KEMBAR78
[export] Add dynamic_shapes to _export.aot_compile by angelayi · Pull Request #110101 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

angelayi
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Following the new dynamic_shapes API (introduced in #108448), we will also add a dynamic_shapes API to _export.aot_compile

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D49653815

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 26, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/110101

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit 6997aa5 with merge base bb9779e (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D49653815

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D49653815

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D49653815

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D49653815

Summary:

Following the new dynamic_shapes API (introduced in pytorch#108448), we will also add a dynamic_shapes API to _export.aot_compile

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: gmagogsfm

Differential Revision: D49653815
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D49653815

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants