MIT Unit 2
MIT Unit 2
INNOVATION STRATEGIES
What is Innovation?
Innovation is the systematic application of ideas that result in the introduction of new or
significantly improved products, services, processes, business models, or organizational
methods to enhance value creation, solve problems, or respond to market opportunities.
Innovation is broader than invention; while invention refers to the creation of a novel idea or
product, innovation includes the successful implementation and commercialization of that
idea, making it useful, profitable, or impactful.
Innovation is not just about newness, but about relevance and impact. It reflects an
organization’s ability to adapt, evolve, and grow by transforming creativity into tangible
outcomes.
Characteristics of Innovation:
● Novelty: Innovation must involve something new, whether it’s a product, service,
process, or model. Novelty can be absolute (world-first) or relative (new to the firm or
market).
● Value Creation: Innovation must lead to added value, either by improving efficiency,
increasing customer satisfaction, reducing costs, or opening new markets. Value can
be economic, social, or environmental.
● Risk and Uncertainty: All innovations involve some level of risk, from technical
failures to market rejection. Managing uncertainty is a critical part of the innovation
process.
Innovation Strategies
Good strategies promote alignment among diverse groups within an organization, clarify
objectives and priorities, and help focus efforts around them
an organization's capacity for innovation stems from an innovation system: a coherent set of
interdependent processes and structures that dictates how the company searches for novel
problems and solutions, synthesizes ideas into a business concept and product designs, and
selects which projects get funded.
Aping someone else’s system is not the answer. There is no one system that fits all
companies equally well or works under all circumstances.
An explicit innovation strategy helps you design a system to match your specific competitive
needs.
A company’s innovation strategy should specify how the different types of innovation fit into
the business strategy and the resources that should be allocated to each.
2. Crowdsourcing
The idea is that rather than relying on a few experts (perhaps your own employees) to solve
specific innovation problems, you open up the process to anyone (the crowd). One common
example is when an organization posts a problem on a web platform (like InnoCentive) and
invites solutions, perhaps offering a financial prize.
Crowdsourcing has a lot of merits: By inviting a vast number of people, most of whom you
probably could not have found on your own, to address your challenges, you increase the
probability of developing a novel solution.
But crowdsourcing works better for some kinds of problems than for others. For instance, it
requires fast and efficient ways to test a large number of potential solutions. If testing is very
time-consuming and costly, you need some other approach, such as soliciting a handful of
solutions from just a few experts or organizations.
3. Co-creation
Close collaboration with customers reveals insights that can lead to novel offerings. But
others say that working too closely with customers will blind you to opportunities for truly
disruptive innovation. Steve Jobs was adamant that customers do not always know what
they want—the reason he cited for eschewing market research.Corning’s customer-centered
approach to innovation is appropriate for a company whose business strategy is focused on
creating critical components of highly innovative systems. It would be virtually impossible to
develop such components without tapping customers’ deep understanding of their system.
An innovation matrix is a strategic tool that can help business leaders identify and prioritize
opportunities for innovation in their organizations.
It provides a framework for analyzing and evaluating potential opportunities, which can help
them focus on the most promising approach for growth. Companies also use it to develop a
shared understanding of the direction and goals of a business and the strategies they plan to
employ to achieve them.
4. Architectural innovation
5. Routine innovation
builds on a company’s existing technological competences and fits with its existing business
model—and hence its customer base. An example is Intel’s launching ever-more-powerful
microprocessors, which has allowed the company to maintain high margins and has fueled
growth for decades. Other examples include new versions of Microsoft Windows and the
Apple iPhone.
6. Disruptive innovation
Disruptive innovation targets niche or underserved markets with simpler, more affordable
solutions that initially fall short of mainstream performance. Over time, these offerings
improve and appeal to broader audiences, eventually displacing established competitors.
This strategy often favors startups and agile firms.
It changes market dynamics by making products more accessible and often forces
incumbents to adapt or decline. Netflix’s shift from DVD rentals to online streaming disrupted
traditional video rental models like Blockbuster, showcasing how disruptive innovation can
reshape consumer habits and industry standards.
Open innovation involves sourcing ideas, technologies, and collaboration from external
partners like customers, startups, or academic institutions. Instead of relying solely on
internal R&D, companies use shared knowledge to accelerate innovation and reduce costs
or development time.
This strategy promotes adaptability and creativity while spreading risks across partners. It’s
especially useful in fast-paced or complex industries. For instance, Procter & Gamble’s
“Connect + Develop” program taps into external innovations to supplement internal
capabilities, allowing for faster and more diverse product development.
Radical innovation introduces entirely new products, technologies, or business models that
can transform industries or create new ones. It typically involves high risk, long development
times, and significant investment in new knowledge or infrastructure. This strategy often
emerges from breakthrough research or emerging technologies.
Despite its risks, radical innovation can bring immense rewards, such as market leadership
and long-term growth. It enables companies to redefine industries and customer
expectations. Tesla’s innovation in electric vehicles and autonomous driving is a prime
example, reshaping the automotive industry through bold, high-impact advancements.
QUES -
Define innovation and provide five instances of organizations that have achieved
groundbreaking innovation. What were the key factors that facilitated their innovative
success?
Below are notable instances of organizations that have achieved groundbreaking innovation,
along with the key factors that enabled their success:
1. Apple Inc. revolutionized the consumer electronics industry with the launch of the
iPhone in 2007. The iPhone integrated a phone, iPod, and internet communicator
into a single touch-screen device, setting new standards for smartphones.
Key success factors included a strong vision under Steve Jobs, design thinking,
end-to-end product control, and seamless user experience. Apple’s culture of
secrecy and intense focus on aesthetics and functionality also played a vital role.
2. Tesla Inc. disrupted the automobile industry with its high-performance electric
vehicles and innovations in battery technology and autonomous driving. Tesla’s
innovation lies not just in electric cars, but in redefining energy and transportation
systems.
Key enabling factors were Elon Musk’s visionary leadership, aggressive R&D
investments, vertical integration (e.g., building Gigafactories), and a bold approach to
software-driven innovation.
3. Netflix transformed from a DVD rental company into a global streaming platform,
reshaping how people consume entertainment. The move to online streaming and
investment in original content positioned Netflix as a pioneer in digital media.
Key factors for success included early adoption of digital distribution, data-driven
decision-making, customer-centric services, and a willingness to pivot its business
model.
4. Airbnb revolutionized the hospitality industry by creating a peer-to-peer lodging
platform where individuals could rent out their homes or rooms. This sharing
economy model disrupted traditional hotel chains.
The key success factors were its platform-based business model, the ability to scale
rapidly without owning property, user-generated trust systems (reviews and ratings),
and the use of data analytics to personalize experiences and optimize
supply-demand matching.
5. Zara, the fashion brand innovated in the area of fast fashion by developing a
responsive supply chain that could design, manufacture, and deliver new clothing to
stores within weeks. Unlike traditional seasonal collections, Zara used real-time
customer data to make rapid design decisions.
Its innovation came from supply chain agility, strong coordination between design
and retail, and localized manufacturing, allowing it to constantly refresh its product
offerings.
6. Spotify transformed the music industry by popularizing on-demand music streaming,
replacing downloads and physical sales. Its innovation lay in the freemium model,
algorithm-based personalized playlists, and seamless cross-device streaming.
Spotify’s success came from leveraging big data and machine learning to enhance
user experience, strong licensing agreements with record labels, and continuous
experimentation with social and interactive features
At the heart of the orbit shifting innovation, is the breakthrough that creates a new orbit and
achieves a transformative impact.
If you are interested in small shifts, slight improvements, and new versions of an existing
product or service, then you can pass. While, Orbit shifting innovation is all about huge,
disruptive, ground-breaking transformations
All excitement around innovation is centred on getting the big idea. Thinking out of the box
is talked about with obsession. The world of innovation is full of stories of how a leader
got to an out-of-the-box idea that created a transformative impact.
Enemies of innovation- The reality for most organizations is that layers and layers of
gravity can make it very difficult to come up with an out-of-the-box idea. Come to think of it,
out of which box is the real question. For there is the organizational gravity box, the
industry gravity box, the country gravity box, and the cultural gravity box. The deeper
you go, the more invisible the box becomes.
Most orbit-shifting innovations did not start with an out-of-the-box idea, but with an
out-of-the-box challenge, an orbit-shifting challenge.
It takes an orbit-shifting challenge to create the escape velocity needed to break through
gravity. An out-of-the-box idea is a consequence. An orbit-shifting challenge leads to an
orbit-shifting idea and not the other way round.
A powerful principle is: for every three orbit-maintaining (performance) goals, a leader needs
to take on at least one orbit-shifting challenge. Adopting and institutionalizing the 3+1
twin-track goal-setting construct will unleash orbit-shifting innovation by design
Twin-track goal setting is a powerful way to embed strategic flexibility into the organization’s
DNA.
Some followers look at the average and create stretch goals, others benchmark with the
industry best practices and create catch-up goals. Orbit-shifters search for the exception,
across industries and domains, and make the exception the reference point for an
orbit-shifting challenge.
New and useful ideas emerge as people with diverse expertise, experience, or points of view
thrash out their differences.
The kind of collaboration that produces innovation is more than simple “get-along”
cooperation. It involves and should involve passionate discussion and disagreement.
This creative collaboration produces innovation, but to many, this kind of engagement is hard
and can be emotionally draining. The sparks that fly can sting or, at minimum, create tension
and stress.
To collaborate means making oneself vulnerable to hard questions and push-back. Not
everyone wants to do that all the time. It’s no wonder that some and perhaps many people
choose to remain silent rather than participate.
● Creative Agility
- A portfolio of ideas is generated and tested, then revised and retested, in an often
lengthy process of repeated experimentation which are messy and unpredictable.
- By its nature innovation requires interim outcomes that make most organizations
nervous. Experiments take time and patience.
- They produce false starts, mistakes, and dead ends along the way. Missteps and
rework are inevitable and must be accepted.
- These realities don’t lend themselves to the preferred corporate approach of set a
goal, make a plan, and work the plan.
- So, to avoid failure, most people don’t perform the experiments that produce real
innovation. Instead, they simply generate a set of alternate solutions and then choose
one and pursue it.
- Organizations that innovate not only attempt new things, but they invite failure as part of
the cost of discovery. And, nobody gets in trouble for trying something that doesn’t work.
● Creative Resolution
- Incorporating the best of option A and option B to create something new, option C, often
produces the most innovative solution. However, the process of integration can be
inherently discomforting, emotionally, and intellectually.
- When faced with two seemingly mutually exclusive alternatives, the human impulse is to
choose one and discard the other as soon as possible, or to forge a simple compromise.
We crave the clarity provided by that kind of clean, assured decision-making.
- It takes courage to hold open a multitude of possibilities long enough that new
ways of combining them can emerge. There is often great pressure to make any
choice and move on.
- Innovative teams know that integrative decision-making often involves more than simply
mechanically combining ideas. Rather, it requires a willingness to play with
experiments until they "click"
- That’s why leadership is the key, cultivating the ability to test possibilities before
choosing one and moving ahead. It’s not so surprising that people often choose not to
innovate – or, more accurately, that they choose to avoid the challenging activities most
likely to produce real innovation.
- The job of the person leading innovation is to create the conditions that allow and
encourage all these things to happen again and again.
● Cross-Functional Collaboration
Organizations should build capabilities to scan the external environment for emerging
trends, technologies, and shifts in consumer behavior. Strategic foresight involves
analyzing these trends and preparing for future scenarios. This allows firms to
proactively innovate rather than reactively adapt.
Frugal innovation
The goal of frugal innovation is to focus only on basic components. In doing so, one does
not focus on the innovation performance itself, but on the requirements and the users or
target group of the innovation.
A frugal solution is therefore simple and reliable to use and thus meets customer needs
much better. On the one hand, production is more resource-efficient, and on the other hand,
the result can be offered at a lower price.
Usually this refers to removing nonessential features from a durable good, such as a car or
telephone, in order to sell it in developing countries.
Frugal innovation refers to the process of designing and developing cost-effective, simple,
and resource-efficient solutions that meet the essential needs of people, especially in
low-income or resource-constrained environments. It focuses on creating high value at low
cost by minimizing the use of resources, simplifying technology, and eliminating
non-essential features. Frugal innovation is often driven by necessity and ingenuity, making
it highly relevant for emerging economies like India, where a significant portion of the
population has limited purchasing power.
Examples
- Designed for developing countries, the Nokia 1100 was basic, durable, and–besides a
flashlight–had few features other than voice and text Selling more than 200 million units
only four years after its 2003 introduction made it one of the best selling phones of all
time.
- Tata Nano- Designed to appeal to the many Indians who drive motorcycles, the Tata
Nano was developed by Indian conglomerate Tata Group and is the cheapest car in the
world. Marketed as the world’s cheapest car, Tata Nano was an attempt to make
four-wheelers accessible to lower-income families. Though it faced commercial
challenges, it showcased how cost-effective engineering and simplified design could
democratize mobility.
- Mitti Cool- fridge made of clay which needs no electricity to preserve food items for
many days. This Rajkot-native’s invention has been featured at a conference organised
by the Centre for India and Global Business, Judge Business School, University of
Cambridge, the UK in May 2009. This clay-based refrigerator works without electricity
and is aimed at rural consumers. It preserves food and medicines using natural cooling,
aligning with both affordability and environmental sustainability.
- Voice Box- Dr Vishal Rao came up with a device that costs just Rs 50 which can give
throat cancer patients their voice back. This Bangalore-based oncologist’s voice
prosthesis is extremely cheap compared to other ones available in the market. ‘Aum’ is
now available after receiving approvals from scientific and ethical committees. This is a
life-saver for such patients and helps them eat and speak well.
Ques - Frugal innovation is the need of the hour considering the purchasing power of
the majority of the people in India. Critically evaluate the statement. Give three
examples of frugal innovation
The statement that “Frugal innovation is the need of the hour considering the
purchasing power of the majority of the people in India” is highly relevant but also
needs critical evaluation. On one hand, a large segment of India’s population resides in rural
or semi-urban areas with limited income and access to sophisticated infrastructure.
For these communities, affordability, accessibility, and utility are far more important than
high-end features or brand prestige. In such a context, frugal innovations can bridge the gap
between supply and demand by offering practical, inclusive, and scalable solutions. They
also promote social equity by ensuring that innovation reaches the underserved and
marginalized.
On the other hand, while frugal innovation addresses immediate affordability and inclusivity
challenges, it may face limitations in scalability, brand perception, and long-term
technological evolution. If not paired with quality and durability, low-cost solutions may
reinforce stereotypes about inferior products for low-income groups.
Additionally, frugal innovation should not become a justification for minimal investment in
quality, design, or user experience. For it to succeed on a larger scale, frugal innovation
must balance cost-efficiency with user satisfaction, sustainability, and adaptability to
changing needs.
Agile is a flexible and iterative approach originally developed in software development but
now widely applied across industries. It emphasizes short development cycles, continuous
customer feedback, and the ability to adapt quickly to change. Agile teams work in “sprints”
to produce working components or solutions, which are then refined based on stakeholder
input. This method reduces the time between idea and execution and ensures that
innovation stays aligned with user needs.
Bringing together diverse expertise in cross-functional teams is essential for fast innovation.
These teams include members from various departments such as R&D, marketing, design,
finance, and supply chain. By collaborating closely and working towards a shared innovation
goal, these teams can avoid delays caused by departmental silos. Cross-functional teams
foster holistic thinking, faster problem-solving, and better execution of ideas. When
decision-making is streamlined and interdisciplinary collaboration is strong, organizations
can compress development timelines and bring innovations to market more quickly.
Example: Mahindra’s Farm Equipment Sector uses open innovation to co-develop low-cost,
high-efficiency farming solutions in collaboration with agricultural universities, local
entrepreneurs, and global tech partners. Its collaboration with MIT for the “Nano Tractor”
project helped introduce small, affordable tractors for Indian farmers, drastically reducing
development time.
Digital technologies play a vital role in speeding up innovation. Tools like AI, machine
learning, cloud computing, and big data analytics help organizations make faster, more
informed decisions. Automation in R&D, design, and testing can significantly reduce time
and resource requirements. Cloud-based platforms enable teams across geographies to
collaborate in real-time, manage projects, share feedback, and iterate swiftly. For example,
digital twins and simulation tools in manufacturing allow organizations to test product
performance virtually before building physical prototypes, thereby saving time and cost.
6. Decentralized Decision-Making
Conclusion