Download to read offline
Uploaded byJane Park
Going open at the state and district level (#goopen)
This document summarizes a presentation about states and school districts transitioning to openly licensed educational resources through the #GoOpen initiative. It provides examples of Louisiana and Washington shifting from traditional textbook adoption to supporting open educational resources. Both states saw benefits like improved materials, teacher investment, and cost savings. Challenges included finding coherent open resources and demonstrating savings. The presentation encourages districts to get help transitioning from organizations supporting open education.
More Related Content
Similar to Going open at the state and district level (#goopen)
Going open at the state and district level (#goopen)
- 1. Going Open atthe State and District Level Jane Park Director of Platforms & Partnerships Creative Commons @janedaily
- 2. Agenda • Creative Commonsand #GoOpen • 2 U.S. examples of #GoOpen states & districts – Shift; Challenges; Benefits; Resources • 2 non-U.S. examples of districts going open • Where to get help • Questions?
- 3. CC and #GoOpen •Jane Park - #GoOpen platform advising – Amazon; Microsoft; Edmodo; IOER (IL state) • Cable Green – Federal, state, district policy advising • Great diversity across 20 states; 107 districts – Varied in approach, IP policies, procurement policies, paper vs digital progress, gov. structure • #GoOpen: surfaced common areas of work, resources, and open policies to keep it open
- 4. What does itmean to #GoOpen? • Less about specific policies; more about the actual shift, a shift in holistic approach at the state level that provides leadership for districts (& vice versa) • Shift from leasing to procurement of OER • Shift $ spent on content acquisition to curriculum development/revision, PD, quality assurance, print costs
- 5. What really happens? •State of Louisiana (LA) – Whitney Whealdon, Director of Academic Content, LA Department of Education • State of Washington (WA) – Barbara Soots, OER Program Manager, WA Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction
- 6. LA Before #GoOpen •Focus was on adoption • State approved list of textbooks and related materials, mostly books – English LA; Social Studies; Math; Science • 70 districts had to adopt state’s list, which only changed once every 7 years • Mostly physical materials, no digital • Top-down, adoption-based system; rigid; outdated
- 7. LA Shift to#GoOpen • Shift started with update to Common Core standards (2013) • Worked with state legislators to revise system and make it official in state (thru 2015) • Holistic review and update to 21st century • Focus on new review/rating system to improve quality and currency of materials
- 8. LA Shift to#GoOpen • Shift from physical to digital • Shift from textbooks to textbooks + new kinds of materials in different formats • Shift from once every 7 years review to ongoing, yearly review • Shift from state oversight to state support of districts • Shift to quality review of both OER & proprietary materials
- 9. LA Focus onQuality • New system allows districts more freedom, but still safeguards to ensure quality – If they forgo quality list, must do their own competitive bid process w/all stakeholders • No tier 1 quality materials? LA state created CC BY materials: English L/A curriculum • Teacher leader program: 3 regional meetings/year
- 10. LA Adoption • Greatsuccess in math– 80% of districts using OER; student improvement seen in math • First year for ELL, so not much data yet, but over 50% of districts using OER so far • Anecdotal data: Districts like and are moving to state’s CC BY ELL curriculum; seeing better value/alignment/quality of materials
- 11. LA Challenges • OERwithout clear provenance • OER curriculum requiring © books, e.g. novels which still require $ • Not a lot of professional dev/support built in with OER • OER takes tends to take you to multiple places
- 12. LA Benefits • Abilityto provide daily feedback and updates to materials (esp in ELL) • Teachers feel super invested, materials get buy-in • “Made by teachers for teachers” – authentic to their experience in LA, feels more natural to their rhythm/pace of the classroom • $ saved? Not yet
- 13. What’s next forLA? • Professional development, training, and support aligned to new materials • Cont’d focus on quality – high quality curriculum being shown to have huge effect, even more than teachers/class size • More data as program continues
- 14. LA Resources • EnglishLanguage Arts Guidebooks (OER Resources for grades 3-12 ELA): http://www.louisianabelieves.com/academics/ela- guidebooks • Instructional Materials Review (IMR) page: http://www.louisianabelieves.com/academics/ONLINE- INSTRUCTIONAL-MATERIALS-REVIEWS • District Guidance around IMR: http://www.louisianabelieves.com/docs/default- source/curricular-resources/guidance-for-textbooks- and-instructional-materials-reviews.pdf?sfvrsn=2
- 15.
- 16. “The legislature findsthe state's recent adoption of new learning standards provides an opportunity to develop a library of high-quality, openly licensed K-12 courseware that is aligned with these standards.” Washington State Capitol by Piutus – CC BY Washington OER Project OER Project Website
- 17. WA Shift to#GoOpen • Shift also started with common core: WA state legislature passed bill mandating state DOE create OER aligned to common core WA state standards (2012) • Districts were actually demanding update to materials, everyone recognized they were outdated and in need of refresh
- 18. WA Shift to#GoOpen • First did a snapshot survey of the state, barriers to implementation – Districts might not recognize OER – Quality of OER and its alignment to new standards – Concerns around tech, access, equity
- 19. WA Shift to#GoOpen • Focus on quality: initiated review of OER according to nationally recognized rubrics (same as other materials) • Worked w/state school directors association to craft new model policy recognizing OER for new materials adoption (not a mandate) – Shift from physical to digital – Shift from textbooks to textbooks + new kinds of materials in different formats
- 20. WA Shift to#GoOpen • Online and Outreach support for OER – Hub on OER commons for districts to connect – Online referatory/library with links to all materials – OER summits every year; outreach within districts • Small grants program (2012 funds earmarked) – Districts developing or adapting OER – Small $, but legitimacy for work, state supported
- 21. WA Shift to#GoOpen At the same time the state was shifting policy for its own resources… • WA statewide education policy requiring staff/contractor/grantee resources be CC licensed • WA SBCTC adopted same policy • Served as a model for districts
- 22. WA Challenges • Nota lot of fully coherent OER, lots of supplemental materials • As districts adopt and/or create their own materials, not enough state staff to help with nuts & bolts of attribution, licensing – so slows process of wide-scale sharing • $ savings hard to demonstrate b/c K-12 is districts purchasing, not students
- 23. WA Benefits • Costshifting from content acquisition to professional development for educators – One district created open civics course w/its teachers, using collaborative process & quality review rubrics • $ also spent on increasing technology capacity • No real pushback from districts; districts wanted to update, recognized barriers to traditional textbooks/materials
- 24. What’s next forWA? • More advocacy work about OER • More support to find fully coherent OER, or build it • Continue to serve as a model for districts and other states (#GoOpen ambassador district) • More data, e.g. around $ shifting, as program progresses
- 25. WA Resources • OERproject website: http://digitallearning.k12.wa.us/oer/ • Open Washington OER Network: http://www.openwa.org Email Barbara Soots (email in session notes)
- 26. Outside the U.S. •New Zealand: 2,500 K-12 schools – © is held by districts as a policy – CC NZ pitch OER/CC licensing – Districts offering teachers option to CC license OER they create or adopt/use existing OER – N4L Pond online teacher community for NZ integrating CC licenses, sharing of OER – http://creativecommons.org.nz/ccinschools/
- 27. Outside the U.S. •United Kingdom: 84 K-12 Leicester schools – Districts own © – Leicester city council gives permission to all schools to create and share OER (CC BY) – Guidance and toolkits on how to find, use, remix, attribute OER – School staff participated in development of these resources – https://schools.leicester.gov.uk/services/planning- and-property/building-schools-for-the-future- bsf/open-education-for-schools/
- 28. Where to gethelp • Kristina Peters, U.S. DOE: https://tech.ed.gov/open • #GoOpen District Launch Packet: https://tech.ed.gov/open/districts/launch/ • CCSSO: Layla Bonnot • SETDA: Tracy Weeks, Executive Director • CC US - K-12 person TBD; please contact Meredith Jacobs for now • CC the org - info@creativecommons.org; http://creativecommons.org • Barbara and Whitney are also happy to answer questions about their state’s/districts’ experiences (contact info in session notes)
- 29. Fun links • Why#GoOpen? Why now? https://medium.com/@OfficeofEdTech/why- goopen-why-now-857a9ce2527f • How open are you? http://www.web2rights.com/OERIPRSupport/ howopenareyou/
- 30. Reuse & Remix! Theseslides by Creative Commons are licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license. Slide #15 (“Louisiana Believes”) and #16 (“Washington OER Project”) licensed CC BY 4.0 by LA DOE and WA OSPI respectively.