KEMBAR78
Mid Notes | PDF | Liberal Arts Education | Social Psychology
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views12 pages

Mid Notes

Uploaded by

Malleswara Reddy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views12 pages

Mid Notes

Uploaded by

Malleswara Reddy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

The formation of culture is influenced by several key factors, including geography, history, and religion or

existing ideologies. Here’s how each factor contributes:

1. Geography

 Climate & Environment: The physical surroundings, such as mountains, rivers, and climate, shape
the lifestyle, clothing, food habits, and architecture of a society.
 Natural Resources: Availability of resources like water, fertile land, minerals, and forests
influences economic activities and traditions.
 Isolation vs. Connectivity: Coastal and riverine societies often have diverse cultures due to trade,
while isolated regions develop unique customs and traditions.

2. History

 Wars & Conquests: Invasions and colonization introduce new traditions, languages, and cultural
practices.
 Migration & Trade: Movement of people leads to cultural exchanges, spreading languages, food
habits, and traditions.
 Historical Events & Leaders: Revolutions, reforms, and influential leaders shape societal values
and practices over time.

3. Religion & Existing Ideologies

 Beliefs & Rituals: Religious teachings influence moral values, festivals, and social norms.
 Ethical & Social Systems: Caste systems, laws, and governance structures often originate from
religious or ideological beliefs.
 Cultural Identity: Religion plays a role in defining art, music, literature, and customs in a society.

Nature of Culture

Culture is a dynamic and complex system of values, beliefs, and practices that shape human societies. Its
key characteristics include:

1. Learned

 Culture is not inherited biologically but is acquired through socialization, education, and experience.
 Individuals learn cultural norms, traditions, and behaviors from family, schools, and society.
 Example: Children learn language, etiquette, and traditions from their parents and community.

2. Shared

 Culture is a collective experience shared by members of a society.


 It fosters a sense of belonging and identity within a group.
 Example: Festivals, cuisine, and customs are practiced collectively within a community.

3. Transgenerational

 Culture is passed down from one generation to the next, ensuring continuity over time.
 While it evolves, core traditions and values are preserved across generations.
 Example: Traditional folk music and storytelling continue through generations.

4. Symbolic

 Culture relies on symbols, such as language, art, gestures, and rituals, to convey meaning.
 Symbols help communicate values, beliefs, and identity.
 Example: Flags, religious icons, and national anthems represent cultural heritage.

5. Patterned

 Cultural practices follow a structured and consistent pattern that defines social behavior.
 These patterns influence institutions like family, politics, and economy.
 Example: Marriage rituals, social hierarchies, and legal systems reflect cultural patterns.

6. Adaptive

 Culture evolves in response to environmental, technological, and social changes.


 It helps societies adjust to new challenges while retaining core traditions.
 Example: Traditional businesses adopting e-commerce to stay relevant in the digital era.

Yes! Culture is an acquired knowledge that helps people interpret experiences and shape social behavior.
It provides a framework for understanding the world and interacting with others.

Key Aspects of Culture as Acquired Knowledge

1. Learned Through Socialization


o Culture is not innate; it is learned from family, peers, education, and society.
o Example: Language, traditions, and customs are passed from one generation to another.
2. Interprets Experience
o Culture provides meaning to events, objects, and actions.
o Example: In some cultures, eye contact signifies confidence, while in others, it may be seen
as disrespectful.
3. Guides Social Behavior
o Cultural norms shape how individuals interact within a society.
o Example: Greeting styles vary—handshakes, bowing, or hugging—depending on cultural
expectations.
4. Symbolic and Shared
o Culture uses symbols (language, art, gestures) to communicate meaning.
o Shared cultural knowledge unites communities and groups.
5. Dynamic and Adaptive
o Culture evolves with technological, social, and environmental changes.
o Example: Digital communication has influenced global cultural exchanges.

Culture, as acquired knowledge, acts as a social blueprint, helping individuals understand their roles,
relationships, and interactions in society.

Edward Hall’s Cultural Model

Edward T. Hall, an anthropologist, introduced a framework for understanding cultural differences through
different "languages" of communication. His model highlights how people from different cultures perceive
and interpret time, space, relationships, and agreements.

1. Language of Time (Monochronic vs. Polychronic)

 Monochronic Cultures: Time is linear, scheduled, and structured. Punctuality and planning are
emphasized.
o Example: The U.S., Germany, and Japan follow strict work schedules.
 Polychronic Cultures: Time is flexible, and multitasking is common. Relationships take precedence
over schedules.
o Example: India, Latin America, and the Middle East prioritize relationships over strict
deadlines.

2. Language of Space (Proxemics)

 Different cultures have different perceptions of personal space and territoriality.


 High Territoriality Cultures: People value personal space and boundaries (e.g., the U.S.,
Germany).
 Low Territoriality Cultures: People are comfortable with close physical interactions (e.g., Latin
America, Middle East).
 Example: In Japan, maintaining distance is a sign of respect, while in Mediterranean cultures, close
proximity is common.

3. Language of Things (Material Possessions & Symbolism)

 Material possessions, gifts, and wealth signify different things in different cultures.
 Status-Oriented Cultures: Wealth and material items indicate power and success (e.g., the U.S.,
China).
 Relationship-Oriented Cultures: Gifts and objects symbolize emotional connection rather than
status (e.g., India, Mexico).
 Example: In Western cultures, a luxury car may indicate success, while in some Asian cultures, an
expensive gift may be a sign of respect.

4. Language of Friendship (Social Relationships)

 The concept of friendship varies across cultures.


 Formal & Selective Friendships: Relationships take time to develop and are long-term (e.g.,
Germany, Japan).
 Informal & Open Friendships: Friendships are formed quickly but may not be as deep (e.g., the
U.S., Latin America).
 Example: In India, friendships are deeply personal and involve family, while in the U.S., friendships
may be casual and work-related.

5. Language of Agreement (Contracts & Trust)

 The way cultures establish agreements and trust varies.


 Rule-Based Agreements: Contracts and legal documents define commitments (e.g., the U.S.,
Germany).
 Relationship-Based Agreements: Trust and personal relationships are more important than written
contracts (e.g., China, Middle East).
 Example: In Japan, business agreements rely heavily on trust and long-term relationships, whereas in
the U.S., detailed contracts are crucial.

6. High-Context vs. Low-Context Cultures

 High-Context Cultures:
o Communication is indirect, relies on non-verbal cues, and is context-dependent.
o Relationships and group harmony are prioritized.
o Example: Japan, China, India, and Arab cultures.
 Low-Context Cultures:
o Communication is direct, explicit, and relies on words rather than context.
o Individualism and efficiency are prioritized.
o Example: The U.S., Germany, and the UK.
Conclusion

Edward Hall’s model helps understand cultural differences in communication, relationships, and business
practices. Recognizing these differences improves cross-cultural interactions and avoids misunderstandings
in global settings.

Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Cultural Value Orientation Model

Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck (1961) proposed a model to understand how different cultures perceive and
interact with the world. Their framework is based on six fundamental questions that shape cultural values
and behavior.

1. How Do We See the Environment? (Human-Nature Orientation)

Cultures vary in how they perceive their relationship with nature:

 Mastery (Dominant over Nature): Humans control and exploit nature for progress. (Example:
Western industrial societies like the U.S. and Europe.)
 Harmony with Nature: Humans coexist with nature, maintaining balance. (Example: Many
Indigenous cultures, Buddhism in East Asia.)
 Subjugation to Nature: Nature is a powerful force, and humans must accept its will. (Example:
Some tribal and religious societies that believe in fate or divine will.)

2. How Do We See Relationships? (Relational Orientation)

This aspect focuses on social structures and interactions:

 Individualistic Cultures: Focus on personal achievement and independence. (Example: The U.S.,
UK, Canada.)
 Collateral (Group-Oriented) Cultures: Emphasize family, community, and teamwork. (Example:
China, India, Mexico.)
 Hierarchical (Authoritarian) Cultures: Social roles are rigid, and respect for authority is central.
(Example: Many traditional Asian and Middle Eastern societies.)

3. How Do We View Our Role in Life? (Activity Orientation)

Cultures define success and purpose differently:

 Being-Oriented Cultures: Focus on personal growth, relationships, and inner peace. (Example:
Many Indigenous and spiritual cultures.)
 Doing-Oriented Cultures: Value action, achievement, and productivity. (Example: The U.S.,
Germany, Japan.)
 Becoming-Oriented Cultures: Emphasize personal transformation and self-improvement.
(Example: Many Latin American and Buddhist-influenced societies.)

4. What Is Basic Human Nature? (Human Nature Orientation)

This reflects a culture’s view on whether people are inherently good, bad, or a mix of both:

 Good: People are fundamentally good and trustworthy. (Example: Scandinavian cultures promote
social trust.)
 Evil: People need strict rules and control to behave properly. (Example: Some conservative societies
with strong legal enforcement.)
 Mixed (Neutral): People have both good and bad traits, depending on their upbringing and
experiences. (Example: Many societies with ethical frameworks like Confucianism and Hinduism.)

5. How Do We Conceptualize and Use Time? (Time Orientation)

Cultures perceive and manage time differently:

 Past-Oriented: Traditions, history, and ancestral values are central. (Example: India, China, Japan,
and many European cultures.)
 Present-Oriented: Focuses on enjoying the moment rather than planning for the future. (Example:
Many Latin American and Indigenous cultures.)
 Future-Oriented: Planning, long-term goals, and innovation are prioritized. (Example: The U.S.,
Germany, South Korea.)

6. How Do We Conceptualize and Use Space? (Space Orientation)

Space perception varies across cultures:

 Private Space: Individuals value personal space and privacy. (Example: The U.S., UK, and
Germany, where personal boundaries are important.)
 Public/Shared Space: People feel comfortable in close physical proximity and value communal
spaces. (Example: Middle Eastern, African, and Latin American cultures.)

Conclusion

Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s model helps explain how cultures differ in their worldview, social interactions,
and values. Understanding these differences is essential for cross-cultural communication, management, and
international relations.

Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Model

Geert Hofstede developed a framework to analyze cultural differences based on six dimensions. These
dimensions help understand how societies organize themselves, interact, and handle challenges.

1. Power Distance (PDI) – How Society Deals with Inequality

Power Distance measures the acceptance of unequal power distribution within a society.

 High Power Distance: Hierarchical structures, respect for authority, and centralized decision-
making. (Example: India, China, Mexico, Russia.)
 Low Power Distance: Equality, flat organizational structures, and decentralized decision-making.
(Example: Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands.)

Example:In high power distance cultures, employees do not challenge authority, whereas in low power
distance cultures, open discussions with managers are common.

2. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV) – Personal vs. Group Orientation

This dimension defines whether societies prioritize individual achievements or group harmony.

 Individualistic Cultures: Emphasize personal goals, independence, and self-expression. (Example:


U.S., Canada, Australia.)
 Collectivist Cultures: Focus on group loyalty, relationships, and community well-being. (Example:
China, Japan, India, Latin America.)
Example:In individualistic cultures, promotions are based on personal performance, while in collectivist
cultures, group harmony and loyalty matter more.

3. Masculinity vs. Femininity (MAS) – Competitive vs. Nurturing Values

This dimension measures the extent to which societies value competition versus care and quality of life.

 Masculine Cultures: Value ambition, competition, and material success. (Example: Japan, U.S.,
Germany.)
 Feminine Cultures: Prioritize care, relationships, and work-life balance. (Example: Sweden,
Norway, Netherlands.)

Example:In masculine cultures, job performance and success define status, whereas in feminine cultures,
well-being and cooperation are valued.

4. Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI) – Comfort with Ambiguity and Change

This dimension reflects how societies handle uncertainty and unpredictability.

 High Uncertainty Avoidance: Prefer rules, structure, and risk reduction. (Example: Greece, Japan,
Portugal.)
 Low Uncertainty Avoidance: More comfortable with flexibility, innovation, and uncertainty.
(Example: U.S., UK, India.)

Example:High uncertainty avoidance cultures have strict regulations in workplaces, while low uncertainty
avoidance cultures encourage experimentation and adaptability.

5. Long-Term vs. Short-Term Orientation (LTO) – Focus on Tradition vs. Future Growth

This dimension examines whether a culture focuses on long-term goals or short-term achievements.

 Long-Term Orientation: Value perseverance, planning, and future rewards. (Example: China,
Japan, South Korea.)
 Short-Term Orientation: Focus on immediate results, tradition, and quick successes. (Example:
U.S., UK, Nigeria.)

Example:Long-term-oriented cultures invest in education and savings, while short-term-oriented cultures


prioritize immediate consumption and quick outcomes.

Conclusion

Hofstede’s model helps businesses, researchers, and policymakers understand cultural differences and
improve cross-cultural communication, leadership, and decision-making.

Trompenaars’ Cultural Dimensions Model

Fons Trompenaars developed this model to explain how different cultures manage relationships, time, and
the environment. It consists of seven dimensions that highlight cultural variations in business and social
interactions.

1. Universalism vs. Particularism – Rules vs. Relationships

 Universalism: Emphasizes rules, laws, and standards that apply equally to everyone. (Example:
U.S., Germany, UK.)
 Particularism: Focuses on personal relationships and context rather than fixed rules. (Example:
China, India, Latin America.)

Example:In a universalist culture, contracts and legal agreements are strictly followed. In a particularist
culture, personal relationships can override legal agreements.

2. Individualism vs. Collectivism – Personal vs. Group Identity

 Individualistic Cultures: Value personal achievements and independence. (Example: U.S.,


Australia, Netherlands.)
 Collectivist Cultures: Prioritize group loyalty, harmony, and interdependence. (Example: Japan,
China, Mexico.)

Example:In individualistic societies, employees are rewarded based on personal performance, while in
collectivist cultures, teamwork and group success are valued more.

3. Neutral vs. Affective – Emotional Expression

 Neutral Cultures: Emotions are controlled, and professionalism is maintained. (Example: Japan,
UK, Germany.)
 Affective Cultures: Open expression of emotions is encouraged. (Example: Italy, Spain, Brazil.)

Example:In a neutral culture, business meetings remain formal and serious, whereas in an affective culture,
people openly express excitement or frustration.

4. Specific vs. Diffuse – Separation of Work and Personal Life

 Specific Cultures: Clear distinction between work and personal life; formal relationships.
(Example: U.S., Switzerland, Germany.)
 Diffuse Cultures: Work and personal life overlap, and relationships extend beyond professional
settings. (Example: China, India, Latin America.)

Example:In a specific culture, colleagues do not socialize much outside of work, while in a diffuse culture,
personal relationships influence professional interactions.

5. Achievement vs. Ascription – Status Based on Merit vs. Birthright

 Achievement Cultures: Status is earned through accomplishments and skills. (Example: U.S.,
Canada, Australia.)
 Ascription Cultures: Status is based on age, family background, or social connections. (Example:
Japan, Saudi Arabia, India.)

Example:In achievement-oriented cultures, promotions are based on performance, whereas in ascription


cultures, seniority or family connections play a bigger role.

6. Sequential vs. Synchronous – Perception of Time

 Sequential Cultures: Time is linear, and schedules are strictly followed. (Example: U.S., Germany,
UK.)
 Synchronous Cultures: Time is flexible, and multiple tasks can be handled simultaneously.
(Example: Mexico, India, Middle East.)

Example:In sequential cultures, meetings start and end on time, whereas in synchronous cultures, schedules
are more flexible, and interruptions are common.
7. Inner-Directed vs. Outer-Directed – Control Over Environment

 Inner-Directed Cultures: People believe they can control their environment through effort and
planning. (Example: U.S., Australia, Germany.)
 Outer-Directed Cultures: People adapt to external conditions and emphasize harmony with nature.
(Example: China, Japan, India.)

Example:In inner-directed cultures, businesses focus on strategic planning to shape the future, while in
outer-directed cultures, they adjust to external circumstances like market trends and government policies.

Conclusion

Trompenaars’ model helps understand cultural differences in communication, leadership, negotiation, and
teamwork, making it valuable for international business and cross-cultural management.

GLOBE Cultural Dimensions Model

The GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness) Study is an extensive
research project that examines cultural influences on leadership and organizational behavior. It identifies
nine cultural dimensions that influence societies and businesses.

1. Performance Orientation – Focus on Achievement & Excellence

This dimension measures how much a society encourages and rewards performance, innovation, and results.

 High Performance Orientation: Emphasizes achievement, competitiveness, and continuous


improvement. (Example: U.S., Singapore, Japan.)
 Low Performance Orientation: Values tradition, family ties, and harmony over competition.
(Example: Russia, Venezuela, Greece.)

Example:Companies in high-performance-oriented cultures set ambitious goals and reward high achievers.
In low-performance cultures, personal relationships often matter more than results.

2. Institutional Collectivism – Importance of Group Interests

This reflects the degree to which organizations and societies encourage collective action.

 High Institutional Collectivism: Emphasizes shared goals, teamwork, and collective welfare.
(Example: Sweden, South Korea, Japan.)
 Low Institutional Collectivism: Prioritizes individual initiative and personal success. (Example:
U.S., UK, Argentina.)

Example:In high institutional collectivist cultures, employees work for the success of the organization,
while in low institutional collectivist cultures, individual career growth is more important.

3. Gender Egalitarianism – Equality Between Genders

This measures how much a society minimizes gender role differences.

 High Gender Egalitarianism: Promotes gender equality in leadership and opportunities. (Example:
Sweden, Norway, Finland.)
 Low Gender Egalitarianism: Maintains traditional gender roles and inequalities. (Example: Middle
Eastern countries, India, Japan.)
Example:Scandinavian countries encourage women in leadership roles, while in some traditional cultures,
gender roles are more rigidly defined.

4. Uncertainty Avoidance – Handling of Risk and Change

This dimension assesses how societies deal with ambiguity, risk, and change.

 High Uncertainty Avoidance: Prefers rules, structure, and stability. (Example: Germany, Japan,
Greece.)
 Low Uncertainty Avoidance: Accepts change, takes risks, and adapts easily. (Example: U.S., India,
China.)

Example:In high uncertainty avoidance cultures, businesses create strict rules and risk management
strategies, whereas in low uncertainty avoidance cultures, companies are more flexible and innovative.

5. In-Group Collectivism – Importance of Family & Close Groups

This refers to the degree of loyalty and pride in small groups such as family, friends, or close-knit work
teams.

 High In-Group Collectivism: Strong family ties, loyalty, and group identity. (Example: China,
Mexico, India.)
 Low In-Group Collectivism: Emphasizes independence and personal identity over group affiliation.
(Example: U.S., Germany, UK.)

Example:In high in-group collectivist cultures, family businesses thrive, while in low in-group collectivist
cultures, people move independently for career growth.

6. Future Orientation – Long-Term Planning & Sustainability

This measures how much a society values long-term planning and future rewards.

 High Future Orientation: Focuses on long-term investments, sustainability, and delayed


gratification. (Example: Japan, Singapore, Switzerland.)
 Low Future Orientation: Emphasizes short-term gains and immediate rewards. (Example:
Argentina, Russia, Nigeria.)

Example:In high future-oriented cultures, companies invest heavily in research and development, while in
low future-oriented cultures, businesses prioritize immediate profits.

7. Humane Orientation – Kindness & Social Responsibility

This measures how much a society values fairness, altruism, and caring for others.

 High Humane Orientation: Encourages generosity, social welfare, and concern for others.
(Example: Philippines, Ireland, Thailand.)
 Low Humane Orientation: Focuses more on self-interest and competition. (Example: Germany,
France, U.S.)

Example:In high humane-oriented cultures, businesses focus on corporate social responsibility (CSR),
while in low humane-oriented cultures, profitability is a bigger priority.

8. Assertiveness – Competitive vs. Modest Behavior


This dimension assesses how much a society encourages confrontation and assertiveness in communication.

 High Assertiveness: Competitive, direct communication, and strong opinions. (Example: U.S.,
Germany, Israel.)
 Low Assertiveness: Modest, cooperative, and indirect communication. (Example: Japan, Sweden,
New Zealand.)

Example:In high assertiveness cultures, negotiations are direct and aggressive, while in low assertiveness
cultures, diplomacy and harmony are valued.

9. Power Distance – Acceptance of Hierarchical Authority

This measures how much people accept power inequalities in society and organizations.

 High Power Distance: Strong hierarchy, respect for authority, and centralized decision-making.
(Example: India, China, Saudi Arabia.)
 Low Power Distance: Flat organizational structures, equal power distribution, and participative
decision-making. (Example: Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands.)

Example:In high power distance cultures, employees rarely challenge their bosses, while in low power
distance cultures, open discussions and feedback are encouraged.

Conclusion

The GLOBE model helps understand how different cultures influence leadership, decision-making, and
organizational behavior. It is widely used in international business, management, and global leadership
development.

Gannon’s Metaphors for National Cultures

George Gannon developed cultural metaphors to describe different national cultures using symbols that
reflect their core values, traditions, and societal structures. These metaphors help in understanding how
people from various countries think, behave, and interact.

1. The British Mansion 🏰

Symbolizes: Tradition, hierarchy, and formality.

 British culture values history, social class, and formal etiquette, much like a well-maintained
mansion that represents stability and prestige.
 Decision-making in organizations follows a structured hierarchy, with respect for seniority.
 Personal privacy is important, and interactions are often reserved and polite.

Example:British businesses operate with a formal, rule-based approach, and social status plays a role in
networking.

2. The Chinese Family Altar 🏮

Symbolizes: Confucian values, respect for elders, and collectivism.

 The family altar represents ancestor worship and Confucian traditions, where family ties and
hierarchy are central.
 Society prioritizes harmony, discipline, and collective well-being over individualism.
 Business and social relationships rely on trust, loyalty, and long-term commitments (guanxi).
Example:In Chinese companies, employees show deep respect for their leaders, and business deals often
take time to build trust.

3. The Spanish Bullfight 🐂

Symbolizes: Passion, drama, and confrontation.

 Spanish culture values strong emotions, intense expressions, and a love for competition.
 Social interactions can be expressive and lively, with a focus on personal honor and pride.
 Decision-making can be dramatic and confrontational, but also deeply engaging and personal.

Example: In Spanish organizations, meetings may involve heated debates, but this is a sign of engagement
rather than conflict.

4. The American Baseball ⚾

Symbolizes: Individualism, teamwork, and competition.

 Baseball reflects the "American Dream", where individual talent and hard work lead to success.
 The culture values rules, strategy, and fair competition, emphasizing equal opportunities.
 Success is often measured through performance and results, rather than relationships.

Example: American companies promote meritocracy, rewarding employees based on their contributions
rather than seniority.

5. The Japanese Rock Garden

Symbolizes: Harmony, precision, and discipline.

 The rock garden represents order, patience, and deep contemplation—key aspects of Japanese
culture.
 Social interactions prioritize politeness, group harmony, and non-confrontation.
 Business decisions take time, as thorough planning and consensus-building are essential.

Example: Japanese companies emphasize teamwork, long-term planning, and perfection in execution.

6. The Korean Kimchi 🥬

Symbolizes: Adaptability, resilience, and collectivism.

 Kimchi, a fermented dish, represents Korea's ability to endure hardship and transform
challenges into strengths.
 Korean culture values hard work, discipline, and deep family and community bonds.
 Education and economic success are highly valued, and perseverance is a key cultural trait ("hahn"
- a deep emotional resilience).

Example: Korean businesses expect dedication and long working hours, emphasizing loyalty to the
company.

7. The Israeli Kibbutz 🌾

Symbolizes: Equality, innovation, and collective effort.


 The kibbutz, a communal settlement, reflects Israel’s emphasis on cooperation, shared
responsibility, and innovation.
 Israeli society values independence, direct communication, and informal leadership.
 Entrepreneurship and adaptability are strong, with a focus on overcoming challenges.

Example: In Israeli organizations, hierarchy is often informal, and employees freely voice their opinions,
fostering innovation.

Conclusion

Gannon’s metaphors provide a rich, symbolic way to understand different cultures, highlighting their
unique values and ways of thinking. These metaphors are useful in cross-cultural communication,
business negotiations, and global leadership strategies.

You might also like