The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: raipc / name: Anton Rybochkin (f62710d, bd2362d)

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.95%. Comparing base (56941a5) to head (bd2362d).
Report is 55 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (71.42%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7141      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     89.85%   89.95%   +0.10%     
- Complexity     6610     6678      +68     
============================================
  Files           740      750      +10     
  Lines         19986    20168     +182     
  Branches       1964     1977      +13     
============================================
+ Hits          17958    18142     +184     
+ Misses         1439     1434       -5     
- Partials        589      592       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

JcTools tests exist but jacoco reports are not generated

hmm. This modifies a shaded-in dependency. Is it possible to have this fixed upstream, and then get it incorporated in here? I'd hate to have our version diverge from the jctool code, if at all possible.

hmm. This modifies a shaded-in dependency. Is it possible to have this fixed upstream, and then get it incorporated in here? I'd hate to have our version diverge from the jctool code, if at all possible.

Could you clarify it, please?

io.opentelemetry.sdk.trace.internal.JcTools is not a shaded class from JcTools library, it's a helper class to work with JcTools queue.
The JCTools library itself is shaded into io.opentelemetry.internal.shaded.jctools package

hmm. This modifies a shaded-in dependency. Is it possible to have this fixed upstream, and then get it incorporated in here? I'd hate to have our version diverge from the jctool code, if at all possible.

Could you clarify it, please?

io.opentelemetry.sdk.trace.internal.JcTools is not a shaded class from JcTools library, it's a helper class to work with JcTools queue. The JCTools library itself is shaded into io.opentelemetry.internal.shaded.jctools package

whoops. I was misreading. Never mind! Carry on.