By : Fajar Primadi A
Date : 6-Jan-2010
Agenda
INTRODUCTION
ACCESSIBILITY ANALYSIS
RETAINABILITY ANALYSIS
INTEGRITY ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
1. Accessibility
The ability of a user to obtain the requested service from the system.
2. Retainability
The ability of the user to retain the requested service once connected
for the desired duration.
3. Integrity
The ability of a user to receive the requested service at a desired quality.
HSDPA ACCESSIBILITY SUCCESS RATE (%)
RRC DROP RATE (%)
RAB ESTABLISH FAIL RATE CS(%)
RAB ESTABLISH FAIL RATE PS(%)
CCSR CS VOICE (%)
CCSR CS VIDEO (%)
CCSR PS (%)
HSDPA RETAINABILITY SUCCESS RATE (%)
RAB DROP RATE PS [%]
RAB DROP RATE CS [%]
ISHO RT SUCCESS RATE (%)
SHO SUCC RATE (%)
INTEGRITY
CSSR PS (%)
RETAINABILITY
CSSR CS VIDEO (%)
TARGET
ACCESSIBILITY
CSSR CS VOICE (%)
DETAIL KPI
KPI
98
98
98
98
99
99
99
99
1.5
1.5
95
95
Accessibility program
RAN Capacity utilization Analysis and monitoring
Audit Node B HW and License Capacity
Consistency check RBS and RNC parameter
Admission parameter adjustment
Periodic Evaluation
Accessibility Analysis
Transport and RNC Load Capacity utilization analysis
and monitoring
RAN Capacity utilization Analysis and
monitoring
OBJECTIVE
Monitor utilization of RAN capacity to prevent performances degradation due to
lack of resources.
Analyze capacity trend and network growing for upgrade proposal
Capacity monitored
CE UL and CE DL utilization
DL power utilization
DL code utilization
HS user utilization
Grace period of license monitoring.
Transport and RNC Load Capacity
utilization analysis and monitoring
OBJECTIVE
Monitor utilization of transport capacity to prevent performances degradation
due to lack of resources.
Analyze capacity trend and network growing for upgrade proposal
Capacity monitored
Iub (Node to RXI) Utilization
Iub (RXI to RNC) Utilization
Cid Utilization
IuCS Utilization
IuPS Utilization
Iur Utilization
RNC Mpload
Audit Node B HW and License Capacity
OBJECTIVE
Audit actual RBS configuration
Audit and consistency check RBS parameter
Monitor actual RBS HW capacity and license capacity
Capacity monitored
HW Capacity : RAXB, TXB, RU, E1
License Key Capacity
RBSLocalCell Parameter
NodeBFunction Parameter
RBS Product type
GraceTimePeriod
AAL2 Configuration
IMA Configuration
E1
IubDataStream
AntennaRef
RBS Parameter dump
OBJECTIVE
Utilize of available resources in RBS
Utilize of available license in RBS
Consistency of RBS parameter and RNC parameter
Capacity monitored
maxDlPowerCapability
maxNumHsPdschCodes
maxNumHsdpaUsers
supportOf16qam
maxHsRate
electricalUlDelay, ulAttenuation
electricalDlDelay, dlAttenuation
Admission parameter adjustment
OBJECTIVE
Optimize of available resources by admission parameter adjustment
Capacity monitored
dlCodeAdm
hsdpaUsersAdm
pwrAdm
sf16Adm
sf16AdmUl
sf4AdmUl
sf8Adm
sf8AdmUl
numHsPdschCodes
maximumTransmissionPower
Accessibility Study Case
Below is HSDPA accessibility success rate of PBR037W3
HSDPAAccSR
Degraded ?
