-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
[None][chore] move some cases from post-merge to pre-merge to detect errors in early stage #7699
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Hui Gao <huig@nvidia.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughMoved specific tests between pre_merge and post_merge sections in two YAML test lists: for A100, a TRT quantization unittest was shifted to pre_merge; for H100, a PyTorch DeepSeekV3Lite bfloat16 test entry was repositioned into the pre_merge block. No test definitions or logic altered. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Tip 👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.
Please see the documentation for more information. Example: reviews:
pre_merge_checks:
custom_checks:
- name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
mode: "warning"
instructions: |
Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_a100.yml(1 hunks)tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_h100.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (5)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: pengbowang-nv
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#7192
File: tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_dgx_b200.yml:56-72
Timestamp: 2025-08-26T09:49:04.956Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test configuration files, the test scheduling system handles wildcard matching with special rules that prevent duplicate test execution even when the same tests appear in multiple yaml files with overlapping GPU wildcards (e.g., "*b200*" and "*gb200*").
Learnt from: fredricz-20070104
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#7645
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt:648-648
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test lists, it's common and intentional for the same test to appear in multiple test list files when they serve different purposes (e.g., llm_function_core.txt for comprehensive core functionality testing and llm_function_core_sanity.txt for quick sanity checks). This duplication allows tests to be run in different testing contexts.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learnt from: moraxu
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6303
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/examples_test_list.txt:494-494
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T17:06:08.621Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM testing, it's common to have both CLI flow tests (test_cli_flow.py) and PyTorch API tests (test_llm_api_pytorch.py) for the same model. These serve different purposes: CLI flow tests validate the traditional command-line workflow, while PyTorch API tests validate the newer LLM API backend. Both are legitimate and should coexist.
Applied to files:
tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_a100.ymltests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_h100.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learnt from: fredricz-20070104
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#7645
File: tests/integration/test_lists/qa/llm_function_core.txt:648-648
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T09:40:45.658Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test lists, it's common and intentional for the same test to appear in multiple test list files when they serve different purposes (e.g., llm_function_core.txt for comprehensive core functionality testing and llm_function_core_sanity.txt for quick sanity checks). This duplication allows tests to be run in different testing contexts.
Applied to files:
tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_a100.ymltests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_h100.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-08-26T09:49:04.956Z
Learnt from: pengbowang-nv
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#7192
File: tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_dgx_b200.yml:56-72
Timestamp: 2025-08-26T09:49:04.956Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM test configuration files, the test scheduling system handles wildcard matching with special rules that prevent duplicate test execution even when the same tests appear in multiple yaml files with overlapping GPU wildcards (e.g., "*b200*" and "*gb200*").
Applied to files:
tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_a100.yml
📚 Learning: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learnt from: galagam
PR: NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM#6487
File: tests/unittest/_torch/auto_deploy/unit/singlegpu/test_ad_trtllm_bench.py:1-12
Timestamp: 2025-08-06T13:58:07.506Z
Learning: In TensorRT-LLM, test files (files under tests/ directories) do not require NVIDIA copyright headers, unlike production source code files. Test files typically start directly with imports, docstrings, or code.
Applied to files:
tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_a100.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Pre-commit Check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_h100.yml (1)
56-56: Approve: move DeepSeekV3Lite bfloat16 combo to pre_merge — verifiedSingle occurrence found in tests/integration/test_lists/test-db/l0_h100.yml (line 56); no post_merge duplicate.
If runtime >5–7m on H100, mark TIMEOUT(90) or split params to keep pre_merge wall time in budget.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A small comment, others LGTM
|
/bot skip --comment "trivial change" |
|
PR_Github #18530 [ skip ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #18530 [ skip ] completed with state |
|
Thanks for enhancing the pre-merge CI. Thanks |
June |
test_unittests.py::test_unittests_v2[unittest/trt/model_api/test_model_quantization.py] test_llm_api_pytorch.py::TestDeepSeekV3Lite::test_bfloat16[mtp_nextn=2-attention_dp=True-cuda_graph=True-overlap_scheduler=True-torch_compile=False-enable_chunked_prefill=False]
Sure. I will start test with target stages. |
|
/bot run --stage-list="A100X-PyTorch-1,H100_PCIe-PyTorch-3" |
|
PR_Github #18542 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #18542 [ run ] completed with state |
|
/bot run --stage-list="H100_PCIe-PyTorch-1,H100_PCIe-PyTorch-2,H100_PCIe-PyTorch-3" |
|
PR_Github #18567 [ run ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #18567 [ run ] completed with state |
|
Moved cases are tested in stages A100X-PyTorch-1 and H100_PCIe-PyTorch-2. |
|
/bot skip --comment "Moved cases are tested in stages A100X-PyTorch-1 and H100_PCIe-PyTorch-2 in previous pipeline" |
|
PR_Github #18589 [ skip ] triggered by Bot |
|
PR_Github #18589 [ skip ] completed with state |
…errors in early stage (NVIDIA#7699) Signed-off-by: Hui Gao <huig@nvidia.com>
…errors in early stage (NVIDIA#7699) Signed-off-by: Hui Gao <huig@nvidia.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
Description
Test Coverage
PR Checklist
Please review the following before submitting your PR:
PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.
PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.
Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)
Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities
CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes
Documentation updated as needed
The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.
Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.
GitHub Bot Help
/bot [-h] ['run', 'kill', 'skip', 'reuse-pipeline'] ...Provide a user friendly way for developers to interact with a Jenkins server.
Run
/bot [-h|--help]to print this help message.See details below for each supported subcommand.
run [--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id --disable-fail-fast --skip-test --stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx" --gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe" --test-backend "pytorch, cpp" --add-multi-gpu-test --only-multi-gpu-test --disable-multi-gpu-test --post-merge --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx" --detailed-log --debug(experimental)]Launch build/test pipelines. All previously running jobs will be killed.
--reuse-test (optional)pipeline-id(OPTIONAL) : Allow the new pipeline to reuse build artifacts and skip successful test stages from a specified pipeline or the last pipeline if no pipeline-id is indicated. If the Git commit ID has changed, this option will be always ignored. The DEFAULT behavior of the bot is to reuse build artifacts and successful test results from the last pipeline.--disable-reuse-test(OPTIONAL) : Explicitly prevent the pipeline from reusing build artifacts and skipping successful test stages from a previous pipeline. Ensure that all builds and tests are run regardless of previous successes.--disable-fail-fast(OPTIONAL) : Disable fail fast on build/tests/infra failures.--skip-test(OPTIONAL) : Skip all test stages, but still run build stages, package stages and sanity check stages. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.--stage-list "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx"(OPTIONAL) : Only run the specified test stages. Examples: "A10-PyTorch-1, xxx". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.--gpu-type "A30, H100_PCIe"(OPTIONAL) : Only run the test stages on the specified GPU types. Examples: "A30, H100_PCIe". Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.--test-backend "pytorch, cpp"(OPTIONAL) : Skip test stages which don't match the specified backends. Only support [pytorch, cpp, tensorrt, triton]. Examples: "pytorch, cpp" (does not run test stages with tensorrt or triton backend). Note: Does NOT update GitHub pipeline status.--only-multi-gpu-test(OPTIONAL) : Only run the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.--disable-multi-gpu-test(OPTIONAL) : Disable the multi-GPU tests. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.--add-multi-gpu-test(OPTIONAL) : Force run the multi-GPU tests in addition to running L0 pre-merge pipeline.--post-merge(OPTIONAL) : Run the L0 post-merge pipeline instead of the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline.--extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx"(OPTIONAL) : Run the ordinary L0 pre-merge pipeline and specified test stages. Examples: --extra-stage "H100_PCIe-TensorRT-Post-Merge-1, xxx".--detailed-log(OPTIONAL) : Enable flushing out all logs to the Jenkins console. This will significantly increase the log volume and may slow down the job.--debug(OPTIONAL) : Experimental feature. Enable access to the CI container for debugging purpose. Note: Specify exactly one stage in thestage-listparameter to access the appropriate container environment. Note: Does NOT update GitHub check status.For guidance on mapping tests to stage names, see
docs/source/reference/ci-overview.mdand the
scripts/test_to_stage_mapping.pyhelper.kill
killKill all running builds associated with pull request.
skip
skip --comment COMMENTSkip testing for latest commit on pull request.
--comment "Reason for skipping build/test"is required. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.reuse-pipeline
reuse-pipelineReuse a previous pipeline to validate current commit. This action will also kill all currently running builds associated with the pull request. IMPORTANT NOTE: This is dangerous since lack of user care and validation can cause top of tree to break.