The Role of Suction Boxes on Forming Section Retention and

Filler Migration

by

JAMES MONTGOMERY

BASc University of Waterloo, Canada, 2008

A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE

DEGREE OF

MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE

in

THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES

(Mechanical Engineering)

THE UNIVERISTY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

(Vancouver)

August, 2010

©James Montgomery, 2010

 Abstract
An apparatus was constructed to observe fibre mat formation under applied vacuum pressure
comparable to that experienced in a suction box. The main focus of study was to determine the
effects of system parameters on overall retention, filler distribution, and filler migration by
analysing samples through weighing, ashing and EDX analysis.

It was found that increasing suction pressure slightly decreased the overall retention, although
the effect was greater at higher filler loadings. The forming fabric selection was statistically
significant in determining the overall retention, and the significance of forming fabric selection
grows with increasing filler loading. The most important factor in determining overall retention
was the presence of retention aids. Measurement of the instantaneous permeability of the
forming fabric and fibre mat during the forming process showed differences in the permeability
curves between forming fabrics, particularly during the initial forming process. The permeability
variations are correlated with differences in retention. Tests performed under gravity drainage,
to provide a correlation between fabric properties and overall retention results, showed that air
permeability had the highest correlation.

Sheet splitting and ashing hand sheets formed using cationic PCC filler showed that applying a
vacuum during the drainage process decreased the average filler content. The filler was
preferentially removed from the wire side of the sheet. Similar tests performed with anionic filler
showed that filler charge affects the distribution in a hand sheet. Anionic filler also showed little
change in distribution when vacuum was applied during forming. Cationic and anionic filler have
different retention mechanisms; attachment and filtration, respectively. Applied vacuum was
found to affect the filler distribution of particles retained by attachment with the highest changes
at the wire side. Applied vacuum was found to have only a small affect on particles retained by
filtration. The reason for both is the compaction of the fibre mat, which occurs to the greatest
extent at the wire side. The compaction reduces the size of openings in the mat which will
further trap large particles retained by filtration but increase the drag on small particles, possibly
exceeding the attractive forces responsible for attachment to the pulp fibres.

ii
 Table of Contents
Abstract .......................................................................................................................................ii

Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................iii

List of Tables..............................................................................................................................vi

List of Figures ...........................................................................................................................vii

Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................ix

Co-Authorship Statement ..........................................................................................................x

Chapter 1 - Introduction .............................................................................................................1

1.1 Introduction to Papermaking .........................................................................................1

1.2 Suction (or Vacuum) Boxes...........................................................................................3

1.3 Mineral Filler..................................................................................................................5

1.4 Retention and Chemical Retention Aids........................................................................7

1.5 Z-direction Filler Distribution..........................................................................................8

1.6 Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersion X-ray ............................................11

1.7 Research Objectives ...................................................................................................14

1.8 References ..................................................................................................................16

Chapter 2 - Effect of Applied Vacuum Box Suction on Overall Retention in Hand Sheet
Forming......................................................................................................................................21

2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................21

2.2 Apparatus, Materials and Method ...............................................................................23

2.3 Results and Discussion ...............................................................................................25

2.3.1 Overall Retention.................................................................................................25

iii
 2.3.2 Overall Retention versus Fabric Properties.........................................................28

2.3.3 Permeability Measurements ................................................................................30

2.4 Conclusions.................................................................................................................32

2.5 References ..................................................................................................................34

Chapter 3 - Filler Removal and Migration due to Applied Suction in Hand Sheet
Forming......................................................................................................................................37

3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................37

3.2 Apparatus, Materials and Method ...............................................................................39

3.3 Results and Discussion ...............................................................................................41

3.3.1 Z-Directional Filler Distribution ............................................................................41

3.3.2 Z-Directional Filler Migration................................................................................46

3.3.2.1 PCC in Lower Pulp Suspension, Clay in Upper Pulp Suspension...................47

3.3.2.2 Clay in Lower Pulp Suspension, PCC in Upper Pulp Suspension...................50

3.3.2.3 Influence of Upper Suspension Filler...............................................................51

3.3.2.4 Influence of Lower Suspension Filler...............................................................52

3.4 Conclusions.................................................................................................................52

3.5 References ..................................................................................................................55

Chapter 4 - Conclusions, Contribution to Knowledge and Recommendations for Future

Work ...........................................................................................................................................57

4.1 Conclusions.................................................................................................................57

4.1.1 Overall Retention in Hand Sheet Forming...........................................................57

4.1.2 Filler Removal and Migration...............................................................................59

4.2 Contribution to Knowledge ..........................................................................................61

iv
 4.3 Recommendations for Future Work ............................................................................63

4.4 References ..................................................................................................................66

Appendix A: Apparatus Construction.....................................................................................68

v
 List of Tables
Table 1: Forming fabric details....................................................................................................25

Table 2: Overall retention versus fabric property correlation coefficients ...................................29

vi
 List of Figures
Figure 1: Forming section of a Fourdrinier paper machine ...........................................................2

Figure 2: Dewatering mechanisms in a suction box [10] ..............................................................4

Figure 3: Scalenohedral precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) [4] ..............................................6

Figure 4: Interaction of the primary electron beam with an SEM sample ...................................12

Figure 5: Emission of a characteristic x-ray ................................................................................13

Figure 6: Schematic of modified hand sheet former ...................................................................23

Figure 7: Typical experimental data. The error bars represent the standard deviation measured
over multiple trials. The pressure transducer accuracy is ±100Pa and the ultrasonic distance
sensor accuracy is ±50µm. .........................................................................................................26

Figure 8: Overall retention versus suction pressure at 20% filler loading ...................................26

Figure 9: Overall retention versus suction pressure at 40% filler loading ...................................27

Figure 10: Overall retention versus air permeability ...................................................................30

Figure 11: Permeability versus drainage ratio (gravity drainage) ...............................................31

Figure 12: Permeability versus drainage ratio (vacuum drainage) .............................................32

Figure 13: Schematic of modified hand sheet former .................................................................39

Figure 14: Distribution of PCC in hand sheets formed with pulp suspension containing 40%
cationic PCC filler under gravity and vacuum drainage determined by ashing ...........................42

Figure 15: Distribution of PCC in hand sheets formed with pulp suspension containing 40%
cationic PCC filler under gravity drainage, gravity at 0.02%C and gravity with a subsequent dry
vacuum pulse determined by ashing ..........................................................................................43

Figure 16: Comparison of PCC distribution in hand sheets determined using EDX and ashing
methods ......................................................................................................................................44

Figure 17: PCC and clay distribution in hand sheets determined using EDX analysis ...............45

vii
Figure 18: PCC distribution in hand sheets divided into profiles from filler in upper and lower
portions of a pulp suspension .....................................................................................................47

Figure 19: Breakdown of filler distribution in sheets formed with PCC pulp suspension on the
lower half and clay pulp suspension on the upper half ...............................................................48

Figure 20: Effects of gravity (a) and vacuum (b) on filler retained by attachment and filtration ..49

Figure 21: Breakdown of filler distribution in sheets formed with clay pulp suspension on the
lower half and PCC pulp suspension on the upper half ..............................................................50

Figure 22: Modified hand sheet forming apparatus ....................................................................69

viii
 Acknowledgements
I extend my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Sheldon Green who provided unending
guidance in my research. I thank him for providing critical insight into the research problems and
for allowing me the freedom to investigate solutions in my own manner. I also thank him for
challenging me to set the benchmark ever higher and for his support throughout this project. It
was a pleasure working with you.

I would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jimmy Jong and Dr. Alois Vanerek of FP Innovations
for their assistance in defining the research objectives and their patience in explaining relevant
concepts that were outside of my field of expertise

I extend my sincerest thanks to Dr. John Xu and other members of Asten Johnson Inc. for
providing their expertise and insight in the papermaking process and guidance throughout the
course of my research.

I would like to thank the technicians without whose help I could not have completed this study.
Thanks to George Soong of the UBC Pulp and Paper Centre and Mary Fletcher of the Materials
Engineering Microscopy Lab.

I would like to thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
(NSERC) and FP Innovations for their financial support of this project.

Finally, I would like to thank the members of my research group for their continued comments
and suggestions concerning explanations and reasoning of experimental outcomes and their
friendship throughout the past two years.

ix
 Co-Authorship Statement
The authors of Chapter 2 are James Montgomery, Sheldon Green, and Alois Vanerek. Dr.
Green identified the need for further information regarding retention during suction box forming.
I determined the research variables to be tested (suction pressure, forming fabric selection and
addition of retention aids) and the method for performing these tests with the supervision of Dr.
Green. I performed all of the experimental testing for the research. With direction from Dr.
Green and Dr. Vanerek, I performed data analysis to determine the effects of the research
variables and provided conclusions regarding the meaning of the results. I wrote the manuscript
with revisions and suggestions from Dr. Green and Dr. Vanerek.

The authors of Chapter 3 are James Montgomery, Sheldon Green, Alois Vanerek, and Jimmy
Jong. Dr. Jong identified the need for further information regarding filler migration during suction
box forming. Dr. Green identified the possibility of forming hand sheets in two parts to determine
migration of filler particles from top side to wire side of the sheet. I determined the research
variables to be tested (gravity and vacuum drainage, two filler types, consistency, and retention
aids), the method for performing these tests and the analysis. I formed all of the hand sheets
and performed the SEM/EDX analysis of filler content. The hand sheet ashing was performed at
FP Innovations in Point-Claire, Quebec. With direction from Dr. Green I performed data analysis
to determine the effects of the research variables and provided conclusions regarding the
meaning of the results. I wrote the manuscript with revisions and suggestions from Dr. Green,
Dr. Vanerek and Dr. Jong.

x
 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction

1.1 Introduction to Papermaking

The concept of papermaking has been around for centuries in various forms. Modern
papermaking can be said to have come about at the end of the 18th century with the
patenting of the first continuous papermaking machine in France [1]. The basic method of
making paper is to create a dilute suspension of pulp fibres (typically wood pulp) in water
and drain the suspension through a wire or mesh (often called the forming fabric). The
remaining wet mat of pulp fibres, once dried, can be used as a sheet of paper. In modern
paper mills this process is performed continuously, at rapid speeds, using large-scale
industrial equipment specialized to produce a specific type of paper product that can vary
from newsprint to liner board to tissue paper.

In addition to pulp fibres, a number of additives are included in the typical pulp suspension.
The components added to the suspension can be either mineral or chemical and serve to
increase the final sheet properties, or aid in sheet formation or solids retention. There are a
wide variety of chemical additives that can be used in the process depending on the desired
results. Some of the possibilities include; pH control, retention aids, flocculants, drainage
aids and a variety of specialty chemicals [1]. The specific chemicals, quantities used and
order of addition greatly affect the final paper properties. Chemical additives and their
effects on the papermaking process have been extensively studied by many authors, an
overview of the fundamentals of papermaking chemistry has been provided by Lindstrom
[2]. Typical mineral additives include starches, clay, talc and calcium carbonate. These
additives affect the final sheet properties such as burst and tensile strength, opacity,
brightness, smoothness, printability, and formation [3-5]. Further information on mineral
fillers will be discussed in Section 1.3.

The paper machine can be broken into five fundamental sections that each play a critical
role in the papermaking process; the approach section, the dewatering section (also called
the forming section), the pressing section, the drying section and the finishing section. The
approach section consists of the pumping, mixing and diluting of the pulp suspension to the
appropriate levels for the process of papermaking. There are also cleaning and screening
processes that can occur before the pulp is permitted to enter the headbox. At this point in
the process the solids content in the pulp suspension is approximately 0.5% [6]. The

1
headbox is at the beginning of the paper machine and serves the function of discharging a
uniform jet of pulp suspension evenly onto the forming fabric. The forming fabric serves as a
screen through which the water in the pulp suspension drains, depositing a wet pulp mat.
The drainage of water through the forming fabric is aided by a number of drainage elements
that provide varying pressure magnitudes and profiles that act to both draw water through
the forming fabric as well as to influence the forming characteristics of the paper. The
drainage elements include: hydrofoils, table rolls, suction boxes, dandy roll, and couch roll,
and vary between paper machines in quantity and order. A diagram of the forming section of
a Fourdrinier paper machine can be seen in Figure 1. After the forming section, wherein as
much water is removed from the pulp suspension as possible by means of gravity and
suction drainage, the wet pulp mat then passes through the pressing section. The solids
content in the wet fibre web at the end of the dewatering section is 20-25% [7]. In the
pressing section the paper is pressed, usually between two rolls, to remove water that could
not be removed in the drainage section due to the vacuum forces. The water is squeezed
from the pulp suspension into a felt that passes between the pulp mat and the press rolls.
After the pressing section the pulp mat, at a solids content of 40-50% [7], passes into the
drying section for the final step of water removal by evaporation. The drying section consists
of numerous heated rolls, blowers and ventilators that act to heat the pulp mat and
evaporate the remaining water to reach a solids content of 90-95% [7]. The final section of
the paper machine is the finishing section. This section can vary considerably between
paper machines and contains the components to perform functions such as calendaring,
reeling and cutting in preparation for the end use.

Figure 1: Forming section of a Fourdrinier paper machine

The forming section on the paper machine can be of different design types depending on
the type of sheet made and the properties required. The most simple type of former is the
Fourdrinier paper machine. Fourdrinier paper machines are characterized by a single

2
horizontal forming fabric that runs in a continuous loop onto which the pulp suspension is
dispersed and the water drains through vertically. This is the more simple design type and it
involves single sided dewatering which results in two-sidedness of the paper sheet (the two
surfaces having different properties) [8]. The basic forming section of the paper machine
has undergone many innovations since the early design of the Fourdrinier machine. The
innovations have led to more complex, faster machines with wider spans that allow for
increased production. The more complex Twin-wire (or gap) formers contain two forming
fabrics between which the pulp suspension is deposited via an impingement jet. Twin-wire
forming is a more complex procedure but allows for dewatering through both fabrics which
eliminates two-sidedness and increases dewatering speeds. Beyond the initial transfer of
pulp suspension from the headbox to the fabric, the two types of paper machines contain
similar components and sections as outline above.

1.2 Suction (or Vacuum) Boxes

In the initial stages of the dewatering section of the paper machine the suspension is
sufficiently dilute to allow for the gravity drainage of water. As the water drains and the
solids content in the pulp suspension increases, pulp fibres are deposited on the forming
fabric and the resistance to drainage increases. At a solids content of approximately 5%
[9,10] the resistance is too high for further drainage by gravity. At this point suction is
required to attain a higher solids content in the fibre mat and can be applied by passing the
forming fabric over a suction (or vacuum) box. Suction boxes are used both before and after
the 5% consistency mark to regulate mat formation and dewatering.

Suction boxes are troughs below the forming fabric with slotted or perforated covers that are
connected to a vacuum system. A diagram of a suction box can be seen in Figure 2. As the
forming fabric with adhering fibre mat passes over the suction box the pressure differential
between the atmosphere and the vacuum system is applied to the pulp suspension and
causes drainage [6]. After the applied suction box dewatering the solids content in the fibre
mat can reach between 15 and 25% [9,10] and is dependent on the pulp properties and the
applied suction. In a paper machine there are typically a number of suction boxes over
which the forming fabric passes. This provides a pulsing action of applied suction. The
vacuum pressure in a suction box can be controlled to vary the pressure in individual
suction boxes thereby controlling the pressure profile to which the pulp suspension and wet
fibre mat is exposed. Typical pressures utilized in suction boxes are between -15kPa and -
50kPa [6,9,10] but may be as low as -70kPa on modern high-speed paper formers [9]. The

3
applied suction level controls the magnitude and profile of the drainage throughout the
section of the paper machine containing suction boxes. Characteristics of the suction boxes
that affect the sheet water content include the magnitude of the suction, the suction pulse
length (related to machine speed and suction box slot width) and the frequency of suction
pulses [11,12]. It was also found that gradually increasing the applied suction in successive
suction boxes provides advantages by drying the sheet more efficiently [11]. Characteristics
of the pulp furnish that affect performance of a suction box include pulp type, basis weight,
consistency of sheet passing over the vacuum box, freeness, fines content, temperature,
etc.[9,12].

Figure 2: Dewatering mechanisms in a suction box [10]

The change in water content in a suction box is attributed to three mechanisms:

compression of the fibre web, displacement of water by air, and rewetting. As the forming
fabric and fibre mat pass over the suction box the pressure difference causes compression
in the fibre mat. This web compression forces water to flow from the fibre mat through the
forming fabric and into the suction box. The applied suction and web compression is
accompanied by air flow through the fibre mat and forming fabric. Airflow displaces water in
the fibre mat and carries it through to the suction box. Finally as the forming fabric and fibre
mat leave the suction box the fibre mat expands and draws water from the forming fabric to
the fibre mat causing a rewetting [10]. A diagram of the three mechanisms of dewatering
can be seen in Figure 2.

4
The literature is lacking in investigations of the affect of applied suction on retention of solids
during forming. Discussion of the research into retention during forming with and without
suction is provided in Section 1.4.

1.3 Mineral Filler

There has been a recent trend in the industry to increase filler content in paper. Addition of
filler to paper increases the brightness and opacity, reduces surface roughness and thereby
increases the printability of paper. Increasing the filler content in the pulp suspension and
final sheet has complex effects on the forming properties, such as drainage, retention, and
permeability, in the paper machine wet end [3-5]. The forming properties of the sheet
depend on the filler type used, the loading and the distribution in the sheet and pulp
suspension. The benefits of increasing the filler content in paper extend beyond the sheet
properties. There are also economic and energy efficiency benefits to increasing filler
content. Typical fillers cost less than pulp fibres and do not require refining, a large
consumer of energy. Wet fibre mats with higher filler contents may leave the press section
at higher solids contents, and therefore require less drying energy than less highly filled
paper [7]. At a given sheet basis weight, more highly filled papers will cost less to produce.

Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) is a common mineral filler that is used extensively in the
papermaking process. The main purpose of CaCO3 in papermaking is to improve opacity,
brightness, ink receptivity and surface smoothness [3]. There are two types of CaCO3 filler
used; ground calcium carbonate (GCC) which is typically ground limestone or calcite, and
precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC). GCC is manufactured in either a wet or dry process
depending on desired particle size and results in a random particle shape [13,14]. One of
the problems associated with the use of GCC is the presence of impurities such as iron and
silica. PCC is a synthetically manufactured calcium carbonate that can be produced on site
at the paper mill and is characterized by high purity, often >96%. The size and shape of
PCC particles can be tightly controlled and depends on the manufacturing method
employed. Typical shapes of PCC particles are rhombohedral (barrel-shaped),
scalenohedral (rosette-shaped) and acicular (needle-like) [13,14]. The increased optical
properties of PCC (brightness level and scattering coefficient) over GCC and clays has led
to its widespread use as a paper filler [15].

5
Figure 3: Scalenohedral precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) [4]

The surface charge of calcium carbonate is an important factor in its use in the papermaking
process. CaCO3 can attach to wood fibres in the pulp stock suspension if the components
have favourable chemical charges. Pulp fibre in the paper machine stock is anionic [16] and,
in general, anionic CaCO3 is repelled from the fibre surface whereas cationic CaCO3 is
attracted to the pulp fibres [17,18]. The surface charge of the components can be affected
by various system parameters. Both GCC and PCC are positively charged when dispersed
in distilled water and negatively charged in tap and white water [19]. The surface charge is
also affected by pH, concentration, time in suspension, surface area of particles, and
addition of polymers [19-21]. An important factor that is controlled by the charge of filler
particles is the size of the aggrogates. At low charges (near neutral), CaCO3 is unstable and
forms large aggrogates. At higher charges, both anionic and cationic, electrostatic forces
repel CaCO3 particles and prevent the formation of aggrogates which causes increasingly
smaller particle sizes [19,21].

Another filler used in papermaking is ground clay. Clay is a naturally occurring substance
that is mined for use in papermaking. The clay used in papermaking is a hydrated aluminum
silicate (Al2Si2O5(OH)6). Clay has many of the same benefits and properties as ground
calcium carbonate filler [22]. Since clay is naturally occurring the particle shape cannot be
controlled to the same tight specifications as PCC. Clay particles used for filler are typically
hexagonal shaped with a size range between 2-20μm [22]. Though the benefits of clay as a

6
filler are not as great as those of PCC it finds use because of ready availability and cost
effectiveness.

1.4 Retention and Chemical Retention Aids

Retention in the papermaking process is the percentage of solids initially added in the pulp
suspension that remains in the final product. In hand sheet forming this is determined by
comparing the oven dry weight of the final sheet with the known amount of solids initially
added to form the hand sheet. Increasing the retention during papermaking is of great
importance because a system with higher retention will require less initial material to create
a sheet of given basis weight, therefore reducing the cost of production. There are a large
number of factors that affect the retention during sheet forming including pulp furnish,
machine speed, temperature, fillers, applied suction, chemical retention aids, basis weight,
consistency, particle affinity, forming fabric structure, etc. [23-25]. The different solids in the
pulp suspension have different rates of retention based on their sizes relative to the size of
opening in the forming fabric used. Pulp fibre length is on the order of 0.5–2 mm [26] which
is much larger than typical frame sizes of 100-400 microns seen in modern forming fabrics.
Filler particles (0.2-15 microns [26]) are significantly smaller than the forming fabric
openings and therefore are not directly retained by the forming fabric itself but by the fibre
mat as it is built up. The mechanisms by which the fibre mat acts to retain filler and fines
particles are electrostatic attraction (attachment), filtration, sedimentation, and flocculation
[27-33]. It has been reported that the primary mechanism for filler retention is attachment by
chemical interaction, or van der Waals electrostatic forces, and that the other mechanisms
are of secondary importance [33,34]. These forces are greatly increased by chemical
retention aids and therefore a great deal of focus has been placed on the use of chemical
retention aids.

A chemical retention aid is any substance added in the papermaking process that increases
the retention of fibres, fines, or fillers [28]. Most retention aids cause increased retention by
one of two methods; macromolecular bridging or charge modification [17,25,35,36]. The
function of both methods of chemical retention aids is to cause increased flocculation in the
system (fibre-fibre, fibre-filler and filler-filler flocculation) by making use of attraction of
oppositely charged particles and providing chemical modifications and interactions to
optimize the benefits obtained. The method that is induced due to the addition of chemical
retention aids depends on the properties of the chemical retention aid. It is generally
accepted that high charge density retention aids will act through charge modification and

7
high molecular weight retention aids will act through macromolecular bridging [2,37]. There
is a wide variety of chemical retention aids used in papermaking. A few examples of popular
types are monopolymer systems, dual polymer systems, and microparticulate flocculation
systems [2].

The benefits of increasing filler content in paper has led to research investigating the effects
of various system parameters on the retention of filler products. A large portion of this
research is in the area of chemical retention aids and how these chemicals can increase the
amount of filler attached to wood fibres. In these studies the percent of filler electrostatically
attached to pulp fibre is used as a retention value. Some studies [17,18,38] perform
investigations of this retention in a dilute pulp suspension where no hydrodynamic shear is
present. These neglect the important effects that hydrodynamic forces have on retention by
attachment of filler to the pulp fibres and the breakup of flocs and agglomerates. Additional
studies have utilized a dynamic drainage jar (DDJ) to incorporate the effects of
hydrodynamic shear and have been performed both without [25,27,28,35,39-42] and with
[30,42] an applied vacuum. These studies implicitly assume that the primary mechanism of
filler retention is through electrostatic and chemical interactions; they do not allow for the
retention effects associated with a fibre mat. The forming of the pulp mat changes the
dynamics of the system by providing non-uniform flow and increasing local flow rates
throughout the sheet as the mat builds up. The fibre mat is also directly responsible for
retention of filler particles through filtration and sedimentation. Those experiments that have
been performed using fibre mats have either consisted of deposition on a preformed fibre
mat [34,43,44] or have not included the effects of varying vacuum levels in the forming
process [30,45]. An investigation into the affects of applied vacuum is important to the
literature because all paper is formed by applying a suction at some point in the process.

1.5 Z-direction Filler Distribution

Z-directional filler distribution refers to the differences in filler concentrations through the
thickness of a sheet of paper. Different paper end uses require different filler distributions for
optimum characteristics. Injet printing, coated paper and supercalendered paper grades
require high filler content on the surface and can accept lower levels in the center [46-49],
copy paper requires low filler content on the sheet surfaces and higher filler content in the
center [46,47], and offset printing paper requires a constant filler loading throughout the
sheet [46].

8
The distribution of filler in a paper sheet affects a number of the sheet properties. When the
filler content on the surface of a sheet is increased there is a decrease in the surface
roughness and an increase in the surface brightness [50], both of which are quality
improvements. At a constant overall filler loading, the strength of a sheet of paper is
increased, and the bending stiffness reduced, when the concentration of filler near the paper
surfaces are increased [50]. Printing properties such as ink receptivity, print quality, and
dusting are also affected by the filler distribution [51]. Sheet permeability is affected by filler
distribution in a complex manner depending on concentration and filler type [4].

The main means of controlling the filler distribution is the method of sheet manufacturing or
type of paper machine used. The dewatering conditions during drainage of the pulp
suspension are responsible for filler movement and the dewatering conditions are strongly
tied to the type of former used. In a standard Fourdrinier paper machine the filler distribution
is non-symmetrical with a trend of increasing concentration towards the sheet top side
(away from the forming fabric) [46,47,51]. Hybrid formers reduce the top side filler content of
a Fourdrinier machine which results in a more symmetrical filler concentration profile
[47,54]. Twin-wire formers have a symmetrical filler distribution with a profile that is affected
by the applied vacuum in the elements and furnish used [47]. Hand sheet forming results in
high filler concentration near the center of the sheet with decreasing concentration towards
both the top and wire sides [51,52].

There are other factors that have been investigated for affect on the z-directional filler
distribution. One factor that has been extensively studied is the affect of headbox layering,
either through layering of the different pulp furnishes or additive layering [46-49]. Layering
consists of keeping the feed streams of the pulp suspension to the different layers (typically
three when layering is being performed) separate until the forming section. The different
layers can consist of variations in pulp furnish, filler percentage or chemical retention aids.
By increasing the filler percentage or chemical retention aids in a layer the filler content in
that layer of the finished sheet can be increased. Headbox flow rate and dewatering rate
have been shown to affect the filler distribution as has sheet basis weight [50]. In gap
forming an increase in headbox flow rate resulted in increased top side (away from the roll
former) filler content while increasing the blade dewatering shifted filler from the center of
the sheet to the surface [50]. As the basis weight of the sheet increases the chance of filler
particles being retained by filtration increases. This results in a plateau of constant filler
content in the middle of a sheet that is not largely affected by the machine parameters [51].

9
Two factors that have been studied but were shown to have minimal to no effect on the filler
distribution are wet pressing and suction boxes which were shown to change the filler
content but not the profile [52,53]. This was prescribed to the filler being fixed in the sheet
by the time pressing or suction occurs. The explanation given was that the water content of
the sheet was reduced and the mat compacted enough to limit filler mobility. The affect of
applied suction during hand sheet forming has also been studied previously [52] and the
conclusions drawn were that vacuum did not change the filler distribution in the z-direction.
These are both contrary to general observations in the paper mill which suggest that the
filler profile is affected by suction boxes and other forming elements.

Though early studies of suction boxes concluded that there was no affect on filler
distribution due to the applied vacuum, subsequent investigations have shown that applying
a vacuum or changing the suction characteristics during the forming process can change
the filler distribution. Increasing the dewatering of loadable blades in a gap former, and
therefore increasing the level of pressure pulse and dewatering speeds, can change the
filler profile on the sheet side closest to the blades. A medium load decreased the surface
and center-plane filler content whereas a high load maintained surface filler content but
caused a great decrease in the center-plane [46]. A more recent study investigating vacuum
box dewatering on a gap former showed that increasing the suction box vacuum pressure
caused reduced surface filler concentration but an increase in the overall filler content [54].
This suggests that other parameters were simultaneously changed. Another author [47] has
stated that increasing the vacuum in suction shoes of a gap former caused an increase in
the surface content of filler but a decrease in the center-plane filler content though the
extent of the changes is dependent on pulp type used. The affect of suction has been of
secondary importance in all previous studies. There has yet to be a controlled laboratory
investigation focusing on the affect of applied suction on filler distribution. Also absent from
the literature is any study investigating how the filler migrates within the sheet to facilitate
the changes in filler distribution.

Some work has been performed to try to explain mechanisms within the forming process or
sheet properties that affect changes in filler distribution. Correlations in changes of filler
distribution and local specific filtration resistance (SFR) due to varying blade loadings in a
gap former led Haggblom-Ahnger et al. [46] to propose that the web compaction and
increase of SFR leads to increased entrapment of filler. This suggests that changes in filler
distribution are dependent on the local SFR in a sheet or the pore sizes between fibres.

10
Szikla and Paulapuro [53] proposed a number of conditions that would affect the ability for
filler particles to move in a sheet during pressing and thus affect the filler distribution.
Though their study focused on movement in a fibre mat that had a high solids content,
similar principles apply in all areas of the forming process. The conditions that they found
were; flow velocity (increasing velocity increases drag on particles), filler content (increasing
the number of filler particles increases the likelihood of movement), sheet density (less
dense sheets allow for more filler motion), particle size (smaller particles can move through
the fibre mat more freely), and state of fibres (increased beating and fibrils caused reduced
filler movement). From these studies it has been inferred that for all practical purposes in
papermaking the filler distribution is fixed after the dry-line.

There is a diverse array of methods used for determining the z-directional filler distribution in
a finished paper sheet. Early investigations used a method of serial grinding of the paper
sheet in the z-direction. The remaining sheet substance was ashed and compared with total
sheet ash content to determine the ash content of the removed layer [51]. Further
development led to sheet splitting using adhesive tape to remove individual fibre layers
[54,55]. This allows for the ashing of individual layers to determine the mineral content in
each layer. Other analytical techniques have been investigated for potential on- and off-line
determination of filler distribution. The use of neutron activation analysis [56] and a
combination of X-ray absorption and fluorescence techniques [57] have both been shown to
provide accurate filler distribution profiles. More recent development has led to the use of
scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersion x-ray (EDX) techniques to
analyze paper cross sections to determine the z-directional filler content [58,59].

1.6 Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersion X-ray

Scanning electron microscopy works based on the interaction of high energy electrons with
the sample to provide an image of the surface. A primary beam of electrons accelerated to a
controlled voltage is directed at the sample specimen and interacts with the atoms on and
near the sample surface by transferring some of their energy to the atoms in the sample.
Figure 4 shows the interaction of the primary electron beam with the SEM sample. The
effects of this interaction (called secondary effects) are the release of secondary electrons,
backscatter electrons, or relaxation of excited atoms. Secondary electrons are electrons that
escape the sample surface with energies below a certain value (about 50eV [60]). These
could be either electrons from the primary beam that have given up most of their energy or
electrons from the sample that have been excited by the primary beam. Backscatter

11
electrons are electrons from the primary beam that are ejected from the surface of the
sample while maintaining a large fraction of their energy. Backscatter electrons are much
less likely to occur than secondary electrons but both are used in SEM imaging. As the
electron beam is scanned across the sample the location is recorded and the corresponding
intensity of detected electrons produces a greyscale image for output to a computer screen.
The intensity of the released electrons is dependent upon the elemental composition of the
sample surface in the area being analysed and produces contrast between surface features.
The resolution of the image is dependent on the diameter of the electron beam which is
controlled by internal condenser lenses to 2-10nm [60-63].

Figure 4: Interaction of the primary electron beam with an SEM sample

Energy dispersion X-ray is an analysis technique that is typically available in modern

scanning electron microscopes. EDX provides an elemental breakdown of the sample area
over which the primary electron beam is directed. As the primary electron beam interacts
with the sample surface it can transfer some of its energy to the electrons of the atoms.
These electrons may be excited beyond the binding energy of their orbital shell and ejected
from the sample. If an electron is ejected from a lower orbit (closer to the nucleus) then the
atom will be considered to be in an excited state and will eventually relax by giving off this
excess energy. There are three ways that relaxation of excited atoms can occur. Two of the
relaxation methods; cathodoluminescence and release of Auger electrons are not relevant
to the context of this study but can be found in the literature [60-65]. The third type of
relaxation occurs when an electron from an outer orbit jumps down to fill the inner vacancy.
During this jump a characteristic X-ray is released with energy equal to the energy
difference between the two shells. This energy is specific to the given electron shells

12
involved and unique for each element. Figure 5 is a diagram of the emission of a
characteristic X-ray by an excited atom. It is by collecting the energy from these
characteristic X-rays and counting the number of X-rays at each energy level that the EDX
analysis can provide details of the weight percentage by element of the sample specimen
[60-65].

Figure 5: Emission of a characteristic x-ray

The ability of the scanning electron microscope to provide surface images at high resolution
and magnification makes it suitable for the use in analysis of paper samples. SEM images
have been used in previous studies of paper surface characteristics for both mineral-free
paper [66] and coated paper [67] and used for determining the effects that surface structure
has on the printability of a paper sheet. SEM has found greater use in the paper industry in
analysing the cross section of paper sheets by coupling SEM images with image processing
capabilities. The analysis of sheet fibre content in the cross section has been used to
determine the location of fines material [68] and sheet pore structure [69]. SEM images of
the coated paper cross sections have allowed for determination of surface coating thickness
distributions [67], analysis of coating structure [70] and subsequent reconstruction of surface
coatings [71]. SEM images have also been used to determine characteristics of individual
fibres in the transverse direction such as wall thickness [72].

13
Energy dispersion X-ray analysis clearly has potential for use in the paper industry because
of the complex matrix of organic and inorganic material and the importance of the
distribution of this material. Gibbon [73] outlined the possibility of using EDX for the
determination of different filler particles in the paper structure and the concentration and
distribution of this material. At the time of this original analysis, EDX technology was limited
to the detection of elements with atomic number 11 (sodium) and heavier which excluded
carbon and oxygen, critical elements in the paper structure. This prohibited the
determination of exact weight and weight percentage of the filler particles in the sheet.
Further development of EDX technology allowed for detection of all elements with atomic
numbers heavier than 4 (beryllium). This lead to EDX being used for the analysis of z-
directional filler distribution in paper [58,59].

1.7 Research Objectives

As the pulp and paper industry moves towards further increases in the filler content of paper
to facilitate cost reductions a deeper understanding of the retention of these particles is
required. There has been a great deal of focus on the effects that chemical retention aids
have on filler retention with less focus on the affects of the hydrodynamics. One area in
particular that has been overlooked is how the pulp suspension and fibre mat are affected
when the forming fabric passes over a suction box. The existing studies neglect the effects
that mat formation and increased suction pressure have on retention properties. The overall
retention of the solids and the filler retention and distribution may be affected by these
parameters.

In order to investigate the affects of vacuum boxes a laboratory scale modified hand sheet
former was constructed to allow control and monitoring of the pressure applied to, and the
height of, the pulp suspension during forming. Hand sheets allow for testing parameters that
are seen on a paper machine under more strict control, for less cost and at a more rapid
pace. The modified hand sheet former allowed for testing conditions, such as forming
fabrics, suction pressure, and suspension consistency, that matched those used on a paper
machine. Details of the design and construction of the apparatus can be found in Appendix
A. The first objective of this investigation was to determine the affect that suction boxes, and
different parameters in the suction box, had on the overall retention during hand sheet
forming and to relate these to paper machine operation where possible. The second
objective was to determine how the applied suction in a vacuum box affects the filler

14
particles in the sheet with a focus on the average filler content, filler distribution, and the
movement of filler within the sheet.

In Chapter 2 the effects of applied suction, forming fabric selection, and retention aids on
overall retention during the forming process are investigated. Instantaneous permeability
curves during sheet formation were also investigated to determine differences in mat
formation between forming fabrics. Finally, correlations between standard forming fabric
design characteristics with the overall retention results were investigated.

In Chapter 3 the effects of applied suction on filler distribution were investigated. The initial
investigations focused on the overall changes in distribution. The effects of filler migration
during forming from the top side to the wire side were also investigated using different filler
types. Separate conclusions were drawn regarding filler motion in paper forming for filler
particles with electrostatic repulsion and attraction.

Chapter 4 provides conclusions that can be drawn from the above mentioned experimental
studies and describes the contributions to knowledge of this work. The chapter closes with
recommendations for future work that can be performed using the apparatus constructed for
these investigations.

15
1.8 References
[1] Smook, G.A., Handbook for Pulp & Paper Technologists, Second Edition Edition, Angus
Wilde Publications, Vancouver, 1992.

[2] Lindstrom, T., “Some Fundamental Chemical Aspects on Paper Forming”. Fundamentals
of Papermaking. Ed. Baker, C.F. and Punton, V.W., London: Mechanical Engineering
Publications, 311-412 (1989).

[3] Griggs, W.H., “Use of fillers in papermaking”, Tappi J. 71(4): 77-81 (1988).

[4] Singh, R. et al., “Permeability of pulp fibre mats with filler particles”, Colloids Surf. A
Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 333: 96-107 (2009).

[5] Liimatainen, H. et al., “Effect of PCC filler on dewatering of fiber suspensions”, Tappi J.
5(11): 11-16 (2006).

[6] Wahlstrom, P.B., “Paper Machine – Forming Section”. Handbook of Pulp and Paper
Technology. Ed. Britt, K.W., New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 401-426
(1970).

[7] Dong, C. et al., “Energy Saving in Papermaking through Filler Addition”, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 47: 8430-8435 (2008).

[8] Gavelin, G,. Fourdrinier Papermaking, Lockwood Trade Journal Co., Inc., New York,
1963.

[9] Britt, K.W. and Unbehend, J.E., “Water removal during sheet formation”, Tappi 63(4): 67-
70 (1980).

[10] Aslund, P. and Vomhoff, H., “Dewatering mechanisms and their influence on suction
box dewatering”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 23(4): 389-397 (2008).

[11] Atwood, B.W., “A study of vacuum box operation”, Paper Technology 3(5): 446-456
(1962).

[12] Nordman, L., “Laboratory Investigation of Water Removal by a Dynamic Suction Box”,
Tappi 37(11): 553-560 (1954).

[13] Macgugan, I.C., “Calcium Carbonate”, in Handbook of Pulp and Paper Technology, Ed.
K.W. Britt, 2nd edition., Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 627-630, (1970).

[14] Gill, R. and Scott, W., “The relative effects of different calcium carbonate filler pigments
on optical properties”, Tappi J. 70(1): 93-99 (1987).

[15] Evans, B., et al., “PCC Fillers for Groundwood Papers”, 1991 Papermakers
Conference, 321-330 (1991).

[16] Strazdins, E., “Factors Affecting the Electrokinetic Properties of Cellulose Fibers”, Tappi
55(12): 1691-1695 (1972).

[17] Vanerek, A. et al., “Interaction of Calcium Carbonate Fillers with Pulp Fibres: Effect of
Surface Charge and Cationic Polyelectrolytes”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 26(9): 317-322
(2000).

16
[18] Šutý, Š. And Lužáková, V., “Role of surface charge in deposition of filler particles onto
pulp fibres”, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 139: 271-278 (1998).

[19] Vanerek, A. et al., “Collidal Behaviour of Ground and Precipitated Calcium Carbonate
Fillers: Effects of Cationic Polyelectrolytes and Water Quality”, J. Pulp Paper Sci.
26(4): 135-139 (2000).

[20] Siffert, B. And Fimbel, P., “Parameters Affecting the Sign and Magnitude of the
Electrokinetic Potential of Calcite”, Colloids Surfaces 11: 377-389 (1984).

[21] Šutý, Š. et al., “Stability of Ground and Precipitated CaCO2 Suspensions in the
Presence of Polyethylenimine and Salt”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 22(9): 321-326 (1996).

[22] Kuusi, J. and Lehtinin, A.I., “Neutron activation of microtome cuts in examination of
paper for its filler distribution”, Pulp Paper Canada 71(3): 37-45 (1970).

[23] Willets, W.R., “Factors Affecting Retention”, Pap. Trade J. 101(13): 81-86 (1935).

[24] Helle, I.T., “The influence of wire structure on sheet forming”, Pap. Technol. Ind. 21(4):
123-124, 126-131 (1980).

[25] Yan, Z. and Deng, Y., “Cationic microparticle based flocculation and retention systems”,
Chem. Eng. J. 80: 31-36 (2000).

[26] Bown, R., “Particle size, shape and structure of paper fillers and their effect on paper
properties”, Paper Technology 39(2): 44-48 (1998).

[27] Britt, K.W., “Mechanisms of Retention During Sheet Formation” Tappi 56(10): 46-50
(1973).

[28] Britt, K.W. and Unbehend, J.E., “New Methods for Monitoring Retention”, Tappi 59(2):
67-70 (1976).

[29] Davison, R.W., “Mechanism of Fine-Particle Retention in Paper” Tappi J. 66(11): 69-72
(1983).

[30] Arno, J.N. et al., “Zeta Potential and its Application to Filler Retention”, Tappi 57(12):
97-100 (1974).

[31] Moore, E.E., “Drainage and Retention Mechanisms of Papermaking Systems Treated
with Cationic Polymers”, Tappi 58(1): 99-101 (1975).

[32] Han, S.T., “Retention of Small Particles in Fiber Mats”, Tappi 47(12): 782-787 (1964)

[33] Hubbe, M.A., “How do retention aids work?”, 1988 Papermakers Conference: 389-398
(1988).

[34] Solberg, D. And Wagberg, L., “On the mechanism of GCC filler retention during
dewatering – New techniques and initial findings”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(6): 183-188
(2002).

[35] Cadotte, M. et al., “Effects of various retention aids on fiber flocculation, filler retention
and drainage”, PAPTAC 91st Annual Meeting: A31-A37 (2005).

17
[36] Hubbe, M.A., “Mechanistic aspects of microparticle systems”, Tappi J. 4(11): 23-28
(2005).

[37] Sikora, M.D. and Stratton, R.A., “The shear stability of flocculated colloids”, Tappi
64(11): 97-101 (1981).

[38] Alince, B. and Bednar, F., “Role of Cationic Polyacrylamide in Fiber-CaCO3 Pigment
Interactions”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 88(10):2409-2415 (2003).

[39] Kuusi, J. and Kumpulainen, H., “Online determination of vertical-distribution of filler

materials in paper using X-ray techniques”, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica – Applied
Physics Series 138: 90-96 (1983).

[40] Modgi, S.B. et al., “Retention of Calcium Carbonate in Mechanical Pulps with
PEO/Cofactor/Coagulant and the Role of Hydrogen Bonding Interactions”, J. Pulp
Paper Sci. 30(11): 293-298 (2004).

[41] Nelson, J.A., “Retention aid performance Effects of process variables”, Tappi 61(11):
108-110 (1978).

[42] Unbehend, J.E., “Mechanisms of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ floc formation in dynamic retention
measurement”, Tappi 59(10): 74-77 (1976).

[43] Alince, B. et al., “Clay Particle Deposition in a Fibre Web: An Alternative Way of Filling
Paper?”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(9): 315-321 (2002).

[44] Al-Jabari, M. et al., “Experimental Study of Deposition of Clay Particles in Packed Beds
of Pulp Fibres”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 20(10): 289-295 (1994).

[45] Alince, B. and Lepoutre, P., “Interaction of cationic clay particles with pulp fibres”, Tappi
J. 66(1): 92-95 (1983).

[46] Haggblom-Ahnger, U.M. et al., “Conventional and stratified forming of office paper
grades”, Tappi J. 81(5): 149-157 (1998).

[47] Odell, M.H., “Paper structure engineering”, Appita J. 53(5): 371-377 (2000).

[48] Ahlroos, J. et al., “Influence of Base Paper Filler Content and Pre-calendering on
Metered Film Press Coating – Part II: Paper and Print Quality”, 1998
Coating/Papermakers Conference, 915-924 (1998).

[49] Kinnunen, J.S., “A new world of papermaking – the layered SC-paper”, Paperi Ja Puu
88(3): 167-171 (1998).

[50] Puurtinen, A., “Controlling filler distribution for improved fine paper properties”, Appita J.
57(3): 204-227 (2004).

[51] Hansen, E., “The Distribution of Filler in Paper”, Tappi 34(4): 180-185 (1951).

[52] Tanaka, H. et al., “How retention aids change the distribution of filler in paper”, Tappi
Papermakers Conference: 129-144 (1982).

[53] Szikla, Z. and Paulapuro, H., “Z-directional distribution of fines and filler material in the
paper web under wet pressing conditions”, Paperi Ja Pu 68(9): 654-664 (1986).

18
[54] Puurtinen, A., “Wet end control of filler distribution using additive layering principles”,
Paper Technology 44(4): 216-224 (2003).

[55] Finger, E.R. and Majewski, Z.J., “Sheet formation on the Fourdrinier Machine”, Tappi
37(5): 216-224 (1954).

[56] Murray, H.H., “China Clay”. Handbook of Pulp and Paper Tehnology. Ed.Britt, K.W.,
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 617-625 (1970).

[57] Zhang, H. et al., “Characteristics of dissolved and colloidal substances in high yield pulp
and their impact on filler retention”, Appita J. 60(5): 390-395.

[58] Modgi, S. et al. “SEM/EDX analysis: A technique for Z-directional mineral topography in
paper”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 21(5): 659-664 (2006).

[59] Modgi, S. et al., “SEM/EDX analysis of Z-direction distribution of mineral content in

paper along the cross-direction”, Pulp Paper Canada, 107(5): 124-127 (2006).

[60] Goodhew, P.J. et al., Electron microscopy and analysis. New York: Taylor and Francis,
2001.

[61] Newbury, D.E. et al., Advanced Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray
Microanalysis, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA; 1986.

[62] Goldstein, J.I., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York NY, USA; 2003.

[63] Egerton, R.F., Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy. New York: Springer, 2005.

[64] Kevex Corporation, Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Microanalysis, Kevex Corporation, Foster

City CA, USA; 1983.

[65] Russ, J.C., Fundamentals of Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis, Butterworths & Co
Ltd., Toronto, ON, Canada; 1984.

[66] Helle, T. and Johnsen, P.O., “Analyses of Paper Surface Structures Using some
Modern SEM Techniques”, 78th Annu. Meet. Tech. Sect. Can. Pulp. Pap. Assoc.:
A301-A307 (1992).

[67] Allem, R., “Characterization of Paper Coatings by Scanning Electron Microscopy and
Image Analysis”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 24(10): 329-336 (1998).

[68] De Silveira, G. et al., “Location of Fines in Mechanical Pulp Handsheets Using

Scanning Electron Microscopy”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 22(9): 315-320 (1996).

[69] Dickson, A.R., “Quantitative analysis of paper cross-sections”, Appita J. 53(4): 292-295
(2000).

[70] Chinga, G. and Helle, T., “Structure characterisation of pigment coating layer on paper
by scanning electron microscopy and image analysis”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 17(3):
307-312 (2002).

[71] Chinga, G. and Helle, T., “Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of a Coating Layer

Structure”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 29(4): 119-122 (2003).

19
[72] Reme, P.A., et al., “Assessment of Fibre Transverse Dimensions using SEM and Image
Analysis”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(4): 122-128 (2002).

[73] Gibbon, D. et al., “New electron and light optical technique for examining papermaking”,
Tappi 72(10): 87-91 (1989).

20
 2 Chapter 2 - Effect of Applied Vacuum Box Suction on Overall
Retention in Hand Sheet Forming1

2.1 Introduction
Paper is produced by dispensing a suspension of wood fibres and various additives, such as
calcium carbonate and clay fillers, onto a forming fabric and draining the water by gravity,
suction and pressure in a number of processes. One of these processes involves passing the
forming fabric over a suction box and applying a pressure difference across the forming fabric
and wet pulp suspension to increase dewatering above levels achieved through gravity
drainage. A great deal of research has focused on understanding the effect that system
parameters such as consistency, pulp furnish, filler, suction strength, pulse length, filler content,
retention aids and others have on the final percent dry content in the fibre mat after passing
over a suction box [1-8]. More recently, a number of studies have focused on characterizing the
mechanisms of water removal from a pulp suspension in the suction box: compression of the
fibre web, displacement of water by air and rewetting [9-14]. These investigations were not
concerned with the effect of the applied suction on the overall retention of fibres, fines and fillers
in the suction box.

As the water is drained through the forming fabric, especially in the presence of a vacuum
pulse, a portion of the fibres, fines and filler are pulled through the mat. The overall retention is
the percent of solids in the headbox slurry that remains on the forming fabric to comprise the
finished paper sheet. There are a large number of factors that affect the retention during sheet
forming, including pulp furnish, machine speed, temperature, fillers, applied suction, chemical
retention aids, basis weight, consistency, particle affinity, fabric structure, etc. [15-17]. The
different solids in the pulp suspension have different rates of retention based on their sizes
relative to the size of opening in the forming fabric used. Pulp fibre length is on the order of 0.5–
2mm [18] which is much larger than typical frame sizes of 100-400μm seen in modern forming
fabrics. Filler particles (0.2-15μm [18]) are significantly smaller than the forming fabric openings
and therefore are not directly retained by the forming fabric itself but by the fibre mat as it is built
up. The mechanisms by which the fibre mat acts to retain filler particles are electrostatic

1
A version of this chapter has been submitted for publication. Montgomery, J., Green, S.I., and Vanerek,
A., (2010) Effect of Applied Vacuum Box Suction on Overall Retention in Hand Sheet Forming.

21
attraction (deposition), filtration, sedimentation, and flocculation. It has been reported that the
primary mechanism for filler retention is deposition (or attachment) by chemical interaction
(retention aids), or van der Waals electrostatic forces, and that the other mechanisms are of
secondary importance [19,20].

There has been a recent trend in the industry to increase filler content in paper. The addition of
filler improves the optical properties, smoothness and printability of paper. At the wet end of the
paper machine the filler affects the drainage, retention, permeability and other physical
characteristics of the fibre mat and finished paper product [21-23]. There are also economic and
energy efficiency benefits to increasing filler content. Filler costs less than pulp fibre and the
replacement of fibre in the paper sheet with filler particles reduces the cost of paper at a given
basis weight. Filler particles do not require refining, which is a process that consumes much
energy in mechanical papermaking. Wet fibre mats with higher filler contents may leave the
press section at higher solids contents, and therefore require less drying energy than fibre
containing less filler [24].

The benefits of increasing filler content in paper has led to research investigating the effects of
various system parameters on the retention of filler products. A large portion of this research is
in the area of chemical retention aids and how these chemicals can increase the amount of filler
attached to wood fibres. In these studies the percent of deposited filler is used as a retention
value. Some studies [25-27] perform investigations of this retention in a dilute pulp suspension
where only low hydrodynamic shear is present. Additional studies have utilized a dynamic
drainage jar (DDJ) to incorporate the effects of hydrodynamic shear and have been performed
both without [28-35] and with [36,37] an applied vacuum. These studies implicitly assume that
the primary mechanism of filler retention is through electrostatic and chemical interactions; they
do not allow for the retention effects associated with a fibre mat. Those experiments that have
been performed using fibre mats have either consisted of deposition on a preformed fibre mat
[19,38,39] or have not included the effects of varying vacuum levels in the forming process
[37,40].

In section 2 we describe a modified hand sheet former that allows for the testing of the effects of
suction pressure, forming fabric selection, and the presence of chemical retention aids on the
overall retention in the paper forming process with high filler loading. Section 3 presents results
related to retention, forming fabrics, and permeability. The paper closes with conclusions.

22
2.2 Apparatus, Materials and Method
All retention tests were performed in a custom device that has some similarities to a standard
hand sheet former. Figure 6 shows a schematic drawing of the apparatus. The apparatus is
constructed of a 3” (75mm) diameter, 6” (150mm) tall, clear acrylic circular cylinder below a
forming fabric. A flush-mounted gauge pressure transducer (GP:50 Model 218-C-SZ-10-GS) is
mounted in the wall of the test chamber below the forming fabric. As described below, the pulp
slurry above the forming fabric is exposed to the atmosphere, so the pressure transducer
measures the pressure drop across the forming fabric and fibre mat. Another circular cylinder is
attached above the forming fabric and a gasket is placed around the outside to provide an
airtight seal. An ultrasonic distance sensor (Senix Model TSPC-30S1-232) is mounted above
the top portion of the test chamber to measure the pulp suspension height as a function of time,
which is used in determining the flow velocity during the forming process. A vacuum chamber
constructed of ½” (13mm) thick PVC sheets is connected to the bottom of the test chamber by a
¾” (20mm) PVC pipe and electrically actuated solenoid valve. The vacuum chamber pressure
can be adjusted to the desired pressure by an attached vacuum pump.

Figure 6: Schematic of modified hand sheet former

23
Pulp slurry at 0.5% consistency of the appropriate filler content was prepared by dispersing 40g
of fibre and filler into 1600mL of 80°C distilled water. The slurry was mixed for 7.5min at
3000rpm and then diluted to 0.5% consistency with additional distilled water. The slurry was
refrigerated until use, at which point it was continuously stirred by a laboratory mixer at 250rpm
throughout the experiment. This provides a uniformly dispersed mixture with a sampling error of
less than 1%. The sampling error was determined by filtering different samples of the slurry
through 0.5μm filter paper and measuring the variation in mat weight. To form a hand sheet,
distilled water is added to the apparatus between the (closed) valve and the forming fabric. A
60g sample of pulp slurry is measured and the required retention aids added. The sample is
transferred into the top cylinder above the forming fabric. A Labview program is used to start the
experiment by opening the solenoid valve, exposing the test chamber and pulp suspension to
the vacuum pressure. The water in the test chamber drains into the vacuum chamber and a
fibre mat is formed on the forming fabric. During dewatering the instantaneous water height
above, and the pressure drop across, the forming fabric and fibre mat are recorded. The voltage
signals from these sensors are filtered using a low pass filter and written to a file for later
analysis. Upon test completion the solenoid valve closes automatically. The fibre mat is
removed and oven dried before being weighed.

Hand sheets were formed with and without chemical retention aids from pulp suspensions with
filler loadings of 20% or 40%. The pulp used was a softwood, hydrogen peroxide bleached,
thermo-mechanical pulp (latency removed, 30% fines) at 0.5% consistency. The filler was
Albacar HO (Specialty Minerals Inc.); a scalenohedral precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC)
with a manufacturer’s listed median particle size of 1.3μm. The chemical retention aids used
were cationic polyacrylamide (cPAM) at 0.35kg per ton of pulp and silica at 0.5kg per ton of
pulp. The hand sheets were formed on three forming fabrics (listed as 1-3 in Table 1) provided
by Asten Johnson (Kanata, Canada). By varying the system parameters described above, as
well as the pressure in the vacuum chamber, it was possible to determine the effect of suction
pressure, presence of retention aids and forming fabric selection on the overall retention during
sheet forming with pulp suspensions of 20% and 40% PCC, representing low and high filler
content, respectively.

24
Table 1: Forming fabric details

Average Paper
Side Frame Size
Opening, mm % Open Area

Paper Infinitely
Fabric # Side Air Perm., Finite Small Paper Caliper, Drainage
No. Layers Weave cfm (m3/s) Yarn Yarn Side Total FSI' mm Index
1 3 Plain 373 (0.176) 0.149 0.273 30 4.2 209 0.734 39.9
2 3 Plain 392 (0.185) 0.168 0.336 25 3.6 170 0.940 34.2
3 3 Plain 513 (0.242) 0.29 0.531 30.8 4.8 108 1.422 22.5
4 3 Plain 428 (0.202) 0.198 0.346 33.2 5.2 165 0.864 39.6
5 3 Plain 366 (0.173) 0.202 0.357 32.6 4.1 160 0.965 32.2
6P 1 1, 4 825 (0.389) 0.389 0.839 38.4 38.4 46 0.965 25.9
Broken
6M 1 Twill 825 (0.389) 0.389 0.839 38.4 38.4 49 0.965 25.9

After results were obtained from the above tests, a number of other hand sheets were formed
using additional fabrics with more widely varying characteristics in order to correlate fabric
characteristics and retention (Section 2.3.2). Further tests were also performed to determine the
permeability of the forming fabric and fibre mat using 40% PCC pulp suspension and no
chemical retention aids to provide insight into a possible reason for the differences in retention
performance (Section 2.3.3).

2.3 Results and Discussion

2.3.1 Overall Retention

Figure 7 shows a typical experimental result. In this figure the pressure drops continuously until
the pulp slurry is completely drained through the forming fabric. At this point the pressure rises
to a constant value as air is continuously pulled through the fabric and fibre mat into the vacuum
chamber. The pulp slurry height drops monotonically. The error bars used in the figure
represent the standard deviation of the results and are indicative of the high degree of
repeatability of the measurements. The standard deviation of the measurements is greater than
the accuracy of the pressure transducer and ultrasonic level sensor. The results for the overall
retention experiments are shown in Figure 8 (20% filler) and Figure 9 (40% filler). The three
data points for each symbol correspond with three different vacuum chamber settings from 0 to -
50kPa. The x-coordinate of each point is the maximum vacuum reading of the pressure
transducer during sheet forming. Despite using consistent vacuum chamber settings for each
forming fabric, the maximum pressure transducer reading varies from symbol to symbol owing

25
to the varying drainage resistance of each fabric and pulp mat. Each point plotted is the average
of five tests performed under identical conditions. The error bars show the standard error of the
results.

0.09 1
0.08 0
0.07 -1

Pressure (kPa, gauge)

0.06 Water -2
Distance (m)

Air Pulled Through

0.05 Drainage -3
0.04 -4
0.03 -5
0.02 -6
0.01 -7
0 -8
-0.01 -9
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Time (s)

Distance Sensor Pressure Transducer

Figure 7: Typical experimental data. The error bars represent the standard deviation measured
over multiple trials. The pressure transducer accuracy is ±100Pa and the ultrasonic distance
sensor accuracy is ±50µm.

80

75

70

Fabric No. 1, Without Retention Aids

Overall Retention (%)

65
Fabric No. 1, With Retention Aids
60 Fabric No. 2, Without Retention Aids

55 Fabric No. 2, With Retention Aids

Fabric No. 3, Without Retention Aids
50
Fabric No. 3, With Retention Aids
45

40
-20.0 -17.5 -15.0 -12.5 -10.0 -7.5 -5.0 -2.5 0.0
Suction (kPa)

Figure 8: Overall retention versus suction pressure at 20% filler loading

26
 80

75

70

Fabric No. 1, Without Retention Aids

Overall Retention (%)

65
Fabric No. 1, With Retention Aids
60 Fabric No. 2, Without Retention Aids

55 Fabric No. 2, With Retention Aids

Fabric No. 3, Without Retention Aids
50
Fabric No. 3, With Retention Aids
45

40
-20.0 -17.5 -15.0 -12.5 -10.0 -7.5 -5.0 -2.5 0.0
Suction (kPa)

Figure 9: Overall retention versus suction pressure at 40% filler loading

A straight line adequately represents the trend of the overall retention versus suction data in
Figure 8 and Figure 9. The graphs clearly show that overall retention has a small dependence
on applied suction. All of the lines in the graph have a positive slope showing that retention is
reduced with increasing suction pressure. Statistical analysis of the uncertainty of the slope
shows that the slope of all data sets is positive within a 95% confidence interval. A possible
explanation is increased drag during the vacuum drainage. The higher pressure difference
causes faster drainage resulting in more drag on particles in the slurry, which can pull
embedded fines and filler from the fibre mat. The greater forces might also break flocs and
agglomerates, which play a role in increasing retention.

In each of Figure 8 and Figure 9 there are two data sets represented for each forming fabric;
one without and one with chemical retention aids. This comprises four sub-groupings of data in
which a comparison of effect of the forming fabric on overall retention is possible. The tests
performed using 20% filler (Figure 8) both with and without chemical retention aids show that
there is little difference between the performance of fabrics 1 and 2 but a striking difference
between those two and fabric 3. In the tests with 40% filler pulp suspension (Figure 9) there is a
distinct separation between performance of all three forming fabrics. The distinct (statistically
significant) separations of the overall retention versus suction pressure lines indicate that the
forming fabric affects the overall retention results even with the 40-50g/m2 basis weight of
sheets formed in these tests.

27
Of all the factors that were varied in producing the twelve lines, the presence of retention aids
had the greatest effect on overall retention. The addition of retention aids narrowed the
performance gap (spacing between the lines) between the forming fabrics as well as
significantly increased the overall retention of each fabric. This is consistent with predictions that
the dominant method of filler/fines retention is through chemical interactions with fibres and
chemical retention aids [19,20].

Comparing the differences in results between Figure 8 and Figure 9 allows for a comparison of
the effect of increasing the filler content. It can be seen that a higher filler loading results in
lower overall retention. This is because filler particles have a lower retention than pulp fibres.
Increasing the filler loading from 20% to 40% also increases the significance of the forming
fabric selection as evidenced by the wider spacing between the overall retention versus suction
pressure lines in Figure 9. This effect is somewhat damped when retention aids are used
because chemical retention aids increase the level of filler retention to only slightly below that of
fibre retention.

2.3.2 Overall Retention versus Fabric Properties

Figures 8 and 9 show that the forming geometry has an impact on the overall retention results.
Knowing this, it would be beneficial to determine a simple correlation between the retention
results and fabric geometric properties. In order to obtain meaningful correlations it was
necessary to form hand sheets using forming fabrics (listed as 4-6 in Table 1) additional to
those used in the previous experiments. Tests were performed using pulp suspensions
containing both 20% and 40% filler with gravity drainage, with or without chemical retention
aids.

In the past, forming fabrics have been characterized by many different properties including air
permeability, caliper, drainage index, fibre support index (FSI), and more. The various
properties investigated for a correlation with the overall retention are listed for each fabric in
Table 1. For the single layer fabric (fabric 6), properties for the paper side are indicated by ‘P’,
and those for the machine side are indicated by ‘M’. The average frame size opening was
calculated rather than using the typical manufacturer’s reported frame size (MD frame size)
because the fibre orientation in the x,y-plane during hand sheet forming is random. FSI’ was
derived by the same method as FSI as described by Beran [41] but using a fibre angle
distribution of 1/π, corresponding to randomly distributed fibres in the x,y-plane.

28
The correlation coefficients for each fabric property tested against the overall retention are
shown in Table 2 for the four data sets tested both with and without including the single layer
fabric (fabric 6). The fabric property that showed the best correlation with overall retention
results was the fabric air permeability. This trend can be seen in Figure 10 for fabrics 1 to 5 as
well as an additional single layer forming fabric (fabric 6). The error bars show the standard
error. This single layer fabric was tested after the correlation was found between the first five
fabrics, to determine if the air permeability trend extended beyond the scope of triple layer
forming fabrics. Table 2 shows correlation coefficients for fabrics 1-5 and for fabrics 1-6 to
determine the validity of the relations tested both when the single layer fabric is excluded or
included. The good correlation is seen even with the single layer forming fabric, which has
significantly higher air permeability (825cfm (0.389m3/s)) than the triple layer fabrics. This trend
is seen for all test groupings performed; 20% or 40% PCC pulp suspension, and with or without
chemical retention aids. This trend would indicate that the most important factor in determining
the retention results of a forming fabric is the air permeability. The correlation with fabric air
permeability is not perfect, however, and the deviations may be due to a contribution from the
fabric shape characteristics such as weave pattern and frame size. The air permeability of a
forming fabric is identical whether the flow is from paper side to machine side or vice versa.
Therefore, by performing retention tests with mat formation first on one side, and then on the
other side, of the fabric, one gains some insight into the impact of weave pattern on retention.

Table 2: Overall retention versus fabric property correlation coefficients

Average Paper Side
Frame Size Opening % Open Area

Fabric Air Finite Infinitely Paper Drainage

Property Data Set Perm. Yarn Small Yarn Side Total FSI' Caliper Index
40%PCC, no RA's 0.8822 0.5799 0.6911 0.0374 0.1358 0.6195 0.6712 0.4764
Correlation 40%PCC, yes RA's 0.8033 0.6618 0.5653 0.2766 0.7904 0.4984 0.4275 0.2188
Coefficient 20%PCC, no RA's 0.8853 0.8608 0.8022 0.1587 0.4755 0.6634 0.7064 0.5182
Fabrics 1-5
20%PCC, yes RA's 0.7807 0.6129 0.5176 0.2786 0.8179 0.4526 0.3814 0.1799
Average 0.8379 0.6789 0.6441 0.1878 0.5549 0.5585 0.5466 0.3483
40%PCC, no RA's 0.9651 0.9075 0.9443 0.5241 0.8549 0.9083 0.0690 0.5191
Correlation 40%PCC, yes RA's 0.8161 0.8603 0.8039 0.6970 0.6519 0.8083 0.1295 0.4508
Coefficient 20%PCC, no RA's 0.9892 0.9352 0.9733 0.7368 0.9579 0.8474 0.0201 0.4470
Fabrics 1-6
20%PCC, yes RA's 0.9585 0.9144 0.9443 0.7652 0.8804 0.8719 0.0303 0.4024
Average 0.9322 0.9044 0.9165 0.6808 0.8363 0.8590 0.0622 0.4548

29
 80
M
75 P
P
M
70

65 M
P

60 Triple Layer Fabrics

Retention (%)

Single
55
Layer
Fabric
50

45
M
P
40
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850
Air Perm (cfm)
40% PCC, Without Retenion Aids 40% PCC, With Retention Aids
20% PCC, Without Retenion Aids 20% PCC, With Retenion Aids

Figure 10: Overall retention versus air permeability

In Figure 10 the results for the single layer fabric with mat formation on the paper side are
indicated by ‘P’, and those with mat formation on the machine side are indicated by ‘M’. In no
case is there a statistically significant difference in the retention between paper side and
machine side mat formation. Hand sheets were also formed on the machine side of triple layer
fabrics which have even larger differences in weave pattern and shape geometry. Only very
small variations in retention results were found between forming on the machine side or paper
side of a triple layer fabric. These findings suggest that weave pattern plays at most a minor role
on retention. Because fibres are randomly oriented in the apparatus, but would be more aligned
with the machine direction in a real paper machine, it is possible that weave pattern plays a
more salient role in paper machine retention.

2.3.3 Permeability Measurements

The apparatus shown in Figure 6 may also be used to measure the permeability, K. The
permeability, K, is defined as the superficial velocity, V, through fabric and fibre mat divided by
the pressure drop, ΔP, across the forming fabric and fibre mat.

V − dh
K= = dt
ΔP ΔP

30
First, pure water (no fibres) was tested in the apparatus, and the permeability of the fabric alone
was measured. The measured permeability was within 10% of that extrapolated from
measurements in a conventional fabric air permeability measuring device, which lends credence
to the use of the apparatus for measurement of permeability.

To shed light on the reason for the difference in overall retention for different fabric selections
(which can be correlated to fabric air permeability), hand sheets were formed using a pulp
suspension containing 40% PCC under both gravity and high vacuum drainage. The sensor
data of water column height, h(t), was fitted with a curve and then the derivative taken to allow
for the calculation of instantaneous permeability for each fabric during the sheet forming
process. The results for permeability versus the drainage ratio of pulp suspension for fabrics 1-3
can be seen in Figure 11 for gravity drainage and Figure 12 for vacuum drainage. The drainage
ratio is defined by: drainage ratio = (hi-h(t))/(hi-hf), where hi is the initial slurry column height, and
hf is the final height of formed pulp mat.

0.20
Permeability (m 3/N s) x 1000

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Drainage Ratio = (hi-h(t))/(hi-hf)
Fabric No. 1, Gravity, 40% PCC Fabric No. 2, Gravity, 40% PCC Fabric No. 3, Gravity, 40% PCC

Figure 11: Permeability versus drainage ratio (gravity drainage)

31
 0.20
Permeability (m 3/N s) x 1000

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Drainage Ratio = (hi -h(t))/(hi -hf)
Fabric No. 1, Vacuum, 40% PCC Fabric No. 2, Vacuum, 40% PCC Fabric No. 3, Vacuum, 40% PCC

Figure 12: Permeability versus drainage ratio (vacuum drainage)

In both Figure 11 and Figure 12 there is a distinct difference in the permeability of the forming
fabrics and fibre mats which is indicative of different levels of retention, especially of fines and
filler. All of the fabrics tend to approximately the same permeability at the end of the sheet
forming process, with slight differences due to variations in final basis weights. This observation
shows that the permeability of the fabric and fibre mat is dominated by the fibre mat once a
significant layer of fibres has been built up. This finding is consistent with previous experiments
[42,43]. The permeability at the beginning of the experiments shows a much larger difference
between the forming fabrics. This difference early in the forming process may be the cause of
differences in overall retention. Until some fibre mat is built up, the exposed openings in the
forming fabric surface are large enough to allow passage of fines, filler and poorly oriented
fibres. As the pulp slurry drains, deposited fibres cover openings in the forming fabric and
reduce the permeability of the forming fabric and fibre mat combination; increasing the
instantaneous retention. Forming fabrics that have a higher initial permeability will have a lower
initial retention and will retain less material throughout the process, particularly in the early
stages of fibre mat build-up.

2.4 Conclusions
A modified hand sheet former was constructed to allow for comparison of overall retention
results for hand sheet forming under an applied vacuum for different forming conditions. The
variables tested were different forming fabrics, filler loadings, suction pressure and the presence
of chemical retention aids. The presence of chemical retention aids was found to be the most

32
significant factor affecting the overall retention. It was found that the overall retention shows a
small dependence on applied suction pressure: an increase in suction pressure decreases the
overall retention. The forming fabric selection was shown to have a statistically significant effect
on the overall retention results even with basis weights of 40-50g/m2. Increasing the filler
loading in the initial pulp suspension increases the performance gap between forming fabrics
and makes the fabric selection more significant in determining the overall retention. Further
tests showed that the overall retention results under gravity drainage conditions showed good
correlation with forming fabric air permeability values. Measurement of the instantaneous
permeability of the forming fabrics and fibre mats during forming showed that the fabric
properties are important in determining permeability in the initial forming stages but become less
significant as a heavier fibre mat is formed. This initial difference in permeability may explain the
difference in overall retention between fabrics.

33
2.5 References
[1] Räisänen, K., “High-vacuum dewatering on a paper machine wire section – a literature
review”, Paperi Ja Puu 78(3): 113-120 (1996).
[2] Räisänen, K. et al., “Vacuum dewatering optimization with different furnishes”, Paperi Ja Puu
78(8): 461-467 (1996).
[3] Neun, J.A., “High-vacuum dewatering of newsprint”, Tappi J. 79(9): 153-157 (1996).
[4] Räisänen, K. et al., “The effects of retention aids, drainage conditions, and pretreatment of
slurry on high-vacuum dewatering: a laboratory study”, Tappi J. 78(4): 140-147 (1995).
[5] Neun, J.A., “Performance of high vacuum dewatering elements in the forming section”, Tappi
J. 77(9): 133-138 (1994).
[6] Britt, K.W., and Unbehend, J.E., “Water removal during sheet formation”, Tappi 63(4): 67-70
(1980).
[7] Atwood, B.W., “A study of vacuum box operation”, Paper Technology 3(5): 446-456 (1962).
[8] Nordman, L., “Laboratory Investigation of Water Removal by a Dynamic Suction Box”, Tappi
37(11): 553-560 (1954).
[9] Mitchell, C. and Johnston, R., “Modelling Water Removal from wet fibre mats”, Appita J.
56(6): 433-437 (2003). [A]
[10] Aslund, P. and Vomhoff, H., “Dewatering mechanisms and their influence on suction box
dewatering”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 23(4): 389-397 (2008).
[11] Aslund, P. and Vomhoff, H., “Method for studying the deformation of a fibre web during a
suction”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 23(4): 398-402 (2008).
[12] Aslund, P. et al., “The deformation of chemical and mechanical pulp webs during suction
box dewatering”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 23(4): 403-408 (2008).
[13] Aslund, P. et al., “External rewetting after suction box dewatering”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res.
J. 23(4): 409-414 (2008).
[14] Aslund, P. and Vomhoff, H., “Web deformation during web membrane-assisted dewatering”,
Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 23(4): 415-419 (2008).
[15] Willets, W.R., “Factors Affecting Retention”, Pap. Trade J. 101(13): 81-86 (1935).
[16] Helle, I.T., “The influence of wire structure on sheet forming”, Pap. Technol. Ind. 21(4): 123-
124, 126-131 (1980).
[17] Yan, Z. and Deng, Y., “Cationic microparticle based flocculation and retention systems”,
Chem. Eng. J. 80: 31-36 (2000).
[18] Bown, R., “Particle size, shape and structure of paper fillers and their effect on paper
properties”, Paper Technology 39(2): 44-48 (1998).
[19] Solberg, D. And Wagberg, L., “On the mechanism of GCC filler retention during dewatering
– New techniques and initial findings”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(6): 183-188 (2002).

34
[20] Hubbe, M.A., “How do retention aids work?”, 1988 Papermakers Conference: 389-398
(1988).
[21] Griggs, W.H., “Use of fillers in papermaking”, Tappi J. 71(4): 77-81 (1988).
[22] Singh, R. et al., B., “Permeability of pulp fibre mats with filler particles”, Colloids Surf. A
Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 333: 96-107 (2009).
[23] Liimatainen, H. et al., “Effect of PCC filler on dewatering of fiber suspensions”, Tappi J.
5(11): 11-16 (2006).
[24] Dong, C. et al., “Energy Saving in Papermaking through Filler Addition”, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 47: 8430-8435 (2008).
[25] Šutý, Š. and Lužáková, V., “Role of surface charge in deposition of filler particles onto pulp
fibres”, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 139: 271-278 (1998).
[26] Alince, B. and Bednar, F., “Role of Cationic Polyacrylamide in Fiber-CaCO3 Pigment
Interactions”, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 88(10):2409-2415 (2003).
[27] Vanerek, A. et al., “Interactions of Calcium Carbonate Fillers with Pulp Fibres: Effect of
Surface Charge and Cationic Polyelectrolytes”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 26(9): 317-322 (2000).
[28] Zhang, H. et al., “Characteristics of dissolved and colloidal substances in high yield pulp
and their impact on filler retention”, Appita J. 60(5): 390-395 (2007).
[29] Cadotte, M. et al., “Effects of various retention aids on fiber flocculation, filler retention and
drainage”, PAPTAC 91st Annual Meeting: A31-A37 (2005).
[30] Modgi, S.B. et al., “Retention of Calcium Carbonate in Mechanical Pulps with
PEO/Cofactor/Coagulant and the Role of Hydrogen Bonding Interactions”, J. Pulp Paper
Sci. 30(11): 293-298 (2004).
[31] Yan, Z. and Deng, Y., “Cationic microparticle based flocculation and retention systems”,
Chem. Eng. J. 80: 31-36 (2000).
[32] Nelson, J.A., “Retention aid performance Effects of process variables”, Tappi 61(11): 108-
110 (1978).
[33] Unbehend, J.E., “Mechanisms of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ floc formation in dynamic retention
measurement”, Tappi 59(10): 74-77 (1976).
[34] Britt, K.W. and Unbehend, J.E., “New methods for monitoring retention”, Tappi 59(10): 67-
70 (1976).
[35] Britt, K.W., “Mechanisms of Retention During Sheet Formation” Tappi 56(10): 46-50 (1973).
[36] Raymond, A. and Sain, M., “Mechanism of fibre ma formation with inorganic-filled
mechanical pulp suspensions in papermaking”, Appita J. 56(5): 376-384.
[37] Arno, J.N. et al., “Zeta potential and it’s application to filler retention”, Tappi 57(12): 97-100
(1974).

35
[38] Alince, B. et al.., “Clay Particle Deposition in a Fibre Web: An Alternative Way of Filling
Paper?”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(9): 315-321 (2002).
[39] Al-Jabari, M. et al., “Experimental Study of Deposition of Clay Particles in Packed Beds of
Pulp Fibres”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 20(10): 289-295 (1994).
[40] Alince, B., and Lepoutre, P., “Interaction of cationic clay particles with pulp fibres”, Tappi J.
66(1): 92-95 (1983).
[41] Beran, R.L., “The evaluation and selection of forming fabrics Theory and applications”,
Tappi 62(4): 39-44 (1979).
[42] Duplantis, W.E. and Green, S.I., “Measurements of Fibre Mat Permeability with a New
Device”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(7): 240-244 (2002).
[43] Jong, J.H. et al., “Experimental Characteristics of Forming Fabrics and Fibre Mats”, J. Pulp
Paper Sci. 25(3): 95-99 (1999).

36
3 Chapter 3 - Filler Removal and Migration due to Applied Suction in
Hand Sheet Forming2

3.1 Introduction
During paper forming the sheet constituents are not uniformly deposited throughout the z-
direction. This two-sidedness leads to variations in paper properties that can negatively affect
ink receptivity, surface strength and roughness, dusting, brightness, bending stiffness, etc. [1-3].
Though two-sidedness also refers to changes in sheet density and formation through the z-
direction, the main reason for this heterogeneity of paper properties is the distribution of fines
and filler material in the z-direction. It has been shown that the filler distribution in a sheet is also
related to the total filler retention [4], which indirectly relates filler distribution to sheet properties
that are typically associated with overall filler content – opacity, printing quality, drainage,
retention, cost [5-8] – and further emphasizes the importance of filler distribution. The
mechanisms by which the fibre mat acts to retain filler particles are electrostatic attraction
(deposition), filtration, sedimentation, and flocculation. It has been reported that the primary
mechanism for filler retention is deposition (or attachment) by chemical interaction (i.e., van der
Waals electrostatic forces), and that the other mechanisms are of secondary importance [9,10].

The primary method for controlling filler distribution is the choice of paper machine. Each
machine type has a filler distribution that is associated with the types of forming conditions
produced in the pulp suspension. Formation of a standard hand sheet results in low filler
concentration on the top side, increasing to a peak between the center and the wire side, and
finally a slight decrease towards the wire side [2-4]. Formation on a Fourdrinier machine results
in a non-symmetrical distribution with a trend of increasing concentration from wire side to top
side [1,3,11,12]. The difference between the distribution in a hand sheet and paper formed on a
Fourdrinier machine is due to pressure pulses and backwash from machine forming elements
disturbing the wire side mat and removing filler particles [1]. On hybrid formers there is a
reduction in top side filler content from that of a Fourdrinier machine. This is caused by the
fraction (approximately 30-45%) of the dewatering that happens through the top of the sheet,
resulting in a more symmetrical filler concentration profile with a peak near the center of the

2
A version of this chapter will be submitted for publication. Montgomery, J., Green, S.I., Vaberek, A., and
Jong, J., (2010) Filler Removal and Migration due to Applied Suction in Hand Sheet Forming.

37
sheet [3,12,13]. Twin-wire forming is characterized by a symmetrical filler distribution, the shape
of which depends on the applied drainage elements and furnish used [3,12].

Early investigations on hand sheet and Fourdrinier forming determined that the filler distribution
in the final sheet was dependent on basis weight, dandy rolls and the forming type [1,2]. These
same studies found that the suspension consistency did not affect the distribution if it was
maintained within practical papermaking limits. Large changes in consistency, however, were
found to change the filler profile. Tests to determine the effects of suction and pressing on filler
distribution during hand sheet [1,4] and Fourdrinier [2] forming found that there was none. From
these observations it was concluded that the filler profile is fixed (at the dry line) on the paper
machine.

The bulk of more recent work regarding filler distribution has focused on layering principles
[3,11-17]. A multilayer headbox is used with a gap former to allow for separation and layering of
pulp furnish, fillers, and additives to control distribution throughout the sheet. The main outcome
of these studies was to show that the filler distribution can be controlled by layering retention
aids [12-15]. The use of loadable drainage elements was also tested and showed that filler
distribution could be changed by increasing the dewatering through blade elements [11,13,15],
suction rolls [11] and suction shoes [12,13]. These studies stated that the type of change in filler
distribution was dependent on furnish and showed inconsistent findings with relation to
increased dewatering and the changes in profile as well as total filler content.

A detailed study into the effect of wet pressing on filler distribution was conducted by Szikla and
Paulapuro [18]. They found that under normal pressing conditions the filler will exit with water
but not change the distribution. Conclusions drawn from pressing results highlighted a number
of factors that affect filler distribution; flow velocity, filler content, particle size, and pulp furnish.

A number of studies have focused on passing a suspension of filler through a pre-formed pulp
mat [19-21], to determine the viability for filling mass-produced paper [22]. These studies show
that migration of filler particles through a fibre network is possible but did not investigate the
degree of migration or how the migration occurs.

The previous studies investigating applied suction on filler particles did not occur under tightly
controlled conditions and inconsistent results were obtained. There has also been no work to
investigate the migration of filler particles within a sheet and to determine the relative effects of
suction on filler content. In section 2 we describe a modified hand sheet former that allows for
the testing of the effects of applied suction (wet and dry), filler type, and suspension consistency

38
on filler distribution in a hand sheet. Section 3 presents results related to filler distribution and
the migration of filler particles within a sheet. The paper closes with conclusions and
recommendations for future work.

3.2 Apparatus, Materials and Method

All hand sheets were formed in a custom device that has some similarities to a standard hand
sheet former. Figure 13 shows a schematic of the apparatus. The apparatus is constructed of a
3” (75mm) diameter, 6” (150mm) high, clear acrylic circular cylinder below a forming fabric. A
flush-mounted gauge pressure transducer (GP:50 Model 218-C-SZ-10-GS) is mounted in the
wall of the test chamber below the forming fabric. As described below, the pulp slurry above the
forming fabric is exposed to the atmosphere, so the pressure transducer measures the pressure
drop across the forming fabric and fibre mat. Another circular cylinder is attached above the
forming fabric and a gasket is placed around the outside to provide an airtight seal. A vacuum
chamber constructed of ½” (13mm) thick PVC sheets is connected to the bottom of the test
chamber by a ¾” (20mm) PVC pipe and electrically actuated solenoid valve. The vacuum
chamber can be adjusted to the desired pressure by an attached vacuum pump.

Figure 13: Schematic of modified hand sheet former

Pulp slurry at 0.5% consistency with the appropriate filler type was prepared by dispersing 40g
of fibre and filler into 1600mL of 80°C distilled water. The slurry was mixed for 7.5min at
3000rpm and then diluted to 0.5% consistency with additional distilled water. The slurry was
refrigerated until use, at which point it was continuously stirred by a laboratory mixer at 250rpm

39
throughout the experiment. To determine the error associated with sampling from this stirred
slurry, multiple equal-volume samples were taken from the slurry. The different samples were
then filtered through 0.5μm filter paper and the variation in dried mat weight was measured. This
procedure was measured to provide a uniformly dispersed mixture with a sampling variation of
less than 1%.

To form a hand sheet, distilled water is added to the apparatus between the (closed) valve and
the forming fabric. A sample of pulp slurry is measured and transferred into the top cylinder
above the forming fabric. The quantity of pulp suspension is varied depending on the forming
conditions to provide a final sheet basis weight of 60g/m2. A Labview program is used to start
the experiment by opening the solenoid valve, exposing the test chamber and pulp suspension
to the vacuum pressure. The water in the test chamber drains into the vacuum chamber and a
fibre mat is formed on the forming fabric. During dewatering the pressure drop across the
forming fabric and fibre mat is recorded. The voltage signal is filtered using a low pass filter and
written to a file for later analysis. Upon test completion the solenoid valve closes automatically.
The fibre mat is removed and oven dried.

Hand sheets were formed using pulp suspensions containing 40% filler. The pulp used was a
softwood, hydrogen peroxide bleached, thermo-mechanical pulp (post latency removal, 30%
fines) at 0.5% consistency. Two filler types were tested. The first filler was Albacar HO
(Specialty Minerals Inc.) dispersed in distilled water; a cationic (+0.1μeq/g), scalenohedral
precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC, CaCO3) with a volume-weighted mean particle size of
5.4µm. The second filler used was anionic (-1.7μeq/g) ground clay (Al2Si2O5(OH)6), a platelet
shaped filler, with a volume-weighted mean particle size of 10.8µm. Particle sizes and
distributions were determined using a Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern Instruments Ltd.). Though the
two filler types have different particle sizes they are both smaller than typical mat pore sizes and
so filler size is unlikely to play a large role in retention results [23]. The hand sheets were all
formed on the same triple layer forming fabric provided by AstenJohnson (Kanata, Canada).
Hand sheets were formed with one or both filler types under gravity drainage, vacuum drainage,
and gravity drainage with a subsequent vacuum pulse applied to draw air through the wet fibre
mat. A limited number of tests were performed using chemical retention aids using the pulp
suspension containing PCC filler. With these sheets it was possible to determine the effect of
applied suction pressure on the z-direction filler distribution and migration for two filler types in a
hand sheet.

Hand sheets that were used to test both filler types simultaneously were formed in two parts.
The lower half of the sheet was formed first as described above. The forming fabric and
adhering wet pulp mat is removed from the apparatus and the lower chamber refilled with
distilled water. The fabric and mat are replaced in the test chamber and the upper portion
secured. A 14 mesh screen is then placed on top of the pulp mat to prevent motion of the pulp

40
fibres when the top pulp suspension was added. The suspension for the upper portion of the
sheet is added without disturbing the lower pulp mat. The solenoid valve is re-activated to drain
the top portion of the suspension. The pulp mat is removed from the apparatus, split into the
upper and lower portions, and oven dried. The mass of pulp suspension used for the upper and
lower portions of the sheet is calibrated to provide a final basis weight of 30g/m2 in each half.

Z-direction filler distribution was determined by two methods. Both methods first split the dried
sheet into multiple layers of approximately equal weight using adhesive tape. For the sheets
formed using only one filler the layers of sheets were weighed, ashed and the remaining mineral
content weighed to provide the percent filler in each sheet layer [20]. The ashing method was
not appropriate for sheets with two filler types and so energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) was used
to determine the amount of mineral in each layer. The EDX analysis method used was a
modification of that introduced by Modgi et al. [25,26] that analyses the surface of split sheet
layers rather than the cross section of a cut sheet. The PCC is represented in EDX results by
weight percent calcium (Ca) and the clay by aluminum and silicon (Al and Si) because these are
elements unique to the filler particles. Note that because each filler is comprised of more
elements than simply Ca or Al and Si, the absolute magnitude of filler weight percentages
computed in this way is too low, but the relative weight percentages in the Z-direction are not
affected by this bias. The actually filler content is determined by stoichiometric conversion.

3.3 Results and Discussion

3.3.1 Z-Directional Filler Distribution

Z-direction filler profiles for 60g/m2 hand sheets formed using pulp suspension containing 40%
PCC filler are shown in Figure 14. The curves represent drainage under gravity and vacuum
(vacuum chamber set to -50kPa). The profiles were determined by sheet splitting and ashing.
Each step in the graph is the average ash content achieved by ashing from five different hand
sheets. A comparison of the average filler content of the sheets clearly shows that applying a
vacuum during the drainage process reduces the amount of filler retained. This finding is
consistent with our previous study of retention [27]. It is evident from the filler distribution curves
that the applied vacuum also changes the filler distribution. The majority of this filler reduction
occurs on the wire side with the top side remaining essentially unchanged.

41
 30

25
Calcium Carbonate (wt %)

20

15

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WS Position in Z-direction (%) TS

Gravity Ave Gravity -50kPa Ave -50kPa

Figure 14: Distribution of PCC in hand sheets formed with pulp suspension containing 40%
cationic PCC filler under gravity and vacuum drainage determined by ashing

The effect of applied suction on filler distribution was also tested on hand sheets formed with
chemical retention aids. These results are not shown in any figures in this paper. Sheet splitting
and ashing showed a constant distribution of filler throughout the sheet and no change due to
applied suction. Tanaka [4] previously reported that an increase in chemical retention aids
beyond a certain limit would result in an even filler distribution throughout the sheet. The
absence of change in distribution when vacuum was applied during drainage with retention aids
could be explained by the increase in agglomerate size. The volume weighted mean PCC
particle size is 5.4µm without chemical retention aids and 18.1µm with chemical retention aids.
The increased size of filler agglomerate increases the probability of filtration retention. This
along with the increased electrostatic attraction due to the charge modification from the
retention aids could overcome the increased drag due to vacuum and result in markedly
decreased filler mobility.

Figure 15 shows z-direction filler profiles for 60g/m2 hand sheets formed using pulp suspension
containing 40% PCC filler. The curves represent drainage under gravity, gravity with a
subsequent vacuum pulse (dry vac), and gravity drainage with a greatly reduced consistency
(0.02%C). The profiles were determined by sheet splitting and ashing. Each step in the graph is

42
the average ash content achieved by ashing from five different hand sheets. The results for filler
distribution for gravity drainage with a subsequent vacuum pulse show no substantial change
from the distribution achieved with gravity drainage alone. This would imply that after the initial
gravity drainage the filler particles are fixed in the fibre mat.

30

25

20
PCC (wt %)

15

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WS Position in Z-direction (%) TS

Gravity Ave Gravity Dry Vac Pulse

Dry Vac Pulse Ave 0.02%C 0.02%C Ave

Figure 15: Distribution of PCC in hand sheets formed with pulp suspension containing 40%
cationic PCC filler under gravity drainage, gravity at 0.02%C and gravity with a subsequent dry
vacuum pulse determined by ashing

The shape of the filler distribution curve for gravity drainage found using the modified hand
sheet former and pulp suspension containing 40% PCC filler is different from that of the
standard hand sheet distribution. Previous researchers [1,4] have stated that the filler
distribution in a hand sheet is not affected by applying a vacuum during drainage, which is
contrary to the results found here. These differences may be due to the forming apparatus, the
large difference in consistency between the studies, or the different filler types used.

It has previously been concluded that large changes in consistency will change the filler
distribution in paper [2]. The filler distribution of hand sheets formed using a 0.02% consistency
in Figure 15 shows obvious variations from those formed with 0.5% consistency. The lower
consistency shows the ‘typical’ hand sheet filler distribution of an increase from top side to past
center with a subsequent decrease towards the wire side. The average filler content throughout

43
the sheet is also reduced. From these results it is clear that the consistency difference is one
reason for the different filler distributions realized in Figure 15 of this study (0.5%C) and
previous works (0.02%C) investigating filler distribution in hand sheets.

Ashing of hand sheets is a time intensive process that cannot distinguish between filler types.
Filler distribution can also be determined by sheet splitting and EDX analysis. Before performing
analysis on filler migration using EDX and sheets formed by the two suspensions (as described
in section 2) it was required to determine if any error was introduced due to the forming or
analysis method. Figure 16 compares filler profiles determined using EDX for gravity and
vacuum drainage from sheets formed as two 30g/m2 layers separated by a screen for cationic
PCC with those of the ashing methods used above. The EDX analysis provides the weight
percentage of elements only and therefore the CaCO3 content was determined by
stoichiometric conversion. The similarity in z-direction filler distribution between the two analysis
methods shows that the forming and analysis techniques do not introduce significant error and
are suitable for experimental comparison.

30

25

20
PCC (wt %)

15

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WS Position in Z-direction (%) TS

Gravity - Ashing Method Vacuum - Ashing Method

Gravity - EDX Method Vacuum - EDX Method

Figure 16: Comparison of PCC distribution in hand sheets determined using EDX and ashing
methods

44
The typical z-directional filler distribution from previous studies was obtained using clay as filler.
Clay filler is anionic whereas the PCC used in Figures 2, 3, and 4 is cationic. This charge
difference is likely to result in different total retention [28] and z-direction filler profiles. Figure 17
shows the z-direction filler distribution for hand sheets formed to 60g/m2 under both gravity and
vacuum drainage determined using EDX analysis. The error bars represent the standard error.
Hand sheets made of pulp suspensions containing cationic PCC show higher filler retention
than those containing anionic clay filler. The difference in filler content between PCC and clay is
caused by the different retention properties of the filler types. The filler distribution in hand
sheets formed with clay filler show the ‘typical’ trend of increasing filler from top side to past
centre with a subsequent decrease in filler content towards the wire side, which is different for
the filler trends in paper with PCC filler. This finding shows that the filler type used, specifically
its charge relative to pulp fibres, affects the z-direction filler distribution. Filler that has an
electrostatic repulsion to pulp fibres (clay) shows a decrease in concentration near the wire side
under gravity drainage. Filler that has an electrostatic attraction to pulp fibres (PCC) shows a
plateau at the wire side under gravity drainage. The two filler types also react differently to an
applied vacuum during drainage. The cationic PCC shows a reduction of filler on the wire side
when vacuum is applied. The anionic clay shows no change.

30.0

25.0

20.0
wt %

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WS Position z-direction (%)
PCC Gravity PCC Vacuum TS

Clay Gravity Clay Vacuum

Figure 17: PCC and clay distribution in hand sheets determined using EDX analysis

45
3.3.2 Z-Directional Filler Migration
It is desirable to understand the role that filler in the top layers of the pulp suspension plays in
filling the lower portion of the sheet and how this migration is affected by the application of a
vacuum during drainage. Figure 18 shows total PCC distribution in hand sheets as well as the
filler profiles in the sheet that are representative of filler from the upper and lower portion of the
pulp suspension. The total filler curves were determined by EDX analysis of a 60g/m2 sheet.
The distribution from the filler in the lower half of the pulp suspension was determine by forming
a 30g/m2 hand sheet. The distribution from PCC in the upper portion of the sheet was
determined by subtracting the filler content of the 30g/m2 sheet from the 60g/m2 sheet at each
location. The two curves for filler from the lower portion of the pulp suspension (triangle symbol)
show that very little filler is retained in the early stages of the forming process. Applying vacuum
during the early forming slightly reduces the filler content at the wire side. The filler from the
upper half of the pulp suspension (square symbol) shows an increase from top side to center
and then a subsequent decrease at the wire side. Retention of filler in the upper portion is far
greater than in the initial stages of forming. This is caused by the added resistance of the fibre
mat in the lower portion of the sheet. As the filler in the upper pulp suspension flows through the
pulp mat deposited in the early stages of forming by the lower portion of the suspension, some
of the filler particles are filtered, which greatly increases the retention. The total PCC distribution
(diamond symbol) shows the same differences in filler distribution for gravity and vacuum
drainage as described earlier.

46
 30

25

20
PCC (wt %)

15

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WS Position in Z-direction (%) TS

Total - Gravity Upper - Gravity Lower - Gravity

Total - Vacuum Upper - Vacuum Lower - Vacuum

Figure 18: PCC distribution in hand sheets divided into profiles from filler in upper and lower
portions of a pulp suspension

An understanding of how different filler types migrate in a hand sheet depending on where in the
pulp suspension they occur can be determined by forming a 60g/m2 hand sheet in two parts, as
described in section 2. The filler (clay and PCC) can be tested in both the upper and lower
portion of the hand sheet to determine if there are differences in the ways that different filler
types fill a hand sheet. It is also possible that an understanding of the reasons for different filler
profiles can be determined based on different retention and migration patterns illuminated from
forming sheets in this manner.

3.3.2.1 PCC in Lower Pulp Suspension, Clay in Upper Pulp Suspension 
The hand sheets were formed with a lower pulp suspension containing PCC filler and an upper
pulp suspension containing clay filler. Figure 19 shows the z-direction distributions of the total
filler, PCC, and clay for hand sheets formed using gravity and vacuum drainage. Each data
point is the average filler content determined from at least three locations (relative to the fabric
yarn pattern) on sheet splits from three hand sheets formed under identical conditions. The filler
content is determined by EDX analysis on sheet layers and stoichiometric conversion. The error
bars show the standard error of the results.

47
 16
TS
Clay
14
PCC
WS
12

10

8
wt %

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

WS Position in Z-direction (%) TS

Total Filler - Gravity Total Filler - Vacuum PCC - Gravity

PCC - Vacuum Clay - Gravity Clay - Vacuum

Figure 19: Breakdown of filler distribution in sheets formed with PCC pulp suspension on the
lower half and clay pulp suspension on the upper half

The total filler content (diamond symbols) in the sheets formed in this manner shows no change
in the trends seen when sheets are formed using only PCC filler. Under gravity drainage the
total filler content shows an increase from top side to wire side until a plateau is reached.
Applying a vacuum during drainage causes a reduction of the overall filler content. The majority
of the reduction occurs on the wire side of the sheet with little change in filler content in the top
half.

Analysis of the individual filler types provides information on the different characteristics of
retention for filler from the upper half and the lower half of the pulp suspension. The PCC
content (square symbols) from the lower suspension shows an increase from the middle of the
sheet to the wire side. The higher filler content in the lower layers suggests that as the pulp mat
forms it is filtering out filler from the suspension that passes through it and not only retaining
filler by attachment to fibres. It is speculated that the PCC content shows a reduction at the wire
side when vacuum is applied because of the increased flow rate. The increased flow rate is
highest at the wire side of the sheet because the wire side has the highest resistance [11] and
thus the lowest effective open area. The change in filler profile is a result of filler particles that
would remain attached to fibres during gravity dewatering being removed due to higher drag

48
forces in vacuum dewatering. The retention of clay (triangle symbols) in the upper portion of the
sheet is very low. There is a marked increase at the center of the sheet and then a decrease
towards the wire side. The poor retention in the upper portion of the sheet can be attributed to
the repulsive forces between the clay and pulp fibres. Clay particles are filtered as the upper
suspension drains through the fibre mat in the lower half, which causes the retention to
increase, except for very near the wire side. Applying a vacuum during drainage only slightly
reduces the clay content throughout the sheet. This reduction could be attributed to the
increased flow rate causing less retention by filtration. Figure 20 is a simplified diagram of the
different effects that an applied vacuum has on particles retained by attachment and filtration.

Figure 20: Effects of gravity (a) and vacuum (b) on filler retained by attachment and filtration

49
3.3.2.2 Clay in Lower Pulp Suspension, PCC in Upper Pulp Suspension 
Additional hand sheets were formed with a lower pulp suspension containing clay filler and an
upper pulp suspension containing PCC filler. Figure 21 shows the z-direction distribution of the
total filler, PCC, and clay formed using gravity and vacuum drainage. Each data point is the
average filler content determined from at least three locations (relative to the fabric yarn pattern)
on each of three different hand sheets formed under identical conditions using sheet splitting.
The filler content is determined by EDX analysis on sheet layers and stoichiometric conversion.
The error bars show the standard error of the results.

30
TS
PCC
25 Clay
WS

20
wt %

15

10

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
WS Position in Z-direction (%) TS

Total Filler - Gravity Total Filler - Vacuum PCC - Gravity

PCC - Vacuum Clay - Gravity Clay - Vacuum

Figure 21: Breakdown of filler distribution in sheets formed with clay pulp suspension on the
lower half and PCC pulp suspension on the upper half

The average total filler content (diamond symbols) in the sheets formed in this manner is
significantly higher than those formed with the pulp suspensions in reverse order. The reason
for this is the greater retention of PCC (square symbols) when in the upper suspension because
of the additive effects of attachment and filtration retention. Figure 21 shows that the total filler
distribution in the sheets is dominated by the PCC distribution. The total filler content of hand
sheets formed in this manner shows a smaller reduction when vacuum is applied during
drainage compared with hand sheets formed with PCC in the lower suspension and clay in the

50
upper suspension (Figure 19). This may also be due to the PCC having higher retention
properties when in the upper suspension due to increased filtration retention.

The filler distribution profiles for clay (triangle symbols) in Figure 21 show that there is very little
retention of clay particles. Since clay particles and pulp fibres are both anionic, the vast majority
of clay retention is from filtration, which is difficult to achieve in the early stages of sheet forming
because of the limited fibre mat. This observation is consistent with the increasing clay content
from the center of the sheet to the wire side. The layers of the fibre mat deposited first will have
more filler passing through them in suspension and a greater probability of filtering particles.
The low clay retention in the lower portion of the sheet prevents the profile of overall filler
content from reaching the plateau seen for gravity drainage with only PCC in Figure 17 and
gravity drainage with the reverse filler layering (Figure 19). This suggests that migration of filler
from the upper portion of the pulp suspension cannot compensate for poor initial filler retention
during the forming of the pulp mat at the wire side. When vacuum is applied during the forming
of the top layer of the sheet there is no discernible difference in the content or profile of clay;
clay particles that are already retained in the fibre mat by filtration are not susceptible to the
negative effects of increased flow rate due to the application of vacuum. The application of
vacuum also does not pull additional PCC from the upper layers when compared with gravity
drainage. This is further evidence that the application of vacuum at later stages in the forming
process cannot compensate for poor initial filler retention on the wire side. These findings show
that it is important to ensure high initial filler retention for high wire side filler content in paper
manufacturing.

3.3.2.3 Influence of Upper Suspension Filler 
A comparison of clay in Figure 19 and PCC in Figure 21 provides information of the retention of
the filler particles in the top portion of a pulp suspension during drainage. Both the PCC and
clay exhibit filler distributions similar to that shown from standard hand sheet forming. The filler
content increases from the top side towards the wire side, peaking after the center and slightly
decreasing towards the wire side. There is considerably higher retention of both filler types
when the filler is in the upper portion of the pulp suspension. Applied vacuum during drainage
has only a small effect on the retention. These observations can both be explained by the
filtration retention of particles in the upper suspension. Clay particles are only retained by
filtration in the pulp mat and PCC particles are retained by both filtration and attachment. This
would imply that filler retained by filtration is not affected by applied vacuum to the same extent
as filler retained by attachment.

51
3.3.2.4 Influence of Lower Suspension Filler 
A comparison of PCC in Figure 19 and clay in Figure 21 provides information of the retention of
the filler particles in the bottom portion of a pulp suspension during drainage. Both fillers have a
lower retention than when used in the upper suspension. This is because of the low probability
of filtration retention in the early stages of sheet forming. It is interesting to note that the PCC in
the lower portion of the sheet exhibits a dip in retention at the wire side when vacuum is applied
but clay retention remains unchanged. The clay retention is also significantly lower than the
PCC retention or clay retention in the upper suspension. The cause of both the low retention
and the negligible reduction when vacuum is applied is that clay particles are retained almost
exclusively by filtration. PCC is retained by filtration and attachment to pulp fibres. This finding is
further evidence that filtration retention has only a small dependence on applied vacuum.

3.4 Conclusions
A modified hand sheet former was used to compare the affects of applied vacuum on filler
distribution and migration in sheet forming at approximately headbox consistency (0.5%). The
variables tested were vacuum pressure, filler type, consistency, and retention aids. Hand sheets
formed with cationic PCC filler showed a different filler profile than those formed using clay filler.
At the wire side of a sheet, PCC shows a plateau at maximum filler loading whereas clay filler
content decreases. This is attributed to the low retention of clay in the initial stages of hand
sheet forming. Vacuum applied during drainage was found to affect the filler distribution of hand
sheets made with PCC but not that of hand sheets with clay filler. The clay filler is retained by
filtration and so is trapped in the fibre web even when greater drag forces are applied. The
overall PCC content of the sheet was lower when suction was applied during forming. The
majority of the filler was removed from the wire side. The application of vacuum, after the pulp
mat has undergone initial gravity drainage, does not change the filler content or distribution.
This vacuum pulls air through the mat, removing water in which only very small filler particles
are still entrained and so no appreciable change in filler distribution or content is seen. Sheet
forming using PCC at a greatly reduced consistency (0.02%) showed the ‘typical’ filler profile
similar to forming with clay.

As the pulp mat builds up during drainage some filler particles are retained by filtration. The
amount and profile of particles retained by filtration are only slightly affected by applied vacuum
during the forming process. This can be explained by the compaction of the pulp mat. When a
vacuum is applied the fibre mat is compacted, with the greatest compaction near the wire side.
As the mat compacts there is a reduction in the effective area. Even though this reduction in

52
area speeds up the local flow velocity, producing a higher drag, the reduced area makes it
harder to remove particles that are trapped by filtration, which tend to be larger than the
openings in the fibre network.

Filler particles with a cationic charge will be attracted to the anionic pulp fibres resulting in
retention by attachment. The amount and Z-direction profile of particles retained by attachment
are largely affected by applied vacuum during the forming process. This can be explained by the
compaction of the pulp mat and reduction in effective area as described above as well as the
increase in bulk flow velocity due to suction. Particles that are retained by attachment are
typically smaller than the openings in the fibre network and are retained primarily by
electrostatic forces between the filler particle and adjacent pulp fibres. When suction is applied
during forming the bulk velocity is increased which causes an increase in drag on the particles.
Filler can be removed from the pulp fibres if the drag force exceeds the electrostatic attraction.
Compaction of the pulp mat occurs to the greatest extent at the wire side. Therefore the local
velocity, and drag on filler particles, will have the greatest increase in this area, causing a
greater reduction in filler retention due to attachment to fibres.

Forming a hand sheet in two stages, using a single filler type or two different filler types, clearly
shows that filler migrates during the forming process. As the pulp mat builds up during forming
the resistance to flow, and likelihood of filler retention, increases. Filler in the upper portion of
the pulp suspension would have to pass through a greater amount of pulp mat to reach the wire,
which increases the probability of retention. The majority of the filler retained in a hand sheet is
from the upper portion of the pulp suspension. The majority of filler from the lower portion of the
suspension is lost before a sufficient fibre mat can be deposited on the forming fabric. When
initial filler retention is too low the filler in the upper pulp suspension cannot migrate through the
sheet enough to compensate, resulting in lower wire side filler content. It is important during
sheet forming to have high initial filler retention at the wire side to ensure high surface filler
content. This has a practical significance when a multilayer headbox is used. For high surface
filler content it is important to use a filler type with high initial retention, possibly through the use
of retention aids, at the wire side and rely on larger, cheaper filler particles to be retained by
filtration retention in the center layers.

Future experiments would shed light on the effect of different parameters on filler distribution
and migration. Using retention aids throughout the pulp suspension was shown to result in an
even filler distribution throughout the sheet. Given the increased interest in additive layering it

53
would be beneficial to understand the effects of using retention aids in only the lower portion of
the hand sheet. It would also be of interest to use chemical retention aids (such as PEI or
aPAM) on the filler particles to reverse the charges. This would give insight into how particle
shape changes filler distribution and migration trends.

54
3.5 References
[1] Underhay, G.F., “Drainage Effects and Two-Sidedness”, Tappi 37(11): 547-553 (1954).

[2] Hansen, E., “The Distribution of Filler in Paper”, Tappi 34(4): 180-185 (1951).

[3] Puurtinen, A., “Controlling filler distribution for improved fine paper properties”, Appital J.
57(3): 204-227 (2004).

[4] Tanaka, H., et al., “How retention aids change the distribution of filler in paper”, Tappi
Papermakers Conference: 129-144 (1982).

[5] Griggs, W.H., “Use of fillers in papermaking”, Tappi J. 71(4): 77-81 (1988).

[6] Singh, R., Lavrykov, S. and Ramarao, B., “Permeability of pulp fibre mats with filler particles”,
Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 333: 96-107 (2009).

[7] Liimatainen, H. et al., “Effect of PCC filler on dewatering of fiber suspensions”, Tappi J.
5(11): 11-16 (2006).

[8] Dong, C. et al., “Energy Saving in Papermaking through Filler Addition”, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 47: 8430-8435 (2008).

[9] Solberg, D. And Wagberg, L., “On the mechanism of GCC filler retention during dewatering –
New techniques and initial findings”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(6): 183-188 (2002).
[10] Hubbe, M.A., “How do retention aids work?”, Tappi 1988 Papermakers Conference: 389-
398 (1988).
[11] Haggblom-Ahnger, U.M., et al., “Conventional and stratified forming of office paper grades”,
Tappi J. 81(5): 149-157 (1998).

[12] Odell, M.H., “Paper structure engineering”, Appita J. 53(5): 371-377 (2000).

[13] Puurtinen, A., “Wet end control of filler distribution using additive layering principles”, Paper
Technology 44(4): 216-224 (2003).

[14] Kinnunen, J.S., “A new world of papermaking – the layered SC-paper”, Paperi Ja Puu
88(3): 167-171 (1998).

[15] Puurtinen, A., and Oksanen, A., “Control of fiber mobility and filler distribution in wet end
layering”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 18(2): 217-225 (2003).

55
[16] Puurtinen, A., et al., “Multilayer handsheet former”, Paperi Ja Puu 85(2): 92-95 (2003).

[17] Haggblom-Ahnger, U., “Layering of office paper”, Paperi Ja Puu 80(7): 508-513 (1998).

[18] Szikla, Z., “Z-directional distribution of fines and filler material in the paper web under wet
pressing conditions”, Paperi ja Puu 68(9): 654-664 (1986).

[19] Alince, B., et al., “Clay Particle Deposition in a Fibre Web: An Alternative Way of Filling
Paper?”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(9): 315-321 (2002).

[20] Al-Jabari, M., et al., “Modeling the Flow and the Deposition of Fillers in Packed Beds of
Pulp Fibres”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 20(9): 249-253 (1994).

[21] Al-Jabari, M., et al., “Experimental Study of Deposition of Clay Particles in Packed Beds of
Pulp Fibres”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 20(10): 289-295 (1994).

[22] van de Ven, et al., “Filling Wet Paper with the Use of a Secondary Headbox”, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 43: 2280-2286 (2004).

[24] Forel F., Orccotoma J.-A. and Bates J., "A New Technique for Quantifying the Z-Direction
Distribution of P200 Fines", 95th Annual Meetin, PAPTAC, Montréal, QC, 2009.
[23] van de Ven, T.G.M., “Theoretical Aspects of Drainage and Retention of Smalle Particles on
the Fourdrinier”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 10(3): 57-63 (1984).
[25] Modgi, S., et al., “SEM/EDX analysis: A technique for Z-direction mineral topography in
paper”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 21(5): 659-664 (2006).

[26] Modgi, S., et al. “SEM/EDX analysis of Z-direction distribution of mineral content in paper
along the cross-direction”, Pulp Paper Can. 107(5): 48-51 (2006).

[27] Montgomery, J. et al., “Effect of applied vacuum box suction on Overall Retention in Hand
Sheet Forming”, Submitted to Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2010.
[28] Vanerek, A., et al., "Two-sided drainage handsheet machine", Tappi PaperCon2010, May
2-5, Atlanta, GA, 2010.

56
 4 Chapter 4 - Conclusions, Contribution to Knowledge and
Recommendations for Future Work

4.1 Conclusions
A modified hand sheet forming apparatus was constructed to allow for laboratory scale studies
of the effects of forming under suction on hand sheets. The main focus was to determine the
affect of suction boxes on overall retention, filler retention, and filler distribution and migration.
The apparatus allowed for testing under conditions close to those seen in real paper forming
such as suction pressures up to -60kPa, high suspension consistencies, chemical retention aid
use, and fibre mat formation. The apparatus also allows for further studies to be performed to
extend understanding of the affects that suction has in papermaking.

4.1.1 Overall Retention in Hand Sheet Forming

The modified hand sheet former was used to test various forming parameters and determine the
affect on overall retention in hand sheet forming. Through the formation of a series of hand
sheets it was possible to test different forming fabrics, filler loadings, suction pressure, and the
presence of chemical retention aids.

Of all parameters tested it was found that the presence of chemical retention aids during sheet
forming has the greatest affect on overall retention. A comparison of overall retention results for
hand sheets formed with and without chemical retention aids using pulp suspensions containing
20% and 40% PCC filler was performed in Section 2.3.1. In all cases the use of chemical
retention aids increases the overall retention. The effects are largest when a pulp suspension
containing 40% filler is used. For a suspension containing 40% filler the overall retention
increases from approximately 55% to 75%. For a suspension containing 20% filler the overall
retention increases from approximately 70% to 78%. This dominance of retention aids in
determining overall retention results is in agreement with previous studies stating that filler is
predominantly retained by electrostatic attraction to pulp fibres [1,2]. The reason for the
increased retention when chemical retention aids are used is fibre-filler and filler-filler
electrostatic interaction. The increased attraction between fibres and filler promotes attachment
to pulp fibres, increasing retention. The filler-filler attraction increases the size of filler particles
by forming aggregates. In the experiments performed with PCC in the studies of Chapters 2 and
3 the volume averaged mean filler particle size increases by approximately 3.5 times, from
5.4µm to 18.1µm, when chemical retention aids were used. The increased size of filler particles
causes a large increase in the probability of filtration retention which is not seen in retention
studies that make use of a dynamic drainage jar [3-10], preventing mat formation. A theoretical
investigation of filler retention performed by van de Ven [11] concluded that increases in filler
size or decreases in mat pore size can drastically increase filler retention. From that order of
57
magnitude investigation, and the experimental results obtained here, it is clear that for certain
combinations of increased mat resistance and/or filler size, filtration resistance, and thus mat
formation, becomes an important factor in the retention of filler particles, especially in light of the
industries trend to further increasing filler content.

It was found that there is a linear relationship between applied suction during forming and the
overall retention in a hand sheet. There is a decrease in overall retention with increasing
vacuum. Though only showing a small dependence, it is important to note for optimization of
the papermaking process. This simple relationship is contrary to that found in another study [m]
of the affects of applied vacuum on retention in a DDJ. This other study fits a fourth order
quadratic to retention versus suction with an initial decrease due to increased flow rate and then
a subsequent increase due to clogging of the screen. This does not allow for mat formation and
relies on clogging of the screen by filler particles as seen when a DDJ is used for pulp
suspensions with high filler content which does not resemble the papermaking process.
Clogging is not accounted for in the design of the DDJ and leads to inaccurate, erroneous
readings.

Experiments from Chapter 2 show that the forming fabric selection affects the overall retention
results. Increasing the filler content in the pulp suspension increases the importance of fabric
selection. The forming fabric characteristic that most closely predicts overall retention results is
air permeability. The air permeability is a measure of the resistance to flow through the fabric.
Instantaneous flow resistance can be correlated to the instantaneous retention of solids passing
through (or depositing on) a porous media. The formation of a pulp mat can be thought of as a
filtering process with a porous media that continually builds up, decreasing the instantaneous
permeability and therefore increasing the instantaneous retention. The permeability results for
forming fabric and adhering fibre mat show that the greatest difference in permeability (and thus
retention) between fabrics occurs during the initial drainage stages. Therefore, during the initial
forming the fabric selection has a large impact on retention results which can affect the final
overall retention of a sheet. The permeability for all three fabrics tested collapses to a single
value after a substantial fibre mat has been deposited. This suggests that fabric selection is only
significant in the initial forming stages. This is consistent with tests relating the relative
magnitude of SFR for forming fabrics and fibre mats [12]. The importance of forming fabric
selection is further emphasized when the filler distribution at the wire side is considered. The
wire side filler content is, to a certain extent, dependent on initial filler retention as concluded in
Chapter 3. Since retention is dominated by the forming fabric in the initial stages of dewatering,
and wire side filler content depends on initial filler retention, the forming fabric selection is
important in determining wire side filler content, as well as overall retention.

58
4.1.2 Filler Removal and Migration
The filler distribution found in hand sheets formed under gravity drainage with cationic PCC filler
shows an increase from top side towards wire side until a plateau is reached. This profile is
different from that seen in standard hand sheets [13]. Hand sheets formed using clay filler
showed the typical profile of an increase from top side past center and a subsequent decrease
toward the wire side. The difference between the distribution curves is caused by the different
charges of filler causing repulsion and attraction with anionic wood fibres. The filler distribution
was successfully determined both by sheet splitting and ashing as well as sheet splitting and
EDX analysis of the layer surfaces. Tests in the modified hand sheet former using a dilute
suspension containing PCC filler showed that a great reduction in consistency can also cause a
change in the shape of filler profile to match the ‘typical’ profile in hand sheet forming even
when cationic filler is used.

Applying a vacuum during the drainage process in a hand sheet with PCC filler reduces the
average filler content. The majority of the reduction is from the wire side of the sheet with the
remaining filler essentially unchanged. Hand sheets formed with clay filler show only small
changes in filler content and distribution when suction is applied during forming. Previous work
by Tanaka et al. [13] showed that applying a vacuum during forming did not change the filler
distribution in a hand sheet. This work was only performed with anionic filler and matches the
results shown here. The differences are attributed to the different charge of fillers and the
retention mechanisms that they promote. Anionic filler is retained by filtration in the fibre mat
and cationic filler is retained by both filtration and attachment to pulp fibres. Other similar
investigations into the filler distribution involved increasing dewatering rates from elements in a
gap former [14,15]. These showed that distributions of filler and mat properties could be
influenced if changes to the forming process were applied. Based on the similarities between
filler distribution in the modified hand sheet former and previous dewatering tests, the filler
distribution can be altered during the forming process with preferential removal from the wire
side. The greatest changes occur when a cationic filler is used.

Applying a suction pulse to the wet fibre mat after gravity drainage mimics the process of dry
vacuum on a paper machine. In all instances, regardless of filler used, the application of a
vacuum pulse subsequent to gravity drainage does not affect the filler content or distribution.
This is in agreement with earlier work investigating on-line paper forming and dry suction [16].
The previous study concluded that the filler profile was fixed at the dry-line in the forming
process. After the dry-line there is not enough filler mobility to allow for movement and changes

59
in distribution. A more severe process on the fibre mat composition is wet pressing. Szikla [17]
investigated the changes in filler distribution due to the wet pressing process. The findings
concluded that pressing could not change the filler distribution because the filler is fixed in
place. Pressing can remove excess water and, entrained in that, small amounts of excess filler
but does not affect the bulk of the filler particles. A parallel can be drawn between the wet
pressing results and the dry suction results in the modified hand sheet former. After the initial
gravity drainage in this study the consistency of the pulp mat (5.5%) is high enough to prevent
substantial movement of filler. There is, however, water removal due to air pulled through the
mat. This water is visibly clouded by a small quantity of filler but does not contain amounts
substantial enough to change the filler content or distribution of the final sheet.

When hand sheets were formed using both clay and cationic PCC filler a contrast between
types of filler retention was seen. During hand sheet forming in this study filler was retained by
attachment (deposition) to fibres and filtration by the fibre mat. Retention by attachment is due
to electrostatic attraction between the filler and fibres. The filler is retained in the pulp mat as
fibres are built up. Filtration retention is due to filler particles larger than fibre mat pore sizes
being entrapped as the suspension drains through the mat.

Filler retention by attachment to pulp fibres was found to be largely affected by applied vacuum.
This is caused by increased drag on particles due to increased flow rate as a result of the
suction. A larger number of filler particles are detached from the fibres with increased suction.
The largest difference is seen at the wire side. This can be related to the change in SFR caused
by increased suction which occurs to the greatest extent at the wire side [15]. SFR can be
related to open area in the sheet; a higher SFR corresponds to a lower open area. The smallest
open area in a pulp mat occurs towards the wire side which results in a higher local velocity in
this area. Since filler particles retained by attachment are affected by local velocity, this increase
at the wire side causes a higher local increase in drag. The higher removal of filler from the wire
side is a result of the higher local drag on particles. A previous study determined the affect of
increased channel flow rate on particle removal [18]. This showed that increased flow rates
increase detachment which is similar to the action of filler removal from the wire side of a fibre
mat. The results of channel flow can be extrapolated to infer that increasing flow rate by
applying suction will increase the amount of filler removed from pulp fibre surfaces thus
providing further confirmation of the results.

60
Filler particles that are not attached to pulp fibres by electrostatic attraction may be retained by
filtration. In this study the retention of clay was predominantly by filtration. Filler retained by
filtration is only slightly affected by applied suction as seen by the small changes for clay when a
vacuum is applied. The reason for the small affect on filtered particles is that the fibre mat
compaction further entraps particles that are already larger than the pulp mat pore sizes.
Though the increasing flow rate will increase drag on filtered particles, similar to attached filler,
the increase does not overcome the physical barrier provided by the pulp mat. Theoretical work
by van de Ven [11] showed a drastic increase of filtration retention with increasing particle size
(or decreasing mat pore size). This would indicate that the reason provided for vacuum having
little effect on clay particles is correct.

Forming hand sheets in two layers shows that filler particles migrate during the forming process.
Filler particles from the upper pulp suspension are seen to migrate through the sheet and are
retained in the lower layer. Though the migration is increased slightly when vacuum is applied it
is not great enough to compensate for poor initial retention. A comparison of hand sheets
formed with PCC in the lower suspension and clay in the upper suspension with those of
reverse layering showed a difference in the total filler profiles. When clay is used for early
stages of forming there is a decrease in filler content at the wire side regardless of the filler type
(anionic clay or cationic PCC) used in later forming. The reason for the lower wire side filler
content is a poor retention of filler in the lower half of the sheet. The majority of filler from the
lower portion of the pulp suspension is lost before a sufficient fibre mat is developed to facilitate
retention. Filler from the top portion of the pulp suspension is then filtered as it drains through
the fibre mat formed earlier in the drainage process. The filler from the top portion of the sheet is
not able to migrate far enough to overcome the poor initial filler retention. This highlights the
importance of initial filler retention. If filler retention is not high in the beginning of the forming
process it will result in poor surface filler content. It is also evident that filler with different
properties such as charge, size and possibly shape will have different distributions as well as fill
the sheet, or build up, in different manners.

4.2 Contribution to Knowledge

The knowledge from this work provides further insight into the affects that applied vacuum has
on the paper forming process. More specifically the work highlights how vacuum affects
retention, filler distribution, and filler migration. This work also provides an apparatus that can be
used to further elucidate the affects that various parameters have on the fibre mat and filler
particles as described in Section 4.3. The apparatus allows for tests performed under conditions

61
near to those on a paper machine which was not previously possible with hand sheet forming.
More specific contributions to knowledge are as follows:

1) Confirmation that, even with mat formation, the dominant variable in determining
retention is the presence of chemical retention aids which had previously been stated
only in the absence of mat formation.

2) A linear relation was shown between applied suction and overall retention.

3) The importance of forming fabric selection was highlighted through overall retention
studies. Fabric selection affects the final overall retention with the highest influence
during the initial stages of forming when wire side filler content is most greatly affected.

4) An understanding that different filler types will not only have different retention levels but
also different z-direction filler profiles under identical forming conditions. The ‘typical’
distribution is realized if anionic filler is used.

5) A confirmation by tightly controlled laboratory study that applied vacuum during

dewatering (thus increased dewatering rate) affects the filler distribution of cationic filler
by preferential removal from the wire side. This is in agreement with general mill
observations.

6) It was shown that anionic filler (that retained predominantly by filtration) is only slightly
affected by applied vacuum. This is in agreement with previous work that concluded that
the changes were negligible.

7) The investigation of filler migration showed that different filler types fill a sheet differently
and may result in different filler profiles. This also showed that during sheet forming filler
particles can migrate from upper layers of the suspension towards the wire side.

8) Retention levels were shown to vary during the forming process. Before mat formation
filler retention is low and increases with basis weight. The majority of filler retained in a
hand sheet is from the upper portion of the pulp suspension.

9) The importance of initial filler retention was highlighted. It was also shown that poor
initial filler retention cannot be accounted for by migration of filler from upper layers of
the sheet.

62
4.3 Recommendations for Future Work
There are still a number of experiments that can be performed using the current apparatus to
provide further insight into the effects that suction boxes have on filler particles and the paper
sheet during forming. Some of these experiments are extensions of the current work and will
provide more elaborate details of the retention effects as outlined above. Others are new
experiments designed to provide insight into the possible aspects of retention differences that
have been illuminated through this work.

The original design of the turbidity meter as installed on the apparatus cannot provide turbidity
measurements throughout the entire forming process because the water below the forming
fabric contains high levels of fines and filler. As filler content in the water increases it eventually
reaches a point where the laser attenuation is 100% and no reading can be obtained.
Modifications to the turbidity meter to limit the width of the channel over which turbidity
measurements are taken will allow for study of turbidity over the entire forming process. By
calibration of the turbidity meter with samples of a known fines and filler content it would be
possible to determine the concentration of each component in the water below the forming
fabric. This would allow for the determination of points in the process that most greatly affect
fines and filler removal and allow for differentiation between the two substances.

A high-speed camera can be used to capture images of the fibre mat as it is being formed in the
apparatus. These video images can be compared with data from the turbidity and permeability
studies to attempt to draw comparisons between the measured characteristics and the physical
build-up of the fibre mat. This can also provide insight into the physical mechanisms of fibre and
filler retention during paper forming and differences in the forming process caused by different
forming fabrics.

In this study it was identified that the forming fabric affects the overall retention during forming.
The overall retention results were best correlated to the manufacturer’s measured air
permeability. The air permeability is an indication of the different system flow properties that the
different fabrics produce under identical conditions. The correlation was not perfect and it is
likely that the shape properties (or weave pattern) of the forming fabric also play a role in the
retention. Experiments should be performed to determine what effect the fabric shape properties
have on overall retention. One method to obtain these results would be to perform retention
tests on fabrics of different weave pattern under identical flow conditions. The flow conditions

63
can be matched between fabrics by varying the applied suction to provide identical drainage
velocity and thus correlation between retention and shape factors can be determined.

In paper forming on a gap former the pulp mat is squeezed between two forming fabrics. At
various points in the forming process suction is applied to one of the forming fabrics while the
other is exposed to the atmosphere, causing a pressure drop across the forming fabrics and
fibre mat. Since the fibre mat is adhering to both fabrics during this process but is being pulled
away from one and towards the other, there is a possibility of the fibre mat being pulled from the
fabric that is exposed to atmospheric pressure. There is currently no understanding of the
possible system parameters, such as furnish, consistency, basis weight, vacuum strength and
duration, etc., that would cause (or prevent) this from occurring or the effects that it has on the
forming process. By forming a sheet in the modified hand sheet forming apparatus, turning it
over and placing a second fabric below the fibre mat, this phenomenon, and the parameters that
affect it, could be studied by analysis using video data.

It has been identified that the hydrodynamics in the forming process have an affect on the z-
direction filler distribution in the finished paper product. Vakil [19] hypothesized that the flow
path on an individual fibre during the forming process will follow a path based on the average
velocity over a circle with a diameter equal to the fibre length. From this it follows that a filler
particle, because of its size, would tend to follow a flow path based on the point-wise velocity
field. Given that the velocity is highest in areas of openings in the forming fabric, and lowest in
areas of yarn crossings, it stands to reason that the fibre mat that builds up over the forming
fabric opening would have more filler particles passing through it and thus a tendency for higher
filler concentration. In measuring the z-direction filler distribution using SEM/EDX analysis,
Modgi [20] noticed that the filler distribution was non-uniform in the x-,y-directions and attributed
this to random fluctuations. A serial grinding of a paper sheet, that is formed on, and left
attached to, a forming fabric and a subsequent systematic SEM/EDX analysis on the filler
content in the sheet can provide a three dimensional mapping of sheet filler content. This filler
distribution can then be related to the weave pattern of the underlying forming fabric to
determine if the x-,y-direction variations in filler can be correlated to forming fabric weave
pattern.

Another pattern introduced during the paper forming process is wire mark. Wire mark can be
seen on the surface of a paper sheet that is in contact with the forming fabric [21]. Though
caused in part by the forming fabric surface geometry, the wire mark does not necessarily follow

64
the physical pattern of the forming fabric. Through the use of SEM/EDX analysis it is possible to
determine if the filler distribution on the wire side of a sheet is affected by the wire mark or if a
relation between the two can be determined.

Further studies of filler distribution and migration should be performed to provide a deeper
understanding of how some of the parameters touched on in this study may change the
outcome. Given the increased interest in additive layering it would be beneficial to understand
the affects of using retention aids in only the lower portion of the hand sheet. Also of interest
would be to modify the charge of filler particles (PCC and clay) to determine if the results would
be different with reversed or increased charges. This, along with including other filler types,
would allow for the determination of the affect of particle shape on distribution and migration. It
could also be interesting to determine how mat permeability variations change the filler removal
to understand at what point attached filler begins to be removed.

65
4.4 References
[1] Solberg, D. And Wagberg, L., “On the mechanism of GCC filler retention during dewatering –
New techniques and initial findings”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 28(6): 183-188 (2002).

[2] Hubbe, M.A., “How do retention aids work?”, Tappi 1988 Papermakers Conference: 389-398
(1988).

[3] Cadotte, M. et al., “Effects of various retention aids on fiber flocculation, filler retention and
drainage”, PAPTAC 91st Annual Meeting: A31-A37 (2005).

[4] Modgi, S.B. et al., “Retention of Calcium Carbonate in Mechanical Pulps with
PEO/Cofactor/Coagulant and the Role of Hydrogen Bonding Interactions”, J. Pulp Paper
Sci. 30(11): 293-298 (2004).

[5] Yan, Z. and Deng, Y., “Cationic microparticle based flocculation and retention systems”,
Chem. Eng. J. 80: 31-36 (2000).

[6] Nelsoin J.A., “Retention aid performance effects of process variables”, Tappi 61(11): 108-
110 (1978).

[7] Unbehend, J.E., “Mechanisms of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ floc formation in dynamic retention
measurement”, Tappi 59(10): 74-77 (1976).

[8] Britt, K.W. and Unbehend, J.E., “New methods for monitoring retention”, Tappi 59(10): 67-70
(1976).

[9] Britt, K.W., “Mechanisms of Retention During Sheet Formation” Tappi 56(10): 46-50 (1973).

[10] Raymond, A. and Sain, M., “Mechanism of fibre mat formation with inorganic-filled
mechanical pulp suspensions in papermaking”, Appita J. 56(5): 376-384 (2003).

[11] van de Ven, T.G.M., “Theoretical Aspects of Drainage and Retention of Small Particles on
the Fourdrinier”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 10(3): 57-63 (1984).

[12] Jong, J.H. et al., “Experimental Characteristics of Forming Fabrics and Fibre Mats”, J. Pulp
Paper Sci. 25(3): 95-99 (1999).

[13] Tanaka, H. et al., “How retention aids change the distribution of filler in paper”, Tappi
Papermakers Conference: 129-144 (1982).

[14] Puurtinen, A. and Oksanen, A., “Control of fiber mobility and filler distribution in wet end
layering”, Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 18(2): 217-225 (2003).

[15] Haggblom-Ahnger, U.M. et al., “Conventional and stratified forming of office paper grades”,
Tappi J. 81(5): 149-157 (1998).

[16] Hansen, E., “The Distribution of Filler in Paper”, Tappi 34(4): 180-185 (1951).

[17] Szikla, Z., “Z-directional distribution of fines and filler material in the paper web under wet
pressing conditions”, Paperi ja Puu 68(9): 654-664 (1986).

[18] Mühle, K., “The Effect of Mechanical Forces on Adhesive Strength in Bridging Flocculation”,
Colloids and Surfaces 22: 249-269 (1987).

66
[19] Vakil, et al., “Three-dimensional geometry and flow field modeling of forming fabrics”, Nord.
Pulp Paper Res. J. 24(3): 342-350 (2009).

[20] Modgi, S., “SEM/EDX analysis of Z-direction distribution of mineral content in paper along
the cross-direction”, Pulp Paper Canada 107(5): 124-127 (2006).

[21] Helle, T., “Analysis of wire mark in printing paper”, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 14(4): 91-95 (1988).

67
Appendix A: Apparatus Construction
Purpose of Construction

A modified hand sheet forming apparatus was constructed to allow for an investigation of the
effects that various system parameters have on the forming process and the retention of fibres,
fines and fillers during hand sheet forming. Standard hand sheet formers do not allow for the
collection of data during the forming process and form paper under conditions far removed from
those of the actual paper machine. It is too costly to run mill trials to determine the fundamental
effects of most system parameters and trial scale machines are often too complex to isolate the
effect of changing a single variable. The modified hand sheet former simplifies the forming
process sufficiently to allow for data acquisition while maintain the important system parameters
such as consistency, forming fabrics and suction near to paper machine levels. This allows for
closer comparison of laboratory results with the actual paper forming process and to provide
more meaningful data for understanding of the industrial process. The idea for the apparatus
construction was first put forth in a CRD proposal by Green [1] in 2008 and further developed
upon to its final construction as described herein. The apparatus follows similar design features
as that designed by Wegner et al. [2], which is a modification of Britt's DDJ [3] but incorporates
measurement of system parameters such as pressure drop and fluid velocity as well as allowing
for sheet formation.

The modified hand sheet former can test the affect of a number of system parameters on the
forming process and retention of suspension components. As further hypotheses are proposed
the tests that can be performed will expand. To this point the possible variables that can be
tested are: suction pressure, forming fabric selection, filler type and loading, chemical retention
aid type and loading, and suspension consistency and mass. Experiments can be performed to
determine the effects that these parameters have on the retention (fibres, fine, fillers), drainage,
and permeability of the fibre mat during forming.

Apparatus Features

A schematic of the modified hand sheet former is shown in Figure 6. The apparatus can be
broken into three main component parts; the test chamber, the vacuum chamber, and the
electronics. A photo of the final apparatus construction can be seen in Figure 22.

68
Figure 22: Modified hand sheet forming apparatus

The apparatus test chamber was constructed of a 3” (75mm) diameter, 6” (150mm) high acrylic
cylinder below a forming fabric. Another 3” (150mm) diameter acrylic cylinder is mounted above
the forming fabric to act as the top portion of the test chamber. The cylinders are connected by
square acrylic sheet flanges with gasket sealing around the forming fabric to prevent leakage
and air entrainment during testing. Clear acrylic cylinders were chosen so optical access was
available to all areas of the test chamber to allow for monitoring during the forming process.
This also provides for future tests of hand sheet forming while using a high-speed video camera
to capture the forming process.

The lower portion of the test chamber contains a flush mounted pressure transducer (GP:50
Model 218-C-SZ-10-GS) mounted 1” (25mm) below the forming fabric in the chamber wall
which provides the pressure difference across the forming fabric and fibre mat during the sheet
forming process. A turbidity meter is also installed below the forming fabric. The turbidity meter
consists of a 6mW 635nm laser diode on one side of the test chamber opposite of which is
mounted a photodiode. As the hand sheet is formed the amount of light reaching the photodiode
from the laser will be attenuated in proportion to the turbidity of the water. This is an indicator of
the amount of solids being lost through the forming fabric. Calibration of the turbidity with

69
standard solutions can provide a breakdown of components in the suspension below the
forming fabric.

An ultrasonic distance sensor (Senix Model TSPC-30S1-232) is mounted above the top portion
of the test chamber, which is open to atmosphere. The ultrasonic distance sensor provides
accurate measurement of the height of the pulp suspension above the forming fabric during
sheet forming. These readings allow for the calculation of the average velocity of the pulp
suspension which can be used with the pressure drop across the forming fabric and fibre mat to
determine the instantaneous permeability.

Vacuum Chamber

A vacuum chamber is connected to the lower portion of the test chamber by a solenoid valve
and ¾” (20mm) PVC piping. The 25L vacuum chamber is constructed of ½” (13mm) thick PVC
sheets connected by PVC cement with silicone sealing around a removable lid. The vacuum
chamber size was designed so that the suction pressure would vary by less than 1% throughout
the experimental process which is defined as the time between the solenoid valve opening and
all of the fluid in the test chamber draining into the vacuum chamber. An analog pressure gauge
is fitted to the top of the vacuum chamber to determine the chamber set vacuum before
commencement of the experiment. The vacuum chamber is connected to a laboratory vacuum
pump (Cole-Parmer RK-79200-30) which allows for adjustment of the chamber pressure
between 0 and -60kPa. This allows for testing of drainage under vacuum conditions found on a
mill scale paper machine.

Electronics

The commencement of the experiment is controlled by a PC with a LabView program through a

data acquisition (DAQ) system. The DAQ provides an output signal to a relay which activates
the solenoid valve and drains the pulp suspension. The input signals from the pressure
transducer, turbidity meter and distance sensor are filtered using a low-pass Butterworth filter
with a cut-off frequency of 7.5kHz to filter electronic noise introduced by surrounding
electromagnetic radiation [4]. This requires a sampling rate of at least 15 kHz which can be
realized using the installed DAQ. The LabView program also provides an output signal through
the DAQ for operation of a high-speed camera set-up (for future experiments) and input and
storage of signals from the pressure transducer, turbidity meter, and distance sensor for later
processing. All of the electronic components employed in the experiment require an excitation

70
power source for operation which is provided by a ±15V power bus in the cases where a power
source is not provided by the equipment manufacturer.

71
References

[1] Green, S.I., “Filler migration in a suction box”, CRD Proposal, University of British Columbia,
(2008).

[2] Wegner, T.H. et al., "Single procedure for measuring drainage, retention, and response to
vacuum of pulp slurries", Tappi J. 67(4): 124-126 (1984).

[3] Britt, K.B., "Mechanisms of Retention During Paper Formation", Tappi 56(10): 46-50 (1978).

[4] Young, R., “Engineering Design Aspects of a Suction Box Apparatus”, Engineering Co-op
Work Placement Report, University of British Columbia, (2009).

72