Frequency and Distribution of the Respondents According to Age
Range Frequency Percent RANK
13 - 15 10 33% 2
16 - 17 11 37% 1
18 - 19 9 30% 3
Total 30 100%
The data reveals that the majority of the respondents fall within the age group of 16 to 17 years old,
making up 37% of the total respondents (11 out of 30). This group ranks first in terms of frequency. The 13 to
15 age group comes next, accounting for 33% of the respondents (10 out of 30), ranking second. The 18 to 19
age group has the fewest respondents, with 9 individuals, representing 30% of the total. This group ranks third.
Overall, the distribution is relatively balanced across the three age groups, with only slight variations in
percentage, indicating a fairly even representation of different age ranges among the respondents.
Social media platforms use by the respondents
Range Frequency Percent RANK
Facebook 13 43% 1
Messenger 4 13% 3.5
Instagram 4 13% 3.5
Youtube 1 3% 5
TikTok 8 27% 2
X/Twitter 0 0% 6.5
Other 0 0% 6.5
Total 30 100%
The most used platform is Facebook, with 13 respondents (43%), ranking first. This indicates that
Facebook remains the dominant social media platform among the group. TikTok follows with 8 respondents
(27%), ranked second, showing its growing popularity, especially among younger users. Messenger and
Instagram are tied at third place (13%), with 4 users each, indicating moderate usage of these platforms. They
likely serve more specific purposes such as messaging or sharing visual content. YouTube had only 1
respondent (3%), ranking fifth, which is surprisingly low considering its global usage—possibly because it’s
more of a media consumption platform than a social networking one. X/Twitter and Other platforms were not
used at all (0%), both tied at last place (6.5), indicating little to no interest in those platforms among the
respondents.
The data clearly shows that Facebook remains the most popular social media platform among the
respondents, likely due to its multi-functionality and familiarity. TikTok’s strong second-place position
highlights its rising influence, especially for entertainment and trends. Platforms like Messenger and Instagram
are still relevant but less dominant.
The absence of users on X/Twitter and other platforms suggests that these are either not appealing or not
considered useful by this demographic. This could reflect generational preferences or a shift toward platforms
that offer more dynamic or visual interaction. The findings imply that for communication, entertainment, and
social interaction, Facebook and TikTok are the go-to platforms, and any outreach or engagement strategies
targeting this group should prioritize those platforms.
Social media usage of respondents tbe describe in terms of frequency
How long do you spend on social media daily?
Range Frequency Percent RANK
A few minutes 5 17% 3.5
Half hour 3 10% 5.5
One-two hours 6 20% 1.5
Three hours 5 17% 3.5
Six hours 2 7% 6
More than six hours 3 10% 5.5
Too much to count 6 20% 1.5
Total 30 100%
The most common responses were "One to two hours" and "Too much to count," each with 6
respondents or 20%, sharing the top rank (1.5). This suggests a significant portion of the respondents either
have a moderate or an untrackable level of usage. "A few minutes" and "Three hours" both had 5 respondents
(17%), ranking third (3.5). This shows that a notable number of individuals still limit their usage to short or
moderate time periods. "Half an hour" and "More than six hours" were reported by 3 respondents each (10%),
tying at rank 5.5. While 30 minutes is a short duration, “more than six hours” represents extensive usage,
showing two extremes in behavior but with equal frequency. The least selected option was "Six hours" with
only 2 respondents (7%), ranking last (6).
The data suggests that while some respondents maintain moderate social media use (1–2 hours), a
significant number also report unmeasurable or excessive usage, indicating potential overuse among part of the
group. At the same time, a fair percentage limit their engagement to shorter durations. This pattern reflects a
diverse range of social media habits, with trends leaning toward either moderate use or potentially problematic
high usage. These insights may point to the need for awareness or balance in digital consumption among the
respondents.
Social media usage of respondents the describe in terms of frequency
How often do you spend time with friends/family?
Range Frequency Percent RANK
10% 4.5
Never 3
30% 1.5
Very rarely 9
3% 7
Rarely 1
13% 3
Occasionally 4
10% 4.5
Sometimes 3
7% 6
Often 2
30% 1.5
Very Often 9
Total 30 100%
The most common responses were "Very rarely" and "Very often", both with 9 respondents each (30%),
sharing the top rank (1.5). This contrast shows a polarized pattern among the respondents—some spend time
with family/friends frequently, while others rarely do. "Occasionally" was selected by 4 respondents (13%),
ranking third. This suggests a small group who maintains a balanced, moderate level of social interaction.
"Never" and "Sometimes" were chosen by 3 respondents each (10%), both ranking 4.5. These indicate a group
that either doesn’t engage in social interaction at all or does so inconsistently. "Often" had 2 respondents (7%),
ranking 6, reflecting a small number who regularly engage with friends and family. "Rarely" was the least
selected, with only 1 respondent (3%), ranking last (7).
The responses reveal a divided trend in social engagement. While a portion of the respondents reported
spending time with friends and family very often, an equal number indicated very rare interaction. This suggests
a significant social gap within the group—some are socially active, while others may be experiencing social
isolation or distancing.
This could be influenced by factors such as personal preferences, family dynamics, or possibly even digital
distractions like social media. The data points to the importance of promoting balanced and healthy
relationships, as consistent social interaction is linked to emotional well-being and mental health.
Social media usage of respondents the describe in terms of purpose
Indicators Mean sd Description Rank
1. Do you use social media to become more sociable? 3.00 2.71 NEUTRAL 1
2. Do you prefer using social media to attend social gathering? 2.57 2.57 NEUTRAL 3
3. Do you use social media to get information regarding current 3.43 3.10 AGREE 2
social events?
TOTAL 3.00 2.80 NEUTRAL
(Scale of interval: STRONGLY AGREE (5.00-4.24), AGREE (4.23-3.43), NEUTRAL (3.42-2.62) DISAGREE (2.61-1.81), STRONGLY DISAGREE (1.80-1)
The overall average mean score is 3.00 with a standard deviation of 2.80, resulting in a general
interpretation of "NEUTRAL" across all purposes. Getting information on current social events has the highest
mean score of 3.43, with a description of "AGREE" and a rank of 2. This suggests that a majority of
respondents use social media as an information source, particularly for staying updated with news and social
trends. Using social media to become more sociable received a mean score of 3.00 with a "NEUTRAL"
interpretation, ranked 1st. This shows uncertainty or mixed feelings among respondents—some may find it
helpful for socializing, while others do not see a significant impact. Preferring social media over attending
social gatherings had the lowest mean (2.57) and was also described as "NEUTRAL", ranked 3rd. This suggests
that respondents do not strongly prefer virtual interaction over in-person social experiences.
The findings indicate that respondents primarily use social media to access information about current
events, showing its importance as a tool for staying informed. However, when it comes to social interaction or
replacing physical gatherings, their opinions are neutral, suggesting that social media is not a strong substitute
for real-world social experiences.
Overall, while social media is recognized as an effective informational tool, its role in enhancing
sociability or replacing face-to-face interaction is seen as limited or uncertain among the respondents. This
highlights a balanced or cautious approach to digital socialization within the group.
Social media and Social Life
Indicators Mean sd Description Rank
1. Do you communicate with friends/family with the use of 3.13 2.91 NEUTRAL 1
social media?
2. Do you find it easier to connect with distant friends/family 2.90 2.67 NEUTRAL 2.5
members through social media?
3. What are the benefits you see in using social media to connect 2.13 1.83 DISAGREE 4
with friends/family members? (Select all that apply).
4. In your opinion, does excessive use of social media affect 2.87 2.61 NEUTRAL 3
friends/family relationships?
5. Would you consider limiting your social media usage for the 2.90 2.67 NEUTRAL 2.5
sake of improving your friends/family relationships?
TOTAL 2.63 2.40 NEUTRAL
(Scale of interval: STRONGLY AGREE (5.00-4.24), AGREE (4.23-3.43), NEUTRAL (3.42-2.62) DISAGREE (2.61-1.81), STRONGLY DISAGREE (1.80-1)
The overall mean is 2.63, with a standard deviation of 2.40, and a general rating of NEUTRAL. The
highest mean score (3.13) is for the question "Do you communicate with friends/family using social media?",
described as NEUTRAL and ranked 1st. This suggests that while many respondents may use social media for
communication, they are not strongly convinced of its effectiveness or value in doing so. Two indicators
—"Connecting with distant friends/family" and "Willingness to limit usage to improve relationships"—share a
mean of 2.90 and are both described as NEUTRAL, ranked 2.5. This reflects indecisiveness: respondents
neither strongly agree nor disagree, possibly acknowledging both the convenience and drawbacks of social
media. "Does excessive social media use affect relationships?" received a mean of 2.87, also NEUTRAL,
ranked 3rd. This shows that respondents are uncertain or divided on whether heavy usage truly harms personal
connections.The lowest-rated indicator is about perceived benefits of using social media to connect, with a
mean of 2.13 and a description of DISAGREE, ranking 4th. This is significant—it shows that many respondents
do not see strong or clear benefits in using social media to enhance relationships.
The results show that respondents have a neutral or uncertain view about the role of social media in their
personal relationships. While it is commonly used as a communication tool, the perceived emotional or
relational benefits are not strongly acknowledged. Additionally, there is no clear consensus on whether
excessive use negatively impacts relationships or whether it's worth limiting.
This suggests that while social media is integrated into their daily interactions, it may not be seen as a
valuable or emotionally fulfilling substitute for real-world connections. The overall neutrality may indicate a
need for greater awareness of the effects of social media on social well-being and the importance of maintaining
meaningful, in-person interactions.
