-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
Support file specific linter config #414
Conversation
8839e01 to
805f0e3
Compare
6bbc973 to
da5fa36
Compare
|
This is probably a worthwhile change on itself, but I don't think it should be needed here: does
|
I believe this PR intends to address my comment on #409 This might also be a nice alternative to |
I suppose people could use this PR to suppress linter errors in dependencies, where you cannot easily add |
People should not be linting their dependencies; lint-cleanness should be considered an implementation detail |
Just to clarify what I meant here: I think this PR is good, and should probably be merged I don't think the rest of the stack should depend on it :) |
da5fa36 to
2960730
Compare
|
Rebased this PR to avoid dependencies between other PRs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
use dynamic instead of shape and remove XHP changes before merging
|
XHP change seems needed because of this, but should be a separate PR (and separate commit in the main branch) as it's independent and should be reviewed (and potentially bisected or reverted) separately |
2960730 to
0db279d
Compare
The file specific linter config is used in #417