KEMBAR78
Fix bug in GraphFlow cycle check by ekzhu · Pull Request #6629 · microsoft/autogen · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@ekzhu
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekzhu ekzhu commented Jun 5, 2025

Resolve #6628

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.75%. Comparing base (796e349) to head (4182eb7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6629      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.76%   79.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         228      228              
  Lines       17040    17040              
==========================================
- Hits        13592    13591       -1     
- Misses       3448     3449       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 79.75% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ekzhu ekzhu merged commit 4358dfd into main Jun 5, 2025
65 checks passed
@ekzhu ekzhu deleted the ekzhu-fix-graph-flow-bug branch June 5, 2025 04:35
ekzhu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cycle detected without exit condition: generator -> reviewer -> generator

1 participant