KEMBAR78
Training IR should preserve custom metadata by tugsbayasgalan · Pull Request #138266 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor

@tugsbayasgalan tugsbayasgalan commented Oct 17, 2024

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/138266

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure, 2 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 72394c4 with merge base bd7cbdd (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@yiming0416
Copy link
Contributor

@tugsbayasgalan Looks like there is an identical test with the same name in test_serialize.py. Do we need to keep them in two places?

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tugsbayasgalan has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

1 similar comment
@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tugsbayasgalan has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tugsbayasgalan has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Rebased gh/tugsbayasgalan/264/orig onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict because #138292 was rebased, please pull locally before adding more changes (for example, via ghstack checkout https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/138266)

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tugsbayasgalan has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 21, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

6 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "Landed internally?

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2024

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

Got EOF while in a quoted string```
Try `@pytorchbot --help` for more info.

@tugsbayasgalan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -f "Landed internally?"

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

12 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / linux-focal-rocm6.2-py3.10 / test (distributed, 1, 1, linux.rocm.gpu)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 2 checks: pull / linux-focal-py3_9-clang9-xla / test (xla, 1, 1, lf.linux.12xlarge), trunk / linux-focal-rocm6.2-py3.10 / test (distributed, 1, 1, linux.rocm.gpu)

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
Inserting runtime_assertions cause gm to have different names but the graph signature was populated earlier. To avoid this kind of errors in the future, I refactored these steps into a helper function.

Differential Revision: [D64576251](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D64576251)
Pull Request resolved: #138292
Approved by: https://github.com/avikchaudhuri
ghstack dependencies: #138266
SamGinzburg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Differential Revision: [D64576252](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D64576252)

@diff-train-skip-merge
Pull Request resolved: #138266
Approved by: https://github.com/yushangdi
SamGinzburg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Inserting runtime_assertions cause gm to have different names but the graph signature was populated earlier. To avoid this kind of errors in the future, I refactored these steps into a helper function.

Differential Revision: [D64576251](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D64576251)
Pull Request resolved: #138292
Approved by: https://github.com/avikchaudhuri
ghstack dependencies: #138266
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/tugsbayasgalan/263/head branch November 21, 2024 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants