KEMBAR78
gh-115942: Add `locked` to several multiprocessing locks by sobolevn · Pull Request #115944 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member

@sobolevn sobolevn commented Feb 26, 2024

TODO:

  • Get field-expert's approval
  • Docs
  • News

@sobolevn sobolevn marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2024 06:44
@sobolevn sobolevn requested a review from gpshead as a code owner March 13, 2024 06:44
@sobolevn
Copy link
Member Author

sobolevn commented Jun 3, 2024

@gpshead do you have an opinion about this? :)

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member Author

friendly ping @gpshead

Co-authored-by: mpage <mpage@cs.stanford.edu>
@gpshead
Copy link
Member

gpshead commented Mar 13, 2025

FWIW this PR makes sense to me.

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, then I will add all the missing details. Thanks a lot! 👍

Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add tests on threading.RLock.locked().

Copy link
Member

@picnixz picnixz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some rewording. Otherwise, once tests requested by Victor are added, LGTM.

@sobolevn
Copy link
Member Author

sobolevn commented Apr 1, 2025

@vstinner @gpshead this is now ready to be reviewed :)

@sobolevn sobolevn requested review from mpage and vstinner April 1, 2025 09:43
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@gpshead gpshead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wish I could object to this being a locked() method instead of a .locked property... but this is matching an existing ancient API on purpose so... LGTM.

@sobolevn sobolevn merged commit f7305a0 into python:main Apr 8, 2025
42 checks passed
@sobolevn
Copy link
Member Author

sobolevn commented Apr 8, 2025

Thanks everyone! 🎉

seehwan pushed a commit to seehwan/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
…n#115944)

Co-authored-by: mpage <mpage@cs.stanford.edu>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants