<regex>: Fix quadratic complexity in regex_search when regex starts with ? quantifier or several alternatives
#5457
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #5452. This is the minimal fix in
_Matcher::_Skipthat I mentioned in the issue: It avoids worst-case running time quadratic in the size of the searched string by giving up on_N_ifnodes with two or more branches.Unfortunately, we can't just give up whenever an
_N_ifis encountered because the parser currently likes to generate such nodes with a single branch. In particular, there is one such node at the beginning of each generated NFA. This means that giving up on such nodes would render_Skippointless for all regular expressions.I confirmed locally that this change is sufficient to fix the quadratic running time that #5452's test case exposes (though the quantifiers still almost double the running time.)