KEMBAR78
Add mechanism for make_fx to not error on data-dependent-ops by zou3519 · Pull Request #114129 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 commented Nov 20, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

I'm looking for a make_fx(tracing_mode=real) that doesn't error out on
data-dependent operations. This PR adds a flag to do that. We use this
to help implement offline generation, but this is useful by itself:
sometimes we want to trace a function with real tensors and don't care
if we bake values in (because we just want to see what happened).

Test Plan:

  • new test

I'm looking for a make_fx(tracing_mode=real) that doesn't error out on
data-dependent operations. This PR adds a flag to do that. We use this
to help implement offline generation, but this is useful by itself:
sometimes we want to trace a function with real tensors and don't care
if we bake values in (because we just want to see what happened).

Test Plan:
- new test

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: fx release notes category label Nov 20, 2023
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 20, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/114129

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 894d27b with merge base f36d09f (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
I'm looking for a make_fx(tracing_mode=real) that doesn't error out on
data-dependent operations. This PR adds a flag to do that. We use this
to help implement offline generation, but this is useful by itself:
sometimes we want to trace a function with real tensors and don't care
if we bake values in (because we just want to see what happened).

Test Plan:
- new test

ghstack-source-id: 09593c9
Pull Request resolved: #114129
@zou3519 zou3519 added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 20, 2023
@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor Author

zou3519 commented Nov 20, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/zou3519/756/head branch November 24, 2023 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: fx release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants