Download to read offline
![13
“[S]elf-archived articles
have a 22% higher citation
rate than articles that were
not self-archived, and that
the difference is statistically
significant.”
https://research.chalmers.se/publication/198512](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/gettingtogripswithopenaccesspublishing2019-191024074800/85/Getting-to-grips-with-open-access-publishing-2019-13-320.jpg)
![13
“[S]elf-archived articles
have a 22% higher citation
rate than articles that were
not self-archived, and that
the difference is statistically
significant.”
https://research.chalmers.se/publication/198512](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/gettingtogripswithopenaccesspublishing2019-191024074800/75/Getting-to-grips-with-open-access-publishing-2019-13-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byChrisBiggs
Getting to grips with open access publishing 2019
This document provides an overview of open access publishing. It defines open access as making peer-reviewed literature available to anyone free of charge. The benefits of open access publishing are discussed, such as increasing the reach of research. Various models of open access publishing are described, including gold open access where the final published version is openly available from the publisher, and green open access where an author archives their work in an open repository. Issues like predatory publishers, open access for books, and mandates from research funders are also covered.
More Related Content
Similar to Getting to grips with open access publishing 2019
Getting to grips with open access publishing 2019
- 1. Getting to gripswith Open Access Publishing Chris Biggs, Research Support Librarian
- 2. 2 1. What isOpen Access Publishing? 2. Why should I publish Open Access? 3. How do I publish Open Access? 4. Gold Open Access 5. Predatory Open Access 6. Books and Open Access 7. Green Open Access 8. Open Access Mandates 9. Open Access and Content Sharing 10.Questions and Feedback
- 3.
- 4. What is OpenAccess Publishing?
- 5. 5 Traditional academic publishing iswhere readers (individuals or their institutions) have financial subscriptions to journals in order to read the content.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8. 8 Open Access publishing aimsto make peer- reviewed literature available to anyone, free of charge at the point of access.
- 9.
- 10. Why should Ipublish Open Access?
- 11. 11 Increase the reachof your research
- 12. 12 “Overall, articles publishedOA appear to show a higher number of citations, though the effect is small, and the data provided does not allow us to control for possible confounding effects such as the posting of articles in repositories, the number and location of authors, and the possibility that authors are selecting their ‘best’ papers to publish on OA terms. …But although the impact on citations is small, the impact of open access publication on HTML views and PDF downloads is large and significant, suggesting increased visibility for the open access papers.” https://www.nature.com/press_releases/ncomms-report2014.pdf
- 13. 13 “[S]elf-archived articles have a22% higher citation rate than articles that were not self-archived, and that the difference is statistically significant.” https://research.chalmers.se/publication/198512
- 14. 14 This paper hasbeen downloaded over 7,000 times by users from over 90 countries and territories since deposit in June 2017. Making the paper Open Access in ORO has increased downloads by 409%. The version in ORO is not behind a paywall – this increases the readership to professionals and practitioners not affiliated to a university When institutional repositories are indexed by Google and Google Scholar they are great platforms to make papers discoverable and accessible on a global scale. http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/the_orb/?p=2738
- 15. 15 … because youare told to
- 16. How do Ipublish Open Access?
- 17.
- 18.
- 19. 19 Final published version isOpen Access on the publisher’s website
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27. 27 Publishers • Charge apublication fee • Do not provide proper peer review • Do not provide proper editorial services Authors • may not be aware publishers are fraudulent
- 28.
- 29. Books & OpenAccess
- 30. 30 “It is veryclear that extending open access to books is not easy. From licensing and copyright to business models and quality, the issues that must be tackled are thorny and numerous.” Crossick Report, 2015
- 31. Consultation on thesecond Research Excellence Framework http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20180322112445tf_/http://ww w.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201636/HEFCE 2016_36.pdf
- 32. https://www.martineve.com/2018/07/01/where-we-are-with-the-oa- monograph-mandate-for-the-third-research-excellence-framework/ Where we arewith the OA monograph mandate for the Third Research Excellence Framework
- 33.
- 34. 34 A version ofthe paper is deposited in a repository
- 35. 35 Author’s Original Submitted ManuscriptUnder Review Accepted Manuscript Proof Version of Record Corrected Version of Record Enhanced Version of Record
- 36.
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.
- 40. 40 • For alljournal articles and conference proceedings with an ISSN • Require accepted manuscript to be deposited in a repository within 3 months of acceptance. (An exception is in place to allow for deposits within 3 months of first publication). • Any embargo periods should be no longer than 12 months (Panels A & B) or 24 months (Panels C & D). REF2021
- 41. 41 • For alljournal articles and conference proceedings. • Gold, funded by a block grant with a CC-BY license. • Green, embargo periods: 12 months AHRC & ESRC, 6 months all other Research Councils. (Where no funding is available longer embargo periods are allowed.) UKRI Grants
- 42. 42 Plan S “With effectfrom 2021, all scholarly publications on the results from research funded by public or private grants provided by national, regional and international research councils and funding bodies, must be published in Open Access Journals, on Open Access Platforms, or made immediately available through Open Access Repositories without embargo.
- 43.
- 44. Open Access and ContentSharing
- 45.
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.
- 49. 49 Picture Credits Dallas SpaghettiBowl http://www.lifewithoutjudgment.com/single-post/2014/11/10/Grief-is-a-spaghetti-bowl Open access: The true cost of science publishing by Richard Van Noorden 2013 http://www.nature.com/news/open- access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676 HEFCE Worflow http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/oa/FAQ/#deposit3 Books https://scribepublications.co.uk/news-events/news/book-of-the-year-from-scribe Beall’s List https://www.enago.com/academy/uncovering-the-real-reasons-behind-bealls-predatory-journals-list- disappearing/ Money https://pixabay.com/en/packs-pile-money-finance-currency-163497/ Printing Press by Unknown author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND. Average APC (GBP) by publisher 2013-2016 https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/08/23/article- processing-charges-in-2016/ How was if for you? – abandoned at Manor Road Training Rooms, Bletchley 2018/10/05
- 50.
- 51.
Editor's Notes
- #37 Where? Ok a repository can be an institutional repository, like our own ORO, or it might be a subject repository like arXiv or another pictured here. But what isn’t listed? - ResearchGate and academia.edu – I haven’t listed them here because Open Access policies don’t count those commercial sites as bona fide repositories. Primarily because they can’t be aggregated or harvested.
- #47 Firstly, email – request a paper. What’s the point of open access when someone can just email me and I’ll send them a copy?
- #48 Secondly, Academic Social Networking Sites – people use these sites in their millions and post papers they may not ought to. Like I mentioned not formally recognised as Open Access by policies – but that’s where everyone is!
- #49 And finally, sciHub – It’s not Open Access per se – but that’s lots of people are everyone is - 200,000 requests a day to more than 64.5 million articles.