Uploaded bySDN Hub
Understanding and deploying Network Virtualization
The document discusses the theory and implementation of network virtualization, emphasizing the benefits of software-defined networking (SDN) for managing multi-tenant cloud environments. It details challenges related to current network infrastructures, including inefficient utilization and poor isolation, while presenting SDN as a solution to enhance efficiency, scalability, and orchestration of network resources. The document also surveys various vendor solutions and emerging technologies in the network virtualization landscape.
More Related Content
Similar to Understanding and deploying Network Virtualization
![[OpenStack Day in Korea 2015] Track 3-6 - Archiectural Overview of the Open S...](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/36-150213070342-conversion-gate02-thumbnail.jpg?width=600ounds&width=560&fit=bounds)
Understanding and deploying Network Virtualization
- 1. Understanding and Deploying Virtual Networks SriniSeetharaman srini.seetharaman@gmail.com
- 2. • THEORY ‒ WhyVirtualize Networks? ‒ What is Software-defined Networking? ‒ Buzzwords: OpenFlow, Open vSwitch, OVSDB, OpenStack, OpenDayLight ‒ Deploying Network Virtualization ‒ Vendor solution survey and landscape Agenda 2 MY GOAL FOR TODAY: Make you dream of network containers.
- 3. Why revisit NetworkVirtualization?
- 4. Introducing the Multi-tenantCloud 4
- 5. • Corporate priorityfor managing internal workloads ‒ Supporting multiple tenants with virtualized resources (computing, storage, and networking) ‒ Speed up configuration to allow workload rollout sooner Immediate feedback on service rollout Reduced time to revenue • Hybrid clouds with bursting ‒ Leveraging guarantees of public CSP Reduced upfront CapEx and OpEx ‒ Bursting to public cloud for peak loads Reduced overprovisioning ‒ Lossless live migration Improved disaster recovery Introducing the Multi-tenant Cloud Network is a serious blocker of this vision 5
- 6. 1. Efficiency limitedby VLANs and/or subnets Multi-tenant Cloud DC today 6 Reality: 25% utilization Goal: 80% utilization
- 7. 2. Network designlimited by poor isolation Multi-tenant Cloud DC today 7 a) Separate physical networks for different load, b) 'N' VLANs allocated to each tenant VM A1 Hypervisor Host 1 Switch-1 Switch-2 Switch-3 Switch-1 Switch-2 Switch-3 WAN VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x VLAN-101-x
- 8. 3. Scaling infrastructureis problematic ‒ L2 switching does not scale because of need to track large number of MAC addresses ‒ L3 routing scales, but traditional architecture does not support IP address overlap between tenants Multi-tenant Cloud DC today 8 Leaf SW1 Leaf SW2 Spine SW3 Server 1 VM 1 VM 2 Server 2 VM 3 VM 4 Server 3 VM 5 VM 6 Server 4 VM 7 Server 5 VM 8 VM 9 Server 6 VM10 VM 11
- 9. 4. Poor orchestrationof virtualized L4-L7 appliances Multi-tenant Cloud DC today 9 Internet Internet NFV
- 10. 5. VMs arenot treated as first class citizens ‒ Over 70% of today's servers are virtual machines ‒ But, East-west traffic poorly managed Lack of prioritization and rate-limiting at VM level Traffic between VMs on same server often unsupervised 6. Dynamic workload over multiple clouds is tricky ‒ Provisioning network takes forever ‒ Flat L2 network requires L2VPNs and other complex entities that are not easily created on the fly Multi-tenant DC Today 10
- 11. • Lack ofabstraction that decouples infrastructure from policy framework • Lack of ways to define the application container with dependencies on resources Basic Problem underlying all this 11
- 12. Dynamic, Programmable, Automated Solution:Network Virtualization 12
- 13. Software-defined Networking (SDN): Technologybehind network virtualization
- 14. • Closed toInnovations in the infrastructure Current Internet Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Operating System Operating System Operating System Operating System Operating System Service Service Service Closed Current Mode of Operation: High complexity and cost, Coarse traffic management, not easy to innovate on top 14
- 15. “Software-defined Networking” Approach SpecializedPacket Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Service Service Service Specialized Packet Forwarding Hardware Operating System Operating System Operating System Operating System Operating System Service Service Service Network Operating System LB service FW service IP routing service 15
- 16. “Software-defined Network” Simple Packet Forwarding Hardware SimplePacket Forwarding Hardware Simple Packet Forwarding Hardware Simple Packet Forwarding Hardware Simple Packet Forwarding Hardware Network Operating System OpenFlow or other API North-bound interface API Unchanged mgmt API Future Mode of Operation: Lower complexity and cost, Granular traffic management, Dynamic and Automated LB service FW service IP routing service 16 Legacy Router
- 17. Modes of SDNDeployment 1.In-network: Existing/green-field network fabrics upgraded to support OpenFlow 2.Overlay: WITHOUT changing fabric, the intelligence is added to edge-devices, ‒ as an additional appliance (e.g., bump-in-wire managed by controller) ‒ as enhanced server kernel bridge (e.g., OpenVSwitch in x86 hypervisors) Control Path OpenFlowHardware switch Data path (Hardware) Figure courtesy of Martin Casada @ VMware 17
- 18. • Google (Mode#1): ‒ Uses Openflow controllers and enabled switches to interconnect their data centers • AT&T, eBay, Fidelity Investments, NTT and Rackspace (Mode #2): ‒ Using OpenStack Quantum and Nicira NVP controller to manage the virtual networks within cloud environment • Genesis hosting (Hybrid Mode #1 + Mode #2) ‒ Uses NEC controller in intra-data-center scenario in production setting Publicly Announced SDN Deployments 18
- 19. Business Potential ofSDN 19 Business potential How? Reduced time to revenue Speed up of service provisioning New revenue Through new business models centered around on-demand usage Improved policy compliance Ensure that cloud workload is compliant with enterprise policies (e.g., access control) OpEx saving Automated operations and easier management of resources Reduced OpEx during upgrades Introduce new functions and service by replacing just software stack
- 20. Buzzwords: OpenFlow, OpenvSwitch, OVSDB, OpenDayLight, OpenStack
- 21. A quick primeron OpenFlow Controller PC OpenFlow Switch OpenFlow Switch OpenFlow Switch Alice's code Decision? OpenFlow Protocol Alice'sRule Alice's Rule Alice's Rule OpenFlow offloads control intelligence to a remote software 21 Match L1: Tunnel ID, Switchport L2: MAC addr, VLAN ID, Ether type L3: IPv4/IPv6 fields, ARP L4: TCP, UDP Action • Output to zero or more ports • Encapsulate • Header rewriting • Send to controller
- 22. Sample OpenFlow PhysicalSwitches Model Virtualize Notes HP Procurve 5400zl or 6600 1 OF instance per VLAN -LACP, VLAN and STP processing before OpenFlow -Wildcard rules or non-IP pkts processed in s/w -Header rewriting in s/w -CPU protects mgmt during loop NEC IP8800 1 OF instance per VLAN -OpenFlow takes precedence -Most actions processed in hardware -MAC header rewriting in h/w Brocade MLX routers Multiple OF instance per switch -Hybrid OpenFlow switch with legacy protocols and OpenFlow coexisting -OpenFlow commands can override state created by legacy protocos Pronto 3290 or 3780 with Pica8 or Indigo firmware 1 OF instance per switch -No legacy protocols (like VLAN, STP) -Most actions processed in hardware -MAC header rewriting in h/w
- 23. • Kernel modulethat replaces the standard linux bridge to provide significant packet matching and processing flexibility Open vSwitch (OVS) 23 Figure courtesy Thomas Graf @Red Hat
- 24. • API thatis an alternative to OpenFlow ‒ Lightweight ‒ Transactional ‒ Not SQL ‒ Persistent ‒ No packet_in events • Include Configuration and Control • Also manages slow-moving state: ‒ VM placement (via VMM integration) ‒ Tunnel setup OVSDB 24
- 25. Open-source OpenFlow Controllers 25 ControllerNotes Ryu (NTT) •Apache license •Python NOX/POX (ONRC) •GPL •C++ and Python Beacon (Stanford Univ.) •BSD-like license •Java-based Maestro (Rice Univ.) •GPL •Based on Java Trema (NEC) •GPL 2.0 •Written in C and Ruby Floodlight (Big Switch) •Apache license •Java-based OpenDayLight (Linux Foundation) •Eclipse Public License •Java-based
- 26. • Vendor-driven consortium(with Cisco, IBM, and others) for developing open-source SDN controller platform OpenDayLight Controller 26
- 27. Stack for Networkingwith OpenStack Typical workflow 1. Create a network 2. Associate a subnet with the network 3. Boot a VM and attach it to the network 4. Delete the VM 5. Delete any ports 6. Delete the network pSwitch pSwitch vSwitch Network Virtualization App SDN Controller vSwitch Plugin API 27 Neutron
- 28.
- 29. Goal Computing Infrastructure SDN-based VirtualizedNetwork Platform
- 30. 1. Traffic isolationacross virtual networks ‒ No VLANs and its 4094 limit ‒ Flexible containerization and switching of traffic ‒ Clear state management ‒ IP address overlap allowed 2. Scalably identifying individual VM’s traffic ‒ Intercepting traffic ‒ Virtual network identification ‒ Tracking hosts with minimal state Requirements/Challenges 30 3. Integration with legacy ‒ Encapsulation and tunneling ‒ VLAN to VxLAN gateways ‒ Support bare metal servers 4. Chaining and orchestrating virtual L4-L7 services ‒ Placement, number of instances, offloading 5. Troubleshooting support ‒ End-to-end visibility ‒ Mapping Virtual to Physical for troubleshooting
- 31. Deployment mode #1:Underlay VPN termination, L3 routing VM VM VM VMVM VM IP 192.168.1.2, MAC 0x1 VM VM VM VMVM VM VM VM VM VMVM VM VM VM VM VMVM VM Controller cluster CLI, REST, GUI IP 192.168.1.2, MAC 0x2 IP 192.168.2.2, MAC 0x1 IP 192.168.1.2, MAC 0x3 IP 192.168.1.2, MAC 0x2 IP 192.168.1.2, MAC 0x1 IP 192.168.2.1, MAC 0x2 IP 192.168.1.3, MAC 0x4 Tenant membership decided based on {switch-port, MAC, IP} tuple in each flow 31 VNet identified using VLANs, VxLANs or GRE Internet Custom routing by controller
- 32. • Problem: OpenFlowswitches have resource limitations ‒ Weak CPU incapable of doing traffic summarization, frequent statistics reporting, and packet marking ‒ Flow-table limitation in switches (e.g., 1500 exact match entries) ‒ Switch-controller communication limits (e.g., 200 packet_in/sec) ‒ Firmware does not always expose the full capabilities of the chipset • Solution: ‒ Next generation of hardware customized for OpenFlow ‒ New TCAMs with larger capacity ‒ Intelligent traffic aggregation ‒ Minimal offloading to vSwitches Performance Limitations 32
- 33. Legacy L3 routing Legacy L2 switching VMVM VM VMVM VM 10.1.1.0/24 10.1.2.0/24 10.2.1.0/24 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 10.1.2.1 10.1.2.2 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 VM VM VM VMVM VM VM VM VM VMVM VM VM VM VM VMVM VM vDP vDP vDP vDP vDP vDP Controller cluster Internet Logical link v/p-GatewayCLI, REST, GUI Deployment mode #2: Overlay vDP: Virtual Data Plane VM addressing masked from fabric Tunnels Tenant membership decided by virtual interface on the vSwitch vDP
- 34. • Use oftunneling techniques, such as STT, VxLAN, GRE • Functionality implemented at the vDP include: ‒ Virtual network switching, rate limiting, distributed ACLs, flow marking, policy enforcement • Functionality implemented at the gateway can include: ‒ NAT, Tunnel termination, Designated broadcast, VLAN interface • Network core is not available for innovation Overlay-based Network Virtualization 34 Topology acts like a single switch
- 35. • Bare metalmode ‒ Running a native OS with baked in containerization • Hypervisor mode ‒ Typically supported with KVM, Xen or Hyper-V • Appliance mode ‒ Typically with VMware ESX Typical Insertion Choices 35 VM A1 VM B1 Hypervisor VM A3 DVS SDN Engine Host server VM A1 VM B1 VM A3 Custom vSwitch VM D1 Host server VM A1 VM B1 VM A3 VM D1 Host server Hypervisor SDN Engine
- 36. VxLAN Tunneling 36 • BetweenVxLAN Tunnel End Points (VTEP) in each host server • UDP port numbers allows better ECMP hashing • In absence of SDN control plane, IP multicast is used for layer-2 flooding (broadcasts, multicasts and unknown unicasts) VTEP outer MAC header Outer IP header Outer UDP header VxLAN header Original L2 packet VxLAN flags Reserved 24bit VN ID Reserved Source port VxLAN port UDP Length Checksum
- 37. MPLS over GRETunneling 37 Transport header of the Authoritative Edge Device MPLS o GRE header Original L2 packet
- 38. • Solution: ‒ Offloadit to the top-of- rack leaf switch ‒ Use hardware gateway • Problem: ‒ Overlay mode is CPU hungry at high line rates and has anecdotally fared poorly in real world Performance Limitations 38 Throughput Recv side cpu Send side cpu Linux Bridge: 9.3 Gbps 85% 75% OVS Bridge: 9.4 Gbps 82% 70% OVS-STT: 9.5 Gbps 70% 70% OVS-GRE: 2.3 Gbps 75% 97% Source: http://networkheresy.com/2012/06/08/the-overhead-of-software-tunneling/
- 39. • Combined overlayand underlay (fabric) to achieve: ‒ end-to-end visibility ‒ complete control ‒ best mix of both worlds • The integration may need 1) link-local VLANs or 2) integration with VM manager to detect VM profile Deployment mode #3: Hybrid 39
- 40. Vendor Solution Taxonomy andLandscape
- 41. Rack Four types ofSDN solutions 1. SDN-Dataplane ‒ Traffic handling devices Physical Virtual 2. SDN-Control ‒ Decoupled control plane OpenFlow++ Overlay 3. SDN-Fabric ‒ Combined data and control plane 4. SDN-Mgmt ‒ Extensible mgmt software and API Core Aggregation Edge Controller cluster Management/ Orchestration Virtual switches Server manager 41
- 42. Vendor Ecosystem Data plane (Elementsused for traffic handling) Controller solutions (Decoupled control plane) Fabric (Combined data and control plane) Management (Extensible mgmt software and API) L2-L4 routing SDN-D- PSwitch SDN-D- VSwitch SDN-C- OpenFlow SDN-C- Overlay SDN-D-Fabric SDN-N-Mgmt 42 (*Not necessarily complete)
- 43. Vendor Ecosystem Data plane (Elementsused for traffic handling) Controller solutions (Decoupled control plane) Fabric (Combined data and control plane) Management (Extensible mgmt software and API) L4-L7 services SDN-S-Dataplane SDN-S-Control SDN-S-Fabric SDN-S- Orchestrator 43 (*Not necessarily complete)
- 44. Converging Architecture forL2-L4 • P+V or Overlay-Underlay ‒ Vendors are converging towards an architecture where Overlay: Provides flexibility Underlay: Provides performance ‒ Achieve end-to-end visibility and control • Vendor options ‒ Same vendor for overlay and underlay (e.g., Cisco Insieme + Cisco 1KV, Big Switch SwitchLight, HP, Juniper) ‒ Different vendor for each Overlay : VMware, IBM, PLUMgrid, Nuage/ALU Underlay: Arista, Brocade, Pica8, Cumulus 44
- 45. Overlay: VMware NSX •VxLAN and STT tunneling • Partnership with several hardware vendors for VTEP 45
- 46. • Open-source solutionthat uses MPLS/GRE/VxLAN in dataplane and XMPP for control plane signaling Overlay: Juniper Contrail System 46 XMPP
- 47. Cloud Service Management Plane Datacenter ControlPlane Datacenter Data Plane Virtual Routing & Switching Virtualized Services Directory Virtualized Services Controller HYPERVISOR HYPERVISOR HYPERVISOR HYPERVISOR HYPERVISOR HYPERVISOR Brooklyn Datacenter - Zone 1 Virtualized Services Directory (VSD) • Policy Engine – abstracts complexity • Service templates and analytics Virtualized Services Controller (VSC) • SDN Controller, programs the network • Rich routing feature set Virtual Routing & Switching (VRS) • Distributed switch / router – L2-4 rules • Integration of bare metal assets Nuage Networks Virtualized Services Platform (VSP) IP Fabric Edge Router MP-BGPMP-BGP Hardware GW for Bare Metal Overlay: Nuage Networks VSP • Tunnel encapsulation using VXLAN or VPNoGRE. • Hardware integration for Gateway through MP-BGP 47
- 48. Hybrid: HP-VMware PartneredNSX • Virtual switches from Vmware or HP • Physical switches from HP 48 OVSDB OpenFlow
- 49. Hybrid: Big Switch“P+V” Fabric • Fabric combining physical and virtual OpenFlow switches ‒ Support for end-to-end network virtualization ‒ Support for integrating L4-L7 and other legacy devices 49
- 50. • Multi-tenant logicalnetworks – 1000 Virtual Tenant Networks • Multipath fabric with traffic engineering – 200 switches/controller • End to end resiliency - millisecond link failover Underlay: NEC ProgrammableFlow VTN2(Layer2) VTN1 (Layer3) Controller cluster OpenFlow Protocol Switch Pool Server Pool Physical Network vRouter vBridge Virtual Tenant Networks Interface 50
- 51. L4-L7: Embrane Heleos •Elastically rollout virtual L4-L7 appliances on x86 hardware based on metrics • Approach complementary to L2-L4 network virtualization solutions 51
- 52. L4-L7: Cisco vPath •Similar to SDN, vPath architecture decouples control plane and data plane, but for L4-L7 service ‒ Intelligence on the Virtual Service Gateway (VSG) ‒ Enforcement on the vPath agent in vSwitch 52
- 53. L4-L7: vArmour VirtualDistri. Firewall • Physical or virtual Multi- enforcement points that integrate to a single policy • Pre-configured security group for diff app are applied automatically through Nova integration • EP = Security and Fwding • L2-L4 SDN not essential 53 Director cluster P/V Enforcement Point EP EP EP vArmour FWaaS Plugin
- 54.