KEMBAR78
Add Quantum PageRank example by Squirtle007 · Pull Request #2806 · NVIDIA/cuda-quantum · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@Squirtle007
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Quantum stochastic walk using dynamic simulation (Quantum PageRank algorithm for social network analysis as an example)

Note: The notebook is formatted using yapf formatter with nbQA, following the instructions at #211 and #678.

Co-authored-by: Ikko Hamamura <ihamamura@nvidia.com>
Co-authored-by: Johnson Sun <johnsons@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Pika Wang <yunyuanw@nvidia.com>
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Apr 11, 2025

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@j3soon
Copy link

j3soon commented Apr 21, 2025

Hi, could someone help approve the workflows? Thanks!

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 22, 2025

Will look into it

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 22, 2025

/ok to test 43723b2

Command Bot: Processing...

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 22, 2025

Seems like you would want to add this notebook to the applications.rst file with the appropriate tags.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Pisal <spisal@nvidia.com>
@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 22, 2025

/ok to test 0889448

Command Bot: Processing...

@Squirtle007
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes, will make this into the the rst file, thanks for the suggestion.

@j3soon j3soon force-pushed the quantum-pagerank branch from 3c2852f to d82e4b2 Compare April 25, 2025 11:23
Signed-off-by: Sachin Pisal <spisal@nvidia.com>
@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 25, 2025

/ok to test cf3d534

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Pisal <spisal@nvidia.com>
@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 25, 2025

/ok to test 37e29b5

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented Apr 28, 2025

/ok to test 1c2ef28

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@mawolf2023
Copy link
Contributor

mawolf2023 commented Apr 30, 2025

@efratshabtai Looks good to me other than two things.

  1. Something funny is happening on the TOC listing due to the headings? Does this happen when you make the docs locally @Squirtle007 ?

image

  1. Should dynamics be category or a backend. At first I was thinking backend, but any applications that use dynamics cannot just run on any other backend so I kind of like it as a category.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Pisal <spisal@nvidia.com>
@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented May 1, 2025

@efratshabtai Looks good to me other than two things.

  1. Something funny is happening on the TOC listing due to the headings? Does this happen when you make the docs locally @Squirtle007 ?

image

  1. Should dynamics be category or a backend. At first I was thinking backend, but any applications that use dynamics cannot just run on any other backend so I kind of like it as a category.

Thanks @mawolf2023. Fixed the first issue.

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented May 1, 2025

/ok to test 763630b

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 1, 2025

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@Squirtle007
Copy link
Contributor Author

We just merged the latest main branch into this branch and resolved conflicts.
@sacpis could you pls help merge if no further issues? Thanks in advance.

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented May 29, 2025

/ok to test 4afecb2

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented May 30, 2025

/ok to test f8d0de6

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented May 30, 2025

/ok to test f6d50e8

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@sacpis
Copy link
Collaborator

sacpis commented May 31, 2025

/ok to test f52bca0

Command Bot: Processing...

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

CUDA Quantum Docs Bot: A preview of the documentation can be found here.

@sacpis sacpis enabled auto-merge (squash) June 2, 2025 02:01
@sacpis sacpis merged commit 08f94ed into NVIDIA:main Jun 2, 2025
383 of 384 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2025
annagrin pushed a commit to annagrin/cuda-quantum that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Signed-off-by: Anna Gringauze <agringauze@nvidia.com>
@bettinaheim bettinaheim added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 22, 2025
@bettinaheim bettinaheim added this to the release 0.12.0 milestone Jul 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants