KEMBAR78
Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut by huydhn · Pull Request #161797 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut #161797

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut #161797

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

@huydhn huydhn commented Aug 29, 2025

This makes it easier to bisect issue now given that we don't have lots of time.

@huydhn
Run vLLM tests on all trunk commit before 2.9 branch cut
6ed8e6f 
Signed-off-by: Huy Do <huydhn@gmail.com>
@huydhn huydhn requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2025 18:19
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/161797

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 6ed8e6f with merge base 9b67d8e (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Aug 29, 2025
@yangw-dev yangw-dev self-requested a review August 29, 2025 18:27
@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

huydhn commented Aug 29, 2025

Let me do some maths to see how much CI will increase because of this, just to be sure

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

huydhn commented Sep 9, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f '#162292 has been landed and there is no H100 needed anymore'

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

huydhn commented Sep 9, 2025

cc @zou3519 As @yangw-dev has move some multi-gpu test off h100, I can land this now #162292 and we will have vLLM signals for all PyTorch trunk commit for the time being

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
@huydhn @markc-614
Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut (pytorch#16…
1f0884c 
…1797)

This makes it easier to bisect issue now given that we don't have lots of time.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161797
Approved by: https://github.com/yangw-dev
mansiag05 pushed a commit to mansiag05/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
@huydhn @mansiag05
Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut (pytorch#16…
ec3c94a 
…1797)

This makes it easier to bisect issue now given that we don't have lots of time.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161797
Approved by: https://github.com/yangw-dev
cleonard530 pushed a commit to cleonard530/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
@huydhn @cleonard530
Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut (pytorch#16…
7a88dc2 
…1797)

This makes it easier to bisect issue now given that we don't have lots of time.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161797
Approved by: https://github.com/yangw-dev
dsashidh pushed a commit to dsashidh/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
@huydhn @dsashidh
Run vLLM tests on all trunk commits before 2.9 branch cut (pytorch#16…
3b1a667 
…1797)

This makes it easier to bisect issue now given that we don't have lots of time.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#161797
Approved by: https://github.com/yangw-dev
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yangw-dev yangw-dev yangw-dev approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Merged test-config/default topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@huydhn @pytorchmergebot @yangw-dev