Measurement Systems Analysis - Summary Report
Gage Name:
#VALUE!
Characteristic:
Hole Depth
Gage Number:
#VALUE!
Gage Type:
#VALUE!
Range of Dimension:
Gage R&R
Date Performed:
Performed By:
% RR of Tolerance
86.2%
Bias
Date Performed:
Performed By:
Bias:
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Linearity
Date Performed:
30-Dec-99
Slope (a):
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Performed By:
Intercept (b):
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Goodness of Fit:
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Stability
Date Started:
30-Dec-99
Performed By:
Conclusion:
Gage was stable for 20 days.
Gage was NOT stable for 20 days.
Gage is acceptable for all parameters.
Gage is NOT Acceptable for all parameters and will not be used.
Gage is NOT Acceptable for all parameters but will be used for the following reasons.
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
ystems Analysis - Summary Report
Gage system may be acceptable based on importance of application and cost
or all parameters but will be used for the following reasons.
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Gage R&R Study
Part Number and Name:
Characteristic:
USL
LSL
XX-XXX-XX
Hole Depth
Gage Name:
Gage Number:
0.314
0.308
Digital Depth Micrometer
XXXX
Gage Type:
Date Measured:
Performed By:
?
?
Depth Micrometer
Part
Appraiser/Trial #
Appraiser A
Trial 1
(Name)
Trial 2
(Title / Function)
Trial 3
Average A
Range A
1
0.3097
0.3096
0.3091
0.3095
0.0006
2
0.3078
0.3076
0.3084
0.3079
0.0008
3
0.3076
0.3076
0.3084
0.3079
0.0008
4
0.3087
0.3087
0.3083
0.3086
0.0004
5
0.3074
0.3088
0.3092
0.3085
0.0018
6
0.3074
0.3086
0.3068
0.3076
0.0018
7
0.3079
0.3094
0.3079
0.3084
0.0015
8
0.3084
0.3085
0.308
0.3083
0.0005
9
0.3069
0.3088
0.3095
0.3084
0.0026
10
0.3077
0.3063
0.3087
0.3076
0.0024
0.3083 Xbar A
0.0013 Rbar A
Appraiser B
(Name)
(Title / Function)
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average B
Range B
0.3086
0.3086
0.3086
0.3086
0.0000
0.3096
0.3076
0.308
0.3084
0.0020
0.3081
0.3076
0.3086
0.3081
0.0010
0.3099
0.3092
0.3083
0.3091
0.0016
0.3076
0.3087
0.3094
0.3086
0.0018
0.307
0.3086
0.3091
0.3082
0.0021
0.3095
0.3097
0.3102
0.3098
0.0007
0.3065
0.3075
0.3077
0.3072
0.0012
0.3106
0.3088
0.3094
0.3096
0.0018
0.3069
0.3075
0.3067
0.3070
0.0008
0.3085 Xbar B
0.0013 Rbar B
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average C
Range C
0.3088
0.307
0.3089
0.3082
0.0019
0.0033
0
0.3088
0.3091
0.3083
0.3079
0.3084
0.0012
0.0033
0
0.3083
0.7071
0.3088
0.3086
0.309
0.3088
0.0004
0.0033
0
0.3083
0.5231
0.3088
0.3074
0.3092
0.3085
0.0018
0.0033
0
0.3087
0.4467
0.309
0.309
0.3087
0.3089
0.0003
0.0033
0
0.3086
0.403
0.3071 .3079.
0.3075
0.3089
0.3087
0.3072
0.3078
0.3081
0.0016
0.0017
0.0033
0.0033
0
0
0.3079
0.3088
0.3742
0.3534
0.3077
0.3087
0.3087
0.3084
0.0010
0.0033
0
0.3080
0.3375
0.307
0.3086
0.3091
0.3082
0.0021
0.0033
0
0.3087
0.3249
0.3075
0.3074
0.3075
0.3075
0.0001
0.0033
0
0.3074
0.3146
Appraiser C
(Name)
(Title / Function)
UCL
LCL
Part Average
K3(Constant)
Average of 3 Ranges
XbarDif
UCL
LCL
Repeatability(EV)
Reproducibility(AV)
Gage R & R
Tolerance
Part Variation
Total Variation
NDC
%
%
%
%
EV
AV
Gage R & R
PV
0.0013
0.0002
0.0032938
0
0.0008
0.0000
0.0008
0.006
0.0004
0.0009
1
5 Trials
2.11
0
4 Trials
2.28
0
0.7071
2 Ops
0.5231
3 Ops
Constants
3 Trials
2.58
0
0.5908
2 Trials
3.27
0
0.8862
# Parts
10
#Trials
3
# Trials
D4
D3
K1
K2
% of Total
% of
Variation
Tolerance
86.18%
12.57%
0.00%
0.00%
86.18%
12.57%
50.72%
7.40%
Conclusion:
Gage system may be acceptable based on importance of application and
Instructions:
Just enter your measurement data in Cells C11:L13, C17:L19, C23:L25
The template will automatically calculate all of the values based on your data
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
0.3083 Xbar C
0.0012 Rbar C
0.0014 RP (Range of Part Averages)
UCL represents the limit of the individual R's
Circle those beyond the limit.
Identify and correct causes
LCL = 0 D3=0 for up to 7 trials
Stacked Average Chart
0.3500
0.3000
Average
0.2500
0.2000
0.1500
0.1000
0.0500
0.0000
1
Part Reading
Appraiser A
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Appraiser B
Appraiser C
UCL
LCL
10
nt Systems Analysis - Gage R&R Study
?
?
RP (Range of Part Averages)
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Gage R&R Study
Part Number and Name:
Characteristic:
Gage Name:
Gage Number:
USL
LSL
2
1
Date Measured:
Performed By:
Gage Type:
Part
2
-0.56
-0.68
-0.58
-0.6067
0.1200
3
1.34
1.17
1.27
1.2600
0.1700
4
0.47
0.5
0.64
0.5367
0.1700
5
-0.8
-0.92
-0.84
-0.8533
0.1200
6
0.02
-0.11
-0.21
-0.1000
0.2300
7
8
9
10
0.59
-0.31
2.26
-1.36
0.75
-0.2
1.99
-1.25
0.66
-0.17
2.01
-1.31
0.6667 -0.2267 2.0867 -1.3067
0.1600 0.1400 0.2700 0.1100
0.1903
0.1840
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average B
Range B
0.08
-0.47
0.25
-1.22
0.07
-0.68
0.1333 -0.7900
0.1800 0.7500
1.19
0.94
1.34
1.1567
0.4000
0.01
1.03
0.2
0.4133
1.0200
-0.56
-1.2
-1.28
-1.0133
0.7200
-0.2
0.22
0.06
0.0267
0.4200
0.47
-0.63
1.8
-1.68
0.55
0.08
2.12
-1.62
0.83
-0.34
2.19
-1.5
0.6167 -0.2967 2.0367 -1.6000
0.3600 0.7100 0.3900 0.1800
0.0683
0.5130
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average C
Range C
0.04
-1.38
-0.11
-1.13
-0.15
-0.96
-0.0733 -1.1567
0.1900 0.4200
0.88
1.09
0.67
0.8800
0.4200
0.14
0.2
0.11
0.1500
0.0900
-1.46
-1.07
-1.45
-1.3267
0.3900
-0.29
-0.67
-0.49
-0.4833
0.3800
0.02
-0.46
1.77
-1.49
0.01
-0.56
1.45
-1.77
0.21
-0.49
1.87
-2.16
0.0800 -0.5033 1.6967 -1.8067
0.2000 0.1000 0.4200 0.6700
-0.2543
0.3280
0.1689 -0.8511
0.7071
0.8815 0.8815
0
0
1.0989
0.5231
0.8815
0
0.3667
0.4467
0.8815
0
-1.0644
0.403
0.8815
0
-0.1856
0.3742
0.8815
0
0.4544 -0.3422 1.9400 -1.5711
0.3534 0.3375 0.3249 0.3146
0.8815 0.8815 0.8815 0.8815
0
0
0
0
Appraiser/Trial #
Appraiser A
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average A
Range A
Appraiser B
Appraiser C
Part Average
K3(Constant)
UCL
LCL
Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03
1
0.29
0.41
0.64
0.4467
0.3500
3.5111
Average of 3 Ranges
XbarDif
0.3417
0.4447
0.8815
0
0.2019
0.2297
0.3058
1
1.1046
1.1461
5
UCL
LCL
Repeatability(EV)
Reproducibility(AV)
Gage R & R
Tolerance
Part Variation
Total Variation
NDC
%
%
%
%
EV
AV
Gage R & R
PV
5 Trials
2.11
0
4 Trials
2.28
0
0.7071
2 Ops
0.5231
3 Ops
Constants
3 Trials 2 Trials
2.58
3.27
0
0
0.5908 0.8862
# Parts
10
# Trials
D4
D3
K1
K2
#Trials
3
% of Total
% of
Variation
Tolerance
17.61%
20.19%
20.04%
22.97%
26.68%
30.58%
96.38%
110.46%
Conclusion:
Gage system needs improvement
Instructions:
Just enter your measurement data in Cells C11:L13, C17:L19, C23:L25
The template will automatically calculate all of the values based on your data
Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03
UCL represents the limit of the individual R'
Circle those beyond the limit.
Identify and correct causes
LCL = 0 D3=0 for up to 7 trials
stems Analysis - Gage R&R Study
8-May-03
?
Xbar A
Rbar A
Xbar B
Rbar B
Xbar C
Rbar C
RP (Range of Part Averages)
Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03
UCL represents the limit of the individual R's
Form xxx Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Bias Worksheet
Note 1: If you perform a complete Linearity Study, you do not have to do this Bias study.
Note 2: This analysis is only valid for 15 repeated readings on 1 sample. Otherwise, see your Quality Manager for assistance.
Part Number and Name:
Gage Name:
Date Performed:
Characteristic:
Gage Number:
Performed By:
Gage Type:
Reference Value:
(NIST traceable standard or as measured using master method, I.e. CMM )
Sample Measurements:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sample Average:
Bias
repeatability =
0.00000
bias =
0.00000
t=
#DIV/0!
Significant t value (2-tailed) =
2.206
lower conf. limit =
#DIV/0!
upper conf. limit =
#DIV/0!
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Bias Worksheet
Note 1: If you perform a complete Linearity Study, you do not have to do this Bias study.
Note 2: This analysis is only valid for 15 repeated readings on 1 sample. Otherwise, see your Quality Manager for assistance.
Part Number and Name:
Gage Name:
Date Performed:
Characteristic:
Gage Number:
Performed By:
Gage Type:
Reference Value:
6.0000
(NIST traceable standard or as measured using master method, I.e. CMM )
Sample Measurements:
5.8000
5.7000
5.9000
5.9000
6.0000
6.1000
6.0000
6.1000
6.4000
10
6.3000
11
6.0000
12
6.1000
13
6.2000
14
5.6000
15
6.0000
Sample Average:
Bias
repeatability =
0.22514
bias =
0.05813
t=
0.114683
Significant t value (2-tailed) =
2.206
lower conf. limit =
-0.1167
upper conf. limit =
0.1320
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
6.0067
0.0067
Bias is Acceptable
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Linearity
Note: This analysis is only valid for studies of 5 parts measured 12 times each. Otherwise see your Quality Manager.
Part Number & Name:
Gage Name:
Date Performed:
Characteristic:
Gage Number:
Performed By:
Specification:
Gage Type:
Part Ref. Values:
g=
m=
12
Sample Average:
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
11
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
12
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Bias Average:
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Range:
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Trials:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Slope (a):
Intercept (b):
Goodness of Fit:
f(x) = NaNx + NaN
R = 0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Linearity Plot
1.0000
0.9000
0.8000
0.7000
0.6000
0.5000
0.4000
0.3000
0.2000
0.1000
0.0000
0.0000 0.1000 0.2000 0.3000 0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0.8000 0.9000 1.0000
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Linearity
Note: This analysis is only valid for studies of 5 parts measured 12 times each. Otherwise see your Quality Manager.
Part Number & Name:
Characteristic:
Specification:
Gage Name:
Gage Number:
Gage Type:
Part Ref. Values:
g=
5
m=
Date Performed:
Performed By:
1
2.0000
2
4.0000
3
6.0000
4
8.0000
5
10.0000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2.7000
2.5000
2.4000
2.5000
2.7000
2.3000
2.5000
2.5000
2.4000
2.4000
2.6000
2.4000
5.1000
3.9000
4.2000
5.0000
3.8000
3.9000
3.9000
3.9000
3.9000
4.0000
4.1000
3.8000
5.8000
5.7000
5.9000
5.9000
6.0000
6.1000
6.0000
6.1000
6.4000
6.3000
6.0000
6.1000
7.6000
7.7000
7.8000
7.7000
7.8000
7.8000
7.8000
7.7000
7.8000
7.5000
7.6000
7.7000
9.1000
9.3000
9.5000
9.3000
9.4000
9.5000
9.5000
9.5000
9.6000
9.2000
9.3000
9.4000
Sample Average:
2.4917
4.1250
6.0250
7.7083
9.3833
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0.7000
0.5000
0.4000
0.5000
0.7000
0.3000
0.5000
0.5000
0.4000
0.4000
0.6000
0.4000
1.1000
-0.1000
0.2000
1.0000
-0.2000
-0.1000
-0.1000
-0.1000
-0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
-0.2000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.1000
-0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
0.0000
0.1000
0.4000
0.3000
0.0000
0.1000
-0.4000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.2000
-0.2000
-0.3000
-0.2000
-0.5000
-0.4000
-0.3000
-0.9000
-0.7000
-0.5000
-0.7000
-0.6000
-0.5000
-0.5000
-0.5000
-0.4000
-0.8000
-0.7000
-0.6000
Bias Average:
0.4917
0.1250
0.0250
-0.2917
-0.6167
Range:
0.4000
1.3000
0.7000
0.3000
0.5000
Trials:
12
Slope (a): -0.1316667
Intercept (b): 0.73666667
Goodness of Fit:
0.7143
Slope is NOT Acceptable
Intercept is NOT Acceptable
Goodness of Fit is NOT Acceptable
Linearity Plot
1.5000
1.0000
0.5000
f(x) = - 0.1316666667x + 0.7366666667
R = 0.7143184159
0.0000
1.0000 2.0000 3.0000 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000 7.0000 8.0000 9.0000 10.0000 11.0000
-0.5000
-1.0000
-1.5000
Reference Value
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Reference Value
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Stability Study
Part Number and Name:
Gage Name:
Date Started:
Characteristic:
Gage Number:
Performed By:
Specification:
Gage Type:
Sample #:
Day #1
Day #2
Day #3
Day # 4
Day # 5
Day #6
Day #7
Day #8
Day #9
Day #10
Day #11
Day #12
Day #13
Day #14
Day #15
Day #16
Day #17
Day #18
Day #19
1
2
3
4
5
Xbar
Range(Max-Min)
Xdoublebar(Grand Average)
Rbar (Average Range)
UCL(Range Chart)
LCL(Range Chart)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
UCL (Xbar Chart)
LCL(Xbar Chart)
Conclusion:
Gage was stable for 20 days.
Gage was NOT stable for 20 days.
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
X Bar Chart For Stability
12
10
Sample Mean
0
Day #1
Sample
Averages
Day #2
Day #3
Day # 4 Day # 5
Day #6
Day #7
Day #8
Day #9 Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20
Days
UCL
LCL
Range Chart For Stability
1
0.9
0.8
Sample Range
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Day #1
Day #2
Day #3 Day # 4 Day # 5
Day #6
Day #7
Day #8
Day #9 Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20
Days
Sample
Ranges
UCL
LCL
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
stems Analysis - Stability Study
Day #20
0.000
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Measurement Systems Analysis - Stability Study
Part Number and Name:
Gage Name:
Date Started:
Characteristic:
Gage Number:
Performed By:
Specification:
Gage Type:
Sample #:
Day #1
Day #2
Day #3
Day # 4
Day # 5
Day #6
Day #7
Day #8
Day #9
Day #10
Day #11
Day #12
Day #13
Day #14
Day #15
Day #16
Day #17
48.600
48.400
48.800
48.900
48.500
48.500
48.400
48.700
47.800
47.900
48.100
48.200
48.100
48.300
48.000
47.900
48.100
48.700
48.800
47.900
50.100
49.000
49.000
48.200
48.000
48.600
48.300
48.600
48.500
48.700
48.900
48.700
48.300
48.400
48.300
48.000
48.000
49.200
49.000
49.000
48.300
47.700
48.700
48.400
48.700
48.900
48.500
48.600
48.600
48.700
48.700
48.600
48.400
48.800
48.900
48.500
48.500
48.400
48.700
47.800
47.900
48.100
48.200
48.100
48.300
48.000
47.900
48.100
48.700
48.800
47.900
50.100
49.000
49.000
48.300
48.000
48.600
48.300
48.600
48.500
48.700
48.900
48.700
48.300
48.400
Xbar
48.58
48.48
48.28
49.44
48.8
48.8
48.32
48.22
48.3
48.16
48.42
48.46
48.42
48.6
48.4
48.22
48.34
Range(Max-Min)
0.4
0.8
0.9
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.9
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.6
Xdoublebar(Grand Average)
48.475
Rbar (Average Range)
0.655
UCL(Range Chart)
1.68
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
LCL(Range Chart)
0.000
UCL (Xbar Chart)
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
LCL(Xbar Chart)
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
Gage was stable for 20 days.
Conclusion:
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Gage was NOT stable for 20 days.
X Bar Chart For Stability
50
Sample Mean
49.5
49
48.5
48
47.5
47
Day #1
Day #2
Day #3
Day # 4 Day # 5
Day #6
Day #7
Day #8
Day #9 Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20
Days
Sampl
e
Averag
es
Range Chart For Stability
1.8
1.6
Sample Range
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
Sample
Ranges
0.2
0
Day #1
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Day #2
Day #3
Day # 4 Day # 5
Day #6
Day #7
Day #8
Day #9
Day #10 Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20
Days
UCL
LCL
ms Analysis - Stability Study
Day #18
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Day #19
Day #20
48.300
48.100
48.000
48.600
48.600
48.600
48.500
48.700
48.700
48.300
48.100
48.000
48.600
48.600
48.600
48.46
48.42
48.38
0.3
0.6
0.7
1.68335
1.68335
1.68335
48.8549
48.8549
48.8549
48.0951
48.0951
48.0951
Chart For Stability
Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20
ys
Sampl
e
Averag
es
Chart For Stability
Sample
Ranges
Day #11 Day #12 Day #13 Day #14 Day #15 Day #16 Day #17 Day #18 Day #19 Day #20
ys
UCL
LCL
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Part Number & Name:
Characteristic:
Specification:
Date:
Gage Name
Gate Number
Gage Type
Performed By:
Sample No A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Key :
G = Good
B = Bad
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
C-2
C-3
Reference Decision
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
A*B
B
G Count B Count
A
Total
A* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
Total
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
Total
Po(A*B)
Po(A* Ref)
Pe(A*B)
Pe(A* Ref)
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
B*C
C
G Count B Count
B
Total
B* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
Total
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
Total
Po(B*C)
Po(B* Ref)
Pe(B*C)
Pe(B* Ref)
Total
C* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
Total
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
Total
Po(A*C)
Po(C* Ref)
Pe(A*C)
Pe(C* Ref)
Total
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