Accessibility Study Case cont
Counter to be checked:
1. pmNoFailedRabEstAttemptExceedConnLimit
Number of failed PS RAB establishment attempts due to exceeding the configured
connection limit when allocating Spreading Factor
Parameter related: e.g sf16admUl, sf8admUl
2. pmNoFailedRabEstAttemptLackDlChnlCode
Number of failed RAB establishment attempts due to lack of DL channelization codes
Parameter related: dlCodeAdm
3. pmNoFailedRabEstAttemptLackDlPwr
Number of failed RAB establishment attempts due to lack of DL power. Counter is stepped
when admission control fails with reject reason lack of DL power
Parameter related: pwrAdm
Accessibility Study Case COnt
NCCR #279
Lack of DL Code
& DL Power
Action: Create NCCR for changing dlCodeAdm &
pwrAdm parameter
Retainability
For most of the drop causes related to RF conditions issues, the speech RAB is
considered as a reference, hence some counters for speech drop call causes
have been defined in order to spot possible radio conditions problems. Following
the RAB speech drop causes are described:
1. Drop speech due to soft handover actions
It is dropped Speech calls due to Soft Handover action, which are network initiated call releases due
to inability to include a non-valid or valid cell in the active set. This means that missing neighbour
drops due to releaseConnOffset exceeding are included. In general every cause that does not allow
executing a SHO is triggering the counter at numerator
Counter related : pmNoSysRelSpeechSoHo
2. Drop speech due to missing neighbor
It is dropped Speech call due to unknown measured cell (missing neighbor relation).
Counter related : pmNoSysRelSpeechNeighbr
Retainability
3. Drop speech due to UL Synchronization lost
It is dropped Speech call due to UL Synchronization Lost. It has to be noted that the counter at
numerator is only pegged as a UL synch drop if dchRcLostT (default 5s) expires.
Counter related : pmNoSysRelSpeechUlSynch
Retainability Study Case
Below is CCSR Voice for PAD012W1
Mostly below KPI
threshold (< 99%)?
Retainability Study Case cont
NCCR #346
High count in pmNoSysRelSpeechSoHo &
pmNoSysRelSpeechNeighbr
Action: check and add some missing neighbor
Integrity
Integrity consist of Soft Handover (SHO) and IRAT Handover
performance:
1. SHO SR:
100 * (1 - pmNoTimesCellFailAddToActSet / (pmNoTimesCellFailAddToActSet + pmNoTimesRlAddToActSet)
pmNoTimesCellFailAddToActSet
Number of times a cell fails to be added to an active set
pmNoTimesRlAddToActSet
Number of times an RL is added to an active set
Integrity
2. IRAT HO SR:
100 * (pmNoSuccessOutIratHoSpeech / (pmNoAttOutIratHoSpeech)
pmNoSuccessOutIratHoSpeech
Number of successful outgoing (to GSM) inter-RAT handover forConversational
speech RAB for the best cell in the active set
pmNoAttOutIratHoSpeech
Number of attempted outgoing (to GSM) inter-RAT handover for Conversational
speech RAB for the best cell in the active set.
integrity Study Case
Below is SHO performance of RNPAD02.
There was SHO degradation on 24 and 25 Nov 09
integrity Study Case cont cont
Check worst cell list:
Date/Time
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
24-Nov-09
Region
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Sumbagteng
Cluster
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Bukittinggi
Utran_Cell
BKT091W2
BKT091W3
BKT091W1
BKT175W2
BKT024W2
BKT176W2
BKT176W3
BKT023W1
BKT023W2
BKT023W3
BKT024W1
BKT024W3
BKT175W1
BKT175W3
BKT176W1
BKT508W1
BKT508W2
BKT508W3
PAY250W1
PAY250W2
SHOSR
0
0.001894406
0.003619189
99.72899729
99.86168741
99.94463923
99.97441801
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
pmNoTimesCellFailAddToActSetpmNoTimesRlAddToActSet
28247
0
158358
3
55259
2
1
368
4
2888
3
5416
2
7816
0
6583
0
474
0
342
0
9975
0
5824
0
750
0
422
0
12350
0
8742
0
3301
0
5973
0
2
0
61
The worst cell are: BKT091WA, BKT091WB and BKT091WC
integrity Study Case cont cont
Check site status from RNC:
RNC
SITE ID CFRPHEM1 CFRPHEM2 CFRPHEM3 ICDS TN
RNPAD02 BKT091W
10001
10001
10001
1110 A
Check alarm in BKT091W:
Conclusion: SHO was degraded due to transmission problem
