KEMBAR78
Concerns re: focus action · Issue #81 · WICG/aom · GitHub
Skip to content

Concerns re: focus action #81

@cookiecrook

Description

@cookiecrook

Fine to leave focus in for now (ref #80), but I have the following concerns about it:

  • User privacy: This is an unambiguous indication of assistive technology where mere navigation of the content "outs" the user.
  • Compatibility with non-linear navigation methods: Would it still be called "focus" if it's triggered by something that would fire many more events that linear keyboard focus? E.g. Pointer-based dwell AT may need to fire this on hover, more akin to mouseover/mouseout.
  • Robustness: To make this complete, we'd need a pair of actions: focus/blur, or focusIn/focusOut.
  • Ambiguity: As you're well aware (see :focus-ring) ambiguity between different types of focus can result in misuse or cumbersome workarounds by web developers.

Thoughts:

  • Should actions allow an optional payload (e.g. "type of focus" or any other relevant data)
  • Should a user privacy model be included at this point in the Incubation process? E.g. prompt the user (non-blocking) when the page first registers for actions. Consider aspects of the privacy model I sketched up for IndieUI User Context a few years back.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions