Features ,function and
approach's of public health
Objectives
Philosophy of Public Health
Scope of Public Health
Features of Public Health
Core Functions of Public Health
Essential Services of Public
Health
Approaches of public health
Public health interventions
Public health…..
Public health is defined as “the science
and art of preventing disease, prolonging
life and promoting of health” (Winslow,
1923)
What do you think of Public Health?
Most people think of public health workers as
physicians and nurses, but a wide variety of other
professionals work in public health, including:
veterinarians, sanitary engineers,
microbiologists,
laboratory technicians,
statisticians,
economists,
administrators,
industrial safety and hygiene specialists,
psychologists,
sociologists, and
educators.
Scope of public health
1. Compare the scope of public health in
developing and developed countries
considering the prevalence of health
problems
Scope of Public Health
Public health systems vary in different parts of the world,
depending upon the prevalent health problems.
In the developing world, where sanitation problems and limited
medical resources persist,
• infectious diseases are the most significant threat to public
health.
• public health officials devote resources to establish
sanitation systems
• immunization programs to curb the spread of infectious
diseases,
• provide routine medical care to rural and isolated
populations.
Scope of Public Health…
In industrialized nations:
sanitary food and water supplies
excellent medical resources have reduced rates of infectious
disease.
Instead, accidents and diseases such as:
• lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes are among the leading
causes of death.
In these areas, public health goals include:
• education programs to teach people how to prevent
accidents
• lessen their risk for disease,
• maintenance of the excellent disease prevention systems
already established.
Features of Public Health
1. Social justice; is the central pillar of
public health
2. Inherently political nature
3. Expanding agenda
4. Link with government
5. Grounded in science
6. It focuses on prevention
7. Uncommon culture
Social Justice Philosophy
Justice indicates that there is fairness in the
distribution of benefits and burdens;
How each member of a society is allocated his or
her fair share of collective burdens and benefits
Factors that impede the fair distribution of benefits
and burdens: social class, racism, disability, etc..
Collective action is necessary to neutralize or
overcome those impediments .
Public health works to overcome those
impediments.
Inherently Political Nature
Public Health is both public and political
in nature.
The social justice component of public
health stimulates political conflict
Governmental public health agencies
seeking to serve the interest of both
government and public health are
frequently caught in the middle.
Expanding Agenda
Prior to 1900, the primary problems addressed by public health
were infectious diseases and related environmental risks.
After 1900, the focus expanded to include problems and needs
of children and mothers
Middle of the century: chronic disease prevention and medical
care fell into public health
Later, substance abuse, violence, injuries
Recently: Bioterrorism, other disaster preparedness are also
added to the public health agenda
Link with Government
Public health is linked with government in
Two ways:
1. Issuing policies that govern the health of the population
2. Directly provide programs and services that are designed to
meet the health needs of the population
Grounded in Science
Often five basic science of public health are identified:
Epidemiology,
Biostatistics,
Environmental Science,
Management Sciences and
Behavioral Sciences.
Occupational Health,
Nutrition, and
Maternal and Child Health
Epidemiology and biostatics are essential tools of public health.
Focus on Prevention
Prevention is the purpose of public health
and is aimed at preventing disease;
however we are also preventing
deaths,
hospital admissions,
days lost from school and work
consumption of human and fiscal
resources; etc.
Uncommon Culture
Public health is unique in that many different sciences, art and
methods can contribute towards the same outcome.
Vast majority of public health workers are not formally trained
in public health.
As a result public health professionals include professionals
from different disciplines, like anthropologist, sociologist,
psychologist, physicians, nurses , nutritionist, lawyers ,
mangers
Why invest in public health?
Why invest in public health?
An effective approach is to prevent than to cure.
Public health contributes a great deal more to the
health of a population than medicine does.
better nutrition and housing, sanitation and
occupational safety
Norm that public health is publicly funded as
market does not have incentive to fund this
Public health facilitates economic growth and
contributes poverty reduction
Why invest in public health?…
For example: In east Asia countries public health
efforts raised labor productivity and life
expectancies which lead to rapid economic
growth in these countries
Major economic loss can happen as a result of poor
public health such as poor municipal sanitation
Poor public health takes economic tolls in various
ways
reduced attraction for investors, tourists,
continued expenditure in combating diseases and
Reduced labor productivity
Core Functions of Public Health
Assessment
Policy Development
Assurance
The Ten Essential Services of Public Health
1. Monitor health status to identify community
health problems
2. Diagnose and investigate health problems and
health hazards in the community
3. Evaluate effectiveness, accessibility, and quality
of personal and population-based health services
4. Research for new insights and innovative
solutions to health problems
5. Inform, educate, and empower people about
health issues
The Ten Essential Services of Public Health…
6. Mobilize community partnerships to identify and
solve health problems
7. Develop policies and plans that support individual
and community health efforts
8.Assure a competent public health and personal health
care workforce
9. Enforce laws and regulations that protect health and
ensure safety
10.Link people to needed personal health services and
assure the provision of health care when otherwise
unavailable
Frame Work for Core Functions of Public Health
Assessment
Regularly and systematically collect, assemble, analyze, and
make available information on the health of the community,
Including statistics on health status, community health needs,
and epidemiological and other studies of health problems.
Purpose and Scope of Needs Assessment
What are the goals of the assessment?
What is intended to be gained from it?
How extensive will the assessment be?
What resources are available to conduct
it?
Data Collection for Needs Assessment
Primary data
Those that collected specifically for use in this process
Secondary data
Those already collected for some other purpose
Essential Services under Assessment
Essential services
1 Monitor health status to Morbidity/ mortality reports
identify community health Surveillance
problems surveys
2 Diagnose and investigate Community needs assessment
health problems and Surveys
health hazards in the
community
Policy Development
Every public health agency exercises its
responsibility to serve the public interest in
the development of comprehensive public
health policies by:
promoting use of the scientific
knowledge base in decision-making
about public health and
leading in developing public health policy
Essential Services under Policy
Essential services
3 Inform, educate, and Mass medias, Brochures,
empower people about Leaflets, booklets
health issues Community gatherings…
4 Mobilize community Community involvement thorough
partnerships to identify CBOs,
and solve health Community conversation
problems Clubs
5 Develop policies and Develop different policies,
plans that support Guidelines and plans
individual and E.g.: drug policy, HIV/AIDS policy,
community health ART guideline, TB/Leprosy
efforts guideline, etc…
Assurance
Assurance is equivalent to the doctors actual treatment of
the patient.
Public health has the responsibility of assuring public
health intervention in the community are available and
accessible to every one.
Essential Services under Assurance
Essential services
Trainings
6 Assure a competent public health
and personal health care workforce • Pre- service training (ensure quality and
quantity), In service training and Mentoring
Assignment of health personnel
Regular technical supervision
Quarantine law,
7 Enforce laws and regulations that
protect health and ensure safety Sanitation ,
STDs
Monitoring and evaluation
8 Evaluate effectiveness,
accessibility, and quality health
services
Out reach services
9 Link people to needed personal
health services and assure the Campaigns
provision of health care when Expansion of health posts
otherwise unavailable Extension health workers
Essential Services of Public Health…
10. Research for new insights and innovative
solutions to health problems
– Research serves all functions of public
health
Public health intervention
Small Group Work
What are the differences between
prevention, control, elimination,
eradication, and extinction?
Prevention, Control, Elimination and Eradication
Public health interventions dealing with infectious diseases
are defined based on their long term target:
1. Prevention
2. Control
3. Elimination
4. Eradication
5. Extinction
1. Disease Prevention
The goals of public health/or medicine are
to promote health, to preserve health, to
restore health, and to minimize suffering
and distress.
These goals are embodied in the word
"prevention"
Prevention: Definition and Concept
Actions aimed at eradicating, eliminating or
minimizing the impact of disease and disability,
or if none of these are feasible, retarding the
progress of the disease and disability.
The concept of prevention is best defined in
the context of levels, traditionally called
primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. A
fourth level, called primordial prevention, was
later added.
Leavell’s Levels of Prevention
Stage of disease Level of prevention Type of response
Pre-disease Primary Health promotion and
prevention Specific protection
Latent disease Secondary Pre-symptomatic
prevention Diagnosis and treatment
Symptomatic disease Tertiary •Disability limitation for
prevention early symptomatic disease
•Rehabilitation for late
Symptomatic disease
Levels of prevention
Primordial prevention
Primary prevention
Secondary prevention
Tertiary prevention
Primordial prevention
Primordial prevention consists of actions and measures that
inhibit the emergence of risk factors in the form of
environmental, economic, social, and behavioral conditions
and cultural patterns of living etc.
It is the prevention of the emergence or development of risk
factors in countries or population groups in which they have
not yet appeared
For example, many adult health problems (e.g., obesity,
hypertension) have their early origins in childhood, because
this is the time when lifestyles are formed (for example,
smoking, eating patterns, physical exercise).
Primordial prevention…
In primordial prevention, efforts are directed towards
discouraging children from adopting harmful lifestyles
The main intervention in primordial prevention is through
individual and mass education
Primary prevention
Primary prevention can be defined as the action taken prior to
the onset of disease, which removes the possibility that the
disease will ever occur.
It signifies intervention in the pre-pathogenesis phase of a
disease or health problem.
Primary prevention may be accomplished by measures of
“health promotion” and “specific protection”
Primary prevention…
Primary prevention
Achieved by
Health promotion Specific protection
Immunization and seroprophylaxis
Health education
chemoprophylaxis
Environmental modifications Use of specific nutrients or supplementations
Protection against occupational hazards
Nutritional interventions Safety of drugs and foods
Life style and behavioral changes Control of environmental hazards,
e.g. air pollution
Approaches for Primary Prevention
The WHO has recommended the following approaches for the
primary prevention of chronic diseases where the risk factors
are established:
a. Population (mass) strategy
b. High -risk strategy
Secondary prevention
It is defined as “ action which halts the progress of a disease at
its incipient stage and prevents complications.”
The specific interventions are: early diagnosis (e.g. screening
tests, and case finding programs….) and adequate treatment.
Secondary prevention attempts to arrest the disease process,
restore health by seeking out unrecognized disease and treating
it before irreversible pathological changes take place, and
reverse communicability of infectious diseases.
It thus protects others in the community from acquiring the
infection and thus provide at once secondary prevention for the
infected ones and primary prevention for their potential
contacts.
Tertiary prevention
It is used when the disease process has advanced beyond its
early stages.
It is defined as “all the measures available to reduce or limit
impairments and disabilities, and to promote the patients’
adjustment to irremediable conditions.”
Intervention that should be accomplished in the stage of tertiary
prevention are disability limitation, and rehabilitation.
Disability limitation
Disease
Impairment
Disability
Handicap
Impairment, Disability and Handicap
Impairment is “any loss or abnormality of psychological,
physiological or anatomical structure or function.”
Disability is “any restriction or lack of ability to perform an
activity in the manner or within the range considered normal
for the human being.”
Handicap is termed as “a disadvantage for a given individual,
resulting from an impairment or disability, that limits or
prevents the fulfillment of a role in the community that is
normal (depending on age, sex, and social and cultural factors)
for that individual.”
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation is “ the combined and coordinated use of medical,
social, educational, and vocational measures for training and
retraining the individual to the highest possible level of functional
ability.”
2. Disease Control
Concept of control:
The term disease control describes ongoing operations
aimed at reducing:
the incidence of disease,
the duration of disease and consequently the risk of
transmission,
the effects of infection, including both the physical and
psychosocial complications, and
the financial burden to the community.
Reduction of disease incidence, prevalence, morbidity or
mortality to a locally acceptable level as result of
deliberated efforts;
2. Disease Control…
Control activities focus on primary prevention or secondary
prevention, but most programs combine both.
control
elimination
eradication
Control can be seen from two perspectives
Local
Particular level of control may be an aim or policy of the
country (countries may have their own optimal level)
Requires economic analysis
Global
One country's/region control may affect others
Locally optimal may not be globally optimal
Examples of Disease Control
Tuberculosis: China
TB prevalence reduced by 40%, and cure rate was 95%
Onchocerciasis: West Africa,
Transmission halted
22 million children in 11 counties are now free from threat
of river blindness
Trachoma: Morocco,
the incidence has been cut by more than 99%
Chagas disease: South America
decreased incidence of Chagas disease by 94%
Disease Control programs in Ethiopia
Malaria
Tuberculosis
HIV
STI
Blindness
3. Disease Elimination
Between control and eradication, an intermediate goal has been
described, called "regional elimination"
The term "elimination" is used to describe interruption of
transmission of disease, as for example, elimination of measles,
polio and diphtheria from large geographic regions or areas
Regional elimination is now seen as an important precursor of
eradication
Elimination
Reduction to zero of the incidence of a specified disease in a
defined geographic area as a result of deliberate efforts;
continued intervention measures are required.
Examples:
Leprosy in Ethiopia
Polio in Latin America and Caribbean
Measles in 7 Southern Africa countries,
Current Elimination Programmes
Neonatal tetanus,
Leprosy,
Onchocerciasis,
Trachoma and
Lymphatic filariasis
4. Disease Eradication
Eradication literally means to "tear out by roots".
It is the process of “termination of all transmission of infection
by extermination of the infectious agent through surveillance and
containment”.
Eradication is an absolute process, an "all or none" phenomenon,
restricted to termination of an infection from the whole world. It
implies that disease will no longer occur in a population.
To-date, only one disease has been eradicated, that is smallpox.
4. Disease Eradication…
It is defined as permanent reduction to zero of the worldwide
incidence of infection caused by specific agent as a result of
deliberate efforts.
Intervention measures are no longer needed.
Two main factors that determine the success of a disease
eradiation programme:
scientific feasibility and
political, social and economic factors
Scientific feasibility
It includes:
availability of effective and practical interventions
availability of diagnostic / surveillance tools
demonstrated successful elimination of the disease in a
particular area.
no animal reservoir for the organism is known or suspected
transmission from one individual to another can be
interrupted (available technology to interrupt disease
transmission, vaccination which gives life long immunity
or effective drug).
the burden of disease is important to international public
health
Political, social and economic factors
the cost effectiveness of eradication versus elimination or
control programmes;
the ability to coordinate with other health programmes and
the potential effects of the eradication programme on the health
system.
the degree of societal and political commitment
the capacity for financial, managerial and technical support
Eradication…
In theory, if the right tools were available, it would be possible
to eradicate all infectious diseases.
In reality, there are distinct biological features of the
organisms and technical factors of dealing with them that
make their potential eradicability more or less likely.
Three indicators however, are considered of primary
importance in determining the likelihood of successful
eradication.
Three Indicators determining the likelihood of successful
eradication:
1. Availability of effective interventional tools to interrupt
transmission of the agent, such as a vaccine.
2. Availability of diagnostic tools, with sufficient sensitivity
and specificity to detect infections that can lead to
transmission of the disease, and
3. Humans are required for the life-cycle of the agent, which
has no other vertebrate reservoir and cannot amplify in the
environment.
Disease eradication programmes should not bypass or
compromise existing health systems and attempts should be
made to expand benefits to health services beyond the limited
impact of eradicating the target disease.
Example of Eradication
Small pox
During the 1900s, global efforts were made to eradicate seven
diseases
1. Hookworm
2. Yellow fever
3. Malaria
4. Yaws
5. Small pox
6. Guinea worm
7. Polio
Eradication - Benefits
A well-defined scope with a clear objective and end
No illness or death from that disease
Successful eradication programmes produce sustainable
improvement in health and provide a high benefit-cost ratio.
No control program needed /Resources can be redirected
Monetary benefits
Eradication programmes are attractive to potential funding
Provide equity in coverage for all affected areas
Eradication - Pitfalls
Diversion of attention and resources from equally or more
important health problems /Diversion of resources
Higher short-term costs,
Increased risk of failure and the consequences of failure,
An inescapable sense of urgency, and
High vulnerability of eradication programmes to interruption by
war and other civil disturbances;
Perception of programmes as "donor driven";
Placement of excessive, counterproductive pressures and
demands upon health workers
Requirement of special attention for countries with inadequate
resources and or weak health infrastructure
5. Extinction
Extinction: The specific infectious agent no longer exists in nature
or in the laboratory.
Example:
• none.
Vertical versus Horizontal Health Program
Small Group Work
Define vertical and horizontal programs
What are the differences between
vertical and horizontal programs?
What are the advantages and
disadvantages of vertical and horizontal
programs?
Vertical versus Horizontal Programs…
Vertical programmes (also known as stand-alone, categorical
or free-standing programmes or the vertical approach) refer to
instances where the solution of a given health problem is
addressed through the application of specific measures through
single-purpose machinery.
In contrast, integrated programmes (also known as horizontal
programmes, integrated health services or horizontal
approaches):
• seek to tackle the overall health problems on a wide front
and on a long-term basis through the creation of a system of
permanent institutions commonly known as general health
services and
Vertical versus Horizontal Programs
All health program planners face the question of how they can
most effectively and efficiently provide health services.
Health services (curative and preventive) can be provided using
two modes of delivery: horizontal and vertical.
At the launch of the ‘Health for All by 2000’, the strategy to
attain the set goals was a comprehensive primary health care
based on a horizontal mode of delivery of basic services (WHO
1978).
Vertical versus Horizontal Programs…
A few years after implementation of PHC
difficult to attain the set goals, e.g., failure to control
malaria,
There was increase in in incidence and prevalence of TB,
Emergence of drug resistance TB and
emergence of HIV/AIDS,
There was a need to consider change in the strategy, selectivity
and prioritization of interventions, particularly in resource
limited settings.
Vertical versus Horizontal Programs…
• include a variety of managerial or operational changes to
health systems to bring together inputs, delivery, management
and organization of particular service functions , or
• are described as a process where disease control activities are
functionally merged or tightly coordinated with
multifunctional health care delivery.
Vertical Programs
Vertical delivery of health services implies a selective targeting
of specific interventions not fully integrated in health systems .
Vertical programs can operate parallel to other programs and
may have their own management, staff, financing and
procurement arrangements. In some situation it might even
have its own facilities.
Examples of vertical programs in our country?
Leprosy and Malaria control programs were managed as
classical vertical program – with administrative and operational
activities centrally located and with minimum/ absent
integration with the general health system.
Advantages of Vertical Programs
they show quick results
easier to manage than horizontal programs
effective in reaching the target group
easier to monitor
useful when the overall health system is extreme weak
attractive to donors
Disadvantages of Vertical Programs
very demanding on resources of public service,
diverting human and financial resources from already
resource-constrained health systems (e.g. “National
Immunization Days, NIDs”)
sustainability of vertical programs in terms of outcomes
and resources is always questionable
fading political commitment
Horizontal Programs
By horizontal delivery: services are delivered through public
financed health systems and are commonly referred as
comprehensive primary care.
Examples:
Routine Immunization: In most countries, EPI services are
fully integrated into health systems.
Family Health
Blindness control program
Advantages of Horizontal Programs
when services are fully integrated into health systems,
programs can be sustained
horizontal programs are attractive to policy makers because of
their long-term sustainability.
important for services which require comprehensive coverage
where there is a sound infrastructure and functional health
systems, horizontal programs work well
horizontal programs are cost effective
Disadvantages of Horizontal Programs
horizontal programs work well in a context of sound
infrastructure and functional health systems and work poorly
otherwise
not easily managed as vertical program
an integrated ‘horizontal’ system may not be as effective as a
vertical program in monitoring compliance to treatment and
serious side effects.
Factors to be considered in developing countries in
choosing mode of delivery of health services
Seriousness of a problem
Geographical demands of health services,
Available resources (human and financial)
Sustainability of programs and
Analysis of costs and benefits
Donors interest
‘‘The selection of mode of delivery may depend whether one is a
donor, policymaker, or service provider. Considerations for
donors differ from that of policy makers.
Poorly paid service providers have different incentives in
selecting vertical or policy makers in selecting horizontal
programs”
Thank you!