KEMBAR78
IPR and Commns | PPT
by Jongsoo(Jay) Yoon [email_address] twitter @iwillbe99 www.jayyoon.kr http://www.flickr.com/photos/60648084@N00/2462966749/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.ko IPR   and Commons
Analysis
텍스트 텍스트 Tragedy of the Commons http://s0.geograph.org.uk/photos/01/34/013499_d958cc19.jpg http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
commons non exclusion but  rivalry Tragedy of the Commons private  ownership government  regulation self  regulation overconsumption
private ownership government regulation self regulation Elinor Ostrom privatization with the market pine tree protection association “ Governing the Commons” transaction cost monopoly of  the infrastrucure common goods as the infrastructure Tragedy of the Commons control by public authorities
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2961565820_3d59b7bdfb_b.jpg http://creative http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ commons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Free Ride on the Commons
commons non exclusion and  non rivalry intellectual property supply by goverment public subsidies underproduction Free Ride on the Commons
intellectual property as the exclusive right public supply public subsidies public funds privatization with the market patronage system open science public goods as the infrastructure financial incentive for innovation and creativity Free Ride on the Commons through public organizations
non exclusion rivalry non exclusion non rivalry underprodution overconsumption incentive regulation Physical Commons and Intellectual Commons infrastructure infrastructure
IC IP innovation creativity infrastructure resource IC(intellectual commons) and IP(intellectual property) economy
IC(intellectual commons) and IP(intellectual property) IC is different from PC(physical commons), as IP is different from PP(physical property)  IC is not  by-product of IP IP is from IC IC is infrastructure for IP itself as well as innovation  and creativity IP should be IC asap Both IP and IC are for innovation and creativity
Scheme
Creativity Innovation Resource Access Use 텍스트 텍스트 IPR  IPR Intellectual Property Scheme Ownership exclusive rights
get permission
or
DIE http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickal/9503734 /http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/2.0/
talents crafts production IPR creativity innovation centralized industrialized exclusive
Creativity Innovation Resource Access Use 텍스트 텍스트 open open Open Culture & Science Scheme with or without pay
experience & information insight free thinking realization creativity innovation decentralized diversity
freedom of information freedom of communication exclusive  creativity open creativity collaborative creativity free creativity
Balance
Out of the Balance transaction costs monopoly of the Infrastrucutre increasing costs for the innovation and creativity obstacles to the incremental and cumulative innovation hindrance to the cultural diversity market failure
extension of objects and periods patent for software and BM TPM micky mouse act putting the cart before the horse patent troll patent as a defensive measure copyright against free expression destruction of the commons aggressive IP policy  e.g. Bay-Dole Act glovalization of IP digital contents on the internet Out of the Balance
http://www.papermasters.com/images/national-infrastructure.jpg not licensed by CCL Tragedy of the Non Commons
property rule exclusive right liability rule compulsory license ACS (alternative compensation system) free use with compensation various schemes opt-in, opt-out or mandatory by the law right for the compensation (1) trying to keep the Balance
enjoy
but
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/26/61056391_31343afdc6_b.jpghttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0
IPR to exclude IPR to prevent the exclusion (2) trying to keep the balance new strategy with various motives
satisfy conditions
and
FREE http://www.flickr.com/photos/josefgrunig/1732787905/ p://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
 
 
http://www.greenxchange.cc/ not licensed under CCL
www.wbcsd.org/web/epc World Business Council for Sustainable Development )
http://www.wipo.int/portal/index.html.en not licensed by CCL
Blues Sky Commission proposed by Prof. Lessig http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/DSCF0886-1024x588.jpg http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
In the short term, to ‘actively support voluntary licensing’ schemes like Creative Commons Secondly, for WIPO to establish a ‘blue  sky commission’ to look into reforming copyright for the digital age.
http://www.ip.qut.edu.au/bluesky http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/au/deed.en
IC IP innovation creativity infrastructure resource economy
Copyright by Jay Yoon( www.jayyoon.kr ) Except where otherwise noted, content   o n t his work is licensed under a creative commons attribution South Korea 2.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/kr) .

IPR and Commns