KEMBAR78
Safe Vs Less | PDF | Agile Software Development | Scrum (Software Development)
Scribd
Upload
189 views4 pages

Safe Vs Less

The document compares two approaches to scaling agile frameworks: Large Scale Scrum (LeSS) and Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). LeSS focuses on organizational descaling, team structure, and agile thinking. It is less prescriptive and suitable for medium to large organizations. SAFe provides a more complete and prescriptive framework for enterprises, with an emphasis on process and product. It is well-adopted but seen by some as not agile enough. Both require training to implement properly.

Uploaded by

saikatsakura78
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
189 views4 pages

Safe Vs Less

The document compares two approaches to scaling agile frameworks: Large Scale Scrum (LeSS) and Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). LeSS focuses on organizational descaling, team structure, and agile thinking. It is less prescriptive and suitable for medium to large organizations. SAFe provides a more complete and prescriptive framework for enterprises, with an emphasis on process and product. It is well-adopted but seen by some as not agile enough. Both require training to implement properly.

Uploaded by

saikatsakura78
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Approach Comparison

Aspects / Criteria

Description

Large Scale Scrum


(LeSS)
Larman/Vodde
Larman / Vodde model
as documented in
"Scaling Lean & Agile
Development"

Completeness of coverage of "levels", including:


Portfolio
Program Structure
Inter-team Coordination
Team Level
Tech Practices

Medium
Medium*
Medium*
High
Medium
Medium

Popularity / Adoption
(new/growing (low) vs. established/leader (high)

Medium

Flexibility / Emergence: Prescriptive (low) vs. emergent (high)?


Typical Cost to Implement
Availability of Details & Support

High
Low
Medium

What Team level frameworks are supported? (Scrum, Kanban, XP, etc.)

Emphasizes more Central control or distributed?


Scale / Target size
(small - med - large)

Scrum

Centralized
prioritization and
distributed coordination
Med - Large

Used typically by what Organization Types?

Has 2 suggested
structures for different
size organizations

Focal point
(teams/structure - enterprise/ROI)

org descaling,
team/structure
Agile thinking, PO scale
via "areas"

Focus on CHANGE in (People, Process, Product, other)

1) Process
2) Product

Software centric - how often used outside of SW or IT?

Focused on Software or
SW/HW

Big Positives / Key Differentiatiators

Key Risks / Concerns

Training / Resource availability

Deployment Approach
(how to get started and make it sustainable)

Good PO scaling; strong


principle alignment,
Non-prescriptive - gives
"suggestions"

A more "radically agile"


approach that may be a
hard sell in larger
traditional orgs with
many layers and
specializations.

Training and coaching


network available
Covered now on their
site
https://less.works/less/a
doption/gettingstarted.html

Notes

Other

Now offering
certifications as
practitioner or trainer.
Many of its aspects are
based on a fairly
profound de-scaling of
the org and removing
of most specialist
teams.

Scaled Agile
Framework (SAFe)
Leffingwell
The method
documented by Dean
Leffingwell and Scaled
Agile, Inc.
High
Medium
High
High
High
Medium
High
Low
High
High
Scrum / Kanban /
specific XP practices
"mandated"
More Central & topdown on ideas but
distributed ownership
on "how"
Large - Enterprise

Focused on enterprises

team/structure
A customizable but
prescriptive framework
for most aspects of
Agile at scale.
1) Process
2) Product
Focused on Software or
SW/HW
The "big picture" and
completeness; getting
Agile "in the door" at
large corporations;
actively evolving.
Little info on "how",
most need certified
SPCs to implement
properly;
Seen as prescriptive;
not "agile enough" in
its structures; "quick
start and leave" issues
some places
Yes, multi-level training
& Certifications
Can roll your own but
usually done with
certified coaches
(SPC's) and training.

Beginning to offer new


certifications and have
more overlap with
Scrum Alliance &
Scrum.org

You might also like