KEMBAR78
windows python 3.14 nightly builds by atalman · Pull Request #159869 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

@atalman atalman commented Aug 5, 2025

@atalman atalman requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2025 14:55
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/159869

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 6 New Failures, 5 Pending, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 6deb137 with merge base 284b719 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@albanD
Copy link
Collaborator

albanD commented Aug 5, 2025

Skipping PR sanity check as this is generated files

@atalman atalman added the ciflow/binaries Trigger all binary build and upload jobs on the PR label Aug 5, 2025
%PYTHON_EXEC% --version
set "PATH=%CD%\Python\Lib\site-packages\cmake\data\bin;%CD%\Python\Scripts;%CD%\Python;%PATH%"
if "%DESIRED_PYTHON%" == "3.14t" %PYTHON_EXEC% -m pip install numpy==2.2.1 cmake
if "%DESIRED_PYTHON%" == "3.14" %PYTHON_EXEC% -m pip install numpy==2.2.2 cmake
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't have appropriate requirements* file to set these?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@atalman atalman Aug 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point we should probably move this to requirements, this is artifacts builder scripts I believe :) I think this can be done as followup BE change

Copy link
Contributor

@malfet malfet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels like a horrible copy-pasta, but sure...

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Aug 18, 2025

Do you mind separating linux-aarch64 PR from Windows? Or do you want me to create one for linux-aarch64?

@atalman atalman marked this pull request as draft August 19, 2025 01:25
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor Author

atalman commented Aug 19, 2025

@malfet aarch64 already landed, this is still wip

@atalman atalman changed the title Add linux-aarch64 and windows python 3.14 nightly builds windows python 3.14 nightly builds Aug 19, 2025
Python 3.14 add Windows and Linux aarch64

fix

fix

fix

fix

Remove including files with error

Revert "Remove including files with error"

This reverts commit 7a37118.

one_more_try

fix

git Revert "fix"

This reverts commit fbb7d7f.

Revert "one_more_try"

This reverts commit a667ccb.

Reapply "Remove including files with error"

This reverts commit a8fd532.

Revert "Remove including files with error"

This reverts commit 7a37118.

test

more_windows

bring_back

test

fix
@atalman atalman force-pushed the windows_314_python branch from 3518ddb to 6deb137 Compare August 19, 2025 12:33
@atalman atalman marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2025 16:43
Copy link
Member

@williamwen42 williamwen42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dynamo side lgtm

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor Author

atalman commented Aug 19, 2025

@pytorchmergebot merge -f "signal is green"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants