KEMBAR78
[Inductor] fix broadcast logic for Triton (#141027) by nandesuka · Pull Request #141693 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@nandesuka
Copy link
Contributor

@nandesuka nandesuka commented Nov 27, 2024

Summary:

Fix logic for inserting broadcast on kernel with load going directly to store. In the case where load is going directly to store, we insert a tl.broadcast on the store, regardless of the block size on the load. In the case where a broadcast is not required, the downstream Triton compiler is expected to remove this no-op broadcast instruction.

Test Plan: Added tests under test_torchinductor_strided_blocks.py:test_expand_broadcast in OSS and internal test cases.

Reviewed By: blaine-rister

Differential Revision: D65518033

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @yf225 @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @ColinPeppler @amjames @desertfire @chauhang @aakhundov

Summary:

Fix logic for inserting broadcast on kernel with load going directly to store. In the case where load is going directly to store, we insert a tl.broadcast on the store, regardless of the block size on the load. In the case where a broadcast is not required, the downstream Triton compiler is expected to remove this no-op broadcast instruction.

Test Plan: Added tests under test_torchinductor_strided_blocks.py:test_expand_broadcast in OSS and internal test cases.

Reviewed By: blaine-rister

Differential Revision: D65518033
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/141693

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit da4a90f with merge base b75bb64 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65518033

@nandesuka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@nandesuka nandesuka self-assigned this Nov 27, 2024
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Nov 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@blaine-rister blaine-rister left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the fix.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Nov 27, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D65518033

@nandesuka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR has internal changes and must be landed via Phabricator! Please try reimporting/rexporting the PR!

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

11 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

7 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 1 checks: inductor / cuda12.1-py3.10-gcc9-sm86 / test (inductor_timm, 1, 2, linux.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu)

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pobin6 pushed a commit to pobin6/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
…41693)

Summary:

Fix logic for inserting broadcast on kernel with load going directly to store. In the case where load is going directly to store, we insert a tl.broadcast on the store, regardless of the block size on the load. In the case where a broadcast is not required, the downstream Triton compiler is expected to remove this no-op broadcast instruction.

Test Plan: Added tests under test_torchinductor_strided_blocks.py:test_expand_broadcast in OSS and internal test cases.

Reviewed By: blaine-rister

Differential Revision: D65518033

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#141693
Approved by: https://github.com/blaine-rister
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the export-D65518033 branch December 30, 2024 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants