KEMBAR78
[QAT] Make Fused modules torchscriptable by Ninja91 · Pull Request #136285 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@Ninja91
Copy link
Contributor

@Ninja91 Ninja91 commented Sep 18, 2024

Summary:
Same as title.

Inspired by: https://pytorch.org/tutorials/recipes/script_optimized.html#fix-common-errors-when-using-the-script-method

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D62980019

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 18, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/136285

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 92e4eb3 with merge base e4571e7 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Sep 26, 2024
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor

still not in sync I think

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: quantization release notes category label Sep 26, 2024
pytorch-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #136285

Same as title. Just moved around code to avoid torchscript failing on
  - False branch not having `conv_output` variable
  - type inference issue

Inspired by: https://pytorch.org/tutorials/recipes/script_optimized.html#fix-common-errors-when-using-the-script-method

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: jerryzh168

Differential Revision: D62980019
@Ninja91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ninja91 commented Sep 26, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

Ninja91 added a commit to Ninja91/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#136285

Same as title. Just moved around code to avoid torchscript failing on
  - False branch not having `conv_output` variable
  - type inference issue

Inspired by: https://pytorch.org/tutorials/recipes/script_optimized.html#fix-common-errors-when-using-the-script-method

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: jerryzh168

Differential Revision: D62980019
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

2 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@Ninja91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ninja91 commented Sep 27, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@Ninja91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ninja91 commented Sep 27, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

2 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@Ninja91
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ninja91 commented Sep 28, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#136285

Same as title. Just moved around code to avoid torchscript failing on
  - False branch not having `conv_output` variable
  - type inference issue

Inspired by: https://pytorch.org/tutorials/recipes/script_optimized.html#fix-common-errors-when-using-the-script-method

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: jerryzh168

Differential Revision: D62980019
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D62980019

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants