[css-lists] Test counter-reset: reversed() #28453
Conversation
Map `<ol start reversed>` and `<li value>` to `counter-reset` and `counter-set` properties as presentational hints. For reversed lists, use the CSS `reversed()` function added in w3c/csswg-drafts#6096. Tests: web-platform-tests/wpt#28040 & web-platform-tests/wpt#28453. Helps with #4808. Co-authored-by: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
| .reset-reversed { counter-reset: reversed(not-list-item) } | ||
| .result::before { content: counter(not-list-item) } | ||
| </style> | ||
| <p>You should see the number 7 below.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like you're expecting the reversed counter to start on 13 here, meaning you're leaning towards "count the number of elements that apply an increment of any kind to the counter" for the impl.
If we're already dynamically counting things that actively increment the counter, wouldn't we want to do it "correctly" and take the actual increment into account, like I suggest above?
|
Thanks @tabatkins , I'll comment in w3c/csswg-drafts#6233 since the spec is wrong. |
|
Should also test |
|
These tests need to be updated to match w3c/csswg-drafts#6297 |
|
Done. |
|
r+, but it looks like we've got transient network failures causing some of the checks to fail. I think you might need to do a contentless push to kick them again. |
zcorpan
force-pushed
the
bocoup/css-lists-reversed
branch
from
6a4ca37 to
aff8277
Compare
3 participants
See w3c/csswg-drafts#6096