A*C
C
G Count B Count
Total
Total
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
Kappa = (Po-Pe)/(1-Pe)
Degree of agreement between operators
Kappa
A
B
C
A
-
Degree of agreement between operators & Ref Decision
Kappa
Ref Decision
Note: Kappa measures the agreement between the two raters when both are rating same object. Its value ranges
from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement while value of 0 indicates that agreement is no better than
chance. A general rule of thumb is that values of Kappa greater than 0.75 indicate good to excellent agreement while
values less than 0.40 indicate poor agreement. Reference AIAG MSA Manual, Third Edition
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Note: Kappa measures the agreement between the two raters when both are rating same object. Its value ranges
from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement while value of 0 indicates that agreement is no better than
chance. A general rule of thumb is that values of Kappa greater than 0.75 indicate good to excellent agreement while
values less than 0.40 indicate poor agreement. Reference AIAG MSA Manual, Third Edition
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Part Number & Name
Characteristic
Performed By
90-0-33745 Handle
Scratches, Marks, Spots
Shailesh Patel & Peter Barlow
Measurement System
Date
Sample No A-1 A-2 A-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 C-1
1
G
G
G
G
G
2
G
G
G
G
G
3
G
G
G
G
G
4
G
G
G
G
G
5
G
G
G
G
G
6
G
G
G
G
G
7
G
G
G
G
G
8
G
G
G
G
G
9
B
B
B
B
B
10
B
B
B
B
B
C-2
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
B
C-3
Manual Visual Inspection
7/5/2003
Reference Decision
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
B
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
G
G
G
B
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
37
38
39
B
B
B
B
B
G
B
G
B
G
B
G
B
G
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
B
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
B
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
B
G
G
B
G
G
Key :
G = Good
B = Bad
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
isual Inspection
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
A*B
Total
B
G Count B
76
63.9
7
19.1
83
83.0
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
Count
1
13.1
16
3.9
17
17.0
Total
77
77.0
23
23.0
100
100.0
Total
A* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
G Count
77
0
Expected Count
64.7
12.3
B Count
7
16
Expected count
19.3
3.7
Count
84
16
Expected Count
84.0
16.0
Po(A*B)
0.92
Po(A* Ref)
0.93
Pe(A*B)
0.68
Pe(A* Ref)
0.68
B*C
Total
Po(B*C)
Pe(B*C)
C
G Count B
82
68.9
2
15.1
84
84.0
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
Count
0
13.1
16
2.9
16
16.0
Total
82
82.0
18
18.0
100
100.0
Total
0.98
Po(B* Ref)
0.98
0.72
Pe(B* Ref)
0.72
A*C
Total
Po(A*C)
Pe(A*C)
B* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B Count
G Count
82
0
Expected Count
68.9
13.1
B Count
2
16
Expected count
15.1
2.9
Count
84
16
Expected Count
84.0
16.0
G Count
Expected Count
B Count
Expected count
Count
Expected Count
C
G Count B
77
64.7
7
19.3
84
84.0
Count
0
12.3
16
3.7
16
16.0
Total
77
77.0
23
23.0
100
100.0
Total
C* Ref Decision
Ref Decision
G Count B
G Count
84
Expected Count
70.6
B Count
0
Expected count
13.4
Count
84
Expected Count
84.0
0.93
Po(C* Ref)
0.68
Pe(C* Ref)
0.73
Count
0
13.4
16
2.6
16
16.0
Kappa = (Po-Pe)/(1-Pe)
Degree of agreement between operators
Kappa
A
B
C
A
0.75
0.78
B
0.75
0.93
C
0.78
0.93
-
Degree of agreement between operators & Ref Decision
Kappa
Ref Decision
A
0.78
B
0.93
Note: Kappa measures the agreement between the two raters when both are rating same object. Its value ranges
from 0 to 1. A value of 1 indicates perfect agreement while value of 0 indicates that agreement is no better than
chance. A general rule of thumb is that values of Kappa greater than 0.75 indicate good to excellent agreement
while values less than 0.40 indicate poor agreement. Reference AIAG MSA Manual, Third Edition
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
Total
77
77.0
23
23.0
100
100.0
Total
82
82.0
18
18.0
100
100.0
Total
84
84.0
16
16.0
100
100.0
tors & Ref Decision
C
1.00
ct. Its value ranges
t is no better than
ellent agreement
n
Form 827 Rev. A 08-Jul-03
