KEMBAR78
[package] Modify Digraph to track predecessors by Lilyjjo · Pull Request #61146 · pytorch/pytorch · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@Lilyjjo
Copy link
Contributor

@Lilyjjo Lilyjjo commented Jul 1, 2021

Stack from ghstack:

Track predecessors of nodes in DiGraph in order to enable cleaner dependency visualization code.

Differential Revision: D29559682

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jul 1, 2021

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 8086760 (more details on the Dr. CI page and at hud.pytorch.org/pr/61146):


  • 1/1 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/1 non-scanned failure(s)

Preview docs built from this PR

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

Track predecessors of nodes in DiGraph in order to enable cleaner dependency visualization code.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@Lilyjjo Lilyjjo requested a review from suo July 6, 2021 16:06
@Lilyjjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lilyjjo commented Jul 6, 2021

@Lilyjjo has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Track predecessors of nodes in DiGraph in order to enable cleaner dependency visualization code.

Differential Revision: [D29559682](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D29559682)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@Lilyjjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lilyjjo commented Jul 9, 2021

@Lilyjjo has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@Lilyjjo merged this pull request in b5f0576.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/Lilyjjo/92/head branch July 13, 2021 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants