KEMBAR78
[PyTorch][easy] Fix TODOs in CppFunction constructors by swolchok · Pull Request #51315 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

@swolchok swolchok commented Jan 28, 2021

Stack from ghstack:

The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: D26137147

The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jan 28, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 7638245 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 2/2 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/2 non-CircleCI failure(s)

1 failure not recognized by patterns:

Job Step Action
CircleCI pytorch_linux_xenial_cuda10_2_cudnn7_py3_gcc7_test2 Run tests 🔁 rerun

Extra GitHub checks: 1 failed


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok swolchok changed the title [PyTorch][easy] Fix TODOs in CppFuntion constructors [PyTorch][easy] Fix TODOs in CppFunction constructors Jan 29, 2021
@swolchok swolchok requested review from ezyang and smessmer January 29, 2021 05:27
The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #51315 (badb50e) into gh/swolchok/102/base (029f857) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 90.24%.

@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##           gh/swolchok/102/base   #51315      +/-   ##
========================================================
+ Coverage                 80.82%   80.85%   +0.02%     
========================================================
  Files                      1948     1938      -10     
  Lines                    213169   211176    -1993     
========================================================
- Hits                     172290   170742    -1548     
+ Misses                    40879    40434     -445     

The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2021
Pull Request resolved: #51315

The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.
ghstack-source-id: 121297937

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)
The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.

Differential Revision: [D26137147](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D26137147/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in c931c29.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/swolchok/102/head branch February 15, 2021 15:18
xsacha pushed a commit to xsacha/pytorch that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2021
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#51315

The TODOs said to remove this wrapper, and it seems that it can be removed easily.
ghstack-source-id: 121363465

Test Plan: CI

Reviewed By: ezyang

Differential Revision: D26137147

fbshipit-source-id: f1e5971dca071f37400d77cc823214527e4231bc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants