KEMBAR78
timeseries: show relative time in tooltip by stephanwlee · Pull Request #5319 · tensorflow/tensorboard · GitHub
Skip to content

Conversation

@stephanwlee
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, we are showing relative time in the tooltip only when you are
using x-axis type == relative. Instead of conditioning like that, we are
now showing the time all the time. This change, to support that,
refactored the data type a little bit to always compute the relative
wall time between the point (which required a lot of test refactors).

Currently, we are showing relative time in the tooltip only when you are
using x-axis type == relative. Instead of conditioning like that, we are
now showing the time all the time. This change, to support that,
refactored the data type a little bit to always compute the relative
wall time between the point (which required a lot of test refactors).
@stephanwlee stephanwlee requested a review from bmd3k September 17, 2021 21:06
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Sep 17, 2021
@stephanwlee stephanwlee merged commit 06d5a5b into tensorflow:master Sep 20, 2021
@stephanwlee stephanwlee deleted the relative branch September 20, 2021 18:46
yatbear pushed a commit to yatbear/tensorboard that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Currently, we are showing relative time in the tooltip only when you are
using x-axis type == relative. Instead of conditioning like that, we are
now showing the time all the time. This change, to support that,
refactored the data type a little bit to always compute the relative
wall time between the point (which required a lot of test refactors).
dna2github pushed a commit to dna2fork/tensorboard that referenced this pull request May 1, 2023
Currently, we are showing relative time in the tooltip only when you are
using x-axis type == relative. Instead of conditioning like that, we are
now showing the time all the time. This change, to support that,
refactored the data type a little bit to always compute the relative
wall time between the point (which required a lot of test refactors).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants