-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
RMSNorms docs - remove biases initialization #139620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/139620
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New FailureAs of commit bc59ea7 with merge base 12d225d ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
@pytorchbot label "topic: docs" |
|
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
|
@pytorchbot merge |
|
Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra. |
|
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / win-vs2019-cpu-py3 / test (default, 1, 3, windows.4xlarge.nonephemeral) Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
|
@pytorchmergebot merge -f "Unrelated failures" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
RMSNorm doesn't use a bias in `elementwise_affine`, so I've removed it from the documentation. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#139620 Approved by: https://github.com/mikaylagawarecki
RMSNorm doesn't use a bias in `elementwise_affine`, so I've removed it from the documentation. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#139620 Approved by: https://github.com/mikaylagawarecki
RMSNorm doesn't use a bias in
elementwise_affine, so I've removed it from the documentation.