-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
Disable torch.complex32 dtype #70606
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slowFor more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit cd0cc98 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:
|
| Job | Step | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 🔁 rerun |
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).
Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.
|
@ngimel should we just cherry-pick this for the next release? |
[ghstack-poisoned]
| | :attr:`~torch.bfloat16` | ``1.6e-2`` | ``1e-5`` | | ||
| +---------------------------+------------+----------+ | ||
| | :attr:`~torch.float32` | ``1.3e-6`` | ``1e-5`` | | ||
| +---------------------------+------------+----------+ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @pmeier
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool! (So long as the tests pass.)
Note from offline meeting: @ngimel plans to file a follow-up issue for proper ComplexHalf support
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved [ghstack-poisoned]
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/all |
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@anjali411 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved Differential Revision: [D33954861](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33954861) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@anjali411 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved Differential Revision: [D33954861](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33954861) [ghstack-poisoned]
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved Differential Revision: [D33954861](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33954861) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@JackCaoG I will be cherry-picking this PR in the 1.11 release branch and looks like it'll require an xla side change (remove |
|
@anjali411 Seems like we only need to remove this dtype from our repo, I can do that and backport to our 1.11 branch. |
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved Differential Revision: [D33954861](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33954861) [ghstack-poisoned]
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved Differential Revision: [D33954861](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33954861) [ghstack-poisoned]
Related #69209 (comment) cc ezyang gchanan anjali411 dylanbespalko mruberry @lezcano nikitaved Differential Revision: [D33954861](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D33954861) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@anjali411 correct me if I'm wrong, but 13b403b has been landed in 1.11, so we probably can remove the milestone (and close this PR) after xla change is landed |
|
@malfet I just merge the pt/xla 1.11 pr. Pytroch/xla 1.11 branch is missing several important prs. I am thinking about recut the 1.11 from master which is a bit easier than me manually porting a bunch of pr at the same time. Will let you know if I do that. |
yup absolutely! |
Related #69209 (comment)
Stack from ghstack:
cc @ezyang @gchanan @anjali411 @dylanbespalko @mruberry @lezcano @nikitaved
Differential Revision: D33954861