CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
INTRODUCTION
Globe and Smart are the most common cellular network
companies used in the Philippines. People choose one of the cellular
network companies based on the signal, data speed, price, promo, and
other more for them to have a great experience with it. In the battle to
offer better mobile internet service in the Philippines, the duopoly of
Globe Telecom and Smart Communications seem to be just even.
While Smart has faster LTE (4G) speed, Globe's LTE connection is
more readily available, according to tests done by a third party.
OpenSignal, a global vendor of mobile monitoring apps and
equipment, released its first “State of Mobile Networks” report for the
Philippines last March 13, analyzing the speed and availability of
mobile internet in the country. “The Philippines is definitely one of the
most intriguing markets we’ve covered as it is one of the few countries
in the world with only two major mobile providers,” it wrote.
The report found that Smart offers faster LTE, averaging 9.9
Mbps. That beat Globe’s average of 7.4 Mbps. However, the report
1|Page
also pointed out that both are significantly lower than the global
average of 17.4 Mbps (Subido, 2017).
“Smart has the best speeds but not the best signal strength,
Globe has the best signal strength but not the best speeds. It is a little
bit hard to understand Globe's website and support pages. I can get a
free tourist sim with Smart from the airport that has 300MB of data for
3 days. Globe has a free tourist sim program as well but their sim
cards do not have any data inclusions, just 35 SMS to all networks.
Smart offers more data at the same price as Globe. I can get bonus
data for an app of my choice (I would choose either Snapchat or Viber)
with Globe. With Smart, they have something similar but they do not
have the apps that I would use. Globe has the *143# menu so it's
even easier to check your balance and load your account. I do not
know if they have something similar with Smart” (idreamofsydney,
2017).
Globe is the country’s provider of the largest 4G Network. Their
core services are mobile voice (which can be used in local, national,
and international long distance call services) and mobile SMS (for local
and international offerings). It also holds prepaid brands such as Globe
Prepaid (targeted for mainstream market) and TM (for value-conscious
market). Globe also offers mobile data which allows subscribers for
internet usage.
2|Page
Smart is known to have introduced “the world’s first electronic
prepaid reloading service and the first 4G service in the Philippines.”
Smart offers prepaid, postpaid, internet service, mobile data, and
other mobile plans in the country. Smart is also the operator behind
Talk N Text (low-cost mobile service) and Sun Cellular.
Both Globe and Smart have comparable data promos. They do
not differ that much in terms of open data allowance (the data you can
freely use on any website), so the contest relies on which freebie you
had want more, and how little or how much you are willing to spend.
Globe gives free Instagram access to all subscribers of its GoSurf
promos. Their cheapest offering at PhP 15 comes with a small
allowance for Mobile Legends, while the succeeding options come with
a free data for an app of choice like Facebook, Viber, Pokémon Go,
YouTube, and more. Users can also avail themselves of individual add-
ons for gaming, streaming, and social apps.
As for Smart, they include extra allowance for GigaSurf promos
with music and video streaming on iFlix, YouTube, Spinnr, Vimeo,
Dailymotion, and Dubsmash.
Out of the nine available prepaid data promos from both telcos,
their PhP 50 combos are still the best choices. They are ideal for phone
use, and also come with unlimited text to any network in the
3|Page
Philippines. Their three-day validity gives users ample time to enjoy
the data allowance, as well.
If you are going to use one of them for mobile Wi-Fi, it is best to
use any of the month-long promos starting at PhP 299, so that you
can connect to the internet anytime without worrying about quick
expiration (Morial, 2017).
This study will identify the gratification rate of users and inquire
the factors of the two cellular network companies, such as Globe and
Smart.
4|Page
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This study focuses on the gratification rate of users of cellular
network companies, mainly Globe and Smart. The researchers would
like to explore and examine the freebies and the strategies in which
the Globe and Smart cellular network companies use to innovate their
services. With that being said, this study would be beneficial to the
following:
FOR THE USERS. This study could help the users to understand
their chosen cellular network company in many ways. And this could
help them to think wisely for their preferred network. By this study,
user will be knowledgeable enough in how or why do they need to
consider the cellular network company. This could lead them to a
better life.
FOR THE CELLULAR NETWORK ADMINISTRATORS. This
study will benefit the cellular network companies in such a way that
they could be prepared in innovating their service. In the end of this
study they will be aware on how their service could affect their users in
many factors. And this study could be the way for the cellular network
companies know what do their users need. This study will help them to
make more observation for the better service.
FOR THE FUTURE RESEARCHERS. This study will benefit the
future researchers in terms of gathering information from which they
5|Page
could base on the process. Furthermore, the future researchers would
have an idea on which gratification rate of users is influential in
improving the cellular network companies service.
6|Page
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
CELLULAR NETWORK
COMPANIES
GLOBE SMART
FACTORS
GRATIFICATION RATE USERS’ PREFERENCES
The illustration shows the flow of the study. The researchers will
conduct the study to determine how the factors affect the users’
gratification rate and preferences to the cellular network companies
Smart or Globe. The conceptual framework will be the basis for the
researchers to have a better study.
7|Page
HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between Smart and Globe
in terms of promo varieties.
Alternative Hypothesis
There is a significant difference between Smart and Globe in
terms of promo varieties.
8|Page
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
This study aims to determine the preference of the users
between the two cellular network companies. The researchers would
like to inquire about the following questions:
1. What do the users prefer the most between the two cellular
network companies; Smart and Globe?
2. What are the factors that affect their preference?
3. How do these factors affect the preference of the users?
4. Is there a significant difference between Smart and Globe in
terms of promo varieties?
5. How do these factors help the cellular network companies to
improve their services?
9|Page
OPERATIONAL VARIABLES
Affinity – a natural liking for or attraction to a person, thing, idea,
etc.
Anthropology – the study of human beings’ similarity to and
divergence from other animals.
Establishments – a place of business together with its employees,
merchandise, equipment, etc.
Gratification – the state of being satisfied.
Latter –
Perceived – to recognize, discern, envision, or understand.
Preceding – referring back.
Preference – the act of choosing one company from others.
Profitability – beneficial or useful.
Promos –pertaining to the product.
Simultaneously – occurring at the same time.
10 | P a g e
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY
This research will concentrate on the factors that affect the
gratification rate of the clients of the two cellular network companies
such as Smart and Globe. The researchers plan to decide how the
clients’ preferences influence the effectiveness of the cellular
companies.
The researchers will inquire 80 random respondents from 16 to
30 years old that owns a cellular phone. Each of the respondent will be
given survey questionnaires to answer. This study will only be
conducted within the vicinity of Congressional Avenue, Quezon City,
inside or outside the establishments.
11 | P a g e
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
This chapter is all about correlated studies, articles and ideas
that are relevant to the researchers’ study. The statements written
below are proven to be relevant to the study.
USERS’ PREFERENCE BETWEEN SMART AND GLOBE
Majority of the people who use cellular network phones prefer
Smart as their cellular network to use because it has the fastest speed
in terms of internet connectivity. But there are some users who prefer
Globe as their cellular network because of it has a strong signal that
can reach areas that other networks cannot (Anonymous, 2017)
FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE USERS’ PREFERENCE
According to Philip Kotler, “satisfaction is a person’s feelings of
pressure or disappointment resulting from product’s perceived
performance (outcome) in relation to his or her expectations.
Customer satisfaction is the level of a person’s felt state resulting from
comparing a product’s perceived performance (outcome) in relation to
the person’s expectations.”
This satisfaction level is a function of difference between
perceived performance and expectations. If the product’s performance,
12 | P a g e
exceed expectation the customer highly satisfied or delighted. If the
performance matches the expectations the customer is satisfied. If the
products performance fall shorts of expectations the customer is
dissatisfied.
Many companies are aiming for high satisfaction because
customers who are just satisfied still find it easy to switch when a
better offer comes along. High satisfaction or delight creates an
emotional affinity with brand. Variety of factors that affect customer
satisfaction includes product quality, product availability and after
sales support such as warranties and services. Customer satisfaction is
seen as a proof of delivering a quality product or service. It is believed
that customer satisfaction brings sales growth, and market share.
Thus the purpose of marketing is to generate the customer value
profitability. India is on the threshold of a new millennium. India chose
for global economy, exposing her to winds of change in the market
place, which has expanded vastly and become fiercely competitive. In
the changed environment, decision makers view the marketing
products, pricing, promotion and distribution. A successful product can
be developed by exploding these opportunities while delivering the
value of the consumer we make sure of marketing support. This
support is based on the knowledge of consumers and distribution.
13 | P a g e
Marketing support both at the introduction of products and maturing is
considered.
Marketing, as suggested by the American Marketing association
is “an organizational function and a set of processes for creating,
communicating and delivering value to customers and for managing
costumer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its
stockholders”. The two major factors of marketing are the recruitment
of new customers (acquisition) and the retention and expansion of
relationships with existing customers (base management). Marketing
methods are informed by many of the social, particularly psychology,
sociology, and economics. Anthropology is also a small, but growing,
influence. Market research underpins these activities. Through
advertising, it is also related to many of the creative arts for
a marketing plan to be successful, the mix of the four "Ps"i.e. product,
price, place, promotion must reflect the wants and desires of the
consumers in the target market. Trying to convince a market segment
to buy something they don't want is extremely expensive and seldom
successful. Marketers depend on marketing research, both formal and
informal, to determine what consumers want and what they are willing
to pay for. Marketers hope that this process will give them a
sustainable competitive advantage. Marketing management is the
14 | P a g e
practical application of this process. The offer is also an important
addition to the 4P's theory (Industrial Kidilams, 2011).
IMPLICATION OF THE FACTORS TO THE USERS’ PREFERENCE
Most of the users rely on others’ feedback as their basis in
choosing their preferred cellular network. If the network has an
expensive offer or promo it will decrease their customers’ satisfaction
rate and it will also decrease their revenue and more negative effects
will come. The more appropriate service they will give the more
satisfied customers they will have.
Some of the networks chose media as their way of advertising
their new offers and promos to their customer so it will be
disseminated to more customers. Cellular network companies also use
popular artists and celebrities in their advertisements to encourage
more people, as well as making their new promos for free as part of
their marketing strategy (Anonymous, 2015).
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SMART AND GLOBE
Smart outperformed Globe in 4 of 5 NTC test parameters, but
Globe outperformed Smart by a wide berth when it comes to the grade
of service parameter.
According to NTS’s own press release, the purpose of the tests is
to measure network performance based on existing NTC-prescribed
15 | P a g e
minimum service performance standards. The tests were conducted by
the NTC in the National Capital Region.
Telecommunication were graded on five (5) parameters namely;
blocked calls or grade of service, dropped call rate, average receive
signal level, average signal quality and call set-up time.
In conducting the test, the monitoring team initiated a total of
1,506 on-net calls per network. The monitoring team made the calls
using the “drive test” method (i.e. inside a moving vehicle). The
initiated calls were simultaneously done for Globe and Smart. Sun
SIMs, Talk and Text SIMs, Red Mobile SIMs and Touch Mobile SIMs
were not used because these SIMs are using the networks of either
Globe or Smart. In their press releases, each telecommunication
claimed it out-performed the other. Technically, they are both right.
Smart rated higher in four (4) of the five (5) parameters: dropped call
rates, average received signal level, average signal quality, and call
set-up time. But Globe outperformed Smart when it comes to blocked
call rates or grade of service. Further, in this parameter, the difference
between the performance of both networks is big: 4.45 % for Globe
and 9.95 % for Smart, where the NTC's standard is set at 4 %.
Both the Globe and Smart Wi-Fi devices are light and compact,
although the latter is slightly smaller in overall size. The Smart router
comes in matte black and less conspicuous with a printed logo
16 | P a g e
branding at the front while the Globe router comes in white and uses a
poorly placed sticker logo at the front. It is obvious that the Globe
router was hastily packaged while Smart managed to produce a well
thought-out design. And in fairness to Globe, Smart had more than 6
months (after Globe went to market) to conceptualize and release
their own version. The Globe device has a single LAN port, just like the
one from Smart but the latter also has a dedicated power switch and
reset button. Props to Globe for placing a sticker at the back with a
guide and manual on how to reload the SIM card while the one from
Smart is included in a separate documentation (you need to keep it
just in case). In addition both devices use a 12V power that plugs into
the wall outlet. In fact, the power rating is identical that you can use
either cable to power the two devices. This also means you can plug
this into the 12V power socket in your car. And both devices have their
Administration panel which is accessible via the local network
(192.168.1.1) although Smart’s added a shortcut to it by going to
smartbrosettings.net, which is easier to remember.
For Globe, all the settings are already pre-configured. The main
page will show the status of the cellular connection (and signal
strength), router status/information and network information. You
don’t need to touch anything here are everything is all set up for you.
17 | P a g e
The only section that you will have to regularly use would be the
built-in SMS feature. This is where you send out text messages to
subscribe to GOSURF and SUPERSURF promos.
In the case of the Smart Wi-Fi router, the administration panel
looks the same with almost identical features. We also like the idea
that there is a link to the Data Usage Monitor that directs you to the
MySmart dashboard.
Once you load credits, you can also subscribe to either can just
subscribe to any of the FlexiTime, SurfMax or GigaSurf plans.
Smart claims their Prepaid LTE Home Wi-Fi has a theoretical
speed of up to 42Mbps which is the standard for an LTE connection. On
the other hand, Globe has made no claims as to the top speed their
Prepaid Home Wi-Fi can achieve but we reckon it should also be
42Mbps.
Both Globe and Smart have nationwide coverage but it is best to
check first if your home or office has good LTE signal reception. The
best way to test this is to buy a prepaid LTE SIM card and try it out
with any LTE-capable smartphone. You can do random speed tests
during the day and night to see the average downstream and
upstream speed of the network. Not to mention the Prepaid LTE Home
Wi-Fi are both sold at Php1, 995 for Smart and Globe. They both have
10GB of free data right out of the box.
18 | P a g e
The difference between them would be the data plans and
promos. The Smart offer promos which are; Smart SurfMax 85 at
Php85 for 2 days at 800MB per day, Smart SurfMax 250 at Php250 for
7 days at 800MB per day, Smart GigaSurf 50 at 1GB + 300MB video
app + unli all-net text for 3 days at Php50, Smart GigaSurf 299 at
2GB + 1.1GB video app + unli all-net text for 30 days at Php299
whereas Globe offer promos which are; Globe GoSURF50 at 1GB +
100MB Instagram + 300MB for app of choice + Unli Allnet Texts for 3
days at Php50, Globe GoSURF299 at 1.5GB + 100MB Instagram + 1GB
for app of choice for 30 days at Php299, Globe SuperSURF50 at 800MB
per day for 1 day at Php50, Globe SuperSURF200 at 800MB per day
for 5 days at Php200 (Olandres, 2017).
IMPLICATIONS OF THE FACTORS TO THE CELLULAR NETWORK
COMPANIES’ SERVICE
The positive effects that the factors will provide the cellular
network companies that they will have the advantage to be more
aware of the drawbacks in their services that will help them to make a
step forward from their competitors. The cellular network companies
will be successfully dominant among others as they implement positive
changes to the service they offer. The positive changes may perform
according to their success and may help them have more costumers’
satisfaction (Anonymous, 2017).
19 | P a g e
The aforementioned literature and studies were interrelated to
the present study entitled, “Globe vs. Smart: Factors that Affect the
Gratification Rate of Users of Cellular Network Companies”. Through
this study, the researchers will gain a stronger foundation about their
study.
20 | P a g e
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
This research, entitled “Globe vs. Smart: Factors that Affect the
Gratification Rate of Users of Cellular Network Companies,” made use
of survey questionnaires, to help the researchers in accomplishing
requirements. The research made use of quantitative approach.
METHODS AND TECHNIQUES
The researchers strictly followed the framework from concept to
practice, to come up with the answers on the problem in this research.
Causal-comparative research design was implemented by the
researchers.
POPULATION AND SAMPLES OF THE STUDY
The respondents involved in data gathering, ranging from 16 to
30 years old, are randomly selected from Congressional Avenue,
Quezon City, inside or outside the establishments. There are 80
respondents in total. The researchers used probability sampling.
INSTRUMENTS OF THE STUDY
The data of this research were gathered through questionnaires.
QUESTIONNAIRES. To determine the factors that affect the
gratification rate of users of cellular network companies, the
researchers constructed well-designed questionnaires. These
questionnaires were given to 80 random respondents within the
21 | P a g e
vicinity of Congressional Avenue, Quezon City, inside and outside the
establishments.
CONSTRUCTION. The questionnaires were articulated by the
researchers containing appropriate questions that will provide the
researchers the respondents’ response about the study. The
questionnaires have two parts; the first part assessed the user’s
preference, while the second part are composed of the factors that
affect the gratification rate of the users of cellular network companies.
The questions were constructed based on the researchers’ statement
of the problem and was shown to the validators for recommendations
in improving and revising the whole questionnaires.
VALIDATION – A letter for the validators was conducted to ask
permission in conducting surveys to the respective respondents.
Validation letters with attached tools were approved after only a few
revisions.
ADMINISTRATION – The questionnaire was administered by
the researchers to the respective respondents, 80, were randomly
selected from Congressional Avenue, Quezon City, inside or outside
the establishments. Before and after conducting short survey, the
researchers formally administered and retrieve the questionnaires.
22 | P a g e
DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE
The research has undergone a procedure; before data-gathering,
during data-gathering and after data-gathering.
Before data-gathering, the researchers have constructed
problems relating to the research resulting to completion of
methodology, conceptual framework and review of related literature
and studies before questionnaire was disseminated to the 80 random
respondents. These drafts have undergone revisions and approval
from the research advisers.
During data-gathering, the researchers then administered the
surveys to the random respondents in Congressional Avenue, Quezon
City, inside or outside the establishments.
Data Processing and Statistical Treatments
After the data-gathering, answers gained from the respondents
were carefully analyzed by the researchers.
The results were analyzed using statistical treatment like Chi-
Square Test.
To answer the specific questions raised in Chapter 1, the
researchers consolidated and classified the result of the test.
Chi-Square Test. Is used to compare observed data with data
we would expect to obtain according to a specific hypothesis. The sum
of the squared difference between observed (o) and the expected (e)
23 | P a g e
data (or the deviation, d), divided by the expected data in all possible
categories.
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Formula to find the value of Chi-square test is:
(𝑂 − 𝐸)2
𝑥2 = ∑
𝐸
O= the frequencies observed
E= the frequencies expected
∑= the ‘sum of’
24 | P a g e
CHAPTER 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
The process and method of this study are presented in the
preceding chapter. This chapter focuses on the presentation, analysis
and interpretation of data gathered from 80 random respondents.
The data are presented in tabular and discussion form. The
interpretation of the findings follow the same sequential order of the
problems indicated in chapter 1 of the study.
USERS’ PREFERENCE BETWEEN SMART AND GLOBE
This study presented the results of the survey that was
conducted in the month of January 2018 to the random cellular
network users in Congressional Avenue, Quezon City. The survey
forms were constructed with questions regarding users’ preference
between Globe and Smart.
Presented on the next page is the graph of percentage of the
users who use Globe and Smart.
25 | P a g e
Figure 1
Percentage of Globe and Smart Users
1%
25%
GLOBE
SMART
OTHERS
74%
As shown in the graph, 74 % of the users use Globe as their
cellular network, however, 25 % of the users use Smart as their
cellular network while 1 % of the users use other cellular network.
There is a big difference between the cellular network companies. The
users’ preference is based on their answer in the multiple choice form
provided in the research questionnaire.
26 | P a g e
FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE USERS’ PREFERENCE
A portion of the questionnaire is consist of questions that are
related to the factors that can affect the users’ preference between the
two major cellular network companies.
Presented below is the graph of the factors that affect the users’
preference.
Figure 2
Factors affecting Users’ Preference
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Legend:
Signal Coverage Price and Affordability
Billing Integrity Company's Image
Fast and Responsive Technical Support Service Llimitations
Downtimes Promo Varieties
Freebies Internet Speed
The respondents were given several known factors and were
asked to rank each by according to its significance and influence to
other users’ preference. As shown in the graph, majority of the users
27 | P a g e
with a total of 63.51% agreed that the image of the company has the
biggest influence to its public demand. Following that is the speed of
their internet where 63.01% users agreed with, and a reliable
technical support with 62.16% significance rating. Further, 61.67%
assented to the signal coverage the company has, 56.58% of the
users also prioritizes the price and affordability of the companies’
promos, and service limitations made up 51.35%. Promo varieties with
a total of 50.63%also took place as one of the factors that affect the
users’ preference of cellular network provider, freebies with a total of
48.61%, downtimes with a total of 41.67%, and lastly, the billing
integrity which from the users, is the least significant factor to the
users’ preference. The users’ reason why they chose Company’s image
as the most affecting factors in their preference is that the reliability of
the company would change if their image is awful the users’ might
change their cellular network.
28 | P a g e
IMPLICATION OF THE FACTORS TO THE USERS’ PREFERENCE
Presented below is the graph of percentage that will indicate the
implication of factors to the users.
Figure 3
Implication of Factors to the Users’ Preference
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Signal Coverage Price and Affordability
Billing Integrity Company's Image
Fast and Responsive Technical Support Service Llimitations
Downtimes Promo Varieties
Freebies Internet Speed
As shown in the graph, 66.25% of the respondents said that if
the signal coverage is not good, they might change their cellular
network. In contrary, 14% of the respondents said that if the billing
integrity does not satisfy the users, they could change their cellular
network. Lastly, 55% said that if the price and affordability have been
lessen, they will find another cellular network.
29 | P a g e
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SMART AND GLOBE
Presented below is the table of computed data which will reveal
the significant difference between Smart and Globe.
Table 1
Computed Data of Difference
Price
20 50 50 100 299
O E O E O E O E O E
Globe 13 102.07 25 32.11 56 36.36 39 31.17 27 28.33
Smart 60 38.53 43 32.89 21 40.64 27 34.83 33 31.67
599 799 999
O E O E O E
32 28.33 33 34 30 30.22
28 31.67 39 38 34 33.74
30 | P a g e
Level of Significance Chi Square Critical Value
0.05 147.57 14.07
The presentation above satisfies the researchers about the
significant difference of the cellular network companies; Globe and
Smart. The data deals with the computation of chi-square formula for
the result.
31 | P a g e
The researchers’ hypothesis states that there are significant
difference between Globe and Smart. The computed data do not reject
the alternative hypothesis of the study.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE FACTORS TO THE CELLULAR NETWORK
COMPANIES
Presented below is the percentage of the implication of the
factors to the cellular network companies.
Figure 4
Implications of Factors to the Cellular Network Companies
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Adding towers Creating cheap promos
Making transactions legitimate Bettering the company's image
Having a responsive technical support Avoiding additional expenses within transactions
Preventing downtimes Adding more promos
Offering more freebies Providing faster internet
As shown in the figure, 72.5% of the respondents said that
having technical support is the best way for the cellular network
companies to gain more users. Next to it is the addition of promos with
32 | P a g e
71.25% of the respondents that could bring more users to the cellular
network companies. Lastly, 70% of the respondents said that adding
towers would be beneficial not only for the users but also to the
cellular network companies as a way of improving their system.
As a conclusion, from the stated data that was gathered by the
researchers, it implies that users would likely to look on the signal
coverage of the cellular companies for a factor of choosing. It also
implies that if the technical support would be more productive, users
will be guaranteed in having a long time partnership with their chosen
cellular network companies. Furthermore, the hypothesis of the study
was proven that there is a significant difference between the two
major cellular network companies, Globe and Smart.
33 | P a g e
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
The general purpose of this study was to determine the study
with emphasis on the summary of findings, conclusions and
recommendations based on the gathered data were analyzed and
interpreted in Chapter 4.
The main goal of this study was to determine the factors that
affect the gratification rate of users of cellular network company. The
80 respondents of this study are randomly selected within the vicinity
of Congressional Avenue, Quezon City inside and outside the
establishments.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
After analyzing and interpreting the data gathered, the answers
to the specific questions raised by the researchers were arrived at and
finally, recommendations for future researchers are included.
1. What do the users prefer the most between the two
cellular network companies: Smart and Globe?
After gathering the data and analyzing the result, the most
preferred cellular company of the users between Globe and Smart, is
Globe.
34 | P a g e
2. What are the factors that affect their preference?
Based on the gathered data there are 10 factors that affects the
users’ preference. Most of respondent’s rated company’s image as the
factor that influenced the gratification rate of users followed by fast
and responsive technical support, signal coverage, price and
affordability, service limitations, promo varieties, freebies, downtimes,
and billing integrity.
3. How do these factors affect the preference of the
users?
There are factors that greatly influenced the preference of users
in terms of signal coverage, price and affordability, internet speed, fast
and responsive technical support, and promo varieties. In signal
coverage, if the signal of their using network is slow the users might
change their preferred network. For price and affordability, many users
now are students and they are finding a much affordable cellular
network. In internet speed, the society is often using their cellular
phones to surf. And having a slow internet speed their users might
change their network to other. In promo varieties, if the cellular
network gives more convenient promos, the cellular network company
will attract the users to stay in their service.
35 | P a g e
4. Is there a significant difference between Smart and
Globe?
There is a significance difference between Smart and Globe
based on the computed data of the researchers through the use of
statistical treatment. This does not reject the alternative hypothesis of
the study.
5. How do these factors help the cellular network
company to improve their services?
Improving a cellular network services has many options, as the
results of the gathered data that the researchers conducted, the 80
random respondents were asked about how the cellular network
companies will improve their services. Most of the respondents
answered; have a fast and responsive technical support, offer faster
base internet speed, add towers for the stronger signal, create their
promos cheaper and offer affordable promos, avoid additional
payments within paid promos and other service limitations, add more
promos, give more freebies, make legitimate and upright transactions
and make the company’s image to be reliable.
36 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
Based on the data gathered on the survey questionnaire, the
following conclusions were;
1. Globe is the most preferred cellular network. It states that the
respondents are satisfied with their network. However, some
respondents chose Smart as their preferred cellular network.
2. There are many factors that affect the users’ preferences and
company’s image has the highest and billing integrity has the least
impact for the users. The following factors followed a sequential rating
such as; fast and responsive technical support, signal coverage, price
and affordability, service limitations, promo varieties, freebies, and
downtimes.
3. There are several factors that have a big implication to the
users’ preference such as; signal coverage, price and affordability,
billing integrity, company’s image, fast and responsive technical
support, service limitations, downtimes, promo varieties, freebies, and
internet speed. These were the basis for the users to choose between
the two major cellular network companies.
4. There are a significant difference between Globe and Smart
and it implies that there has been a great competition between the two
major cellular companies.
37 | P a g e
5. The factors could help cellular network companies most likely
in technical support for better service for the users. It also implies that
adding more promos and towers could also help the cellular network
service.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the summary of findings and conclusions of this study,
the following recommendations are hereby made:
1. For the users, they should be more observant in making
decision in choosing cellular network for them to be satisfied with the
performance of the chosen cellular network. And also, the researchers
recommend being more knowledgeable in how and why do they need
to consider those factors that the cellular network has.
2.For cellular network administrators, they should be aware on
how their service could affect their users’ gratification rate. The
researchers also recommend that they should be more observant in
doing some technical issues for the users not to interrupt.
3. For the future researchers, they should seek for more
information for their study to be much more relevant in the present
time. And also, they could use this study as a basis or guide tool for
them to accomplish their research study.
38 | P a g e
BIBLIOGRAPHY
39 | P a g e
APPENDICES
40 | P a g e
Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Quezon City
January 2018
Mr. Ramon N. Manzon
Faculty, Senior High School Department
The Institution
Dear Sir,
Greetings!
We, the undersigned students enrolled in Colegio de San Lorenzo are
currently working on our research entitled, “Globe Vs Smart: Factors
that Affect the Gratification Rate of Users of Cellular Network
Companies” in partial fulfillment of the course Practical Research 2.
We would like to request from your good office to validate our tools.
Your comments and suggestions will be highly appreciated by the
researchers.
Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully yours,
Balingit, Jannah Francine
Eclarinal, Chelsea
Guevara, Robert Joshua
Tovera, Tim Christopher
Researchers
Noted by: Validated by:
Ms. Camille C. Cano Mr. Ramon N. Manzon
Research Adviser
41 | P a g e
Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Quezon City
January 2018
Ms. Christine Lara A. Ta-an
Faculty, Senior High School Department
The Institution
Dear Ma’am,
Greetings!
We, the undersigned students enrolled in Colegio de San Lorenzo are
currently working on our research entitled, “Globe Vs Smart: Factors
that Affect the Gratification Rate of Users of Cellular Network
Companies” in partial fulfillment of the course Practical Research 2.
We would like to request from your good office to validate our tools.
Your comments and suggestions will be highly appreciated by the
researchers.
Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully yours,
Balingit, Jannah Francine
Eclarinal, Chelsea
Guevara, Robert Joshua
Tovera, Tim Christopher
Researchers
Noted by: Validated by:
Ms. Camille C. Cano Ms. Christine Lara A. Ta-
an
Research Adviser
42 | P a g e
Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Quezon City
January 2018
Mr. Jhon Michael D. Padilla
Faculty, Senior High School Department
The Institution
Dear Sir,
Greetings!
We, the undersigned students enrolled in Colegio de San Lorenzo are
currently working on our research entitled, “Globe Vs Smart: Factors
that Affect the Gratification Rate of Users of Cellular Network
Companies” in partial fulfillment of the course Practical Research 2.
We would like to request from your good office to validate our tools.
Your comments and suggestions will be highly appreciated by the
researchers.
Thank you and God bless.
Respectfully yours,
Balingit, Jannah Francine
Eclarinal, Chelsea
Guevara, Robert Joshua
Tovera, Tim Christopher
Researchers
Noted by: Validated by:
Ms. Camille C. Cano Mr. Jhon Michael D.
Padilla
Research Adviser
43 | P a g e
Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Quezon City
Name:___________________________ Age:____ Biological Sex:___
TEST I: User Preference
Directions: Read each question thoroughly. Encircle the letter that
corresponds to your answer. Be honest in answering this
questionnaire.
1.) What cellular network do you use?
a. Globe/TM/ABS-CBN c. Others, please specify: _____________
b. Smart/TNT
2.) Which between the two cellular network companies do you think
offers services more efficiently?
a. Globe/TM/ABS-CBN
b. Smart/TNT
3.) What service do you use the most with your cellular network
provider?
a. Text c. Surf
b. Call d. Entertainment (games and free apps)
e. Others, please specify:_________________
4.) What do you think is the service that a cellular network company
should prioritize in improving?
a. Fast Internet Speed c. Good Signal
44 | P a g e
b. Affordable Promos d. Duration of Promos’ Validity
e. Others, please specify:________________________
5.) How many times in a week do you experience technical difficulties
with your chosen cellular network provider?
a. One to two times a week c. Five to six times a week
b. Three to four times a week d. Everyday
6.) Are you satisfied with your chosen cellular network provider?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
Why?
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
45 | P a g e
7.) If you are given a different cellular network to use, will you choose
to switch?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
Why?
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
TEST II: Factors That Affect the Gratification Rate of the Users
Directions: Read each question thoroughly. Put a cross () inside the
box to rate the factor that you think influenced your gratification rate
as a user. The criteria for rating the factors are as follows:
1 – Insignificant 4 – Slightly Significant
2 – Slightly Insignificant 5 - Significant
3 – Neither
Factors 1 2 3 4 5
1. Signal Coverage
2. Price and Affordability
3. Billing Integrity
4. Company’s Image
46 | P a g e
5. Fast and Responsive
Technical Support (e.g.:
refunding, troubleshooting)
6. Service Limitations (e.g.:
data caps, additional
expenses within paid
promos)
7. Downtimes (e.g.: service
maintenance)
8. Promo Varieties
9. Freebies
10. Internet Speed
47 | P a g e
Direction: Check all the bullets () that apply.
A. Which of the factors do you think your chosen cellular network
company has that other competitors do not have? Check all the
bullets () that apply.
[ ] Globe [ ] Smart
o Signal Coverage o Service Limitations
o Price and Affordability o Downtimes
o Billing Integrity o Promo Varieties
o Company’s Image o Freebies
o Fast and Responsive o Internet Speed
Technical Support
48 | P a g e
B. Which do you think will help the cellular network companies to
o Add towers so they can o Avoid additional
provide stronger signal payments within paid
o Create their promos promos and other
cheaper and offer service limitations
affordable promos o Prevent downtimes and
o Make legitimate and improve their
upright transactions maintenance on their
o Make the company’s service
image to be reliable o Offer faster base
o Have a fast and internet speed
responsive technical o Add more promos
support o Give more freebies
improve their services?
C. How do these factors affect your satisfaction as a user?
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
49 | P a g e
Directions: Put a check in which do you think is the most affordable
and comfortable promo.
Price Globe Smart
20 Globe SuperAll Txt 20 Smart All Text 20 at
at 250 local texts to all Unlimited texts to all
networks (Smart, Sun, networks + 20 minutes
Red, and TNT) for just call to Smart, Sun and
Php20 for 1 day Talk 'N Text (TNT)
networks + Free Viber,
Facebook and Facebook
Messenger access.
Globe GoUNLI50 at Smart GigaSurf 50 at
Unlimited calls and texts 1GB + 300MB video app +
to Globe and Touch unli all-net text for 3 days
Mobile (TM) networks + at Php50 for 3 days.
50 MB data for internet
surfing for 3 days.
50 Globe GoSURF50 at Smart Unli Call & Text
1GB + 300MB for app of 50 at Unlimited calls to
choice + Unli All net Smart, Sun and Talk 'N
Texts for 3 days at Text (TNT) networks,
Php50. Unlimited texts to all
50 | P a g e
networks, 50 MB of data
for internet access.
100 Globe GOCALL100 at Smart Smartalk 100 at
500 minutes calls to UnlimitedOn-Net Calls, 30
Globe/TM, Valid for 7 MB of data for internet
days, P100 only access.
299 Globe GoSURF299 at Smart GigaSurf 299 at
1.5GB + 100MB 2GB + 1.1GB video app +
Instagram + 1GB for app unli all-net text for 30
of choice for 30 days at days at Php299
Php299
599 ThePLAN 599 with Plan 5995GB Data at30
Samsung J2 Prime (24 mins. all-net calls and
months contact Unlimited all-net texts
period)at1.5 GB Mobile with Free Facebook
Internet, Unli All-Net Messenger, Whatsapp,
Text at P100 Consumable Viber
with FREE 1GB Viber/mo.
for 24 months and Add
P35/month for G-Suite
799 ThePLAN 799 with PLAN 599 at 8GB Data
with 40 mins. all-net calls,
51 | P a g e
Samsung Galaxy J3 LTE and Unlimited all-net
(24 months contract textswithFree Facebook
period) at 4GB Mobile Messenger, Whatsapp,
Internet, Unli Text to Viber
Globe/TM, 50 All-Net
Text and 50 minutes Call
to Globe/TM with FREE
1GB Viber/mo. for 24
months and Add
P199/month for
myBusiness Expert.
999 ThePLAN 999 with LG Plan 999 at 10GB Data,
Q6 (24 months contract 50 mins. all-net calls and
period) at 4GB Mobile Unlimited all-net texts
Internet, Unlimited Call with Free Facebook
and Text to Globe/TM Messenger, Whatsapp,
with FREE 1GB Viber/mo. Viber
for 24 months and Add
P170/month for Microsoft
Office 365.
52 | P a g e
CURRICULUM VITAE
53 | P a g e
Balingit, Jannah Francine M.
55 road 7, Project 6, Quezon City
09475891496
balingit.jannah@gmail.com
Personal Background
Age: 16 Religion: Roman Catholic
Birthday: January 23, 2001 Birth place: Quezon City
Civil Status: Single Nationality: Filipino
Educational Background
Primary: Project 6 Elementary School
Road 8 cor. Road 7, Project 6. Quezon City
Secondary:
Junior High School: Ernesto Rondon High School
Road 3, Project 6, Quezon City
Senior High School: Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Project 6, Quezon City
54 | P a g e
Eclarinal, Chelsea M.
53 C-Aplaya St., NPC Village, Pasong Tamo,
Quezon City
09776666902
chelseaeclarinal@gmail.com
Personal Background
Age: 16 years old Religion: Roman Catholic
Birthday: January 15, 2001 Birthplace: Quezon City
Civil Status: Single Nationality: Filipino
Education Background
Intermediate: Sauyo Elementary School
Del Nacia Village 4, Tandang Sora, Quezon City
Secondary:
Junior High School: Sauyo High School
2nd Laguna St., Napocor Village Tandang Sora, Quezon City
Senior High School: Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Ave., Project 6, Quezon City
55 | P a g e
Guevara, Robert Joshua E.
J-73 Upper Banlat, Tandang Sora, Quezon City
09322275501
rjguevara98@gmail.com
Personal Background
Age: 16 Religion: Roman Catholic
Birthday: January 19, 2001 Birthplace: Quezon City
Civil Status: Single Nationality: Filipino
Educational Background
Intermediate: Tandang Sora Elmentary School
Banlat rd., Brgy. Tandang Sora, Quezon City
Little Wings Academy
Neil Property subd., Brgy. Tandang Sora, Quezon City
Milestone Innovative Academy
Neil Property subd., Brgy. Tandang Sora, Quezon City
Secondary:
Junior High School: New Era High School
Brgy. New Era, Tandang Sora Ave., Quezon City
Senior High School: Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Project 6, Quezon City
56 | P a g e
Tovera, Tim Christopher V.
Gremville Subdivision Tandang Sora, Quezon City
09159551993
cagertsof@gmail.com
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Age: 17 years old Religion: Roman Catholic
Birthday: April 15, 2000 Civil Status: Single
Birthplace: Imus City, Cavite Nationality: Filipino
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Intermediate: Jesus the Good Shepherd School
Imus City, Cavite
Secondary:
Junior High School: Our Lady of the Pillar Catholic School
Imus City, Cavite
Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Q.C
Senior High School: Colegio de San Lorenzo
Congressional Avenue, Q.C
57 | P a g e