KEMBAR78
migrate more simple gso checks by laithsakka · Pull Request #160253 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor

@laithsakka laithsakka commented Aug 9, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/160253

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (3 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 8c83e50 with merge base 8ca8b60 (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 4a17433
Pull-Request: #160253
@laithsakka laithsakka added the topic: not user facing topic category label Aug 9, 2025
@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 12, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 2 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / macos-py3-arm64 / test (mps, 1, 1, macos-m1-14), trunk / macos-py3-arm64 / test (mps, 1, 1, macos-m2-15)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

[ghstack-poisoned]
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 591afef
Pull-Request: #160253
[ghstack-poisoned]
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 968caba
Pull-Request: #160253
[ghstack-poisoned]
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
ghstack-source-id: a309d76
Pull-Request: #160253
@iremyux iremyux added the ciflow/win-arm64 Trigger Windows Arm64 CI Workflows label Aug 14, 2025
@iremyux
Copy link
Collaborator

iremyux commented Aug 14, 2025

Adding ciflow/win-arm64 label to trigger Windows Arm64 CI and its test purposes - nothing about this PR specifically. (It should not effect the acceptance of the PR even if it fails.)

[ghstack-poisoned]
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
ghstack-source-id: edc2eef
Pull-Request: #160253
@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

can-gaa-hou pushed a commit to can-gaa-hou/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2025
markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request ciflow/win-arm64 Trigger Windows Arm64 CI Workflows Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants