KEMBAR78
[tp] fix SP style regression by wanchaol · Pull Request #111353 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@wanchaol
Copy link
Collaborator

@wanchaol wanchaol commented Oct 16, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

[tp] fix SP style regression

Although we want to remove prepare_input/output, we should still keep
the old behavior for SequenceParallel

[tp] fix SP style regression

Although we want to remove prepare_input/output, we should still keep
the old behavior for SequenceParallel

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/111353

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit d4507df with merge base 882bc17 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

… or less>"

[tp] fix SP style regression

Although we want to remove prepare_input/output, we should still keep
the old behavior for SequenceParallel

[ghstack-poisoned]
wanchaol added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
[tp] fix SP style regression

Although we want to remove prepare_input/output, we should still keep
the old behavior for SequenceParallel

ghstack-source-id: c4e1fc6
Pull Request resolved: #111353
@wanchaol wanchaol changed the title <Replace this line with a title. Use 1 line only, 67 chars or less> [tp] fix SP style regression Oct 16, 2023
@wanchaol wanchaol added ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request release notes: distributed (dtensor) release notes category labels Oct 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@fduwjj fduwjj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, looks like test_tp_example should have captured this.. I will look into that UT later.

@wanchaol
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: distributed (dtensor) release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants