KEMBAR78
fix: Remove flushAll method by yirutang · Pull Request #850 · googleapis/java-bigquerystorage · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@yirutang
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #<issue_number_goes_here> ☕️

@yirutang yirutang requested a review from a team February 18, 2021 00:05
@yirutang yirutang requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2021 00:05
@yirutang yirutang requested a review from tswast February 18, 2021 00:05
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. label Feb 18, 2021
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 18, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #850 (8b0379c) into master (87a37d9) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #850      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     80.74%   80.71%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity      990      987       -3     
============================================
  Files            74       74              
  Lines          5317     5306      -11     
  Branches        413      412       -1     
============================================
- Hits           4293     4283      -10     
+ Misses          849      848       -1     
  Partials        175      175              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...e/cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/StreamWriter.java 84.17% <ø> (+0.05%) 35.00 <0.00> (-1.00) ⬆️
.../google/cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/Waiter.java 53.93% <0.00%> (-1.13%) 12.00% <0.00%> (-2.00%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 87a37d9...ac22732. Read the comment docs.

@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 18, 2021
@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 19, 2021
@stephaniewang526 stephaniewang526 merged commit 33a4502 into googleapis:master Feb 19, 2021
*
* @throws Exception
*/
public void flushAll(long timeoutMillis) throws Exception {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yirutang Would you explain whether this removal is a backward compatible change from the library users's perspective?

(I'm surveying how much CLIRR helps Java libraries to follow semantic versioning or not)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As of now I am pretty sure, there is no user on this. We would eventually provide this method but there is still some dispute about this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it. Thanks.

@yirutang yirutang deleted the remove-flushall branch April 30, 2021 19:00
shubhwip pushed a commit to shubhwip/java-bigquerystorage that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
Fixes a NullPointerException introduced in googleapis#841 which occured when trying
to check the the requesterPays status of a file while authenticated with an
invalid service account.

Refs: googleapis#849, googleapis#841
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigquerystorage Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigquerystorage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants