KEMBAR78
FITT Toolbox: Open Source Business Model | PDF
Open Source Business Case



                              FITT
– Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer –



                                  www.FITT-for-Innovation.eu
 Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Practice in General

     Siruna NV has developed Software for development of mobile
      websites through a dual Open source business model
     Nature of reusability: this model can be easily copied as far as it
      helps to cover development costs by the help of a large and free
      developer community, helps to market the product, quickly sets a
      reference in a rapidly evolving market and succeeds in creating value
      within an open source setting.
     Case is mostly generic
     Quality/Nature of stakeholders: High tech start-up company, starting
      form research results
     Processes related to case: business model, IP management




2 | 03/2011                      Open Source Business Case
How we can help you open the
mobile experience.
Who are we?
About Us


   The experts in web-to-mobile: Make Anything Mobile

   Professional Open Source company

   Venture Capital backed startup

   Located in Belgium | UK | US | India | UAE | China




                                                         5
: the   leading OPEN SOURCE platform
                    and
        managed SOLUTION provider
         for mobile web applications
Internet is everywhere

CONTENT




                         USER experience
WEB App’s
Nice USABLE stuff …
 Mobile News             Mobile Search           Mobile Portal




                                                            8




  (POWERED BY SIRUNA)      (POWERED BY SIRUNA)    (POWERED BY SIRUNA)

m.deredactie.be          m.goldenpages.ie           m.zita.be
  (STANDARD WEBSITE)       (STANDARD WEBSITE)     (STANDARD WEBSITE)

www.deredactie.be       www.goldenpages.ie         www.zita.be
Open vs. Closed Source
         OPEN SOURCE                           CLOSED SOURCE

      Revenue from services                  Selling software licenses
      Source code is publically              Source code protected as
     available « Copyleft »                  intellectual property
      Source can be adapted /                Customer can’t get the
     improved                                source code
      Development by a                      Development inside the
     community                               company



  The business models are linked with the license model:
  •GPL/LGPL business models
  •BSD/Apache models
  •Multi license business models: Dual license
Customer value
First Generation Business
Models
                     Revenues are generated through support, consulting,
 Services based      training, documentation



                     A free OS product is used to create a market position for
 Loss leader         the traditional commercial software.




                     Vendors as IBM, Apple, Novell, Oracle.. realize that OS provides a way to
                     compete against Microsoft because:
 Fight competition   • They can reduce R&D costs
                            • Eliminate dependencies on competitor’s technology
                            • Of the access to a large, external development community

                     Example: instead of competing with Symbian, Motorola committed to OS




               11
Siruna OSS strategy


   Is NOT to create a large developer community
          Can be a side effect

          We control it through the Contributor License Agreement. (CLA)


   Disruptive business model
          People can try the code, see the internals

          They buy what they like (quality)

          They can modify the code for their customer

          Create a developer/user pull




                                                                            12
Dual Licensing


     Product available under a regular commercial license for
      commercial customers and under a free software licence
      (AGPL) for those who live by the principles of free software
     The product is technically identical under both licences, but the
      financials and the legal ramifications are different
     It is up to the customer to decide what path he wants to follow
      and what licence to use but restricted by our policy &
      commercial strategy.
     MySQL AB, Sleepycat Software & Trolltech AS use dual
      licensing

             Siruna is the copyright holder
Copyright of Siruna


Necessary          condition for dual licensing.
Gives      us rights and protection
         We decide what license is used by who:
           • Commercial
           • AGPL
         We can introduce “golden lines” or
          credentials.

   Our “golden lines”
       Adapted for Mobile by Siruna
       Google Analytics transformer insert

                                                    14
Affero GPL license


GPL    license:
     Everything that touches it becomes GPL
      (viral)
     If you redistribute a GPL software package,
      you need to publish your code
     Service provider loophole


AGPL    license:
     Closes the MSP loophole
     Software distribution & network access


                                                    15
OSS Sales Funnel




                   16
OSS Marketing




                17
Open Source Trends

   By 2010, Global IT organizations will use OS in 80% of infrastructure
    investments and in 25% of business software investments (Source:
    Gartner).

   OS impact on infrastructure SW is 20 B $ growing to 46 B $ in 2011




                                                   OS infrastructure SW

                   16.000,0

                   14.000,0

                   12.000,0                                                                OS
                                                                                           DBMS
                   10.000,0
                                                                                           AD
                    8.000,0                                                                Security
                                                                                           AIM
                    6.000,0
                                                                                           ITOM
                    4.000,0                                                                Others

                    2.000,0

                        0,0
                              2004   2005   2006     2007     2008   2009    2010   2011




                                                            (Source GIMV )
          18
VC activity

    Increased VC investment in OS:
            2005: 294 M $ was invested
            2006: 475 M $ was invested, up 61% from 2005 (Source: Computer
             Business Review, Feb. 2007)


    Why do VCs invest in Open-Source?
           The increased adoption of OS by corporate users.
           Attracted by the success of Red Hat,:
                Marketcap of 3.8 B $ and .. profitable!
                Revenues increasing very fast: 200 M $ in 2005, 280 M $ in
                 2006 and 400 M $ in 2007
           Belief that there could me more money made from OS than from
            proprietary software
           Lower cost of development
           Also lower cost of sales & marketing due to the viral effect of the
            dvlpt community
           OS leads to better quality assurance, more frequent releases,
            community dvlpt



                                                           (Source GIMV )

         19
M&A activity


    Recent deals:
           There were 35 transactions

           There were 3 significant transactions;

               • Sun acquiring MySQL for 1 B $, EV/S of 14.3 x
               • Yahoo acquiring Zimbra for 350 M $ (email
                 collaboration),
               • Nokia acquiring Trolltech for 153 M $,
               • Citrix acquiring Xensource for 500 M $
               • RedHat acquiring JBoss for 350 M $




                                                     (Source GIMV )

         20
OSS Facts & Figures


     MySQL           – Database vendor
           Founded in 1995.
           Challenger for Oracle, Sybase, ..
           External VC in 2001:
           Revenues
               • 2002: 6,5 Mio Revenue
               • 2005: 34 Mio Euro
               • 2006: 50 Mio Euro
           Exit 2007: Sun acquiring MySQL for 1 B $,
           2009:   Oracle acquiring Sun


     OpenBravo                – ERP vendor (GIMV investment)
           Founded in 2003. (Univ. of Navarra – 2001)
           External VC in 2006: 4 Mio Euro from SODENA
           Revenue 2007: 1,1 Mio Euro
           External VC in 2008: 9 Mio Euro
           Target 2008: 3,3 Mio Euro
           Target 2010: 24 Mio Euro (requiring 15 Mio Euro investment)


21
Contact Us


FRANK GIELEN, CEO

Zuiderpoort Office Park
Gaston Crommenlaan 10/101
9050 Gent, Belgium

Tel +32 (0)9 331 48 36
contact@siruna.com




                            22

FITT Toolbox: Open Source Business Model

  • 1.
    Open Source BusinessCase FITT – Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer – www.FITT-for-Innovation.eu Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
  • 2.
    Practice in General  Siruna NV has developed Software for development of mobile websites through a dual Open source business model  Nature of reusability: this model can be easily copied as far as it helps to cover development costs by the help of a large and free developer community, helps to market the product, quickly sets a reference in a rapidly evolving market and succeeds in creating value within an open source setting.  Case is mostly generic  Quality/Nature of stakeholders: High tech start-up company, starting form research results  Processes related to case: business model, IP management 2 | 03/2011 Open Source Business Case
  • 3.
    How we canhelp you open the mobile experience.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    About Us  The experts in web-to-mobile: Make Anything Mobile  Professional Open Source company  Venture Capital backed startup  Located in Belgium | UK | US | India | UAE | China 5
  • 6.
    : the leading OPEN SOURCE platform and managed SOLUTION provider for mobile web applications
  • 7.
    Internet is everywhere CONTENT USER experience WEB App’s
  • 8.
    Nice USABLE stuff… Mobile News Mobile Search Mobile Portal 8 (POWERED BY SIRUNA) (POWERED BY SIRUNA) (POWERED BY SIRUNA) m.deredactie.be m.goldenpages.ie m.zita.be (STANDARD WEBSITE) (STANDARD WEBSITE) (STANDARD WEBSITE) www.deredactie.be www.goldenpages.ie www.zita.be
  • 9.
    Open vs. ClosedSource OPEN SOURCE CLOSED SOURCE  Revenue from services  Selling software licenses  Source code is publically  Source code protected as available « Copyleft » intellectual property  Source can be adapted /  Customer can’t get the improved source code  Development by a Development inside the community company The business models are linked with the license model: •GPL/LGPL business models •BSD/Apache models •Multi license business models: Dual license
  • 10.
  • 11.
    First Generation Business Models Revenues are generated through support, consulting, Services based training, documentation A free OS product is used to create a market position for Loss leader the traditional commercial software. Vendors as IBM, Apple, Novell, Oracle.. realize that OS provides a way to compete against Microsoft because: Fight competition • They can reduce R&D costs • Eliminate dependencies on competitor’s technology • Of the access to a large, external development community Example: instead of competing with Symbian, Motorola committed to OS 11
  • 12.
    Siruna OSS strategy  Is NOT to create a large developer community  Can be a side effect  We control it through the Contributor License Agreement. (CLA)  Disruptive business model  People can try the code, see the internals  They buy what they like (quality)  They can modify the code for their customer  Create a developer/user pull 12
  • 13.
    Dual Licensing  Product available under a regular commercial license for commercial customers and under a free software licence (AGPL) for those who live by the principles of free software  The product is technically identical under both licences, but the financials and the legal ramifications are different  It is up to the customer to decide what path he wants to follow and what licence to use but restricted by our policy & commercial strategy.  MySQL AB, Sleepycat Software & Trolltech AS use dual licensing Siruna is the copyright holder
  • 14.
    Copyright of Siruna Necessary condition for dual licensing. Gives us rights and protection  We decide what license is used by who: • Commercial • AGPL  We can introduce “golden lines” or credentials.  Our “golden lines”  Adapted for Mobile by Siruna  Google Analytics transformer insert 14
  • 15.
    Affero GPL license GPL license:  Everything that touches it becomes GPL (viral)  If you redistribute a GPL software package, you need to publish your code  Service provider loophole AGPL license:  Closes the MSP loophole  Software distribution & network access 15
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Open Source Trends  By 2010, Global IT organizations will use OS in 80% of infrastructure investments and in 25% of business software investments (Source: Gartner).  OS impact on infrastructure SW is 20 B $ growing to 46 B $ in 2011 OS infrastructure SW 16.000,0 14.000,0 12.000,0 OS DBMS 10.000,0 AD 8.000,0 Security AIM 6.000,0 ITOM 4.000,0 Others 2.000,0 0,0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 (Source GIMV ) 18
  • 19.
    VC activity  Increased VC investment in OS:  2005: 294 M $ was invested  2006: 475 M $ was invested, up 61% from 2005 (Source: Computer Business Review, Feb. 2007)  Why do VCs invest in Open-Source?  The increased adoption of OS by corporate users.  Attracted by the success of Red Hat,:  Marketcap of 3.8 B $ and .. profitable!  Revenues increasing very fast: 200 M $ in 2005, 280 M $ in 2006 and 400 M $ in 2007  Belief that there could me more money made from OS than from proprietary software  Lower cost of development  Also lower cost of sales & marketing due to the viral effect of the dvlpt community  OS leads to better quality assurance, more frequent releases, community dvlpt (Source GIMV ) 19
  • 20.
    M&A activity  Recent deals:  There were 35 transactions  There were 3 significant transactions; • Sun acquiring MySQL for 1 B $, EV/S of 14.3 x • Yahoo acquiring Zimbra for 350 M $ (email collaboration), • Nokia acquiring Trolltech for 153 M $, • Citrix acquiring Xensource for 500 M $ • RedHat acquiring JBoss for 350 M $ (Source GIMV ) 20
  • 21.
    OSS Facts &Figures MySQL – Database vendor  Founded in 1995.  Challenger for Oracle, Sybase, ..  External VC in 2001:  Revenues • 2002: 6,5 Mio Revenue • 2005: 34 Mio Euro • 2006: 50 Mio Euro  Exit 2007: Sun acquiring MySQL for 1 B $,  2009: Oracle acquiring Sun OpenBravo – ERP vendor (GIMV investment)  Founded in 2003. (Univ. of Navarra – 2001)  External VC in 2006: 4 Mio Euro from SODENA  Revenue 2007: 1,1 Mio Euro  External VC in 2008: 9 Mio Euro  Target 2008: 3,3 Mio Euro  Target 2010: 24 Mio Euro (requiring 15 Mio Euro investment) 21
  • 22.
    Contact Us FRANK GIELEN,CEO Zuiderpoort Office Park Gaston Crommenlaan 10/101 9050 Gent, Belgium Tel +32 (0)9 331 48 36 contact@siruna.com 22