were the case, firemen should be arrested during their training exercises.
Therefore, the crime of arson must be looked up in the law book, which will provide the
correct elements of the crime.
Police officers must report information accurately. Police officers must not change
hearsay information into first-hand information. For example, if John told Mary that he was
late for work because his car broke down, and if Mary told the supervisor that John was late
23
because his car broke down, then Mary has changed the value of the information. Mary is
testifying that John’s car broke down. If John had lied to Mary and he was late because he
had overslept, it is irrelevant as far as Mary’s testimony is concerned. Mary should be held
accountable for her statement. Mary stated that John’s car broke down, which is a false
statement. Mary should have stated that John told her that his car broke down, which is a
true statement.
If a report writer follows this format, it will not matter if a driver’s statement does not match
the evidence. The officer can still complete the report.
24
Information on Crash Diagram
1) Location
2) North Always Faces Toward Top of Diagram (for consistency) N↑
3) Not to scale
4) Point of impact
5) Solid lines before initial impact, dashed lines after initial impact
6) Measurements from a fixed reference point
7) Label all items on diagram
25
The case report is a criminal report and is not available to the public. The case report
should mention that the suspect was double-locked handcuffed, the time the officer left the
scene and arrived at the jail, and what the officer did with the evidence that was collected.
This may reduce complaints against the officer and enhance the credibility of the report.
26
Intelligence Report (suspicious activity report)
1) Date and time notified, location of incident
2) Time arrived
3) What suspects stated
4) Associates of suspect
5) What officer observed
6) What evidence indicates
7) History of area (e.g., documented problem area)
The intelligence report is a suspicious activity report with reasonable suspicion that a crime
has occurred or is likely to occur. There is no probable cause to make an arrest. The
intelligence report is not available to the public. The purpose of the report is to gather and
record information that may be used by police officers to solve crimes.
For example, if an officer uses a plastic bag to seal a plastic bag containing what a field test
indicated was marijuana, then the officer will record the evidence as follows.
Item 1: One sealed plastic bag containing a plastic bag containing green plant
material.
Lab personnel will testify as to what the lab results indicate. Remember, the property record
and receipt is an official receipt of what the police officer has taken from the suspect. If the
police officer indicates that he or she took marijuana and the drug is actually Khat, the
suspect will show written proof in court that he never had Khat (the receipt indicates that it
27
was marijuana). Indeed, the official police department receipt will prove the defendant’s
case. Also, if the officer takes a gold-colored watch, it is important that the officer not claim
that the watch is gold just because it is gold in color.
Lab Request
1) Describe items exactly as they were described on the Property Record & Receipt
form
2) Tell the lab exactly what to do (use active language); do not make them guess
Item 1: One sealed plastic bag containing a plastic bag containing green plant
material.
The lab receives many different pieces of evidence from many different departments that
need to be tested. The police officer must not make the lab personnel guess about which
tests to perform. If the tests are not specifically listed, do not expect that the tests will be
performed. Every item to be tested should start in the same way: Test item # 1 for…
28
Firearms Diagram
1) Indicate location
2) North always faces toward top of diagram (for consistency)
3) Not to scale
4) Draw area; include position of vehicles, individuals, and animal
5) Measurements from a fixed reference point
6) Label all items on diagram
The elements of a crime, which are found in the state law book, must be described
completely and accurately on the probable cause affidavit and charging forms. If the
elements of the crime are not properly recorded on the probable cause affidavit and charging
form, then the officer has failed to indicate a proper arrest. A police officer who arrests a
person without properly charging the person may realize severe consequences.
29
In sum, police report writing is a process that can be adapted to any police
department. Because police officers have different experiences, educational levels, and
cultural experiences, probable cause may vary from officer to officer. Thus, officers must
articulate their positions based on the available information, which includes a totality of
circumstances. Police officers must engage in critical thinking, which is the open-minded,
dynamic, and reflective process of collecting, analyzing, evaluating, and applying
information in order to reach a reasonable decision. Critical thinking is used to establish
probable cause and to make best-practice decisions.
Plan of Action
Below is a plan of action for completing a DUI investigation that involves domestic violence. Of
course, every case is unique and the events at the scene will be handled according to their seriousness
and the chronological order in which they are presented. Police officers may divide and share the
work load.
At crash scene
1) Conduct DUI investigation (issue citation for DUI, if probable cause found)
At residence
6) Collect evidence (property record & receipt form; photographs of property damage)
7) Case report (title of case will be most serious charge; at a minimum, domestic violence)
30
At jail
11) Probable cause affidavit and charging form or 1) application for arrest warrant and 2) arrest
warrant
12) DataMaster DUI Test (some departments arrest after the DataMaster test, some arrest before
the test)
17) Prisoner transfer form (completed a little later, if want to interrogate suspect)
At court/post
18) Store evidence; complete lab request form (immediately after arrest)
19) Supplemental case report (completed a little later; updates; new information)
20) Final disposition form (reporting court decision; need court order to dispose of evidence)
FORMAT OF NARRATIVES
***The narrative of every report should start with date, time, and location.***
31
Narrative of Crash Report
On May 12, 2011 at about 2:00 am, I was notified by dispatch that there was a crash on I-20
MP 12 EB in Aiken County. I arrived at the scene at about 2:22 am and met with D1. D1
stated that on 5/12/2011 at about 1:50 am, he was eastbound on I-20 MP 12 when he came
upon a deer standing on the roadway. D1 stated that he swerved to miss the deer and, as a
result, he drove into the north ditch and hit the sign post. Also, D1 stated that he had a
friend’s $1,000 LuGusta vase in the vehicle that broke as a result of the crash.
Witness 1 stated that she was directly behind D1 at the time of the crash and that D1 was
weaving for several miles prior to the crash. W1 stated that it appeared that D1 fell asleep
because he gradually drove into the north ditch. W1 completed a written statement.
I observed the evidence at the scene and I noticed that the ruts in the sod along the highway
indicated that D1 gradually drove into the north ditch. For over 200 yards, the ruts in the sod
are only about 2 feet from the roadway’s berm. Thus, the evidence indicates that D1 fell
asleep and drove into the north ditch.
Involving the cargo, I observed that there was a red LuGusta vase in the vehicle that was
damaged. D1 stated that the vase was owned by Jane Doe (provide personal information).
Also, I observed that there was damage to 1) the state owned sod in the North Ditch at MP 12
and 2) the state owned sign post # 24 at MP 12 EB (name, address, and phone number of the
agency that owns the damaged property).
At 3:11 am, King Wench was called to remove the vehicle. King Wench arrived at 3:33 am
and removed the vehicle from the scene.
32
the police, and waited at the scene until the police arrived. There were no other individuals
in the vehicle.
On August 2, 2013 at about 1:11 am, I used radar and I clocked a blue Chevy Caprice on I-
20 MP 5 WB in Aiken County at 99 MPH in a 70 MPH zone. I initiated my police car’s
emergency lights and stopped the vehicle at MP 2 WB. I approached the driver of the
vehicle and I immediately noticed what appeared to be a bag of marijuana in front ash tray. I
asked the driver for his driver’s license and he handed me his MI driver’s license, which
identified the driver as John DOE (DOB = 1/5/1971). I asked DOE, and sole occupant of
the vehicle, what he had in the bag in the front ash tray. DOE stated that it was marijuana
and he handed me the bag. From my experience as a police officer, the green leafy substance
did look and smell like marijuana. I asked DOE to exit the vehicle, and he complied. I
double-locked handcuffed DOE and secured him in my police vehicle. I secured the evidence
as indicated on PRR # 11073. I left the scene at about 1:30 am and I transported DOE to the
Aiken County jail. I arrived at the jail at about 1:44 am.
At about 2:44 am, after the booking process, I immediately transported the evidence to the
Aiken City Police post, as indicated on property record and receipt # 11073. I returned to I-
20 MP 2 WB at about 3:00 am. Dispatch contacted King Wench, who removed the vehicle
from the scene at about 3:30 am, as indicated on impound form # 4838.
33
Narrative of Case Report: Example 2 – Possession of Marijuana with 2 Suspects
When checking the Aiken Café’s parking lot, you notice two suspects sitting in a
car in the parking lot smoking what appears to be marijuana. You arrest both
the suspects for possession of controlled substance.
On 7-11-2013 at about 11:01 am, I was patrolling the parking lot of Aiken café, which is
located at 122 Laurens Street in Aiken, SC. I came upon a black 2 door Ford Mustang that
was occupied by two females who appeared to be smoking marijuana. I exited my police car
and approached the occupants. When the driver rolled down her widow, I could immediately
smell the odor of burnt marijuana. I asked both occupants for their identifications and both
occupants provide me their SC driver’s licenses. The driver was identified as Jane DOE
(w/f/DOB = 3/3/1977; SC DL 47347) and the passenger was identified as Jonnie JONES
(h/f/DOB 4/4/1981; SC DL 58480). I asked DOE if she had any marijuana in the vehicle and
she stated that she did. DOE opened the center console and handed me a bag of green plant
material. From my training and experience as a law enforcer, the bag of green plant material
did look and smell like marijuana. I asked DOE if the bag of green plant material was hers,
and she stated that it was hers.
I then asked JONES, who was sitting in the front passenger seat, if she had any marijuana.
JONES stated that she did. JONES reached under the front passenger seat and then handed
me a bag of green plant material. From my training and experience as a law enforcer, the
bag of green plant material from JONES did look and smell like marijuana. At that time, I
double-locked handcuffed both occupants, and I secured them in the back of my police car. I
then performed a NIK Marijuana Field Test on each bag of green plant material, which
indicated positive for marijuana. At about 11:22 am, I arrested both occupants for possession
of controlled substance. I secured the evidence from DOE as indicated on PRR # 2192. I
secured the evidence from JONES as indicated on PRR # 362. At about 11:25 am, Trooper
34
Sheila Smith (434) arrived at the scene and she searched both suspects. After the search, at
about 11:31 am, I transported both suspects to the Aiken County jail. I arrived at the jail at
about 11:42 am.
At about 12:39 pm I arrived back at 122 Laurens Street in Aiken, SC and I called King
Wench to tow the suspect’s vehicle. King Wench arrived at the scene at about 1:11 pm and
removed the vehicle at about 1:28 pm. The address of King Wench is 132 Wrecker Lane
Aiken, SC 29801 (803-555-6753).
At about 1:30 pm, I transported the evidence to Aiken City Police Department. I secured the
evidence for PRR # 2192 in locker 1. I secured the evidence for PRR # 362 in locker 4.
Questions that a supervisor may ask the officer after reading the report:
1) Is the report written in chronological order? Start with date, time, and location.
2) How did you know it was contraband? Training, experience, and field test.
3) Where are the drugs? Did you secure them at the post or lab?
4) Where is the car? Was it towed or did you leave it for the driver to remove?
5) Did you double-lock handcuff the suspects? There is an injury complaint.
6) Did you search/frisk the suspects? If a suspect is touched, it should be documented.
7) Does department policy allow an officer to search the opposite sex? Call same sex
officer.
8) How long did it take for you to transport the suspects to jail? There is a sexual complaint.
35
CHAPTER 4. POLICE REPORTS
Layout of Reports
36
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
37
Police Department Assignment Card* (example)
February 14, 2014
Event Time
Assignment Card
Complete an assignment card for a crash at I-20 MP 11 in the south ditch. There were
injuries, an ambulance was called, the Fire Department was called, a HazMat scene was
declared, a state DNR representative was contacted, state DOT were contacted, a HazMat
cleanup crew was contacted, and a wrecker for the vehicle was contacted.
38
Police Daily Activity Report
Activity
Total Citations Crashes Investigated
Hours
Total Crash Criminal Incident
Case Report Court
Patrol Report Investigation Investigation
Hrs. Hrs.
Hrs. Hrs. Hrs. Hrs.
39
Police Employee Personal Illness or Injury
Officer’s Name (Last/First/MI) Badge # Rank County
Date of Illness/Injury Time of Illness/Injury Date Failed to Report Time of Day Failed to
to Work Report to Work
Total Number of Hours Failed Status (Check all that apply) Type of Report
to Report to Work
◊ Illness ◊ Injury ◊ Family ◊ Original
◊ Line-of-duty ◊ Non-line-of-duty ◊ Supplemental
Examined by Physician? Name of Physician Place of Confinement
(Home, Hospital Name,
◊ No etc.)
Location of Treatment
◊ Yes
40
Police Vehicle and Equipment Form
Date Time Beginning Mileage
Y N Y N
Comments
41
Affidavit of Citizen Complaint
____________________________Police Department
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
or
____ as informed by police and recorded on police telephone line (if check this box, read
information below over recorded telephone line)
state that this affidavit for complaint is true, and I request an investigation of the matters
contained within. I understand this affidavit is an official police report and may be subject to
public disclosure upon request. I am advised that if the allegations contained within are
proven to be untrue, and if this affidavit contains deliberate falsehoods or is made with
malicious intent, I may be subject to criminal charges and/or civil liability.
42
COMMENDATION/COMPLAINT FORM
__________________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
INCIDENT
LOCATION:_______________________________________________________________________________
INCIDENT DATE:_________________ INCIDENT TIME:____________________
CASE#___________________
OFFICERS INVOLVED
NAME BADGE # RANK
WITNESSES
NAME ADDRESS PHONE #
43
DESCRIPTION OF ALLEGED INCIDENT:_______________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
ATTACHMENTS:
____ NONE
____ STATEMENTS
____ EVIDENCE
____OTHER_____________________
44
SUPERVISOR INVESTIGATION REPORT
INSTRUCTIONS: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE SUPERVISOR INVESTIGATING AN ALLEGATION
OF RULES VIOLATIONS BY ONE OF HIS/HER EMPLOYEES.
______________________________________________________________________________
FINDINGS:______________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
45
RECOMMENDATION AS TO CONCLUSION OF FACT
ATTACHMENTS:
___ NONE
___ STATEMENTS
___ EVIDENCE
___ OTHER______________________
46
EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINARY REPORT
The following was issued today and it is to be made part of the official record. □Warning □Separation
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7.___ Violation of Safety Rules 8.___ Leaving Without Permission 9.___ Unbecoming of an officer
10.___ Insubordination 11.___ Failure to Obey Orders 12.___ Defective and Improper Work
13.___ Reporting Under the Influence of Alcohol 14.___ Other (Describe) _________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
47
FIELD TRAINING OFFICER (FTO) DAILY OBSERVATIONS
______________POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINEE EVALUATION
___________________________________ __________________________________
TRAINEE’S NAME BADGE # FTO’S NAME BADGE #
GENERAL
Rating ___ 1. GENERAL APPEARANCE
ATTITUDE
Rating ___ 2. ACCEPTANCE OF FEEDBACK FTO/FTO PROGRAM
Rating ___ 3. ATTITUDE TOWARD POLICE WORK
KNOWLEDGE
Rating ___ 4. KNOWLEDGE OF DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Rating ___ 5. KNOWLEDGE OF CRIMINAL STATUES
Rating ___ 6. KNOWLEDGE OF TRAFFIC CODES
Rating ___ 7. KNOWLEDGE OF CODES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PERFORMANCE
Rating ___ 8. DRIVING SKILLS: NORMAL CONDITIONS
Rating ___ 9. DRIVING SKILLS: MODERATE/HIGH STRESS
Rating ___ 10. RESPONSE TIME TO CALLS
Rating ___ 11. ROUTINE FORMS: ACCURACY / COMPLETENESS
Rating ___ 12. REPORT WRITING: ORGANIZATION / DETAILS
Rating ___ 13. REPORT WRITING: GRAMMAR / SPELLING/ NEATNESS
Rating ___ 14. REPORT WRITING: APPROPRIATE TIME USED
Rating ___ 15. FIELD PERFORMANCE: NON-STRESS CONDITIONS
Rating ___ 16. FIELD PERFORMANCE: STRESS CONDITIONS
Rating ___ 17. INTERVIEW SKILLS
Rating ___ 18. INTERVIEW/INTERROGATION SKILL
Rating ___ 19. SELF-INITIATED FIELD ACTIVITY
Rating ___ 20. OFFICER SAFETY: GENERAL
Rating ___ 21. OFFICER SAFETY: SUSPECTS/SUSPICIOUS PERSONS/PRISONERS
Rating ___ 22. CONTROL ON CONFLICT: VOICE COMMAND
Rating ___ 23. CONTROL ON CONFLICT: PHYSICAL SKILL
Rating ___ 24. PROBLEM SOLVING / DECISION MAKING
Rating ___ 25. RADIO: APPROPRIATE USE OF CODES / PROCEDURE
Rating ___ 26. RADIO: LISTENS AND COMPREHENDS
RELATIONSHIPS
Rating ___ 27. WITH CITIZENS IN GENERAL
Rating ___ 28. WITH ETHNIC/ CULTURAL / SOCIAL GROUPS
Rating ___ 29. WITH OTHER DEPARTMENT MEMBERS
FTO’S NOTES:
________________________________________ ________________________________________
TRAINEE’S SIGNATURE BADGE # FTO’S SIGNATURE BADGE #
48
PUBLIC SERVICE REPORTS
49
Public Speaker - Community Relations Form
Sponsoring Organization Date Time
Program Title
Activities
50
Police Service Report
_____________________________Police Department
Vehicle _____________________________________________
(Color) (Year) (Make)
Name ________________________________________________
Address ______________________________________________
Location ______________________________________________
(Highway) County
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
51
Police Courtesy Notification
The vehicle described below has been observed parked in the parking lot
in the following condition:
____ (other):____________________
Vehicle: ________________________________________________
Color Make Model Year
_______________________________________________________
License# State
52
ABANDONED VEHICLE NOTICE
DATE
TIME
OFFICER
DEPARTMENT ADDRESS#
DEPARTMENT PHONE#
IMPOUNDED.
53
BREAK-UP PERMIT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
_________________________________________________
COMPANY NAME
_________________________________________________________________________________________
ADDRESS
_________________________________________________________________________________________
CITY STATE
__________________________________________________________________________
______________
MOTORIZED UNIT LICENSE # # OF AXLES TRAILER LICENSE # # OF AXLES
________________________________________________________________________________________
DRIVER’S SIGNATURE
ROADWAY ________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
POLICE OFFICER SIGNATURE BADGE #
Exiting Turnpike
________________________________________________________________________________________
LANE NO. DATE TIME
________________________________________________________________________________________
ATTENDANT’S SIGNATURE BADGE #
54
TIME LIMIT SHALL NOT EXCEED 72 HOURS
55
POLICE OFFICER AFFIDAVIT for TITLE
The purpose of this form is to confirm information about the applicant and the vehicle or
watercraft so that a title for the vehicle or watercraft may be obtained. Used for vehicles or
watercraft with no title or lost titles. After the form is complete, the police officer will submit
it to the BMV/DMV/Secretary of State.
Address: _____________________________________________________________
Vehicle Information
Vehicle Check
□ VIN □ HIN Checked on Computer for Cleared Status ____ Yes ___ No
56
LAW ENFORCEMENT DEMAND FOR DRIVER RE-EXAMINATION
A Police Officer’s request for Re-Examination is allowed based on the officer’s observation
of a driver who may have a mental or physical problem that affects his/her driving ability.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
POLICE DEPT ADDRESS PHONE #
Driver ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Name Address
Based on my observation(s) of the above named driver I have concerns that the driver may have a mental
or physical problem that affects his/her ability to safely operate a motor vehicle.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Police Officer Signature Badge # Department
RESULT OF DEMAND: □ YES, DRIVER REQUIRED TO ATTEND □ NO, DRIVER NOT REQUIRED TO ATTEND
_____________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________
Name of Dept. of Motor Vehicle Supervisor Dept. of Motor Vehicle Supervisor Signature
_____________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________
Date Agency
57
Salvation Army Voucher
Travelers’ Assistance Program
Name & Location that Provided Service County where services were rendered
Maximum Amount Granted $ Services Provided and Amount for Each Service Provided
Address Phone
Merchant Name
58
Permit for Possession of Deer
________________________________Department
□Highway Kill
Sex of Deer □ Illegal Kill
□Male □Female □ Destroyed by Police
□Other ______________________
Recipient’s Signature
59
Courtesy Summons
_________________________ Police Department
Cause # ______________________
Address: ___________________________________________________________________
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to be and appear in your person before the
Honorable ____________________________, _________________ Court Judge, at
(address) __________________________________________ on the _______________ day
of ______, 20______ at _____________ o’clock A.M. in response to
____________________________ vs. ___________________________ involving the
offense(s) of (title of offense) _______________________________________________
being in violation of statute/code____________________________________________.
I understand that I am charged with a violation of a □ state law □ local ordinance □ both.
This summons is being issued as a courtesy. Failure to appear will be followed by an arrest warrant
being served.
__________________________ _____________________________________
Printed Name of Defendant Printed Name of Officer Badge #
________________________ _______________________________________
Signature of Defendant Signature of Officer
60
TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION REPORTS
61
POLICE COMPLAINT - INFORMATION SUMMONS
Court Cause # (to be issued by court)
Color Vehicle Year Make License expiration year License state License plate #
Description of Offense:
In Violation of Statute/Code:
62
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS – COURT NOTICE
________________________________ Court
Address ______________________________
Phone ________________________________
of issue.
5. Schedule of Costs
Speed
63
POLICE TRAFFIC WARNING
County of ___________________________ City of _______________________________
Equipment
Moving Violation Non-Moving Violation Violation
64
Crash Definitions/Rules for Reference
Crash number will be issued by the post or by the computer during electronic submission
Draw vehicles from top view (if can see the vehicle’s wheels, then the vehicle is not upright)
Make north point upward on the crash diagram. This will make all crash reports consistent
and easier for others to read.
Crash report required if total damage ≥ $1,000 or if someone requests it (damage required)
Trailer = being pulled (not using a motor at time of crash) + touching ground
Draw the vehicles before crash, at initial impact, and at final rest (if practical)
If vehicle left scene (e.g., car-deer crash), look for evidence (e.g., deer hair on car). Actual
location of crash may be unknown and may be impossible to find – only measurements
available may be roadway. Only need to draw vehicle and deer prior to crash and at initial
impact (based on driver’s statement). At a minimum, draw vehicle prior to POI and at POI;
it may not be necessary to draw a vehicle at final rest if vehicle did not stop and left scene
(e.g., car versus deer crash).
Measure all important distances, marks, debris, and other items at a crash scene from fixed
reference points (points that will not likely move). Do not use the vehicle as the reference
point (even if it is parked because it can easily be moved). At a minimum, there should be at
least 2 measurements on diagram (e.g., width of road and berms for car-deer crash when the
car has left the crash scene).
Draw a sketch of the scene and use straight lines at the scene to take the measurements as
easily and quickly as possible; the scene can be rotated on the final drawing to face north at a
later time.
65
Label all items/group of items on diagram (e.g., may label one parking line to represent
group). Be clear.
Initial Impact + Vehicle Damage boxes will be completed for each vehicle involved
Other participant = someone who influenced the crash but who was not part of the actual
crash. For example, ice comes off of a tractor-trailer and hits a car. The tractor-trailer did
not make contact with anything and is not directly involved with the crash. Information
about the tractor-trailer and its driver will be included in the report as other participant. This
scenario will be a one vehicle collision crash.
Record what drivers/witnesses say – do not change what they say to meet your agenda
Collision crash = vehicle impacted something that caused damage; Non-collision crash =
vehicle did not impact something that caused damage. Vehicle cannot collide with roadway
surface or ground surface (however, a vehicle can collide with an earth embankment, dirt
pile, etc.). Vehicle cannot collide with itself (e.g., jackknife).
No crash report for flat tires; however, crash report may be required for damaged rims
May write report in either 1st or 3rd person. First person is better for the jury (more
personalized); third person is better for the police department (seems more objective)
If the report writer follows this format, it will not matter if the driver’s statement does not
match the evidence. The officer can still complete the report.
66
Information on Crash Diagram
Location
North Always Faces Toward Top of Diagram (for consistency) N↑
Not to scale
Point of initial impact
Measurements from a fixed reference point (indicate a minimum of at least two
measurements)
Solid lines before initial impact, dashed lines after initial impact
Label all items on diagram
Not to Scale N ↑
LOCATION of CRASH
67
POLICE CRASH REPORT Page ____ of _____
Date of Crash Time of Crash Date & Time Crash Reported Crash #
State of ID ID # Type of ID
Vehicle Make & Model Vehicle Year License Plate # State of Plate Year expires
VIN
Trailer Make & Model Year License Plate # State of Plate VIN
68
POLICE CRASH REPORT Page ____ of _____
Crash #
69
Vehicle # __ Initial Impact Vehicle # __ Damage
Front Front
□ undercarriage □□□ □ undercarriage □□□
□ trailer □ trailer
□ none □□□ □ none □□□
□ unknown □□□ □ unknown □□□
Back Back
Back Back
70
Crash #
Type of Roadway
Road Surface
Attachments:
□ witness statements
□ other _____________________________
Crash #
71
Vehicle # _______ Type of vehicle
□ another motor vehicle □ deer □ animal other than deer □ pedestrian □bicycle
□ impact attenuator □ guardrail □ median barrier □ utility pole □ bridge
□ work zone equip. □ mail box □ embankment □ sign □ tree
□ railway vehicle □ curb □ fence/wall /post □ ditch □ other _____
If non-collision crash (fill in one)
Crash #
72
□ passenger car □ pickup truck □ motor cycle □ tractor/tractor trailer □ bus
□ another motor vehicle □ deer □ animal other than deer □ pedestrian □bicycle
□ impact attenuator □ guardrail □ median barrier □ utility pole □ bridge
□ work zone equip. □ mail box □ embankment □ sign □ tree
□ railway vehicle □ curb □ fence/wall /post □ ditch □ other _____
If non-collision crash (fill in one)
Crash #
73
(Complete only if there was an injury and EMS arrived at the Scene)
(Complete only if there was an injury and EMS arrived at the Scene)
74
POLICE CRASH REPORT Page ____ of _____
Crash #
Narrative: ___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
75
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Crash Diagram
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
76
Vehicle Crash Proof of Insurance Form
Crash ID # ______________________________ In order to avoid having your driver’s license suspended, return this completed form signed by your insurance agent within 30 days to _________________________________ Police Department Crash Records.
Month Day Year Day of Week Local Time # Vehicles Involved # Injured # Dead
Did crash occur inside city limits? Distance and direction from city limits __________
◊ yes ◊ no ◊ N ◊ NE ◊ NW ◊ S ◊ SE ◊ SW ◊ E ◊ W
Driver 1 Driver 2
Address Address
Date of Birth License State License Type Date of Birth License State License Type
Vehicle year Make Model Color Vehicle year Make Model Color
License Plate State Expiration date License Plate State Expiration date
77
Vehicle Crash Proof of Insurance Form
Crash ID # ______________________________ In order to avoid having your driver’s license suspended, return this completed form signed by your insurance agent within 30 days to _________________________________ Police Department Crash Records.
Month Day Year Day of Week Local Time # Vehicles Involved # Injured # Dead
Did crash occur inside city limits? Distance and direction from city limits __________
◊ yes ◊ no ◊ N ◊ NE ◊ NW ◊ S ◊ SE ◊ SW ◊ E ◊ W
Driver 1 Driver 2
Address Address
Date of Birth License State License Type Date of Birth License State License Type
Vehicle year Make Model Color Vehicle year Make Model Color
License Plate State Expiration date License Plate State Expiration date
78
Crash Information Exchange Form
This form may be used for crashes that total less than $1,000 worth of damage and
when no police report is requested or required. Instead of using this form, either party
may request a crash report to be completed by the police at the time of the crash. This
form may be used to facilitate your handling of the crash and to exchange driver and
vehicle information.
Your license plate registration: State ____ Number ____________ Expiration year _____
Description of your vehicle: Make ___________ Model _________ Year ____ Color _____
79
Vehicle Crash Summary Involving Serious Injury or Fatality
Crash ID #
Seatbelt/Helmet in
Use
◊ Belt ◊ Did ◊ Reduce ◊ Injuries
Person other than driver injured ◊ Yes ◊ No Admitted ◊ Yes ◊ No Hospital Taken To
80
POLICE VEHICLE CRASH FORM
Driver’s last name Driver’s first name Driver’s last name Driver’s first name
Lic. Plate # Issuing State Vehicle Color Lic. Plate # Issuing State Vehicle year Color
year
# of Occupants Vehicle Towed Direction Posted # of Occupants Vehicle Towed Direction of Posted
of Travel Speed Travel Speed
◊ Yes ◊ No ◊ Yes ◊ No
Injuries
81
Name Address Injury Age Sex Code
↑N
82
◊ Police Car Crash ◊ Equipment Damage ◊ In Line of Duty
Location of Crash/Loss
Garage # 1 Cost
Garage # 2 Cost
Garage # 3 Cost
Affidavit: I affirm that, to the best of my knowledge, the information on this form is true.
83
Page____of______ Type of Report ______________ Report #_____________
Interview Statement
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Witness____________________________ Signature____________________
Print name
Witness____________________________ Signature____________________
Print name
84
VOLUNTARY STATEMENT This is page ______ of ___.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Draw a diagonal line through all unused space. Have person place initials at end of statement.
85
POLICE DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY CHECKPOINT PLAN
APPOVED PLAN REQUIRED WHEN AGENCY PERSONNEL PLANS TO PARTICIPATE IN OR ASSISTS OTHER AGENCIES.
LOCATION:____________________________________________________________________________________________
SITE CONSIDERATIONS:
____THE LOCATION SELECTED FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY CHECKPOINT IS BASED ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A PUBLIC
SAFETY PROBLEM IN AN AREA. DESCRIBE REASON THE PROPOSED SITE WAS SELECTED FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY
CHECKPOINT.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____ THE CHECKPOINT LOCATION WILL BE VISIBLE BY APPROACHING MOTORISTS FROM A SAFE DISTANCE.
____THE CHECKPOINT WILL NOT BE SET UP IN A CURVE, OVER THE CREST OF A HILL OR OTHER DANGEROUS
LOCATION.
____THE TRAFFIC FLOW WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO BACK UP SO MUCH THAT IT BECOMES A HAZARD.
____IF ADDITIONAL OFFICERS AND PRECAUTIONS ARE REQUIRED WHEN SETTING UP THE CHECKPOINT ON A FOUR-
LANE
____THE SITE WILL INCLUDE ADEQUATE SPACE ON THE ROADSIDE TO MOVE VEHICLES THAT MAY BE CITED, AN
ARREST IS TO BE MADE, OR FURTHER INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED.
PURPOSE:
___APPREHENDING FLEEING FUGITIVES WHO ARE LIKELY TO FLEE BY WAY OF PARTICULAR ROUTE
86
MANPOWER
DETAIL MUST INCLUDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR OFFICERS, INCLUDING A FIELD SUPERVISOR AT THE CHECKPOINT
AT ALL TIMES.
SUPERVISOR ON SCENE:_______________________________________________________________________________
CHECKPOINT.
____TRAFFIC CONES OR BARRICADES WILL BE USED TO ENHANCE THE VISIBILITY OF THE CHECKPOINT.
____ALL UNIFORMED OFFICERS ASSIGNED TO THE OPERATION WILL WEAR UNIFORMS AND REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC
VESTS.
____PLAIN CLOTHES OFFICERS WILL DISPLAY POLICE IDs AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CHECKPOINT OPERATIONS.
____ALL VEHICLES USED FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL WILL BE MARKED PATROL VEHICLES.
CHECKPOINT OPERATIONS:
___ A SYSTEM WILL BE USED TO SELECT VEHICLES AT THE CHECKPOINT LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE,
ALL VEHICLES OR EVERY FIFTH VEHICLE WILL BE STOPPED. AT NO TIME WILL RANDOM STOPS BE
UTILIZED.
____ DURING OPERATIONS, OFFICERS WILL APPROACH EACH MOTORIST AND EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF
THE STOP.
87
NIGHTTIME REQUIREMENTS
___ALL “PUBLIC SAFETY CHECKPOINT AHEAD” SIGNS WILL BE ILLUMINATED FOR THE DURATION OF
THE CHECKPOINT.
___NIGHTTIME CHECKPOINT OFFICERS WILL WEAR UNIFORMS, REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC VESTS AND
UTILIZE FLASHLIGHTS WITH TRAFFIC WANDS.
___ PLAIN CLOTHES OFFICERS WILL DISPLAY POLICE IDs AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CHECKPOINT
OPERATIONS.
___THE PUBLIC SAFETY CHECKPOINT WILL BE ILLUMINATED IN A MANNER THAT WILL ENSURE THAT
ANY APPROACHING MOTORIST HAS ADEQUATE WARNING OF THE CHECKPOINT. (EMERGENCY
OVERHEAD LIGHTING ON POLICE VEHICLES SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON TO PROVIDE SUCH
ILLUMINATION.)
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL:
CHECKPOINT APPROVAL:_________________________________________________DATE:______________
88
Special Activity Report
Location ________________________________________________________
□ Self-Initiated
□ Assigned by Department
Type of Support (check all that apply)
Activity
Total Traffic Citations Total Traffic Warnings
Speeding Citations Speeding Warnings
Seatbelt Citations Seatbelt Warnings
Child Restraint Citations Child Restraint Warnings
Crash Related Citations Crashes Investigated
DUI Arrests Intelligence Reports
Minor Consuming Arrests Commercial Motor Vehicle Citations
Other Alcohol Arrests Commercial Motor Vehicle Warnings
Criminal Arrests Alco-sensor tests
Drug related Arrests DataMaster Tests
Work Zone Citations Police Services
Total # of Units _______ Total Man Hours _________ Total Mileage _________
89
DUI Investigative Notes
(Intended solely for practicing Field Sobriety Tests; there is no claim to the
significance or validity of the tests. However, there must be some reference
level to determine if a suspect has passed or failed each test.)
Walk-and-turn
Have the suspect place his left foot on the line and his right foot in front of his left (heel to
toe)
Have the suspect stand in this position, demonstrate and explain the test before he begins
Stay on line
During turn, swivel on left foot and take small steps with right foot to turn around
After the turn, take 9 steps and return to the starting point in the same fashion.
90
One-leg stand
Have the suspect stand with his heels together and his arms at his side
Have the suspect stand in this position, demonstrate and explain the test before he begins
Horizontal Nystagmus
Face toward me and do not turn your head; only move your eyes
[Move finger from side to side; move finger so that eyes can be assessed at 45 degrees and at
maximum deviation; record eye movements]
Finger Count
Count from 1 to 4, touching the tip of your thumb to the tip of your fingers
Count 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1
91
Backward Count
Example: Tell suspect to count backward from 33 to 14
Alphabet:
Ask suspect if he knows alphabet
Alco-sensor test
Place the breath tube on the instrument
Tell suspect you want a steady breath and for him to blow until you tell him to stop
Determine reading (a reading will automatically come up or can press read button)
Toggle set and read buttons and swing instrument to clear out current readings
92
Horizontal Nystagmus
Horizontal Nystagmus Test (check box only if characteristic observed) Left Right
◊ Onset of Nystagmus Prior to 45 degrees (includes while eyes at rest) ____ ____
Tests to detect head injuries (if check yes, then the test is suspect)
93
Walk-and-Turn
Walk-and-Turn Test Results ◊ Passed ◊ Failed
If suspect exhibited 2 or more clues, then it is a failed test.
8 clues of impairment
R9 L8 R7 L6 R5 L4 R3 L2 R1 ←
L R L1 R2 L3 R4 L5 R6 L7 R8 L9 →
Walk-and-Turn
INSTRUCTIONS STAGE
Other: ______________________________________________________________________
94
One Leg Stand
One Leg Stand Test Results ◊ Passed ◊ Failed
If suspect exhibited 2 or more clues, then it is a failed test.
4 clues of impairment
Puts foot down 3 times is a failed test. Foot stood on ___ L ___R
Hops
______________________________________________________________
Other _________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
95
Backward Count
◊ Hesitation
◊ Incomplete (Left out numbers) ___________________________________
◊ Continued past number and counted to____________________________
◊ Other ________________________________________________________
96
Alphabet A-Z
97
Finger Count
◊ Hesitation
◊ Misses tip of thumb to tip of finger
◊ Does not count 1-2-3-4-4-3-2-1
◊ Count not in alignment with appropriate finger
◊ Other ________________________________________________________
98
IMPLIED CONSENT WARNING
I have probable cause to believe that you have operated a vehicle while
intoxicated. I must now offer to you the opportunity to submit to a chemical
test, and inform you that your refusal to submit to a chemical test will result in
the suspension of your driving privileges for ___ months.
99
DataMaster Evidence Ticket
Below is information that is recorded on a DataMaster evidence ticket.
State of ___________
Instrument # ____________________
Date: __________________________
DOB ___________________
SSN ____________________
Department ____________________
Breath Analysis
100
Affidavit for Probable Cause: Driving While Intoxicated
State of _________________________
vs.
________________________________
________________________________
I, _____________________________, a law enforcer with the __________________ Department, swear that on the
________ day of ___________ 20__, at about ________ □am □ pm (Name) __________________, the accused, a
(race) ________ , (sex) □ male □ female, (date of birth) _____________, was observed at (location) __________
The accused, having □ ___ (State) driver’s license □ social security number □ other identification number
(list number) _______________________ operated a motor vehicle under the following circumstances:
Preliminary Observations
□ I observed the accused operate the motor vehicle in my presence.
□ _________________________ observed the accused operate a motor vehicle.
□ I had reason to believe that the accused operated a motor vehicle because _______________________________
□ The accused committed the following traffic violations:_______________________________________________
□ On private property, the accused’s driving was erratic and unusual because _______________________________
Field Observations
I had probable cause to believe that the accused was intoxicated because I observed (check all that apply):
□ Odor of alcoholic beverage □ alcohol beverage containers in view □ admitted consuming alcohol
□ blood shot eyes □ improperly left vehicle in gear □ leaned against vehicle
□ slurred Speech □ failed to shut off vehicle at crash scene □ soiled/disorderly clothing
□ poor manual dexterity □ was involved in crash □ could not open door
□ poor balance □ could not exit vehicle on own □ fell asleep at scene
□ belligerent attitude □ staggered from vehicle □ excessive giggling
Field Sobriety Tests (check all of the tests that were administered and the corresponding results)
□ Horizontal Nystagmus □ Passed □ Failed
□ Walk-and-turn □ Passed □ Failed
□ One-leg stand □ Passed □ Failed
□ Finger count □ Passed □ Failed
□ Backward count □ Passed □ Failed ________________________ (list range & describe response)
□ Alco-sensor 0.________ grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. □ Passed □ Failed
102
Chemical Test
□ I informed the accused of the state implied consent law & the accused □submitted to □ refused
the chemical test.
□ The accused was unable to take the chemical test because □ injured □ unconscious □ too intoxicated
□_________________, a certified chemical test operator, performed a chemical DataMaster test on the accused
at (location) _______________________. The alcohol concentration was equivalent to 0._______ gram of
alcohol per 210 liters of breath.
□ I was informed by _________________ that a blood test was conducted on accused at _____ □ am □ pm
and that the result was an alcohol concentration equivalent 0._____ gram of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood.
□ I was informed by _________________ that a □ blood □ urine □ other test was conducted on
accused at _______ □am □ pm at (location) ______________________ and that the result was positive
for the controlled substance _____________________________________.
I swear or affirm that under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true.
Previous Convictions
I, __________________________, have examined the accused driving/criminal record and have determined that the
accused has a prior Operating While Intoxicated conviction on (date) _________ from ___________________ Court in
____________ County, __________ (State) having cause number __________________________________________.
I swear or affirm that under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true.
_____________________________________ __________
103
Receipt for Driver’s License (confiscated by police)
_____________________ Police Department ORI # ______________________
Charges _____________________________
Sex _________ Weight _________ Height ______ Eyes __________ Hair ________
The above motorist □ refused the alcohol test □ failed the alcohol test 0. _____ %.
County _____________________________
104
CHARGING FORM FOR DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED
State of __________________ IN THE _______________________________ COURT
State of ___________________
vs.
__________________________
DOB: ____________________
SSN: ____________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
All of which is contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the
State of _____________________.
I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the foregoing representations are true.
105
Monthly ALCO-SENSOR Report
Alco- Coun
sensor ty
Officer ____________________ Badge # #
____________
106
MOBILE VIDEO TAPE LOG
Dat Count
Time Name/Subject UTT/Case/Incident # Offense Remarks
e y
107
I-94 Arrival/Departure Record (US. Department of Justice, 2002, 1991)
Non-U.S. citizens who are visiting the U.S. will have the bottom part of the I-94, which is
written in English.
The I-94 arrival/departure record may be used to identify visitors when they try to present
identifications to police officers that are not written in English.
The information below will be provided on the I-94 arrival/departure record and it will be
written in English.
Departure # __________________
DOB ______________________________________
108
INCIDENT REPORTS (NON-CRIMINAL)
109
Incident Report (non-
criminal) Page ___ of ___
Incident (non-criminal) #
Victim’s Sex Victim’s Race Victim’s Place of Treatment (Name & Address)
□ Yes □ No
Name and address of Vehicle Owner
110
□ Yes □ No
NARRATIVE
ATTACHMENTS:
111
□ Yes □ No
Incident (non-criminal) #
Location of Offense City County State
Offense Code
Summary:
ATTACHMENTS:
112
Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
4. THE FACTS THAT SUPPORT THE OFFICER’S BELIEF THAT THE RESPONDANT PRESENTS
A LIKELIHOOD OF SERIOUS HARM ARE:
5. THIS OFFICER REQUESTS THE COURT TO ORDER THAT THE PATIENT BE HELD IN
CUSTODY AND TRANSFERRED TO __________________________________________________
FOR DETENTION, EVALUATION, AND TREATMENT FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 72
HOURS PURSUANT TO LAW.
THIS OFFICER VERIFIES & AFFIRMS THAT THE FACTS STATED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE.
113
OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE
114
Police Department’s Animal Bite Report
Report Report Reported by Received by Victim Type Date Biting animal Incident
Date Time (circle 2) of tested for
Name: Bite rabies after On Off
Human/Animal bite?
Personal
Juvenile/Adult Y N property
Phone:
Result of test
(circle)
Pos Neg
Species of
biting
animal
TREATMENT
OF VICTIM
(check all that
apply)
Number of
VICTIM Human Rabies Immune Globulin Rabies Vaccine
Doses Planned
Rabies Prophylaxis
115
VICTIM Minor, no Minor Moderate Severe Death
break in skin puncture in puncture in puncture
skin skin (deep,
crushing,
or tears
due to
shaking)
Seriousness of
Bite (check one)
Behaviors
Exhibited by
Biting
Animal
(Check all
that apply)
116
Vehicle Impound Rules (Department Policy)
Document group of items over $20. For example: A case containing 20 DVDs.
Document all damage. If a car is scratched all over, then indicate that the car is scratched all over.
Inventory
Cash: $44.48
Damage
Cracked windshield.
State date, time, and location. State the date and time that the vehicle was reported
abandoned, its location, and the date and time that the wrecker was called. The time
differential must indicate that a violation of law has occurred (e.g., more than 72 hours).
State who arrived at the scene and who removed the vehicle. Include all times.
117
VEHICLE IMPOUND FORM
RETURN THIS PORTION OF COMPLETED FORM TO: BMV/DMV/Secretary of
State
118
ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP
TOW-IN FEE DAILY STORAGE DATE STORED TIME WRECKER TIME ARRIVED
FEE CALLED
SIGNATURE OF PERSON TOWING
Damage
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Inventory
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Signature:
Release
Information Released
to:______________________________________________________
(Printed Name) (Signature)
119
Form of ID
presented:_______________________________________________
Released
by:______________________________________________________
Printed Name Signature
Badge#
120
Vehicle Impound Incident Report
Incident (non-criminal) #
□ Yes □ No
Name and address of Vehicle Owner
NARRATIVE
The vehicle was impounded by the above listed towing service on the date and time
listed.
121
Owner notification of impound was made by: ___ Telephone Date ______ Time ________
___ Certified mail Date __________________
___ All efforts of notification failed (explain in comments)
Narrative of Report:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
122
NOTICE OF VEHICLE CONFISCATION &
REQUEST FOR CONFISCATION HEARING
_________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
You may request a hearing before the Court and contest the confiscation of the
attached referenced vehicle. Otherwise, the vehicle will proceed to forfeiture proceedings.
To request a confiscation hearing, sign this document below and return to the Clerk of Court.
Your request must be received by the Clerk within ten (10) days of your receipt of
this notice. Otherwise, your right to the hearing is waived. If your request is timely
received, the hearing will be held with ten (10) days of receipt of your request. You will be
notified by First Class mail of the date, time and location of the hearing.
I request a hearing.
________________________________________
Signature of Owner
___________________________________________
Address
_______________________________________ _________________________________
City State ZIP Date of Request
123
A E D utomatic lectric efibrillator USE REPORT
__________________________ Department
Case # Date of Incident: Date of Report:
Officer Name & Badge #
Location of Incident:
LOCATION TYPE: □ Home □ Public Place □ Long Term Care Facility
Patient Information
Name:
DOB: Age:
State of ID Type of ID ID #
CONDITION ON ARRIVAL: □ Breathing with Pulse □Apneic with Pulse □Apneic No Pulse
Was Arrest Witnessed □ YES □ NO ONSET OF COMPLAINT _______:_______ (Time)
Assistance Information
Time Collapse: Time Bystander Started CPR:
Bystander Name & Address:
Time Arrived at Patient’s Side: Time CPR Started: Time First Shock Delivered:
124
CRIMINAL & JUVENILE REPORTS
125
Consular Notification ……………………………………………. 160
Jail Intake Form ………………………………………………….. 162
Custody Order/Custody Hold…………………………………….. 163
Temporary Hold Form – Detention Division …………………… 164
Fingerprint Card Information …………………………………… 165
Example – Latent Print Card …………………………………….. 166
Latent Print Card ………………………………………………… 167
Probable Cause Declaration – Bail Setting Information ………… 168
Narcotics or Intoxication Report ………………………………… 169
Correctional Medical Survey …………………………………… 170
Crime Scene Entry Log …………………………………………. 171
Photography Log Sheet …………………………………………. 172
Evidence Bag Example …………………………………………. 173
Police Property Record & Receipt Form – Chain of Custody …… 174
Request for Police Laboratory Examination …………………….. 176
Certificate of Proof of Chain of Physical Custody ……………… 178
Tape Review Request …………………………………………… 179
Subpoena ………………………………………………………… 180
In Field Show-Up Report ……………………………………….. 181
Photographic Lineup Procedures ……………………………….. 182
Photographic Line-Up ……………………………………………. 183
Citizen’s Arrest ………………………………………………….. 184
Use of Force Report ……………………………………………… 185
Use of Firearms Diagram Information…………………………… 186
Firearms Report ………………………………………………….. 187
Vehicle Pursuit Critique Form …………………………………… 189
Injury Report – Corrections Employee ………………………….. 191
Inmate Violation Report …………………………………………. 192
Custody Request – Detention Division ………………………….. 193
Application for Emergency Protective Order …………………… 194
Emergency Protective Order ……………………………………. 195
126
Domestic Violence Supplement ………………………………… 196
Trespass Warning ………………………………………………. 198
Suspected Child Abuse Report …………………………………. 199
Police Department – Victim’s Notification and Waiver ………… 200
Wanted/Missing Person Report ………………………………….. 202
Missing Child Report ……………………..……………………… 203
Crime Scene Checklist …………………………………………… 204
Stolen Items Notification ………………………………………… 207
Juvenile Information …………………………………………….. 208
Juvenile Notice of Violation …………………………………….. 209
Release to Custody ………………………………………………. 210
Juvenile Fingerprint Card – Final Disposition …………………… 211
127
POLICE COMPLAINT - INFORMATION SUMMONS
Court Cause # (to be issued by court)
Color Vehicle Year Make License expiration year License state License plate #
Description of Offense:
In Violation of Statute/Code:
128
MIRANDA WARNING
__________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
MIRANDA RIGHTS
Before we ask you any questions, you must understand your rights. Initial each line to indicate your
understanding of, and agreement with, that line.
______ Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
______ You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions and to have him
with you during questioning.
______ If you cannot afford a lawyer, the court will appoint one to represent you without cost if you wish.
______ If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you will still have the right to stop
answering at any time. You also have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to a
lawyer.
______ I have read this statement of my rights and I understand what my rights are.
WAIVER OF RIGHTS
_______ I am willing to make a statement and answer questions. I do not want a lawyer at this time. I
understand and know what I am doing. No promises or threats have been made to me and no pressure of any
kind has been used against me.
129
When interrogating juveniles, legal guardian signatures also required.
Signed____________________________
Witness:___________________________
Witness:___________________________
130
VOLUNTARY STATEMENT This is page ______ of ___.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Draw a diagonal line through all unused space. Have person place initials at end of statement.
131
Page____of______ Type of Report ______________ Report #_______________
Interview Statement
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Draw a diagonal line through all unused space. Have person place initials at end of statement.
Witness____________________________ Signature____________________
Print name
Witness____________________________ Signature____________________
Print name
132
CONSENT TO SEARCH
__________________________ Police Department
LOCATION____________________________________________________________
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE THAT A SEARCH WARRANT BE OBTAINED BEFORE ANY SEARCH OF YOUR
PROPERTY & YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE TO CONSENT TO WARRANTLESS SEARCH.
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO TALK TO A LAWYER BEFORE GIVING CONSENT TO SUCH SEARCH.
IF YOU ARE A JUVENILE, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO TALK WITH YOUR PARENT OR GUARDIAN BEFORE ANY CONSENT
TO SUCH A SEARCH.
JUVENILE: I HAVE READ THE STATEMENT OF MY RIGHTS AND I UNDERSTAND MY RIGHTS. I DO NOT WANT A
LAWYER AT THIS TIME. I CONSENT TO A WARRANTLESS SEARCH BY OFFICERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED AT ________________________________________________________________.
I AUTHORIZE THESE OFFICERS TO SEIZE ANY ARTICLE OF PROPERTY THAT THEY CONSIDER EVIDENCE. I
UNDERSTAND AND KNOW WHAT I AM DOING. NO PROMISES OR THREATS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ME AND NO
PRESSURE OR COERCION OF ANY KIND HAS BEEN USED AGAINST ME.
I FURTHER AUTHORIZE THEOFFICERS TO SEIZE ANY ARTICLE OF PROPERTY WHICH THEY CONSIDER EVIDENCE. I
UNDERSTAND AND KNOW WHAT I AM DOING. NO PROMISES OR THREATS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ME AND NO
PRESSURE OR COERCION OF ANY KIND HAS BEEN USED AGAINST ME.
133
EXAMPLE 1: AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF SC
VS.
SNN 000-44-3432
COMES NOW, Trp C. Allen (862) (name of law enforcer), who being duly sworn upon oath, swears that he/she has good
reason to believe that in the body described as John Smith w/m/DOB = 1/2/1987; SC DLN 568585, SNN 000-44-3432
currently located at Aiken City Police Dept., in Aiken County, SC (State) there is now in or about said person, being
concealed certain property, namely: blood that contains an illegal amount of alcohol for a driver in the state of SC
Is possessed unlawfully.
___________________ Is used or possessed with intent to be used as the means of committing another crime.
See record of proceedings for the facts and information tending to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search
warrant.
This affidavit is made for the purpose of obtaining a search warrant from _________________ Court, ___________ County,
_____________________ Subscribed and sworn to be true before me this _____day of __________, 20____
(Affiant)
_____________________________________ ___________________
Judge Court
134
EXAMPLE 1: ORDER FOR SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF SC
VS.
SNN 000-44-3432
Trp. C. Allen (862) (name of law enforcer), is a sworn law enforcer and has presented testimony to establish
probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant. The court FINDS that the testimony presented does
describe the items to be searched, and the things to be searched for then seized;
That it sets forth that such are things to be searched for are concealed;
That it sets forth that such search is for evidence that may be lawfully searched for and seized;
That probable cause does exist for the issuance of the requested search warrant and that a search warrant shall
be issued.
The officer who executes said search warrant shall make a return thereto directed to this court, which return
shall indicate the date and time searched and the list of items seized. Said items seized shall be securely held by
the law enforcement agency whose officer executed this warrant pursuant to Order of the court trying the cause.
JUDGE: ___________________________________________________________
135
EXAMPLE 1: SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF SC
VS.
SNN 000-44-3432
WHEREAS, there has presented before me testimony of Trp. C. Allen (862) , a sworn law enforcement officer, for the
purpose of establishing probable cause for the issuance of a Search Warrant. The Court, after hearing the testimony, now
finds that probable cause exists for the issuance of said Search Warrant of the location described as follows: body of John
YOU ARE, THEREFORE, commanded in the name of the State of SC with the necessary and proper assistance in the day
time or night time to enter into the location aforementioned and there diligently search for goods and chattels described as
blood that contains an illegal amount of alcohol for a driver in the state of SC
And that you are to bring the same or any part thereof found on such search forthwith before the Court and to be processed
according to law.
136
EXAMPLE 2: AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF SC
VS.
VIN 1F2HF72J858304372
SC Registration DV3842
COMES NOW, Trp C. Allen (862) (name of law enforcer), who being duly sworn upon oath, swears that he/she has good
reason to believe that in the vehicle described as a 1995 Blue Ford Explorer, VIN 1F2HF72J858304372, SC Registration
DV3842, currently located at 123 Elm Street, in Aiken County, SC (State) there is now in or about said vehicle, being
concealed certain property, namely:
XXX Is used or possessed with intent to be used as the means of committing another crime.
See record of proceedings for the facts and information tending to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search
warrant.
This affidavit is made for the purpose of obtaining a search warrant from Aiken Superior Court, Aiken County, SC
(State) to examine One 1995 Blue Ford Explorer, VIN 1F2HF72J858304372, SC Registration DV3842 to search for the
aforementioned evidence.
_____________________ Subscribed and sworn to be true before me this _____day of __________, 20____
(Affiant)
_____________________________________ ___________________
Judge Court
137
EXAMPLE 2: SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF SC
VS.
VIN 1F2HF72J858304372
SC Registration DV3842
WHEREAS, there has presented before me testimony of Trp. C. Allen (862) , a sworn law enforcement officer,
for the purpose of establishing probable cause for the issuance of a Search Warrant. The Court, after hearing the
testimony, now finds that probable cause exists for the issuance of said Search Warrant of the location
described as follows: One 1995 Blue Ford Explorer, VIN 1F2HF72J858304372, SC Registration DV3842.
YOU ARE, THEREFORE, commanded in the name of the State of SC with the necessary and proper
assistance in the day time or night time to enter into the location aforementioned and there diligently search for
goods and chattels described as Marijuana, paraphernalia, and any other evidence of illegal drug trafficking.
And that you are to bring the same or any part thereof found on such search forthwith before the Court and to be processed
according to law.
138
AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF _______________
VS.
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
COMES NOW, _________________________ (name of law enforcer), who being duly sworn upon oath, swears that
he/she has good reason to believe that in the ______________ described as _________________________________,
currently located at ______________________________, in __________________ County, ______ (State) there is now in
or about said _________________________, being concealed certain property, namely: __________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________ Is used or possessed with intent to be used as the means of committing another crime.
See record of proceedings for the facts and information tending to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search
warrant.
This affidavit is made for the purpose of obtaining a search warrant from _________________ Court, ___________ County,
_____________________ Subscribed and sworn to be true before me this _____day of __________, 20____
(Affiant)
_____________________________________ ___________________
Judge Court
139
ORDER FOR SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF ___________________
VS.
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
_________________________ (name of law enforcer), is a sworn law enforcer and has presented testimony to
establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant. The court FINDS that the testimony presented
does describe the items to be searched, and the things to be searched for then seized;
That it sets forth that such are things to be searched for are concealed;
That it sets forth that such search is for evidence that may be lawfully searched for and seized;
That probable cause does exist for the issuance of the requested search warrant and that a search warrant shall
be issued.
The officer who executes said search warrant shall make a return thereto directed to this court, which return
shall indicate the date and time searched and the list of items seized. Said items seized shall be securely held by
the law enforcement agency whose officer executed this warrant pursuant to Order of the court trying the cause.
JUDGE: ___________________________________________________________
140
SEARCH WARRANT
STATE OF _________________
VS.
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
WHEREAS, there has presented before me testimony of ________________________, a sworn law enforcement officer,
for the purpose of establishing probable cause for the issuance of a Search Warrant. The Court, after hearing the testimony,
now finds that probable cause exists for the issuance of said Search Warrant of the location described as follows: ______
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
YOU ARE, THEREFORE, commanded in the name of the State of ____________ with the necessary and proper assistance
in the day time or night time to enter into the location aforementioned and there diligently search for goods and chattels
described as
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
And that you are to bring the same or any part thereof found on such search forthwith before the Court and to be processed
according to law.
141
Field Interview Card
___________________ Police Department
County Date Time
Address Phone
Clothing Description
Gang Affiliation
Owner of Vehicle
Owner at Scene □Y □N
142
POLICE DEPARTMENT - INTELLIGENCE REPORT
OCCUPATION: _______________________________________________________________________
143
SUSPECT REPORT
________________________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
REGISTERED OWNER
□PASS
DL STATE & #
144
AMOUNT OF
HAIR STYLE COMPLEXION TATTOOS/SCARS WEAPON(S)
HAIR
HAD WEAPON IN
TYPE OF HAIR FACIAL HAIR GLASSES UNIQUE CLOTHING
OR ABOUT
__UNKNOWN __UNKNOWN __UNKNOWN __UNKNOWN __UNKNOWN
__CLEAN __N/A __NONE __NONE __N/A
__DIRTY __CLN SHAVEN __YES __CAP/HAT __BAG/BRIEFCASE
__GREASY __MOUSTACHE __REG GLASSES __GLOVES __NEWSPAPER
__MATTED __FULL BEARD __SUN GLASSES __SKI MASK __POCKET
__ODOR __GOATEE __WIRE FRAME __STOCKING MASK __SHOULDER
__OTHER __FU MANCHU __PLASTIC FRAME __OTHER __HOLSTER
__LOWER LIP __COLOR __WAISTBAND
__SIDE BURNS __OTHER __OTHER
__FUZZ
__UNSHAVEN
__OTHER
__UNKNOWN
__UNKOWN __UNKNOWN __ALTERED STOCK
__N/A __SAWED OFF
__RIGHT __LISP __AUTOMATIC
__SLURRED __BOLT ACTION
__LEFT __STUTTER __PUMP
__ACCENT __REVOLVER
__DESCRIBE_________________ __BLUE STEEL
__OTHER __CHROME/NICKEL
__DOUBLE BARREL
__SINGLE BARREL
__OTHER
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
145
Case Report Checklist Attachments
Case # ______________________________________________
_____ Warrant
146
INVESTIGATIVE CHECKLIST
Case Number_______________________________
15. Vict and/or Wit Shown Mug Shots Y__ N__ _____________________________________________
147
LEAD SHEET
Case Number:___________________ Date:_____________
Time:_____________________
□ Other
(Specify)__________________________________________________________________
Name:__________________________ Address:___________________________________
Information Received:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Action Taken:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Offense Code
Victim’s Sex Victim’s Race Indication of Hate Crime Victim Injured Name of Facility that Treated Victim
□ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No
Description(Sex/Race/Ht/Wt/Hair/Eyes/Scars/Tattoos/Clothing)
□ Yes □ No
Name and address of Vehicle Owner
___
149
NARRATIVE (First indicate MOTIVE & MO. Then list additional Suspects, Victims, Witnesses, Vehicles, etc.)
ATTACHMENTS:
□ Yes □ No
150
Supplemental Case Report
Case (criminal) #
Location of Offense City County State
Offense Code
Summary:
ATTACHMENTS:
□ Yes □ No
151
FINAL DISPOSITION OF CASE
________________________________ Police Department
Page of Date
Case (criminal) #
Victim’s Address
Name of Defendant:
Original Charge:
Final Charge:
Attachments:
□ Yes □ No
152
AFFIDAVIT FOR PROBABLE CAUSE (General)
STATE OF __________________
VS.
_________________________________
DOB: ____________________________
SSN: ____________________________
COMES NOW, _________________________, who being duly sworn upon oath, says that:
1. He/She is an officer with the _____________________ Department, and believes the following to be
true.
3. Did then and there commit the following violation (code) __________________________, by
(describe the specific act that supports the criminal charge via elements of the crime) ___________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
153
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
4. This officer believes the above facts to be true because (check all that apply)
The above was told to me by another sworn law enforcement officer, upon whom I have relied on in
the past for information and found his/her information to be credible without exception.
The above was told to me by the victim of a crime, who has no apparent motive to lie, and said
statement was given in a straightforward and non-evasive manner, which indicated that the statement
was credible.
The above was told to me by a witness of a crime, who has no apparent motive to lie, and said
statement was given in a straightforward and non-evasive manner, which indicated that the statement
was credible. Further, witness’ statement was corroborated by independent evidence.
The above was told to me by the defendant, which was a statement made against his/her penal
interests. Further, Defendant’s statement was corroborated by independent evidence.
I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the foregoing representations are true.
____________________________________
Arresting Officer’s Name & Badge #
Prosecutor
154
INFORMATION FOR VIOLATION OF LAW
STATE OF ___________________
VS.
__________________________
DOB: ____________________
SSN: ____________________
COMES NOW, _________________________ (name of officer), who being duly sworn upon oath,
says that on or about : (date of offense) ________________, 20___, at (location of offense) _____
____________________________________________, in _________ County, _____ (State), one
(defendant) _____________________________ of (Defendant’s address) ___________________
_______________________________ did then and there RECKLESSLY, KNOWINGLY, or
INTENTIONALLY: (describe elements of the crime)
________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
155
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
All of which is contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the
State of _____________________.
I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the foregoing representations are true.
_______________________________________
Witness List:
PROSECUTOR
156
APPLICATION FOR CRIMINAL ARREST WARANT
________________________ Police Department Case # __________________
Defendant’s name _____________________________ AKA ________________________
Address ___________________________________________________________________
Phone ________________________
SSN ________________ State of ID _____ Type of ID _________ ID # _______________
DOB ______________ Age ________
Description (race/sex/ht/wt/tattoos/scars) _______________________________________
157
ARREST WARRANT
□ County □ City of State: _________________
STATE OF ________
VS.
Sex ___ Race ___ Height ___ Weight ___ DL State ___ DL # ___________________
EXECUTION OF WARRANT
A copy of this arrest warrant was delivered to the defendant on ______________ (date).
158
ARREST WARRANT
State of ______________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
159
ARREST WARRANT - TO ANY LAW ENFORER OF THIS STATE:
It appearing from the above affidavit that there are reasonable grounds to believe that on or
did violate the criminal laws of the State of _____ (or ordinance of □ County □ City of
Code ________________________________________________________________
Having found probable cause, you are empowered to arrest the defendant and to bring the
defendant before this court. A copy of the ARREST WARRANT shall be delivered to the
160
ARREST WARRANT SERVICE REPORT
Warrant # ______________________________
Issue Date ______________________________
Title of Offense _________________________ Code ______________________
Offense Date ____________________________
Affiant ____________________ Badge # ___________ Dept. ____________________
Victim ___________________________________
161
Example of MUG Sheet
(used when photographing suspect at jail during booking process)
Name: _____________
DOB: _____________
Mug # _____________
DATE: _________________
162
Example of MUG Sheet
(used when photographing suspect at jail during booking process)
DOE, JOHN L.
DOB = 10-17-1936
Mug # AA-1224
WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE = 02-07-2014
163
CONSULAR NOTIFICATION
FAX SHEET FOR NOTIFYING CONSULAR OFFICERS OF ARREST OR DETENTION
_________________________________________________________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
______________________________________________________________________________ (address)
MR./MRS./MS:___________________________________________________________________________
DOB: __________________________________________________________________________________
COMMENTS:_____________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
164
CONSULAR NOTIFICATION
_________________ Police Department
DATE: _______________________________________________________________________________
165
Jail Intake Form
______________ Police Department Booking Record
Ill or Injured __YES __NO TYPE OF ILLNESS OF INJURY Type of Medication Taking
Special Management for Inmate __Medical __Mental __Suicidal __High Security __Other (Describe):
166
Name of Jailer Accepting Inmate: ____________ Signature: ______________
Signature: ________________________________________________________
167
TEMPORARY HOLD FORM - DETENTION DIVISION
_________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
DOB:_____________________ SS#_____________________________________________________
____ THE ARRESTEE IS TOO COMBATIVE TO APPEAR BEFORE A MAGISTRATE AT THIS TIME.
_________________________________________ ___________________________________
SIGNATURE BADGE# DATE/TIME SIGNATURE BADGE# DATE/TIME
168
Fingerprint Card Information
Criminal = Red
Applicant = Blue
Juvenile = Yellow
169
Example - Latent Print Card
Date: 01-07-2014
Case # 2014-1107-2304
Lift # 5
170
Latent Print Card
Date: __________________
Case # _________________
Lift # ___________________
Victim: _________________________________________________________
Print Sketch
171
PROBABLE CAUSE DECLARATION - BAIL SETTING INFORMATION
ADDRESS (RESIDENCE)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
□ WEAPON DESCRIPTION____________________________________________________________________
I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
ACCURATE.
_______________________________________________________________________________
OFFICER NAME SIGNATURE BADGE# DATE/TIME
172
NARCOTICS OR INTOXICATION REPORT
Name AKA
Advisement of Rights
You have the right to remain silent
Anything you say may be used against you in court
You have the right to an attorney before and during questioning
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before questioning if you wish (Do you
understand?)
Examination Location
Method of Consumption
What? Circle all that apply. Name of drug ___________________________
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
173
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SURVEY
INTAKE SCREENING AND TRIAGE
MEDICAL/MENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
1. DO YOU HAVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PROBLEMS?
__ASTHMA __ENT PROBLEMS __HERNIA __INTESTINAL DISORDERS
__BACK INJURIES __FX/SPRAINS __HIV/AIDS __MENATL PROBLEMS
__DEFORMITIES __HEART TROUBLE __HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE __PSYCH. HOSPITAL
__TUBERCULOSIS __DENTAL PROBLEMS __STD __HEPATITIS: TYPE____
__DIABETES __SEIZURES __PREGNANT/DUE DATE:________________
__OTHER______________________ ALLERGIES______________________
Y N
2. ARE YOU TAKING OR DO YOU NEED TO TAKE ANY PRESCRIBED MEDICATIONS
(INCLUDING PSYCHIATRIC, BIRTH CONTROL PILLS)?
3. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TREATED FOR TUBERCULOSIS?
4. HAVE YOU HAD A COUGH FOR MORE THAN THREE WEEKS WITH ANY OF THE
FOLLOWING: FEVER, WEIGHT LOSS, FATIGUE, NIGHT SWEATS?
5. HAVE YOU HAD A HEAD INJURY/TRAFFIC ACCIDENT OR ALTERCATION IN THE
PAST 7 HOURS?
6. ARE YOU AN ALCOHOLIC? DATE OF LAST DRINK:
HOW MUCH DO YOU DRINK?
174
175
Crime Scene Entry Log Sheet
ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE CRIME SCENE MUST SIGN THIS SHEET
Name
In Out Reason for Entering
&
Signature Agency Date/Time Date/Time Scene
Title
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
176
Photography Log Sheet pg ___ of ____ pgs
177
Evidence Bag Example
(Information that should be written on evidence bag.)
Case # _______________________________________
Date ________________________________________
Suspect ______________________________________
Item # _______________________________________
Officer ______________________________________
Badge # _____________________________________
Dept _______________________________________
Note: Place your initials across the edge of the evidence tape where it meets the bag/box.
Initial at the top, bottom, and side edges of the tape. The purpose of the tape is to detect
unauthorized entry. Do not use masking tape. Use evidence tape or wide scotch tape.
178
POLICE PROPERTY RECORD & RECEIPT FORM - CHAIN OF CUSTODY
(α → ∑∆ → Ω) PRR # ___________
Name of Investigating Officer Badge Number Report # / Citation #
Name of officer submitting evidence to lab Badge Number Lab # (issued by lab)
Date of Evidence Collection Time of Evidence Collection Who was evidence collected from
Witnesses to recovery
Specific detail or title of offense (use law book if a crime) Offense code (only if criminal case)
Evidence Description for Lab (quantity, serial #, identifying marks, color, etc.)
Item #
Item #
Item #
Item #
Item #
179
Code: T = Transferred; S = Stored; R = Released; D = Destroyed
180
POLICE PROPERTY RECORD & RECEIPT FORM - CHAIN OF CUSTODY
(α → ∑∆ → Ω) PRR # ___________
Name of Investigating Officer Badge Number Report # / Citation #
Name of officer submitting evidence to lab Badge Number Lab # (issued by lab)
Date of Evidence Collection Time of Evidence Collection Who was evidence collected from
Witnesses to recovery
Specific detail or title of offense (use law book if a crime) Offense code (only if criminal case)
Evidence Description for Lab (quantity, serial #, identifying marks, color, etc.)
Item #
Item #
Item #
Item #
Item #
181
Code: T = Transferred; S = Stored; R = Released; D = Destroyed
182
REQUEST FOR POLICE LABORATORY EXAMINATION
Type of Case Investigation (most serious criminal violation) Police Case Report #
Evidence Description for Lab (quantity, serial #, identifying marks, color, etc.)
Item # Description of Items being submitted to lab
Lab Exam Request (Specify each item number to be tested. For example, state, “Test item X for
……”)
183
REQUEST FOR POLICE LABORATORY EXAMINATION
Type of Case Investigation (most serious criminal violation) Police Case Report #
Evidence Description for Lab (quantity, serial #, identifying marks, color, etc.)
Item # Description of Items being submitted to lab
Lab Exam Request (Specify each item number to be tested. For example, state, “Test item X for
……”)
184
CERTIFICATE OF PROOF OF CHAIN OF PHYSICAL CUSTODY
(Transfer of evidence from evidence storage to a non-law enforcement party)
Defendant ________________________________
The following substance(s) or container(s): (Describe substance or container with sufficient particularity to
distinguish it.)
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________ ___________________________
(Delivering Officer’s Signature) (Receiving Officer’s Signature)
185
Tape Review Request
_________________Police Department
Communications Bureau
Complainant: ______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Received by:________________________________Date:__________________
186
SUBPOENA
◊ County ◊ City of _________________
_______________________________ Court
STATE OF ___________________
Cause Number: ______________________
vs.
___________________________ Subpoena for (charge title & code):
___________________________
___________________________ Charge ________________; Code___________
To:
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear in the above named court at the place, date, and
time specified below to testify in the above case.
Place: Courtroom:
______________________________ Court
Ph: ______________________
This subpoena shall remain in effect until you are granted leave to depart by the court or by
an officer acting on behalf of the court.
Date
________________ Court Judge or Clerk of the ____________________ Court
◊ State/Plaintiff ◊ Defendant
187
IN FIELD SHOW-UP REPORT
IDENTIFICATION:
________________________________________________________________________________________
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
188
PHOTOGRAPIC LINEUP PROCEDURES
A LINE-UP THAT IS SUGGESTIVE IS INADMISSIBLE IN COURT. TO BE SURE
YOUR LINEUP IDENTIFICATION WILL NOT BE EXCLUDED AT TRIAL AS
UNFAIR, FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES.
189
PHOTOGRAPHIC LINE-UP
PHOTOGRAPHIC LINE-UP:
ON_________________________________________(DATE/TIME),
READ THE FOLLOWING ADMONITION, AND THEN ALLOWED TO VIEW THE PHOTOGRAPH LINE-UP
STATEMENT OF WITNESS/VICTIM:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
190
CITIZEN’S ARREST
ORDER OF ARREST by PRIVATE PERSON
TO: POLICE
VS.
_________________________________________
DEFENDANT
YOU ARE HEREBY REQUESTED TO TAKE INTO CUSTODY THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT
WHO I HAVE ARRESTED FOR THE COMMISSION OF A PUBLIC OFFENSE IN MY PRESENCE. I
WILL FURTHER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, APPEAR AND SWEAR TO A COMPLAINT
AGAINST SAID DEFENDANT, AND WILL APPEAR AS A WITNESS FOR THE PEOPLE IN ANY
SUBSEQUENT ACTION WHEN MY PRESENCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROSECTION OF SAID
DEFENDANT.
DATE_________________TIME________________ _______________________________
191
USE OF FORCE REPORT
INCIDENT INFORMATION
DATE TIME LOCATION COUNTY CASE #
OFFICER INFORMATION
SUBJECT
192
(e.g., for destruction of deer)
Not to Scale N ↑
LOCATION of INCIDENT
Additional information
Once the scene is drawn, 4 items that are required on a firearms report are a) location of shooting, b) North, c)
not to scale, d) and measurements.
Always make North point upward on the diagram. This will make the report consistent and easier for others to
read.
Make sure officer is in safe position relative to deer and traffic (i.e., when traffic is clear, shoot downward
toward deer and away from traffic).
Measure all important distances from fixed reference points (points that will not likely move). Do not use the
parked police vehicle as the reference point (because it can easily be moved). At a minimum, there should be at
least 2 measurements on diagram (x and y coordinates). More measurements result in a more detailed and
accurate diagram.
Label all items on the diagram (may label one tree to represent group). Draw and label deer, individuals, and
vehicles at scene. Be sure to draw scene so that it indicates that the shooting was performed safely.
193
FIREARMS REPORT
DATE & TIME OF SHOOTING TYPE OF AREA (Rural, Residential, etc.) WERE OFFICIAL PHOTOS TAKEN?
□ YES □ NO
TYPE OF FIREARM USED SERIAL NO. OF WEAPON OWNER OF WEAPON ISSUED TO
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
194
Firearms Diagram
Officer’s Name (printed) Officer’s Signature & Badge # Date Approved by Supervisor
□ Yes □ No
195
VEHICLE PURSUIT CRITIQUE FORM
____________________________POLICE DEPARTMENT
INSTRUCTIONS: THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE FIELD SUPERVISOR WHEN AN OFFICER IS
INVOLVED IN A VEHICULAR PURSUIT.
BACK-UP OFFICER(S)
OTHER OFFICER(S)
APPROVING SUPERVISOR(S):
7. WHAT WAS THE REASON FOR THE PURSUIT? CHECK ALL THAT APPLY.
A.____ THE IMMEDIATE OR FUTURE DANGER TO THE PUBLIC CREATED BY THE PURSUIT WAS LESS
THAN THE IMMEDIATE OR FUTURE DANGER TO THE PUBLIC IF THE SUSPECT OF A VIOLENT
USING HIGH SPEED OR OTHER EVASIVE TACTICS THAT CREATED A DANGER TO THE PUBLIC.
C.____ THE SUSPECT OF A VIOLENT CRIME FAILED TO YIELD TO THE OFFICER’S VISIBLE & AUDIBLE
SIGNAL TO STOP.
196
8. HOW MANY PUBLIC SAFTEY VEHICLES WERE INVOLVED IN THE PURSUIT?________________________
NAME(S):_______________________________________________________________________________
14. RESULT OF PURSUIT: ___TERMINATION ___ ESCAPE ____ TRAFFIC COLLISION ____ ARREST
CHARGE(S)_____________________________________________________________________________________
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
197
Injury Report – Corrections Employee
_____________________ Department
Case Report #
Address of Incident:
Did Employee Remain on Duty? Did Employee See Doctor? Name of Attending
Doctor
□ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No
Employee’s Statement
Witnesses’ Statements
Supervisor’s Statement
198
INMATE VIOLATION REPORT
_________________ Police Department
Case Report #
Address of Incident:
3) ________________
199
Custody Request Form - Detention Division
_________________________Police Department
Charges:_________________________________________ Code(s)___________________
Requesting Officer:___________________________________________________________
I will assume responsibility for the safety and security of the above named inmate while
he/she is in my custody.
____________________________________ ___________________________
Receiving Officers Signature Date
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Remarks:___________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
200
APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER
________________________________________________________________________________________
DOB __________ Sex ____ Race ____ Ht ____ WT ____ Hair _____ Eyes _____
Tattoos or marks _____________________________________________________
3. The events that cause the protected person to fear immediate and present danger for self and/or
children are described below.
4. ___The person to be protected lives with the person to be restrained and requests an order that the
restrained person move out immediately.
5. ___The person to be protected has minor children in common with the person to be restrained.
6. ___ A temporary custody order ___ does ___does not exist.
7. ___The person to be protected is a minor child, who is in immediate danger of being abducted by
the person to be restrained.
201
EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER
Reasonable grounds for the issuance of this order exist and an emergency protective order is necessary to
prevent the occurrence or recurrence of violence or abuse.
THIS EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER WILL EXPIRE AT __________ (time) ON: _______ (date)
PROOF OF SERVICE
5. Person served (name):___________________________________________________________________
6. I personally delivered copies to the person served on DATE:_________ Time:______________
7. Location Served (address):________________________________________________________________
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
202
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SUPPLEMENTAL
___________________ POLICE DEPARTMENT CASE # __________________
I RESPONDED TO A CALL OF AT
__CRYING __ABRASION(S)
__FEARFUL __MINOR CUT(S)
__HYSTERICAL __LACERATION(S)
__CALM __FRACTURE(S) SUSPECT’S NAME DOB
__AFRAID __CONCUSSION(S)
__NERVOUS __THREATENING HOME ADDRESS PHONE
__IRRATIONAL __OTHER EXPLAIN
SUSPECT WORK ADDRESS PHONE
__ANGRY __COMP OF PAIN
__APOLOGETIC __BRUISE(S)
PRIOR HISTORY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? ___YES ____NO
__CRYING __ABRASION(S)
__FEARFUL __MINOR CUT(S)
__HYSTERICAL __FRACTURE(S) PRIOR HISTORY OF VIOLENCE DOCUMENTED? ___YES ___NO
__CALM __ LACERATION(S)
__AFRAID __CONCUSSION(S)
__IRRATIONAL __ OTHER EXPLAIN NUMBER OF PRIOR INCIDENTS ___MINOR ___SERIOUS
__NERVOUS
__THREATENING
__OTHER EXPLAIN
CASE NUMBER(S)_________________________________________
INVESTIGATING AGENCY:_________________________________
EXPLAIN ________________________
IF APPLICABLE,
MEDICAL TREATMENT
EVIDENCE
203
EVIDENCE COLLECTED FROM
___CRIME SCENE ___HOSPITAL ___OTHER (EXPLAIN)
204
Trespass Warning
at (address) _____________________________________________________
The above named person was advised that if he/she returns onto
Said property, he/she will be in violation of law and subject to arrest.
There are no time limits for this warning. The person so warned
was given notice of this warning.
Badge# ___________________
205
SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE REPORT
AGENCY ADDRESS
1.__________________________________________________________________
2.__________________________________________________________________
3.__________________________________________________________________
4.__________________________________________________________________
5.__________________________________________________________________
6.__________________________________________________________________
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION:
SUMMARIZE WHAT THE ABUSED CHILD OR PERSON ACCOMPANYING THE CHILD SAID HAPPEN
206
Police Department - Victim’s Notification and Wavier
Name of Victim______________________________ Case # __________________________ Date
__________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Victim Address Home
Phone
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Place of Work Address Work
Phone
You are responsible for informing the Police Department and the appropriate court of
any changes in your residency, employment, or phone number.
I would like to be notified when an arrest has been made in this case: □ Yes □ No
As the victim of a criminal offense (Court Date, if known:___________________________)
I would like to be present when a person arrested in this case appears for a
Waiver: I fully understand my rights as a victim and do not wish to be notified of any court proceedings: □ Yes □ No
207
For Criminal Domestic Violence Cases Only
1.You have the right to “Petition for an order of Protection” in this incident from the Family Court.
2. If you wish to seek an “Order of Protection” in this incident, you must preserve evidence and/or may
need witnesses to assist you in your case. You also may have to testify in court.
6. Do you need an officer to accompany you to your residence to remove personal items?
□ Yes □ No
I acknowledge that the reporting officer has advised me of my rights as a victim in this matter, and I
understand them completely.
Victim Rights: As a victim of a crime, you have the following rights and
responsibilities.
To be treated with fairness and dignity, and to be free from intimidation, or harassment, or abuse, throughout
the criminal and juvenile justice process.
To be reasonably informed when the accused or convicted person is arrested, released from custody, or has
escaped.
To be reasonably informed of and be allowed to submit either a written or oral statement at all hearings
affecting bond or bail.
Victim Acknowledgement
As a victim of crime, I have received a copy of the Victim/Witness Rights and Responsibilities sheet provided
to me by a Police Officer and I agree that if I should have a change of address, I must notify the appropriate
agency in order for Law Enforcement to make a reasonable attempt to contact me for court proceedings and
inmate status.
208
Wanted/Missing Person Report
Case # Police Dept.
Officer: Badge:
Wanted/Missing Person
Last Name First Name
DOB ID (Type)
Height/Weight Jewelry
Aliases
Scars, Marks, Tattoos Check One
__ Disabled
__ Juvenile Runaway
__ Crime Victim
__ Suspect
__ Person of Interest
__ Other
Vehicle Information
Vehicle License No. & State Number of Doors
VIN Color/Make/Model
Comments: _________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
Name(printed) Signature Badge# Date
209
MISSING CHILD REPORT
_______________________ Police Department Case # _________________________
NAME (LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE) ALIAS
__ PONYTAIL __STRAIGHT
HAIR COLOR HAIR LENGTH
__ BLACK __ BROWN __ RED __ NO HAIR __EAR __SHOULDER __COLLAR __ BELOW SHOULDER __N/A
BUILD
SSN DL # STATE
__ RUNAWAY __OTHER_______________________________
210
CRIME SCENE CHECKLIST
SCENE DESCRIPTION
SCENE DOCUMENTATION
ADDRESS SSN HT WT
ADDRESS SSN HT WT
211
DECEASED □ YES □ NO AMOUNT OF DECOMPOSITION
ALIVE □ YES □ NO APPROX. TIME OF DEATH (HOURS)
INJURED □ YES □ NO WEAPON USED (KNIFE, GUN, ETC.)
SUBJECT # 1 INFORMATION
ADDRESS SSN HT WT
MODEL SERIAL#
Draw the cylinder’s chambers and the position of each casing. Label each spent and
non-spent round.
CYLINDER POSITION
212
EVIDENCE
TYPE OF EVIDENCE COLLECTED DESCRIPTION
WEAPON □ YES □ NO
FOOTWEAR/TIRE WEAR □ YES □ NO
LATENT □ YES □ NO
SEROLOGICAL □ YES □ NO
TRACE □ YES □ NO
NARCOTICS □ YES □ NO
OTHER □ YES □ NO
WAS EVIDENCE PACKAGED AND SEALED? □ YES □ NO
WERE ITEMS SUBMITTED TO EVIDENCE ROOM? □ YES □ NO
213
Stolen Items Notification
STOLEN
VEHICLE VEHICLE TAG GUN ARTICLE
LIC. # LIC. # MAKE TYPE OF ARTICLE
LIC. STATE
MAKE
COLOR SERIAL #
OFFICER OFFICER
Comments: ________________________________________________________________
214
JUVENILE INFORMATION
TO BE OBTAINED BY POLICE OFFICERS
JUVENILE’S NAME:__________________________________________________________________________
JUVENILE’S ADDRESS:______________________________________________________________________
ADDRESS:_____________________________________________________________________________________
PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT:___________________________________________________________________
ADDRESS:______________________________________________________________________________________
PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT:___________________________________________________________________
STEP-PARENT’S NAME:______________________________________________________________________
PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT:___________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
215
Juvenile Notice of Violation
STATUTE___________________ LOCATION
COMPANIONS AGE
ORDINANCE________________
AGE
__CURFEW
__POSS ALCOHOL/DRUGS
AGE
__WEAPON(S)
__DISTURBANCE/ASSAULT
OFFICER’S SIGNATURE BADGE #
__TRESPASSING/PROWLING
__GANG ACTIVITY
__VANDALISM
__OTHER___________________ JUVENILE’S SIGNATURE
REMARKS:
216
RELEASE TO CUSTODY
STATE OF _____________________ COUNTY OF ___________________
I, ____________________________________________________________________
Family Court at such time as the Court may direct, if he/she is released to my custody.
_______________________________ ____________________________
___________________
Date
217
Juvenile Fingerprint Card - Final Disposition
(Below is some information that might be asked for the final disposition that involves a juvenile.)
218
APPENDIX
Police Department
1) Aiken City Police Department
ORI # s
1) 330053000; 2) 74000543000; 3) 440054000; 4) 8800056000
Dispatch
1) Badge # 394 2) Badge # 126 3) Badge # 292
Post Command
1) Badge # 1 2) Badge # 2 3) Badge # 11
Court Information
1) Aiken County Superior Court 2) Aiken Town Court 3) Aiken Co. Circuit Court
ph: 803-555-4444
219
Vehicles
(Fictitious information; VINS are variables only and may not represent proper format)
3. OHIO REGISTRATION
4. MISSOURI REGISTRATION
220
6. GEORGIA REGISTRATION
8. FLORIDA REGISTRATION
9. CALIFORNIA REGISTRATION
221
REPORT NUMBERS
Case Report #
1) C2014-0716-0900
2) C2015-0879-3949
3) C2016-1111-1930
Incident #
1) I2014-33304
2) I2015-57476
3) I2016-1212-120
1) PRR # 4959
2) PRR # 2912
3) PRR # 3X23
Crash Report #
1) 76-2014-0711-013
2) 44-2015-0831-303
3) 11-2015-1111-202
Firearm Report #
1) FAR2014-33
2) FAR2015-41
Mug #
1) AA-4082
2) BB-30003
3) CC-4948
222
Drivers/Suspects/Victims/Witnesses (fictitious)
2) James S. King dob= 3-6-1980 w/m/6-1/211/brn/haz/tattoo: skull on F/R shoulder; SSN = 000-44-1441
6) Juan Gonzalas dob= 5-8-1988 h/m/5-8/177 brn/brn; tattoo:marijuana leaf L-forearm; SSN = 000-91-3948
ID #s (fictitious)
1) SC 473832044
2) MI D203291020
3) TN 4939393
4) OH 48293675
6) MO 5838320
7) NJ 5905030
8) DC 6849309
9) MO 48943832
10) GA 58949839
223
DL #s (fictitious)
1) AK H583359
2) DC 5737203
3) RI G35128H2
4) MA 583894939
6) OH 5949309
7) MO K58398
8) OR F683932
9) TX T472829
10) FL 5738202
11) GA 48393298
12) KY 5839209
13) NC N583929
14) NJ 583302
15) CA 4829292
16) SC 49209277
17) MI D411529
Phone #s (fictitious)
1) ph: 260-555-3392
2) ph: 803-555-2935
3) ph: 313-555-5948
4) ph: 410-555-0932
5) ph: 503-555-1199
224
Address/Roadway Locations (fictitious)
16) Pine Tree road at Maple Tree Ave (SB) Burnettown, SC 29829
225
Insurance Information (fictitious)
County of Residence
1) Wayne
2) Cass
3) Aiken
4) Lexington
5) Lagrange
6) Richland
7) Elkhart
226
Tractors
Trailers
227
Exercises
Daily Activity Report
Today you wrote 25 citations; you changed one flat tire for a driver; you obtained 33 completed traffic
dispositions from the courthouse; you gave two Alco-sensor tests (.03% BAC & .26% BrAC); you gave one
DataMaster test (.25% BrAC); you made one DUI arrest (felony); you investigated one crash and issued one
citation during the crash investigation (expired DL); you went to traffic court for 1 hour during your shift; and
you gave 7 warnings total.
Shift: 8:00 am - 7:00 pm; (your shift included ½ hour lunch break & 2 hours overtime for seatbelt patrol)
Entire shift mileage: 50,403 - 50,693; Seatbelt patrol mileage: 50, 655 - 50, 693
19 citations to cars; 5 citations to tractor-trailers; 1 citation for public intoxication (no vehicle)
1 broken taillight
1 seatbelt violation
228
PURPOSE OF REPORTS
___ To collect suspicious criminal activity, but do not have PC for an arrest
___ Form used to record when a police officer changes a tire for a driver
A) Crash Report
E) Information
G) DUI PC Affidavit
H) Case Report
I) Intelligence Report
229
Crash: Collision vs. Non-Collision
Indicate type of crash. Each incident sustained some sort of damaged to vehicle or injury to person.
Collision Non-collision
2 Car turns too fast and rolls over. There is much damage to car.
10 A rock flies from the tire of a truck and cracks the windshield of
a car.
12 A u-joint on the drive shaft breaks and the drive shaft bounces off
of the ground and damages the undercarriage of the car.
14 A car slides off of the roadway and hit a pile of snow/ice in the
median, which damages the front of the vehicle.
230
SCENARIOS
Initial Contact: You observe and stop car for speeding and following too close
at 8:30 am on today’s date: US Hwy 1 at Flute Ave (EB) Aiken, SC in Aiken
County
231
Citation & Warning
You work for Aiken County Sheriff Office, Traffic Division, Badge # 3934
Aiken County Sheriff Office 3848 Walton Avenue Aiken, SC 29801 ph: (803)555-1825
Offense Location: US HWY 1 at Sudow Lake Rd (EB) (Graniteville City in Aiken County)
Insurance: All State policy # AS58374; Agent: Matthew Murdock ph: 803-555-1313
232
Case Report
Complete a case report
You work at Aiken County Police Department 123 Yale Ave, Aiken, SC 29802
Use current date and time. You stop the vehicle described below at 2276 US HWY 1 in
Graniteville, SC for speed (30 MPH in a 15 MPH zone). The vehicle has two occupants.
You smell what appears to be marijuana. You ask the driver to open the ash tray and
the driver complies, and you see what appears to be marijuana in the ash tray. You ask
the driver what it is and the driver states that it is marijuana. You ask the passenger if
it is also hers and she states that it is not hers because she has her own, which she pulls
out of her purse and shows you. You use the NIK Presumptive Drug Test Kit and
perform a field test, which indicates positive for marijuana on both samples.
Case # 2015-0501-11711
Driver: From information provided in the Appendix, use person # 2, DL # 6, address # 18,
phone # 1, Police Dept. = 1, Dispatch = 1, Post Command = 1, Court = 1.
233
Crash Report
Use today’s date and time. Dent to front left fender of car. Crack in wall/barrier.
D1 stated that the he was EB in parking lot 8 and turned right into the loading
dock when he collided with the wall. The front left of V1 hit the wall. D1
stated that the passenger’s Samsung Galaxy S4 phone that fell off of the center
console and broke during the crash. This was corroborated by the passenger.
Serial # 47322002. Cost of phone = $99.
Passenger (front seat): Passenger 1 stated that she has been living with driver since Jan
2012.
Passenger 1 stated that she hurt her neck but that she does not want any treatment.
Crash report # 1
234
Vehicle Crash Proof of Insurance
Vehicle at Fault
V1 South Carolina REGISTRATION
Insurance: All State policy # AS58374; Agent: Tim Murdock ph: 803-555-1313
235
Personal Illness
Complete a Police Employee Personal Illness Report.
You work for Aiken County Sheriff Office, Traffic District, Badge # 3934 ph: (803)555-
1825
You were supposed to work yesterday from 8:00 am – 5:00 pm today. You called in sick at
4:00 am prior to your shift.
You only missed one day. You have returned to work today at 8:00 am.
Abandoned Vehicle
You work for Aiken County Sheriff Office, Traffic District, Badge # 3934 ph: (803)555-
1825
V1 Colorado REGISTRATION
Plate: CA3843 Expires: 1/7/2022
236
Public Speaker
Complete a Public Speaker – Community Relations Form.
South Aiken High School requests that you give a talk about saying “no” to drugs. You gave
the talk yesterday at 8:30 am.
South Aiken High School address: 232 East Pine Log Road Aiken, SC 29803
There is a classroom of students. You talk for about 20 minutes, and you pass out a brochure to each
student called, It’s called Dope for a reason.
The teacher stated that she would like you to talk about youth services and traffic safety in the future.
You are on duty and you see a car with a flat tire. You change the tire.
Location: I-20 MP 21 WB
Michigan REGISTRATION
237
Permit for Possession of Deer
Give a Permit for Possession of Deer to the driver from the Police Service Report. You
shot and destroyed a wounded button buck at I-20 MP 21 in the south ditch.
The driver to whom you provided the deer permit has just run out of gas. Provide him fuel.
Location: I-20 MP 21 WB
Michigan REGISTRATION
Merchant HQ Address
Marathon Station
1231 Money Lane
Columbia, SC 29814
238
CRASH DIAGRAM
Vehicle 1 was traveling on I-26 MP 11 (NB) in the driving lane and collided with a deer
head-on. The deer came out of the east ditch.
Draw a crash diagram. Place the 5 items on the crash diagram that every crash diagram
must have on it. In addition, complete the lines of travel and vehicle direction/labels. In
other words, make the vehicle and directional lines look right.
239
DUI: Probable Cause Affidavit
You are investigating a vehicle crash at I-20 MP 16 EB in Aiken, SC. The driver stated that
she has a sore neck but she refuses any medical attention. During the crash investigation,
you notice empty beer cans in the vehicle. You also smell a strong odor of an alcoholic
beverage on the driver’s breath. The driver stated that she had a few drinks a couple of hours
ago. She stated that there was no passenger with her. You run her record and discover that
she has been arrested last month by the Ohio Highway Patrol in Erie County for DUI. You
give the driver an Alco-sensor test at 9:56 am and the result was 0.11% BAC.
HI REGISTRATION
Kim, Roger
Honolulu, HI 95813
Time notified: 9:31 am; Time arrived: 9:44 am, current date
240
James Nibert (223), a certified DataMaster operator, provided you the results.
REFERENCES
Adams, W. (1999). The interpermeation of self and world: Empirical research, existential
phenomenology, and transpersonal psychology. Journal of Phenomenological
Psychology, 30(2), 39-65.
Bank, S. (2001). From mental health professional to expert witness: testifying in court. New
Directions for Mental health Services, 91, 57-66.
Carter, D. (2002). Issues in police-community relations: Taken from The Police and the
community (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Crandall, C., Silvia, P., N’Gbala, A., Tsang, J., & Dawson, K. (2007). Balance theory, unit
relations, and attribution: the underlying integrity of heiderian theory. Review of
General Psychology, 11(1), 12-30.
Defoe, T. (2007). The truth is, you gave a lousy talk. Chronicle of Higher Education,
54(17), C1-C4.
Fears, D. (2008, June 12). New criminal record: 7.2 million. The Washington Post.
Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/
11/AR2008061103458.html
Federal Bureau of Investigation (2013). FBI releases 2012 crime statistics. Retrieved from
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-releases-2012-crime-statistics
Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research:
Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 42(3), 266-290.
doi:10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3
241
Hatch, J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State
University of New York Press.
Huesmann, L.R., & Eron, L.D. (1992). Childhood aggression and adult criminality. In J.
McCord (Ed.), Facts, frameworks, and forecasts: Advances in criminology theory (p.
137-156). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Huesmann, L.R., Eron, L.D., & Dubow, E.F. (2002). Childhood predictors of adult
criminality: Are all risk factors reflected in childhood aggressiveness? Criminal
Behaviour and Mental Health, 12(3), 185-208.
Kelley, L., Mueller, D., & Hemmens, C. (2004). To punish or rehabilitate revisited: An
analysis of the purpose/goals of state correctional statutes, 1991-2002. Criminal
Justice Studies, 17(4), 333-351.
Kentner, K. (2012). The Ice Cream Murders: Correlation vs. Causation. Retrieved from
http://biojournalism.com/2012/08/correlation-vs-causation/
Klimon, E. (1985). “Do you swear to tell the truth?” Nursing Economics, 3(2), 98-102.
Lambert, D. (2008). Body language 101: The ultimate guide to knowing when people are
lying, how they are feeling, what they are thinking, and more. Ney York, NY:
Skyhorse.
Leedy, P., and Ormrod, J. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Lewis, D. (2001). The police officer in the courtroom. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas
Publisher, LTD.
Liptak, A. (2008, April 23). U.S. prison population dwarfs that of other nations.
International Herald Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.iht.com/articles/
2008/04/23/america/23prison.php
Maxey, C., and O’Connor, K. (2007). Dealing with blunders. T+D, 61(3), 78-79.
McCarthy, K. (2009). Growth in prison and jail populations slowing: 16 states report
declines in the number of prisoners. Retrieved from Bureau of Justice Statistics Web
site: http://bjs .ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=361
Miller-Johnson, S., Moore, B.L., Underwood, M.K., Moore, B.L., & Cole, J.D. (2005).
African-American girls and physical aggression: Does stability of childhood
242
aggression predict later negative outcomes? In D. Pepler, K. Madsen, C. Webster, &
K. Levene (Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression (p. 75-101).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Navarro, J. (2004). Testifying in the theater of the courtroom. FBI Law Enforcement
Bulletin, 73(9), 26-30.
Reardon, K. (1981). Persuasion: Theory and context. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Resnick, P. and Knoll, J. (2007). Being an effective psychiatric expert witness. Psychiatric
Times, 24(6).
Reynolds, D. (1990). The truth, the whole truth and nothing but... Springfield, IL: Charles
C Thomas Publisher, LTD.
Routledge, F. (2007). Exploring the use of feminist philosophy within nursing research to
enhance post-positivist methodologies in the study of cardiovascular health. Nursing
Philosophy, 8(4), 278-290. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00324.x
Schiappa, E. (1991). Protagoras and logos. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina
Press.
Smith, R., & Hilderbrand, D. (n.d.). Courtroom testimony techniques: Success instead of
survival. Retrieved from http://www.ronsmithandassociates.com/ CTT.htm
Smith, S., Eggen, M., & St. Andre, R. (2006). A transition to advanced mathematics (6th
ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
Speaking successfully (2006) Techniques: Connecting Educations & Careers, 81(8), 10-11.
243
Tucker, J., Donovan, D., and Marlatt, G. (Eds.). (1999). Changing additive behavior:
Bridging clinical and public health strategies. New York: Guilford Press.
U.S. Department of Justice (2002). I-94 Arrival/departure record. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Officer
Verma, S. (2005). The little book of scientific principles, theories, & things. New York,
NY: Sterling.
Weber, R. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly,
28(1), iii-xii.
244