Download as PDF, PPTX
![Less State
• Each property has to be maintained over the lifetime of
the object.
• It’s like planting a tree. It’s cool & nice, until you’re
mowing the lawn around it.
• Very often, it’s easy and convenient to use a property.
But you’ll pay for it over time.
• Avoid properties if you can. Even private / internal
ones. Compute values from other state or from inputs
instead. [Exception: caching]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/2015-05-cocoaheads-orthogonality-150507080112-lva1-app6891/85/Orthogonality-A-Strategy-for-Reusable-Code-13-320.jpg)
![Less State
• Each property has to be maintained over the lifetime of
the object.
• It’s like planting a tree. It’s cool & nice, until you’re
mowing the lawn around it.
• Very often, it’s easy and convenient to use a property.
But you’ll pay for it over time.
• Avoid properties if you can. Even private / internal
ones. Compute values from other state or from inputs
instead. [Exception: caching]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/2015-05-cocoaheads-orthogonality-150507080112-lva1-app6891/75/Orthogonality-A-Strategy-for-Reusable-Code-13-2048.jpg)
More Related Content
Similar to Orthogonality: A Strategy for Reusable Code
![[CocoaHeads Tricity] Do not reinvent the wheel](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/cocoaheads-tricity-do-not-reinvent-the-wheel-150401022727-conversion-gate01-thumbnail.jpg?width=600ounds&width=560&fit=bounds)
Orthogonality: A Strategy for Reusable Code
- 1. ORTHOGONALITY A strategy forreusable code @rsebbe
- 2. Orthogonality • Why thistalk? • I saw some frameworks with unmanageable complexity. “We do complex stuff, so complexity is OK” • Most of the time, it’s not! • Hoping to share some techniques that will help.
- 3. Orthogonality • What isit? • Make <features> that don’t(*) depend on each other. • (*) minimally depend • Where <feature> is: • Code - Method - Class - Library - Project - App - etc. • Self-discipline
- 4. Orthogonality • Why? • Easiermaintenance. Changes to some part of the code shouldn’t affect some other part. • Easier reading. Because less (told or untold) dependencies. • Easier reuse. • Future-proof, adapts more easily.
- 5. Orthogonality • How? • Someprefer to “think before”. Does not really work for me. (could work for you) • I start from real-world needs & use-cases, not trying to predict them *all* beforehand. • Then I continuously challenge the design, and try to improve it with new real-world usage, until it settles/converges.
- 6.
- 7. App Library Class Method • One purpose(avoid Swiss knives) • Expose what’s strictly required • Less state (fewer properties) & immutability • One purpose • Clear naming • Option dictionaries instead of signature variants • One purpose, keep them thematic • Don’t expose internals • Limit external dependencies (vertical slicing) • One purpose • Factor them out, make reusable libs (horizontal slicing) Code • One purpose code blocks, think of those as a “flow”, avoid local hacks • Use local variables Orthogonality
- 8. Techniques • Think Lego®Bricks (standard, reusable blocks), avoid custom solutions. • Keep as much internal things as possible. (Swift) • Make abstractions, handle complexity internally (~ class clusters) • Take a step back when designing APIs • Use of static libs / frameworks / resource bundles • Use categories • Minimize state, favor the immutable.
- 9. API • A meetingpoint. • Insulates inside from outside. • Keep complexity inside, there’s really no point in exposing it. • An API separates a feature from its implementation choices.
- 10. Anatomy of aMethod • Method signature, required args, optional ones, return values, completion handlers. • Be aware of the flow & dependencies • No internal returns. Single entry, single exit.
- 11. Global Variables • Constantsthat absolutely need to be known outside: OK • Avoid otherwise, they break orthogonality
- 12. Local variables… … insulateyour code from the outside (think threads) • Interactions with self have a meaning. Don’t abuse those. Consider them as input / output for your code. • Code with lots of reference to self or ivar is suspect.
- 13. Less State • Eachproperty has to be maintained over the lifetime of the object. • It’s like planting a tree. It’s cool & nice, until you’re mowing the lawn around it. • Very often, it’s easy and convenient to use a property. But you’ll pay for it over time. • Avoid properties if you can. Even private / internal ones. Compute values from other state or from inputs instead. [Exception: caching]
- 14. Immutability • Has beenthere from day one in Cocoa. • Once you get an object, it won’t change behind your back. It stops all form of change propagation. • Very interesting in a parallel world (GCD). • Makes code robust. • Trendy: Swift’s let & struct vs. class, reactive/ functional programming, etc.
- 15. Property Check List •Do you need a property? Why? • Internal or public? • Read-only or read-write? • Public read-only & internal read-write? • Read-only & mutable or read-write & immutable? • Public & read-only or full read-write? read-only + set through specific method?
- 16. Method Check List •Private or public? Internal? • Inputs as arguments or options dictionary? • Flow: do you really need those internal return’s? • Are you insulating against self ? • Isn’t it too long, woud factoring it out make more sense?
- 17. Class/API Check List •Do you need that class? • Internal or public? Class cluster? • Do you need each of those methods, public/ private? • Do you need to include that additional framework in the .h? Isn’t a .m inclusion enough? • Do you compartmentalize deps with categories?
- 18. Fruit Ninja Large App FrameworkFramework Framework Framework App Framework Horizontal Slicing
- 19. Large Framework, w/ allkinds of dependencies Vertical Slicing Framework Ext A Ext B
- 20. Keep cool, man! •Good framework, method, API design is clear for everyone. There’s not that much room for ego or personal preferences. • Junior could come up with a better design. That’s OK, you should welcome it & even encourage it! Be thankful for learning new stuff. • Search for design examples. It helps. For API design, Apple *typically* makes effort about this. (OK, they screw up sometimes) • When you reach good design, you typically feel you’ve achieved something. It fits nicely together, hacks are not needed, it is easily reusable… But don’t stop there! • Simplicity of code often converges to the same design, even from people with different backgrounds.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23. Case Study 1:CeedOCR • Reusable OCR library • Possibly different OCR engines • Mac / iOS DEMO: Prizmo
- 24. Case Study 1:CeedOCR • Simple API: 1 class, 1 method. OCR engines are strings. • Similar to class-cluster design (variety of internal classes) • No internal API is exposed (engine types, classes, etc.) • Dynamically looked up (not linked -> Class is Nil) • Extensible through delegation (binarization)
- 25. Case Study 2:CeedAnalytics • Reusable Analytics library. Goal: track which app features are used, which are not. • Possibly different backends (Google, Countly…) • Similar solution as CeedOCR DEMO: Prizmo
- 26. Case Study 3:CeedVision • Has a class to perform Accelerate-based image processing • Variety of image source options (CoreVideo, CoreImage, OpenCV, CoreGraphics, vImage…) DEMO: Prizmo
- 27. Case Study 3:CeedVision • Core features part of the class • Input options as categories (Swift: extensions)
- 28. Case Study 4:CeedImage • GPU Image Processing lib, similar to Core Image (tiled rendering) but with more control (color vs. gray, memory cache…). • Optional features (external JPEG lib) • We don’t want app have JPEG part if app don’t need it (external lib dep, maintenance…) DEMO: Hydra
- 29. Fruit Ninja CeedImage CeedImage Framework VerticalSlicing +JPEG
- 30. Case Study 4:CeedImage • Use extension/category for the optional feature (JPEG) • Put it in its own library: CeedImage.JPEGExt.a • App link against that lib if it needs the feature.
- 31. Case Study 5:CeedGL • Obj-C Wrapper for OpenGL • Optional features: handling of Core Video buffers • We don’t want app have Core Video dependency if they don’t need it • We use a separate library: CeedGL.CoreVideoExt.a • It’s open source -> have a look! DEMO: Hydra
- 32.
- 33.
- 34. Frameworks or staticlibs? • Frameworks are available on iOS 8+ (any OS X) • We use frameworks to share code between app and extensions, static libs otherwise. • Libraries can have their resource bundle • Frameworks can be built from libraries
- 35. Frameworks or staticlibs? Libs.a PrizmoKit (Framework) Prizmo PrizmoKit (Framework) Cleanup Extension PrizmoKit (Framework) Lib A.a Lib B.a Lib C.a
- 36. Tips & Tricks •OK, but libs that depend on libs are a mess in Xcode. • How do you solve that? Use scheme to force lib build order? No, cumbersome. • There’s a better way.
- 38. Workspace Project A Lib A ProjectB Lib B (depends on Lib A) Project C App (depends on Lib A, Lib B) Tips & Tricks
- 39. Workspace Project A Lib A ProjectB Lib B (depends on Lib A) Project C App (depends on Lib A, Lib B) Tips & Tricks
- 40. Workspace Project A Lib A ProjectB Lib B (depends on Lib A) Project C App (depends on Lib A, Lib B) Stub A • Using (empty) stub libraries, clean schemes! implicit dependency explicit dependency
- 42.