Allow Large Extras #523
Merged
Allow Large Extras #523
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Is that all that is needed? Was the extras duct already growing as big as required besides the fatal? |
|
(Not at Home or Laptop to check myself) |
|
Yes it's dynamically allocated. |
|
@domenukk max testcase size being MAX_FILE = 1MB by default? good to know but I do not think this is likely to happen. LGTM - IMHO you can merge |
|
@vanhauser-thc 1MB is more than enough xddd |
abertschi
pushed a commit
to mattweingarten/AFLplusplus
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR allows large extras, making fuzzing with huge dictionaries possible (for people that want to)...