Upgrade mypy support to 0.960 #973
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Updates test_model_field_classes_from_existing_locations to account for the behaviour change in python/mypy#12663 - Bumps the version of django-stubs for a new release
|
@sobolevn would it be possible to release this change in a new release of |
|
Yes :) |
This was referenced Jun 3, 2022
andersk
added a commit
to andersk/django-stubs
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2022
Due to a bug in mypy 0.940 (typeddjango#870), we made two changes in typeddjango#871: • pinned mypy==0.931 in requirements.txt (for running our tests); • bounded mypy<0.940 in setup.py (for downstream users). After the mypy bug was quickly fixed upstream in 0.941, our setup.py bound has been repeatedly raised but not removed (typeddjango#886, typeddjango#939, typeddjango#973). The only changes in those commits have been to the precise wording of error messages expected in our tests. Those wording changes don’t impact compatibility for downstream users, so it should be safe to go back to allowing them to upgrade mypy independently. Since mypy doesn’t yet guarantee backwards compatibility in the plugin API (although in practice it has rarely been an issue), add a django-stubs[compatible-mypy] extra for users who prefer a known-good version of mypy even if it’s a little out of date. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
sobolevn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2022
* Move mypy version upper bound to a [compatible-mypy] extra Due to a bug in mypy 0.940 (#870), we made two changes in #871: • pinned mypy==0.931 in requirements.txt (for running our tests); • bounded mypy<0.940 in setup.py (for downstream users). After the mypy bug was quickly fixed upstream in 0.941, our setup.py bound has been repeatedly raised but not removed (#886, #939, #973). The only changes in those commits have been to the precise wording of error messages expected in our tests. Those wording changes don’t impact compatibility for downstream users, so it should be safe to go back to allowing them to upgrade mypy independently. Since mypy doesn’t yet guarantee backwards compatibility in the plugin API (although in practice it has rarely been an issue), add a django-stubs[compatible-mypy] extra for users who prefer a known-good version of mypy even if it’s a little out of date. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu> * Update setup.py Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <mail@sobolevn.me>
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have made things!
Related issues
Closes Support mypy 0.960 #972
Updates test_model_field_classes_from_existing_locations to account
for the behaviour change in Sync typeshed python/mypy#12663
Bumps the version of django-stubs for a new release