KEMBAR78
[CI] Move libtorch-cpu-shared-with-deps-release-build to python 3.10 by atalman · Pull Request #162877 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@atalman
Copy link
Contributor

@atalman atalman commented Sep 13, 2025

Related to #162862

@atalman atalman requested a review from a team as a code owner September 13, 2025 13:13
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 13, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/162877

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 1386dca with merge base deb7ebe (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@atalman atalman added the topic: not user facing topic category label Sep 13, 2025
@atalman atalman added this to the 2.9.0 milestone Sep 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet malfet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, I've incorporated the fix in my other PR, but good not having to worry about it

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Sep 15, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f "Lint is green"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

markc-614 pushed a commit to markc-614/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2025
This code is a delicious spaghetti: Sometimes python version is defined in jinja template (see #162297 ) sometimes in shell script (see #162877 ), but this time around it's in a python file (and there is another one called `generate_binary_build_matrix.py` that defines `FULL_PYTHON_VERSIONS`)

Pull Request resolved: #163339
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
mansiag05 pushed a commit to mansiag05/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
mansiag05 pushed a commit to mansiag05/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
This code is a delicious spaghetti: Sometimes python version is defined in jinja template (see pytorch#162297 ) sometimes in shell script (see pytorch#162877 ), but this time around it's in a python file (and there is another one called `generate_binary_build_matrix.py` that defines `FULL_PYTHON_VERSIONS`)

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#163339
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
cleonard530 pushed a commit to cleonard530/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
cleonard530 pushed a commit to cleonard530/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2025
This code is a delicious spaghetti: Sometimes python version is defined in jinja template (see pytorch#162297 ) sometimes in shell script (see pytorch#162877 ), but this time around it's in a python file (and there is another one called `generate_binary_build_matrix.py` that defines `FULL_PYTHON_VERSIONS`)

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#163339
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
pytorchbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
This code is a delicious spaghetti: Sometimes python version is defined in jinja template (see #162297 ) sometimes in shell script (see #162877 ), but this time around it's in a python file (and there is another one called `generate_binary_build_matrix.py` that defines `FULL_PYTHON_VERSIONS`)

Pull Request resolved: #163339
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000

(cherry picked from commit 52dd7a8)
Camyll pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2025
Move ROCM trunk wheel builds to 3.10 (#163339)

This code is a delicious spaghetti: Sometimes python version is defined in jinja template (see #162297 ) sometimes in shell script (see #162877 ), but this time around it's in a python file (and there is another one called `generate_binary_build_matrix.py` that defines `FULL_PYTHON_VERSIONS`)

Pull Request resolved: #163339
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000

(cherry picked from commit 52dd7a8)

Co-authored-by: Nikita Shulga <nshulga@meta.com>
dsashidh pushed a commit to dsashidh/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
dsashidh pushed a commit to dsashidh/pytorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
This code is a delicious spaghetti: Sometimes python version is defined in jinja template (see pytorch#162297 ) sometimes in shell script (see pytorch#162877 ), but this time around it's in a python file (and there is another one called `generate_binary_build_matrix.py` that defines `FULL_PYTHON_VERSIONS`)

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#163339
Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
@atalman
Copy link
Contributor Author

atalman commented Sep 29, 2025

@pytorchbot cherry-pick --onto release/2.9 --fixes "Critical CD fix" -c critical

pytorchbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
@pytorchbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Cherry picking #162877

The cherry pick PR is at #164182 and it is linked with issue Critical CD fix. The following tracker issues are updated:

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

malfet pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2025
…164182)

[CI] Move libtorch-cpu-shared-with-deps-release-build to python 3.10 (#162877)

Related to #162862

Pull Request resolved: #162877
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet

(cherry picked from commit c9e57d7)

Co-authored-by: atalman <atalman@fb.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants